America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Barbara Bush Wants Hillary Clinton To Run For President In 2016 among other things...

In an upcoming interview with People Magazine, Babs jr. says she thinks Clinton is "unbelievably accomplished," and wants to see her run for president. The younger Bush has a streak of political independence despite her Republican heritage. Bush has already voiced her support for same-sex marriage. She also commented in 2010 that she was “glad” President Obama could pass a healthcare reform bill through Congress.

Despite numerous rumors, and the apparent support of a former Republican president’s daughter, Hillary has remained up in the air (yeah, right...) about whether or not she could run for president. And while she said she hopes the former first lady will run, Barbara Bush isn’t sure she would vote for Clinton. That would apparently all depend on who she would be running against.

Yeah again, right... Could be her RHINO uncle Jeb.

Babs has also partnered with the Clinton Global Initiative as part of her job as the president of Global Health Corps, a public health non-profit. Bush, a Yale grad, also partnered with current First Lady Michelle Obama for her Let’s Move! anti-childhood obesity initiative.

Are you surprised to learn that Barbara Bush would consider voting for Hillary Clinton for president?
Now do you understand why the parties have incestuously morphed into one while giving the facade of two?

We globalists control everything

HE IS Michael Moore

They are pretty much in 100% consensus for increasing their salary, health benefits, pensions, etc... and getting themselves re-elected. At least until they "retire" and become multi millionaires working for super-PACs &/or hitting the lecture circuit.

Term limits would be a good starting point, but getting it through congress would be as impossible as getting thieves to give up stealing because it's wrong.

Term limits maybe would help, maybe not. I've heard the argument that term limits would only serve as an incentive for elected representatives to scarf all they can from the taxpayer trough as quickly as possible. With a term limit in place they would even be spared the effort to at least look honest for re-election campaigns.

It'd be like telling a bank robber OK, from now on you only have 10 minutes to rob banks instead of taking as long as you need to without getting busted.

They walk like ducks, they talk like ducks, they're ducks be it for 4 years, 6 years, or indefinitely.

It's an interesting point, Dad, but I disagree. It may apply to the Weiners of the world who will lie and steal when unwatched, but I happen to have more faith in people in that I agree with Tarpon that it is the LONG duration of time which corrupts most decent people in public office. In time, they begin to believe that they are an entitled, ruling class. An aristocracy of sorts.

We shouldn't be afraid to "lose" this diseased brain drain. It's their administrative staffs that maintain the status quo anyway not the electees. In time, these rotten apple, career hucksters should be tossed as well.

No, I think that if it's corruption we fear, we have to make an example of a few of them. Make impeachment easier, perhaps discharge/jail their support staffs, etc. but term limits should stay. Many of our best politicians practiced this voluntarily.

And if we can't implement any of the aforementioned suggestions, what is happening right now in Egypt will happen here within our lifetimes.

^ why? (don't know the 17th amendment)

The Seventeenth Amendment, adopted on May 31, 1913, changed the manner in which United States senators were elected. Formerly elected to office by state legislatures, the Seventeenth Amendment provided for a constitutional mandate that United States senators be elected by the popular vote of the citizens of each state. It also provided for unexpected vacancies in senatorial seats due to various reasons, including the death of a senator, by allowing the governor of the affected state to appoint a senator until a special election can be held.

So Bush's daughter is supporting Hillary? Just goes to show that the "stupid" apple doesn't fall far from the tree.

Yes...term limits.

When they fulfill them...bullet to the back of their head. That will stop the lobbyists.

Lobbyists, perennial congressional support staffs... the whole lot contribute to the systemic root rot.



They're twins but one looks like a blond, pie pan-faced Dubya Bush. The other like a slightly off Laura Bush. I'm referring to the slightly off brunette who seems to idolize the Clintons.

Truth be told, I think they were BOTH drunks and continue to be so until recently anyway. Their male counterparts as well.
The gals told Maliqua and Shaniqua that the 8 years will go by fast & that they should fill the White House with laughter and dry heaves. I would hope the current residents, Managua and Saffron, love their country as much as their mammy moo by now. We spoil them enough- fancy dresses, private schools, chauffeurs, & rhinestone/leopard prayer rugs. Not long ago they would have been cleaning rooms and preparing ice teas in white uniforms as they listened to Petey Green.

And, your point about them and Great Society is? They aren't the only two presidential children whose parents are or will be rich/wealthy.

I'd say the Great Society gave blacks emancipation from parental duties while grandparents gladly stepped in. Call it a win win. Hallelujah!
Illegitimacy is at 73% but non-white latinos and whites are closing the gap FAST! They know a good thing when they see it.


But getting back on track. It does the heart good to see canoodling between Dems and Repubs.
Good for you, Babs. I hope your idols Jeb & Hillary continue in the fine tradition of self-serving governance..
Who knows? Mebbe you and the Chelsea can double team the country some day.

Historicly, black males/fathers were seperated from their families and sold as slaves. That to could be a factor from generation to generation.

Also, despite my disagreement with Jeb Bush on abortion, Schiavo, prayer in school and other "social conservative values", he was an excellent governor who has no business being compared to his ex-presidential brother.

That would not explain the change of the traditional black family unit with little illegitimacy to the HUGE jump in illegitimacy after the mid-sixties.
I think the more palatable excuse that the liberal establishment uses for the ever- increasing bas tards is lack of jobs... That's also debatable because they AND other poor ethnic groups had previously maintained a sense of family even under "great depressions".

The abortion & Schiavo issues notwithstanding because I consider them "public posturing" (phony) issues to solidify his base such as prayer, desecration of flag, etc., don't know much about Jeb except for seeing him on occasion on tv spouting off on immigration reform. I also believe he agreed with his brother on the foreign interventions, Wall Street bailouts, nice sole source (no compete) government contracts, outrageous prescription coverage increase to Medicare, etc.

May be a nice local bureaucrat for you but sounds like a typical RHINO to me, not worthy of consideration for anything larger.

I object to this line of questioning.

The prosecution is going to have to show relevance. Not only that, they will have to show how these facts relate to the case.

See:

http://www.exposethetruth.info/2012/08/the-effects-of-fatherlessness-on-the-behavior-and-academic-achievement-of-the-adolescent-african-american-male-2/

"Ruggles’ (1994) findings revealed very little change in the family structure between the years 1880 and 1960. Both African American and white families showed a strong preference for a two-parent family structure. While black households were nearly twice as likely to be headed by a single mother as white households, at a rate of 13%, it does not give support to the theory that a female-dominant household was the norm coming out of the post slavery period."

"While the studies by Gutman (1975), Agresti (1978), and Ruggles (1994) may have slightly different conclusions, none of them decisively point to the effects of slavery for an almost total breakdown of the African American family structure in the latter part of the 20th century. There are doubtless many detrimental effects attributable to slavery that deeply influence African American family structure, but it seems evident that there are other, more current forces at work, both cultural and economic, that must be at work."



Sounds like slavery is not the cause.

Agreed.

Hey, when it appeared my hypothesis is incorrect, I admitted it. Gotta at least give me credit, don't ya?

This is what happens when the focus of your life is on your political career, and not on properly raising your kids. They get stupid, and advocate for stupid things, and make you look like a moron.

Just take a look at Meagan McCain...