victor809 wrote:
Why would you think it is smart to take a title of a scientific study, make wild claims about how useless it is (without actually reading the purpose), and then demand a lawyer who has no interest or knowledge of the study come in and defend it. If that short-bus Hannity actually wanted to discuss the merits of those studies he was whining about, he would ask the grant author to come on and defend it.
Pffth!
Anyone who knows anything about these talking head shows knows that many people with a specific agenda will NOT go on shows that challenge them.
Case in point: Mario Cuomo. That guy was / is a complete and total dunce, and I've seen people who were even partially on the ball pin him down in a matter of seconds. he is 100% completely agenda-focused, and will only go on shows where he is not questioned or challenged on anything that contradicts that agenda.
Ted Kennedy was another.
Grant authors, and people who do studies are no different. They have an agenda, and will only go on shows where they promote themselves to an audience that is like-minded, and will hail their "insightful" views. Which is the reason why most libtard talk shows that go out there to "discuss" issues make sure they pack the panel with like-minded libtards so they can gang-up on the sole conservative. They been doing that crap since the Sixties.
You are wholly taken in by agenda-driven science, Victor. Therefore it is little wonder you posted something this remarkably naïve (sp:?).