America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 10 years ago by bloody spaniard. 44 replies replies.
Poll Question : Should Transgeder Students Have these rights ?
Choice Votes Statistics
YES 1 6 %
NO 4 26 %
TW Deserves better 2 13 %
HEMP 1 6 %
Medical Marijuana helps me forget about this ! 2 13 %
What does Justin Bieber Think..?? 1 6 %
Whatever Victor Says 2 13 %
Can Hockeydad make money from this ?? 1 6 %
Hey what about Midgets and Wheelrite? 1 6 %
Total 15 100%

GOV OF CALIFORNIA JERRY (MOONBEAM )BROWN BACKS TRANGENDER STUDENT RIGHTS BILL
jackconrad Offline
#1 Posted:
Joined: 06-09-2003
Posts: 67,461
(\ /) !!!!!!!!!!
(.’.’.)
(")_(")






ALLOWING TRansgender students to pick which bathrooms they want to use and whether to play girls or
boys sports.

IS this an invasion of privacy for straight students ?

Is this fair to straight atheletes ?

Does TW wish it was this way when he was a student ???
teedubbya Offline
#2 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
While I do deserve better I had to vote for wheel.... since his face is deek level to most grown men it causes problems.
DadZilla3 Offline
#3 Posted:
Joined: 01-17-2009
Posts: 4,633
Then they should let straight boys go into the girls bathrooms too. It's only fair.
ZRX1200 Offline
#4 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,629
Poor Drafter.....
teedubbya Offline
#5 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
we need a reverse lickometer to see who can and can't go where.

the funny part is why not have unisex bathrooms anyway.... why is everyone so ashamed of their body.... that's a learned thing.
victor809 Offline
#6 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
I honestly find this to be the most confusing part of the entire gay/straight/trans issue.

I look at it as having four possible ways to go:
1 - Everyone has to use whichever facilities match their sexual genotype (ie, you may install a ****, but you're still a woman TW, so you have to let your schlong hang out in the women's locker)
2 - Everyone has to use whichever facilities match their sexual phenotype (ie, TW has to use the men's locker room once his surgery is complete).
3 - Everyone has to use whichever facilities match their sexual identity (ie, if you dress in women's clothing, you use a women's room regardless of your equipment state)

Of course, since Sexual Identity does not necessarily match sexual orientation, any statements about "straight boys in the girls bathroom" are kind of irrelevant.

I'm assuming everyone's panic is because people will see naughty bits of other people which they find attractive. If that's the case, then locker rooms shouldn't be based on the individual's gender at all. They should be based on what gender you find attractive. People who want to screw men, go in one locker room, people who want to screw women go in another locker room and people who like screwing either sex get to have lots of fun in their own locker room.

Alternatively, if you want to look at locker rooms as functional areas which are slightly specialized to match the gender of those using it (ie, tampon dispensers/urinals that sort of specialization) then they should be based on sexual phenotype (#2 above)

If you look at locker rooms as functional areas which are slightly specialized to match the needs of that gender's clothing (places to hang skirts etc) then it should be based on sexual identity (#3 above).

There isn't a good answer to this problem. But in all reality, there isn't a BAD answer either. What's the worst thing that happens if someone goes into whatever locker-room they're most comfortable with? They get changed where they're comfortable, then leave. If your comfort in a locker-room is based on who's around you, you probably have some problems of your own.
tailgater Offline
#7 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
teedubbya wrote:

the funny part is why not have unisex bathrooms anyway.... why is everyone so ashamed of their body.... that's a learned thing.


Yeah!

Why not send 12 year old girls into the bathroom with 14 year old boys?

You're smart and enlightened.
And stuff.

tailgater Offline
#8 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
victor809 wrote:
I honestly find this to be the most confusing part of the entire gay/straight/trans issue.

I look at it as having four possible ways to go:
1 - Everyone has to use whichever facilities match their sexual genotype (ie, you may install a ****, but you're still a woman TW, so you have to let your schlong hang out in the women's locker)
2 - Everyone has to use whichever facilities match their sexual phenotype (ie, TW has to use the men's locker room once his surgery is complete).
3 - Everyone has to use whichever facilities match their sexual identity (ie, if you dress in women's clothing, you use a women's room regardless of your equipment state)

Of course, since Sexual Identity does not necessarily match sexual orientation, any statements about "straight boys in the girls bathroom" are kind of irrelevant.

I'm assuming everyone's panic is because people will see naughty bits of other people which they find attractive. If that's the case, then locker rooms shouldn't be based on the individual's gender at all. They should be based on what gender you find attractive. People who want to screw men, go in one locker room, people who want to screw women go in another locker room and people who like screwing either sex get to have lots of fun in their own locker room.

Alternatively, if you want to look at locker rooms as functional areas which are slightly specialized to match the gender of those using it (ie, tampon dispensers/urinals that sort of specialization) then they should be based on sexual phenotype (#2 above)

If you look at locker rooms as functional areas which are slightly specialized to match the needs of that gender's clothing (places to hang skirts etc) then it should be based on sexual identity (#3 above).

There isn't a good answer to this problem. But in all reality, there isn't a BAD answer either. What's the worst thing that happens if someone goes into whatever locker-room they're most comfortable with? They get changed where they're comfortable, then leave. If your comfort in a locker-room is based on who's around you, you probably have some problems of your own.


So you think it's fine if men go into the women's locker room?
How very short sighted of you.
victor809 Offline
#9 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
tailgater wrote:
So you think it's fine if men go into the women's locker room?
How very short sighted of you.


Which of the options are you referring to specifically?
tailgater Offline
#10 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
victor809 wrote:
Which of the options are you referring to specifically?


" What's the worst thing that happens if someone goes into whatever locker-room they're most comfortable with? "

and

"If your comfort in a locker-room is based on who's around you, you probably have some problems of your own."


If we have to discuss the logical reasons WHY there are separate locker rooms for men vs women, then I'm gonna bail on this one.
DrafterX Offline
#11 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,566
it's prolly not an issue at the YMCA..... Mellow
victor809 Offline
#12 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
tailgater wrote:
" What's the worst thing that happens if someone goes into whatever locker-room they're most comfortable with? "

and

"If your comfort in a locker-room is based on who's around you, you probably have some problems of your own."


If we have to discuss the logical reasons WHY there are separate locker rooms for men vs women, then I'm gonna bail on this one.


But we do. You need to state EXACTLY what you want to achieve with the separation. That's the entire reason I listed the 3 points at the beginning. Because if you want to say "everyone who's genotypically male needs to be in on locker-room, then you may have some "boys" without a d$ck in your "boys" locker room and you'll have some "girls" with d$cks in the women's locker room. If you want to define it by what equipment you have, that's another level. Then there's simply dress.

But if your fear is that someone who's attracted to a person in the locker room is going to be there, then you have to split things by orientation, not by identity.

I don't actually have a problem with any of the choices. I think the issue deserves some thought beyond everyone's first (and usually stupid) knee-jerk response, but I actually don't care what the ruling is. It just needs to be arrived at thoughtfully.
teedubbya Offline
#13 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
tailgater wrote:
Yeah!

Why not send 12 year old girls into the bathroom with 14 year old boys?

You're smart and enlightened.
And stuff.




Much of the rest of the world doesn't seem to have the same issue with this that we do
DrafterX Offline
#14 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,566
teedubbya wrote:
Much of the rest of the world doesn't seem to have the same issue with this that we do



commie bassards..!! Mad
tailgater Offline
#15 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
teedubbya wrote:
Much of the rest of the world doesn't seem to have the same issue with this that we do


Sorry.
I forgot I was speaking with el enlightened one.

The rest of the world can't afford separate bathrooms.
Hell, their kitchen bedroom and bathroom are one and the same.
Doesn't mean I want to emulate that concept either.

Truth be told, it shouldn't matter. Most 14 year old boys won't do anything to a 12 year old girl.

But it's also true that most drunk drivers will make it home safely tonight. Doesn't make it right.

A wise man once said something about an ounce of prevention.
I think it was Belichick.
teedubbya Offline
#16 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
tailgater wrote:
Sorry.
I forgot I was speaking with el enlightened one.

The rest of the world can't afford separate bathrooms.
Hell, their kitchen bedroom and bathroom are one and the same.
Doesn't mean I want to emulate that concept either.

Truth be told, it shouldn't matter. Most 14 year old boys won't do anything to a 12 year old girl.

But it's also true that most drunk drivers will make it home safely tonight. Doesn't make it right.

A wise man once said something about an ounce of prevention.
I think it was Belichick.


can't argue with facts LOL
jackconrad Offline
#17 Posted:
Joined: 06-09-2003
Posts: 67,461
Build Airtight paystalls . i'm tellin ya $1 a use $1 for TP $1 for minutes 5 minutes WIFI and you'll be a Billionare in no time flat ...

That's 3 bucks a poop or i mean pop..
HockeyDad Offline
#18 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,164
Under the new law you can pick which restroom to use and which sports teams to join.

I can't see any reason why school-age kids will abuse this.
bloody spaniard Offline
#19 Posted:
Joined: 03-14-2003
Posts: 43,802
HockeyDad wrote:
Under the new law you can pick which restroom to use and which sports teams to join.
I can't see any reason why school-age kids will abuse this.


Peer pressure among guys will prevent that. As far as the women are concerned, they're usually just not good enough athletically to successfully compete with the men. Unless, you have a transgendered guy achieve success as a female and then cross the line. Gets confusing. Best EVERYONE use a stall and sit when they pee.
jackconrad Offline
#20 Posted:
Joined: 06-09-2003
Posts: 67,461
But schmart guys will wear a wig and a towel into the Gym showers ( And a little chocolate covered Hemp bar to get the party started ...)
HockeyDad Offline
#21 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,164
jackconrad wrote:
But schmart guys will wear a wig and a towel into the Gym showers ( And a little chocolate covered Hemp bar to get the party started ...)



Bloody thinks peer pressure will stop that. Maybe peer pressure will encourage it!
tailgater Offline
#22 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
bloody spaniard wrote:
Peer pressure among guys will prevent that.


Absolutely untrue.

Schools in Massachusetts are forced to allow the opposite sex to try-out for any sport when an "equivalent" is not available. Baseball and softball are examples of equivalents, so guys can't play on girls softball nor girls on baseball.

My daughter plays field hockey, and a local charter school has no "male equivalent" so guys play on that team and play against my daughter.
They wear the full uniform, including the skirt.
They are not pansy boys, they are big and athletic and play ice hockey during that season.
The rules have been modified to accommodate this: The boys can't score twice in a row, or something silly like that. If this is an attempt to force "equality" then it's a total failure by short sighted liberals.

Another story that I'm not as directly involved with concerns a local school with no boys swim team. Boys therefore swim on the girls team, and have been for over a decade. No big deal, right?
Well now some boys are breaking records. First school records, but what about tomorrow and the state records?
So your daughter who might have gained the attention of certain colleges by being the best on her team is now just a third place swimmer and lost in mediocrity.

So the next question is: Will transgendered boy-to-girl students be just as successful? Will biological girls be injured by testosterone laden she-males in the contact sports?

At what point is enough enough?
bloody spaniard Offline
#23 Posted:
Joined: 03-14-2003
Posts: 43,802
I suppose I'm old school. Back in my turnip buckle-wearing days, guys would have been too ASHAMED to go out for a girl's team. We knew we were better than that. Any accomplishment would have been tarnished by the fact that we were competing against smaller, weaker, slower opponents.

Part of the feminization of guys I suppose, that they'll wear skirts to play field hockey against little girls or swim for trophies that they wouldn't have gained otherwise. That's not to say that women can't hold their own in "sports" like archery and target shooting however. Same thing applies to jobs where women are being paid the same without meeting the weight/strength/stamina minimums.
teedubbya Offline
#24 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Yall have a lot of concerns. Good on you. I don't have time to worry about all that crap because I'm training to be a ringer in a knitting bee.
bloody spaniard Offline
#25 Posted:
Joined: 03-14-2003
Posts: 43,802
teedubbya wrote:
Yall have a lot of concerns. Good on you. I don't have time to worry about all that crap because I'm training to be a niggah in a spelling bee.



racist but hilariousApplause
teedubbya Offline
#26 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
bloody spaniard wrote:
racist but hilariousApplause



dictate

d i c t a t e

Bloody say my dictate goooood
tailgater Offline
#27 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
Manor

M a n o r

When naked, it is difficult to determine whether TW is a manor a woman.

jackconrad Offline
#28 Posted:
Joined: 06-09-2003
Posts: 67,461
Defeat Of Deduct went Over Defense before Detail..
victor809 Offline
#29 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
tailgater wrote:
Absolutely untrue.

Schools in Massachusetts are forced to allow the opposite sex to try-out for any sport when an "equivalent" is not available. Baseball and softball are examples of equivalents, so guys can't play on girls softball nor girls on baseball.

My daughter plays field hockey, and a local charter school has no "male equivalent" so guys play on that team and play against my daughter.
They wear the full uniform, including the skirt.
They are not pansy boys, they are big and athletic and play ice hockey during that season.
The rules have been modified to accommodate this: The boys can't score twice in a row, or something silly like that. If this is an attempt to force "equality" then it's a total failure by short sighted liberals.

Another story that I'm not as directly involved with concerns a local school with no boys swim team. Boys therefore swim on the girls team, and have been for over a decade. No big deal, right?
Well now some boys are breaking records. First school records, but what about tomorrow and the state records?
So your daughter who might have gained the attention of certain colleges by being the best on her team is now just a third place swimmer and lost in mediocrity.

So the next question is: Will transgendered boy-to-girl students be just as successful? Will biological girls be injured by testosterone laden she-males in the contact sports?

At what point is enough enough?


Is your concern about sports performance or about locker-rooms? Because you're kind of jumping around here a bit.

These are two very different conversations. For sports, I see no reason why schools shouldn't just adopt whatever standards the Olympics have for gender/genotype in sports. To do otherwise would create an environment which would be unsuitable for their highest level athletes. Since sports are by nature competitive, it's stupid to have rules that aren't in line with the most competitive levels of that sport.
Kidmd Offline
#30 Posted:
Joined: 07-12-2013
Posts: 314
I would be VERY comfortable in the copper tone models locker room!
tailgater Offline
#31 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
victor809 wrote:
Is your concern about sports performance or about locker-rooms? Because you're kind of jumping around here a bit.

These are two very different conversations. For sports, I see no reason why schools shouldn't just adopt whatever standards the Olympics have for gender/genotype in sports. To do otherwise would create an environment which would be unsuitable for their highest level athletes. Since sports are by nature competitive, it's stupid to have rules that aren't in line with the most competitive levels of that sport.


Jumping around?
My post was a direct response to Bloody's comment that I quoted.

You myopic tonight?
Try to keep up, son.
victor809 Offline
#32 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
tailgater wrote:
Jumping around?
My post was a direct response to Bloody's comment that I quoted.

You myopic tonight?
Try to keep up, son.


Yes, but earlier your problem was with the locker rooms. Is there a third and fourth problem you want to let us know about now, so we can address it?
jackconrad Offline
#33 Posted:
Joined: 06-09-2003
Posts: 67,461
US???

Multiple Victors now !
victor809 Offline
#34 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
jackconrad wrote:
US???

Multiple Victors now !


What, you thought the numbers were all one person?
HockeyDad Offline
#35 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,164
victor809 wrote:
For sports, I see no reason why schools shouldn't just adopt whatever standards the Olympics have for gender/genotype in sports. To do otherwise would create an environment which would be unsuitable for their highest level athletes. Since sports are by nature competitive, it's stupid to have rules that aren't in line with the most competitive levels of that sport.



California disagrees with you in their new law.
victor809 Offline
#36 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
HockeyDad wrote:
California disagrees with you in their new law.


OH NOES!!! Someone disagrees with me on something! They must be wrong about everything else EVAARR!

:)

that outraged enough for you?
HockeyDad Offline
#37 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,164
I dunno. It seems a little contrived.
tailgater Offline
#38 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
victor809 wrote:
Yes, but earlier your problem was with the locker rooms. Is there a third and fourth problem you want to let us know about now, so we can address it?


Locker rooms, bathrooms, etc.

Competitive sports teams, especially those involving contact.

Nope.
I think that about covers it.

In the future I'll try to keep you posted prior to introducing related topics that deviate slightly from your focus.
victor809 Offline
#39 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
tailgater wrote:


In the future I'll try to keep you posted prior to introducing related topics that deviate slightly from your focus.


I'd appreciate that. Make sure you use the official Form too... I believe it's NOC154.2
tailgater Offline
#40 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
In triplicate.

victor809 Offline
#41 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
tailgater wrote:
In triplicate.



Make sure you file a copy with HD.
Kidmd Offline
#42 Posted:
Joined: 07-12-2013
Posts: 314
An aside....during one of my E.R. Rotations while a student we had a visit from a " woman" who complained about rectal pain....one of my fellow students was required to do the exam....she wentt into the room and we heard a SHRIEK....I went running in to find her sitting on an exam stool " FACE to Face" with the woman's manhood. Woot .seems she had sat down and asked the " woman" to disrobe and he/she did so.... she wheeled over on the stool and spun around only to find herself eye to eye with the one eyed snake.....BTW the patient had a foreign body in his (her?) rectal cavity... That was the cause of the pain.......
God Bless her (my fellow student )... She never lived it down....we reminded her of the incident for the next 2 years until graduation, she was cool and continued to laugh about it....I wonder how she is doing now? 17 years later....I bet she still remembers that...

Herfing
ZRX1200 Offline
#43 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,629
It ain't too bocoup baby.....
bloody spaniard Offline
#44 Posted:
Joined: 03-14-2003
Posts: 43,802
Kidmd wrote:
....I wonder how she is doing now? 17 years later....I bet she still remembers that...
Herfing

Prolly working with Drs. Apullalottadingdong & Wonhunglo in urology.
Users browsing this topic
Guest