America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 10 years ago by victor809. 26 replies replies.
Anti gun senator shoots intruder
Jump to Bottom | Previous Topic | Next Topic
engletl Offline
#1 Posted: Tue, Jul 23 2013, 9:52 PM EST
Joined: 12-26-2000
Posts: 26,493

Typical elitist politician crap

http://tpo.net/anti_gun_senator/#.Ue87IVn9Vus.facebook

C&P from above link

Long time Anti-Gun Advocate State Senator R.C. Soles, 74, shot one of two intruders at his home just outside Tabor City , N.C. about 5 p.m. Sunday, the prosecutor for the politician's home county said.

The intruder, Kyle Blackburn, was taken to a South Carolina hospital, but the injuries were not reported to be life-threatening, according to Rex Gore, district attorney for Columbus, Bladen andBrunswick counties..

The State Bureau of Investigation and Columbus County Sheriff's Department are investigating the shooting, Gore said. Soles, who was not arrested,declined to discuss the incident Sunday evening.

"I am not in a position to talk to you," Soles said by telephone. "I'm right in the middle of an investigation."

The Senator, who has made a career of being against gun ownership for the general public, didn't hesitate to defend himself with his own gun when he believed he was in immediate danger and he was the victim.

In typical hypocritical liberal fashion, the "Do as i say and not as i do" Anti-Gun Activist Lawmaker picked up his gun and took action in what apparently was a self-defense shooting. Why hypocritical you may ask? It is because his long legislative record shows that the actions that he took to protect his family, his own response to a dangerous life threatening situation, are actions that he feels ordinary citizens should not have if they were faced with an identical situation.

It has prompted some to ask if the Senator believes his life and personal safety is more valuable than yours or mine.

But, this is to be expected from those who believe they can run our lives, raise our kids, and protect our families better than we can.
dpnewell Offline
#2 Posted: Tue, Jul 23 2013, 9:58 PM EST
Joined: 03-16-2009
Posts: 7,491
No different then Pelosi. She has a gun and a concealed carry permit, yet she does everything she can to keep you and I defenseless. Of course, her life and safety is worth protecting. Yours, mine, and the rest of the great unwashed, not so much.
engletl Offline
#3 Posted: Tue, Jul 23 2013, 9:59 PM EST
Joined: 12-26-2000
Posts: 26,493
dpnewell wrote:
No different then Pelosi. She has a gun and a concealed carry permit, yet she does everything she can to keep you and I defenseless. Of course, her life and safety is worth protecting. Yours, mine, and the rest of the great unwashed, not so much.

so true
Abrignac Offline
#4 Posted: Tue, Jul 23 2013, 10:04 PM EST
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,384
I'm not surprised. back in 1995-1996 I worked on Capital Hill. Never in my life could I have imagined the hypocrisy.




























From both sides of the isle.....
TMCTLT Offline
#5 Posted: Wed, Jul 24 2013, 7:04 AM EST
Joined: 11-22-2007
Posts: 19,733
Abrignac wrote:
I'm not surprised. back in 1995-1996 I worked on Capital Hill. Never in my life could I have imagined the hypocrisy.




























From both sides of the isle.....




True...true BUT, this particular issue IS mostly backed by the Left side of the Isle and we both know it
DadZilla3 Offline
#6 Posted: Wed, Jul 24 2013, 7:38 AM EST
Joined: 01-17-2009
Posts: 4,633
engletl wrote:
The Senator, who has made a career of being against gun ownership for the general public, didn't hesitate to defend himself with his own gun when he believed he was in immediate danger and he was the victim.

I wonder how many other rabid anti-gun liberals either hire their own body guards or carry a weapon themselves.

Typical liberal behavior. Look at all the libs that avoid paying their own taxes, but think nothing of taxing you and redistributing your money in exchange for votes.

The time to drain the political swamp is way overdue.
Abrignac Offline
#7 Posted: Wed, Jul 24 2013, 8:11 AM EST
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,384
DadZilla3 wrote:
I wonder how many other rabid anti-gun liberals either hire their own body guards or carry a weapon themselves.

Typical liberal behavior. Look at all the libs that avoid paying their own taxes, but think nothing of taxing you and redistributing your money in exchange for votes.

The time to drain the political swamp is way overdue.



Good luck with that. Only a dumba$$ would vote themselves out of office. THEY leave when THEY are ready.
victor809 Offline
#8 Posted: Wed, Jul 24 2013, 8:27 AM EST
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Oh my god... You guys are such idiots.

At first, I thought "hey... hah, that's funny... yeah, politicians are a bunch of hypocrites.".

Then I realized I shouldn't take everything at face value.

http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/soles.asp

#1 - This was originally "news" in 2011. And Soles hasn't been a Senator since he retired in 2009. You guys are using 4 year old information to rail on those "hypocritical liberals"... for f-s sake, there's more recent stuff, use it.

#2 - Soles WASN'T EVEN ANTI GUN. Your little "article" claims he was the worst anti-gun liberal out there. Yet the NRA gave him A grades at the end of his career (down to Bs in 1998). You're essentially attacking, and calling a hypocrite, someone who was VOTING FOR YOUR GUN RIGHTS.

Seriously. How does misinformation like this even happen? You're now running around talking about those "rabid anti-gun liberals" and "typical liberal behavior". but your argument is actually built on a lie.
riverdog Offline
#9 Posted: Wed, Jul 24 2013, 9:32 AM EST
Joined: 03-28-2008
Posts: 2,600
victor809 wrote:
Oh my god... You guys are such idiots.

At first, I thought "hey... hah, that's funny... yeah, politicians are a bunch of hypocrites.".

Then I realized I shouldn't take everything at face value.

http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/soles.asp

#1 - This was originally "news" in 2011. And Soles hasn't been a Senator since he retired in 2009. You guys are using 4 year old information to rail on those "hypocritical liberals"... for f-s sake, there's more recent stuff, use it.

#2 - Soles WASN'T EVEN ANTI GUN. Your little "article" claims he was the worst anti-gun liberal out there. Yet the NRA gave him A grades at the end of his career (down to Bs in 1998). You're essentially attacking, and calling a hypocrite, someone who was VOTING FOR YOUR GUN RIGHTS.

Seriously. How does misinformation like this even happen? You're now running around talking about those "rabid anti-gun liberals" and "typical liberal behavior". but your argument is actually built on a lie.


Dadgummit.
teedubbya Offline
#10 Posted: Wed, Jul 24 2013, 10:43 AM EST
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
effin lyin no good wacko libs
dpnewell Offline
#11 Posted: Wed, Jul 24 2013, 12:26 PM EST
Joined: 03-16-2009
Posts: 7,491
victor809 wrote:
Oh my god... You guys are such idiots.

At first, I thought "hey... hah, that's funny... yeah, politicians are a bunch of hypocrites.".

Then I realized I shouldn't take everything at face value.

http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/soles.asp

#1 - This was originally "news" in 2011. And Soles hasn't been a Senator since he retired in 2009. You guys are using 4 year old information to rail on those "hypocritical liberals"... for f-s sake, there's more recent stuff, use it.

#2 - Soles WASN'T EVEN ANTI GUN. Your little "article" claims he was the worst anti-gun liberal out there. Yet the NRA gave him A grades at the end of his career (down to Bs in 1998). You're essentially attacking, and calling a hypocrite, someone who was VOTING FOR YOUR GUN RIGHTS.

Seriously. How does misinformation like this even happen? You're now running around talking about those "rabid anti-gun liberals" and "typical liberal behavior". but your argument is actually built on a lie.


My comment was about Pelosi, smarty pants. Too bad the old bag didn't retire in '09 with Soles.
jpotts Offline
#12 Posted: Wed, Jul 24 2013, 2:43 PM EST
Joined: 06-14-2006
Posts: 28,811
victor809 wrote:


Seriously. How does misinformation like this even happen? You're now running around talking about those "rabid anti-gun liberals" and "typical liberal behavior". but your argument is actually built on a lie.



The original story came from Field and Stream magazine.

Oh, and don't use Snopes. The information you get there is, at best, crap.
engletl Offline
#13 Posted: Wed, Jul 24 2013, 10:00 PM EST
Joined: 12-26-2000
Posts: 26,493
victor809 wrote:
Oh my god... You guys are such idiots.

At first, I thought "hey... hah, that's funny... yeah, politicians are a bunch of hypocrites.".

Then I realized I shouldn't take everything at face value.

http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/soles.asp

#1 - This was originally "news" in 2011. And Soles hasn't been a Senator since he retired in 2009. You guys are using 4 year old information to rail on those "hypocritical liberals"... for f-s sake, there's more recent stuff, use it.

#2 - Soles WASN'T EVEN ANTI GUN. Your little "article" claims he was the worst anti-gun liberal out there. Yet the NRA gave him A grades at the end of his career (down to Bs in 1998). You're essentially attacking, and calling a hypocrite, someone who was VOTING FOR YOUR GUN RIGHTS.

Seriously. How does misinformation like this even happen? You're now running around talking about those "rabid anti-gun liberals" and "typical liberal behavior". but your argument is actually built on a lie.


everyone knows snopes is part of the liberal agenda...sheesh d'oh!

how can I be relevant in political forums if I don't build my arguments on lies??? Whistle
victor809 Offline
#14 Posted: Thu, Jul 25 2013, 8:25 AM EST
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
jpotts wrote:
The original story came from Field and Stream magazine.

Oh, and don't use Snopes. The information you get there is, at best, crap.




Ah... so since in your estimation information one gets from snopes is "at best, crap" I assume this means that the senator Soles is still a senator? Right? Never retired? Or did he retire in 1840? Or was he a cat?

typical potts post.
teedubbya Offline
#15 Posted: Thu, Jul 25 2013, 8:58 AM EST
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
easy peasy. he is just the opposite of whatever snopes says.
DrafterX Offline
#16 Posted: Thu, Jul 25 2013, 9:08 AM EST
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,595
I never liked Snopes... Not talking
jackconrad Offline
#17 Posted: Thu, Jul 25 2013, 9:42 AM EST
Joined: 06-09-2003
Posts: 67,461
No no.. Down boy,, your thinking of Snoopy...
DrafterX Offline
#18 Posted: Thu, Jul 25 2013, 9:52 AM EST
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,595
OhMyGod

everybody loves Snoopy... Shame on you
teedubbya Offline
#19 Posted: Thu, Jul 25 2013, 10:27 AM EST
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
DrafterX wrote:
OhMyGod

everybody loves Snoopy... Shame on you


The Red Baron dint
DrafterX Offline
#20 Posted: Thu, Jul 25 2013, 10:31 AM EST
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,595
Think
true...... and the more I think about it, that little bitch Lucy didn't really like him either... Mad
teedubbya Offline
#21 Posted: Thu, Jul 25 2013, 10:35 AM EST
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
DrafterX wrote:
Think
true...... and the more I think about it, that little bitch Lucy didn't really like him either... Mad


I always hated her but would still hit it.
DrafterX Offline
#22 Posted: Thu, Jul 25 2013, 10:45 AM EST
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,595
teedubbya wrote:
I always hated her but would still hit it.



I figured you more as a Peppermint Patty kind of guy.... Mellow
teedubbya Offline
#23 Posted: Thu, Jul 25 2013, 10:49 AM EST
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
DrafterX wrote:
I figured you more as a Peppermint Patty kind of guy.... Mellow


I'd do em both at the same time
victor809 Offline
#24 Posted: Thu, Jul 25 2013, 10:50 AM EST
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
teedubbya wrote:
I'd do em both do me with strapons at the same time


fixed it for ya
teedubbya Offline
#25 Posted: Thu, Jul 25 2013, 11:18 AM EST
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
victor809 wrote:
fixed it for ya


I don't beleive in boundries or constraints and since I'm hung like a lightswitch I have no problem strapping something on if that's what it takes to satisfy
victor809 Offline
#26 Posted: Thu, Jul 25 2013, 12:12 PM EST
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
teedubbya wrote:
I don't beleive in boundries or constraints and since I'm hung like a lightswitch I have no problem strapping something on if that's what it takes to satisfy


Good for you tw... way to be open minded. :)
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Back to Top