America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 11 years ago by DrMaddVibe. 22 replies replies.
Free Obamanet coming soon.....
DrafterX Offline
#1 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,601

Lawmakers warn cost of federal free phone program spinning out of control
By Jim Angle

Published April 22, 2013

What started out as an effort by President Reagan to help poor people in rural areas have a phone in cases of emergency has mushroomed into what critics suspect is a new welfare program.

"The cost has gone from $143 million a few years ago to $2.2 billion today," Republican Louisiana Sen. David Vitter said, noting that today's cost is 15 times what it was.

The cost of the program increased dramatically after cellphones were added in 2008. Only low-income people on welfare and food stamps legally qualify, but some lawmakers say the program is out of control.

Sen. Claire McCaskill, a Democrat from Missouri, was incensed when she got an offer of a free phone.

"I got solicitation for a free phone at my apartment, which is certainly not a building where you're going to have people who are qualified for free phones. ... There is clearly money being wasted here."

And Vitter adds, "The FCC, itself, said in a recent year there were 270,000 beneficiaries that had more than one of these subsidized cellphones. That's completely against the law right there."

Funded by a small tax on all phone bills, the program has exploded -- with companies advertising free phones and offering 250 minutes.

Harold Feld of a group called Public Knowledge notes, "you have a lot of these prepaid-phone, no-contract options that are obviously very popular."

The FCC told lawmakers the top five companies can't verify the eligibility of 41 percent of those who get phones.

"I hear from law enforcement that these phones are often found at crime scenes and are used in drug deals," Republican Rep. Tim Griffin of Arkansas said. "Why? It's because you can't trace them."

"Just handing out phones willy nilly and allowing them to be sold on the black market," Sen. McCaskill said. "This isn't the way to do it, and we need to stop."

Some recipients famously called them "Obama phones," with one boasting to the media during the election that minorities should support the president precisely because he gave them free cellphones.

That is not true, and many are appalled by the abuse in the program. One supporter, however, argues cellphones are helpful because they're not just for emergencies:

"It's how we find jobs, it's how we now participate in all the activities in the economy," Feld said.

But McCaskill says those looking for work could simply check out a phone from the unemployment office or a shelter.

With so much abuse in the current program, she is now concerned about some new proposals: "What's really worrisome to me is now the FCC wants to expand to this program into broadband. That's a very bad idea, I think."
She says such a waste of money makes taxpayers think government just isn't paying attention. And she says the current program is so far out of control, we should simply scrap it and start over, not expand it.



Film at 11.... Not talking Not talking
dubleuhb Offline
#2 Posted:
Joined: 03-20-2011
Posts: 11,350
Wheres mine ?
ZRX1200 Offline
#3 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,682
I bet the homepage has a DNC donation link.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#4 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,633
I want 30 of them...at the same house!
DrafterX Offline
#5 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,601
no way man.... Not talking Not talking
DadZilla3 Offline
#6 Posted:
Joined: 01-17-2009
Posts: 4,633
DrafterX wrote:
What started out as an effort by President Reagan to help poor people in rural areas have a phone in cases of emergency has mushroomed into what critics suspect is a new welfare program.
"The cost has gone from $143 million a few years ago to $2.2 billion today," Republican Louisiana Sen. David Vitter said, noting that today's cost is 15 times what it was.

The cost of the program increased dramatically after cellphones were added in 2008. Only low-income people on welfare and food stamps legally qualify, but some lawmakers say the program is out of control.


Well, there you go. It's all Reagan's fault.
DrafterX Offline
#7 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,601
DadZilla3 wrote:
Well, there you go. It's all Reagan's fault.



ya, try to help a few poor bassards and they find a way to exploit it... and then they give Obama the credit... Not talking
daveincincy Offline
#8 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2006
Posts: 20,033
KAPOOYA! KAPOOYA!
DrafterX Offline
#9 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,601
Mellow
daveincincy Offline
#10 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2006
Posts: 20,033
DrafterX wrote:
Mellow


Step 1: Go to youtube
Step 2: Search "kapooya"

DrafterX Offline
#11 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,601
ok.... but it better not be any of that sick gay-homo stuff.... Not talking
daveincincy Offline
#12 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2006
Posts: 20,033
DrafterX wrote:
ok.... but it better not be any of that sick gay-homo stuff.... Not talking


Shame on you homey don't play dat
DrafterX Offline
#13 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,601
Laugh
cacman Offline
#14 Posted:
Joined: 07-03-2010
Posts: 12,216
Almost an additional $5 on my Bill… and you can't opt-out of it. I asked.
jetblasted Offline
#15 Posted:
Joined: 08-30-2004
Posts: 42,595
But ... Is it really "free" ??
DrafterX Offline
#16 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,601
That's what I heard.... Mellow
HockeyDad Offline
#17 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,213
jetblasted wrote:
But ... Is it really "free" ??



The child of some Mexican who gets amnesty will ultimately pay for it. Or something like that.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#18 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,633
HockeyDad wrote:
The child of some Mexican who gets amnesty will ultimately pay for it. Or something like that.


Jesus already paid for it.
jetblasted Offline
#19 Posted:
Joined: 08-30-2004
Posts: 42,595
I swear the guy is hell bent on bankrupting our country come hell or high water . . .
DadZilla3 Offline
#20 Posted:
Joined: 01-17-2009
Posts: 4,633
jetblasted wrote:
But ... Is it really "free" ??

Sure it is...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tpAOwJvTOio
Brewha Offline
#21 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,207
The huge sums of money we waste on this, cuts deeply into the funds we give to Monsato.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#22 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,633
jetblasted wrote:
I swear the guy is hell bent on bankrupting our country come hell or high water . . .



Cloward/Piven
Users browsing this topic
Guest