America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 10 years ago by Brewha. 48 replies replies.
9/11 Never Forget!
HockeyDad Offline
#1 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,179
I doubt we will. We got the Patriot Act, cameras on every street corner, the NSA monitoring all phone calls, and the NSA tapping into the internet.

Meanwhile, we're arming Al Qaeda....



U.S. weapons reaching Syrian rebels

By Ernesto Londoño and Greg Miller, Published: September 11

The CIA has begun delivering weapons to rebels in Syria, ending months of delay in lethal aid that had been promised by the Obama administration, according to U.S. officials and Syrian figures. The shipments began streaming into the country over the past two weeks, along with separate deliveries by the State Department of vehicles and other gear — a flow of material that marks a major escalation of the U.S. role in Syria’s civil war.

The arms shipments, which are limited to light weapons and other munitions that can be tracked, began arriving in Syria at a moment of heightened tensions over threats by President Obama to order missile strikes to punish the regime of Bashar al-Assad for his alleged use of chemical weapons in a deadly attack near Damascus last month.

The arms are being delivered as the United States is also shipping new types of nonlethal gear to rebels. That aid includes vehicles, sophisticated communications equipment and advanced combat medical kits.

U.S. officials hope that, taken together, the weapons and gear will boost the profile and prowess of rebel fighters in a conflict that started about 2 1/2 years ago.

Although the Obama administration signaled months ago that it would increase aid to Syrian rebels, the efforts have lagged because of the logistical challenges involved in delivering equipment in a war zone and officials’ fears that any assistance could wind up in the hands of jihadists. Secretary of State John F. Kerry had promised in April that the nonlethal aid would start flowing “in a matter of weeks.”
DrafterX Offline
#2 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,571
I guess the weapons that came from Bengazi don't count...?? Huh
HockeyDad Offline
#3 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,179
DrafterX wrote:
I guess the weapons that came from Bengazi don't count...?? Huh



Weapons the CIA bought from Islamic extremists in Libya and given to Islamic extremists in Syria don't really count as "American".
ZRX1200 Online
#4 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,648
We bought shoulder-fired anti-aircraft missiles that we gave Libya back?

Definitely sounds like a Democrat program.
frankj1 Offline
#5 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,235
despite the political aftermath and legit disdain for government power grab, I for one will never forget 9/11 and would not smear the memory of it.
wheelrite Offline
#6 Posted:
Joined: 11-01-2006
Posts: 50,119
I called 911 once.
I remember...


wheel,
DrafterX Offline
#7 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,571
frankj1 wrote:
despite the political aftermath and legit disdain for government power grab, I for one will never forget 9/11 and would not smear the memory of it.


I understand what your saying Frank... 9/11 is nothing to joke about and nobody should forget... unfortunatly we now have two separate attacks on 9/11.. People were lost in, granted not on the same scale, but Bengazi does scream coverup and I have a problem with the government with it.... to watch Obama during the debates play this thing made me sick... hopefully the truth will finally come out and we can grieve for both equally as terrorist attacks...
frankj1 Offline
#8 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,235
DrafterX wrote:
I understand what your saying Frank... 9/11 is nothing to joke about and nobody should forget... unfortunatly we now have two separate attacks on 9/11.. People were lost in, granted not on the same scale, but Bengazi does scream coverup and I have a problem with the government with it.... to watch Obama during the debates play this thing made me sick... hopefully the truth will finally come out and we can grieve for both equally as terrorist attacks...

how can I argue when you make sense? I get it, and every day requires vigilence, but I hate tying it in on a day of horrendous loss. I'd prefer a day of respect and remembrance, and let the dogs howl later.
DrafterX Offline
#9 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,571
yes I know... I had my moment of silence.. but later I was pissed.. the truth will come out....
wheelrite Offline
#10 Posted:
Joined: 11-01-2006
Posts: 50,119
DrafterX wrote:
yes I know... I had my moment of silence.. but later I was pissed.. the truth will come out....


which truth are you waiting for ?

That we live in a porous society in which nutts can attack us ?

Or that Cheney and Bush master Minded it after only 9 months in office...

Sometimes the easiest answer is the correct one,,,


wheel,
DrafterX Offline
#11 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,571
wheelrite wrote:
which truth are you waiting for ?

That we live in a porous society in which nutts can attack us ?

Or that Cheney and Bush master Minded it after only 9 months in office...

Sometimes the easiest answer is the correct one,,,


wheel,



go make another drink... Mellow
frankj1 Offline
#12 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,235
DrafterX wrote:
yes I know... I had my moment of silence.. but later I was pissed.. the truth will come out....

no prob
RICKAMAVEN Offline
#13 Posted:
Joined: 10-01-2000
Posts: 33,248
the few unanswered questions?

what was being painted on support beams.

why were dogs that sniff out explosives not allowed in the building

after it was painted.
ZRX1200 Online
#14 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,648
Or why a private investor would buy a building that needed 1 billion dollars of asbestos removal.
rfenst Offline
#15 Posted:
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,394
ZRX1200 wrote:
Or why a private investor would buy a building that needed 1 billion dollars of asbestos removal.


To make money?
ZRX1200 Online
#16 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,648
And low and behold with a 3.2 billion insurance policy he did.
snowwolf777 Offline
#17 Posted:
Joined: 06-03-2000
Posts: 4,082
RICKAMAVEN wrote:
the few unanswered questions?

what was being painted on support beams.

why were dogs that sniff out explosives not allowed in the building

after it was painted.



Speaking of paint, how much have you huffed today?

rfenst Offline
#18 Posted:
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,394
ZRX1200 wrote:
And low and behold with a 3.2 billion insurance policy he did.


Happens all the time that sharp people buys undervalued real property and other assets.

The insurer did its own appraisal(s) before selling 3.2 billion in insurance and it wouldn't have paid that much either unless it felt it was worth fighting more. Shaving just a few million dollars off $3.2 billion would be worth the cost.

For example: I can't buy $50k in collision coverage for my $25k Honda because it isn't worth that much by any reasonable appraisal. If I was able to buy that amount and totaled my Honda, my auto insurer would only pay me what it was worth when it was totaled, not the $50k maximum...
bloody spaniard Offline
#19 Posted:
Joined: 03-14-2003
Posts: 43,802
RICKAMAVEN wrote:
the few unanswered questions?
what was being painted on support beams.
why were dogs that sniff out explosives not allowed in the building
after it was painted.

snowwolf777 wrote:
Speaking of paint, how much have you huffed today?


You say that like huffing paint is a bad thing.Think

In all seriousness, my wife and her friends (structural civil engineers) cannot explain the almost symmetrical "telescoping" of both towers. The heat/positioning of the fires could not have been more perfect. We'll never know other than what the folks in charge want us to know. Maybe it WAS just the work of wild-eyed, booze swilling, white woman leering, fervent Saudi muslims. Who knows? I don't trust the "experts" trotted out for mass consumption any more.
rfenst Offline
#20 Posted:
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,394
bloody spaniard wrote:
You say that like huffing paint is a bad thing.Think

In all seriousness, my wife and her friends (structural civil engineers) cannot explain the almost symmetrical "telescoping" of both towers. The heat/positioning of the fires could not have been more perfect. We'll never know other than what the folks in charge want us to know. Maybe it WAS just the work of wild-eyed, booze swilling, white woman leering, fervent Saudi muslims. Who knows? I don't trust the "experts" trotted out for mass consumption any more.


Occam’s razor v. empirical evidence. Randomness and coincidence. Defective design or construction. No one designs an office building taking in to consideration that it an airliner might strike it.

snowwolf777 Offline
#21 Posted:
Joined: 06-03-2000
Posts: 4,082
bloody spaniard wrote:
You say that like huffing paint is a bad thing.Think

In all seriousness, my wife and her friends (structural civil engineers) cannot explain the almost symmetrical "telescoping" of both towers. The heat/positioning of the fires could not have been more perfect. We'll never know other than what the folks in charge want us to know. Maybe it WAS just the work of wild-eyed, booze swilling, white woman leering, fervent Saudi muslims. Who knows? I don't trust the "experts" trotted out for mass consumption any more.



I'm no engineer. But I'll take lex parsimoniae in this case.

Multiple floors were compromised in the original event. Upon failure, it would make sense they would drop vs. going in some horizontal direction. As the floors piled upon floors, each would fail faster and it would seem it would exactly telescope to the pavement.

I've seen the documentaries that included engineers who were involved in the construction of the towers. They are able to explain how and why it failed. I believe the building was designed to withstand an air plane strike, but the assumption was it would be an errant private plane, not a fully fueled passenger jet at several hundred mph.

I can't watch any of the 9/11 truther stuff without some booze, Xanax, a foil hat, and a liberal willingness to reach out and let go of reality for a while. Those who buy into it still base it all on the dumbest president in the history of the world was somehow able to mastermind this gigantic tragedy (9 months into his first term), and no one on the "team" has stepped forward to rat him out. At least no one who isn't a fugitive from a strait jacket.

Hell, no one had a problem believing some skinhead hick could roll up in front of the Alfred P. Murrah building in a U-haul loaded with nitro methane and fertilizer and take the place down. Don't know why the twin towers is such a stretch.

I've about had my fill of Muslim drama for another week. Heading back over to see if there's anything new in the oatmeal cookie thread.Whistle
snowwolf777 Offline
#22 Posted:
Joined: 06-03-2000
Posts: 4,082
I got too wordy in my response. rfenst beat me to Occam's Razor. But I'm in damn good company on it.
Brewha Offline
#23 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,201
snowwolf777 wrote:
I'm no engineer.

I am.

And even of you believe the physics defining explanations for the twin tower collapses, it takes genuine ignorance to watch the film of building 7 implode due to a 'fire' and buy it. Not stupidity, ignorance proper.

It is an interesting point of science though; the 'laws of physics' can be overwritten by the 'golden rule'.
Brewha Offline
#24 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,201
rfenst wrote:
Occam’s razor v. empirical evidence. Randomness and coincidence. Defective design or construction. No one designs an office building taking in to consideration that it an airliner might strike it.


In fact the builders boasted that the towers WHERE designed to take the impact of a plane. And not just a plane, the big jet of the day, called a 707. This is a matter of record, but no match for a razor in the right hands . . . .

bloody spaniard Offline
#25 Posted:
Joined: 03-14-2003
Posts: 43,802
Brewha wrote:
In fact the builders boasted that the towers WHERE designed to take the impact of a plane. And not just a plane, the big jet of the day, called a 707. This is a matter of record, but no match for a razor in the right hands . . . .

I'd heard same but we'll never really know why the towers collapsed more neatly than a planned Vegas casino demolition.
All I know is that the normally hardy conifer "tree of hope" is dying at ground zero.Anxious
Brewha Offline
#26 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,201
bloody spaniard wrote:
I'd heard same but we'll never really know why the towers collapsed more neatly than a planned Vegas casino demolition.
All I know is that the normally hardy conifer "tree of hope" is dying at ground zero.Anxious

Truth is we are never going to peal the layers of the onion on this one. To question the government explanation is to suggest that we may have been lied to, and thus gone to war. People gave their sons and daughters and even their lives. To many, even a suggestion of this type is treasonous heresy. Not to mention being in bad taste . . .

I would like to think that transparency and disclosure would be our first priority to fight for as Americans - but that just is not real. It is just silly idealism.

So, If they tell us WTC 7 fell in less than a minute, in a neat little pile because of a fire, well, it would be unamerican argue.
Or would it be more American?
DrafterX Offline
#27 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,571
I don't know much about building 7 but I can see 12,000 gallons of jet fuel melting some I-beams... were those jihad pilots really that well trained that they could crash into a specific floor already painted with explosives..?? why did it take a couple hours to fall then... Think
HockeyDad Offline
#28 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,179
DrafterX wrote:
I don't know much about building 7 but I can see 12,000 gallons of jet fuel melting some I-beams... were those jihad pilots really that well trained that they could crash into a specific floor already painted with explosives..?? why did it take a couple hours to fall then... Think



They maybe hit the wrong floors?
TMCTLT Offline
#29 Posted:
Joined: 11-22-2007
Posts: 19,733
DrafterX wrote:
I don't know much about building 7 but I can see 12,000 gallons of jet fuel melting some I-beams... were those jihad pilots really that well trained that they could crash into a specific floor already painted with explosives..?? why did it take a couple hours to fall then... Think



Building 7 is the real puzzler and I find it interesting that the American public hasn't heavily questioned this one!!!
I will NEVER believe that the towers fell " on their own " based solely on two jetliners hitting them
Brewha Offline
#30 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,201
HockeyDad wrote:
They maybe hit the wrong floors?

No, they were all trained and certified on Sony PS2.
Brewha Offline
#31 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,201
DrafterX wrote:
I don't know much about building 7 but I can see 12,000 gallons of jet fuel melting some I-beams... were those jihad pilots really that well trained that they could crash into a specific floor already painted with explosives..?? why did it take a couple hours to fall then... Think

Since jet fuel does not burn hot enough to melt steel it may explain the couple of hours; the jihad pilots brought along thermite and fire proof suits. It took a few hours for them to go floor to floor rigging the beams to blow . . . .
Abrignac Offline
#32 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,351
Brewha wrote:
Since jet fuel does not burn hot enough to melt steel it may explain the couple of hours; the jihad pilots brought along thermite and fire proof suits. It took a few hours for them to go floor to floor rigging the beams to blow . . . .


I don't have a dog in the fight, neither am I inclined to jump on the conspiracy bandwagon, but I do have a simple question. As an engineer, can you give some uncomplicated yet, plausible reasons for the collapse of the buildings?
Brewha Offline
#33 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,201
Abrignac wrote:
I don't have a dog in the fight, neither am I inclined to jump on the conspiracy bandwagon, but I do have a simple question. As an engineer, can you give some uncomplicated yet, plausible reasons for the collapse of the buildings?

What is interesting is the things that can reasonably be ruled out;
Total structural failure due to fire of a steel structure building. WTCs are unique in this.
Pancake collapse. This could not happen at free fall speeds, and it is not demonstrated as a real world failure mode.
Hidden design flaws. Two different building designs, both conventional.

This would leave three engineering possiblites; something new and unthought of, divine intervention or demolition.
wheelrite Offline
#34 Posted:
Joined: 11-01-2006
Posts: 50,119
Brewha wrote:
They were built by commie Union workers in the 70s that were more concerned with a lunch break than doing quality work...

The new tower is built by Mexican immigrants like the Empire State Building was 80 yrs ago,,

It will never fall



I knew it !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


wheel,
snowwolf777 Offline
#35 Posted:
Joined: 06-03-2000
Posts: 4,082
With one final risk of horse

I know these guys at MIT were probably in on the conspiracy, but for anyone interested:

http://www.tms.org/pubs/journals/JOM/0112/Eagar/Eagar-0112.html#authors

Since the incident was and is unprecedented, perhaps things happened that not everyone can just immediately explain or understand.

I suppose it's a lot more fun to think of Bush and Cheney in their ninja outfits pressing the detonator buttons from a Starbucks up the street. But what the hell. We still have people who claim they have definitive evidence the moon landings were faked. Oh, and they also have scientific "proof" the Holocaust never happened, aliens pre-select our presidents, and Elvis and Tupac are still alive.







snowwolf777 Offline
#36 Posted:
Joined: 06-03-2000
Posts: 4,082
Brewha wrote:
I am.

And even of you believe the physics defining explanations for the twin tower collapses, it takes genuine ignorance to watch the film of building 7 implode due to a 'fire' and buy it. Not stupidity, ignorance proper.

It is an interesting point of science though; the 'laws of physics' can be overwritten by the 'golden rule'.



It is an interesting point of arrogance though. The unwillingness to do a simple Google search and read the accounts of the firefighters who went inside WTC 7, what they saw inside, what the firefighters saw outside, what their commanders saw, and why they pulled back from WTC 7 two hours before it collapsed.

But piss on all the people who were actually there, right? Those who had boots on ground during and afterwards. You saw it on the TV. And you're an engineer. Holy sh*t. Why didn't you tell everyone about this sooner?






Brewha Offline
#37 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,201
wheelrite wrote:
I knew it !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


wheel,

Got the DT's again Wheel?
Brewha Offline
#38 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,201
snowwolf777 wrote:
It is an interesting point of arrogance though. The unwillingness to do a simple Google search and read the accounts of the firefighters who went inside WTC 7, what they saw inside, what the firefighters saw outside, what their commanders saw, and why they pulled back from WTC 7 two hours before it collapsed.

But piss on all the people who were actually there, right? Those who had boots on ground during and afterwards. You saw it on the TV. And you're an engineer. Holy sh*t. Why didn't you tell everyone about this sooner?

A Google search? Wow, and after I waisted all that time in college.

So, master of the google oracle, what conclusions did the firefighters come to on the building 7 collapse?
Because the videos of the boot on the ground that I have seen said that they thought it was demoed. They heard sequential explosions.

Have you even seen the films of the collapse? Does that look like a fire to you?

Btw, I was not pissing on you. I was just saying that you were ignoring the information. That would be ignorance, you know.
victor809 Offline
#39 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
snowwolf777 wrote:


I suppose it's a lot more fun to think of Bush and Cheney in their ninja outfits pressing the detonator buttons from a Starbucks up the street. But what the hell. We still have people who claim they have definitive evidence the moon landings were faked. Oh, and they also have scientific "proof" the Holocaust never happened, aliens pre-select our presidents, and Elvis and Tupac are still alive.






I'm with snowwolf on this. I cannot in good conscience claim that the idiot bush was able to mastermind himself into his slacks every morning, let along pull something like this off.

In all honesty, people aren't clever, smart or loyal enough to pull off conspiracies for any length of time. All it takes is one person.
wheelrite Offline
#40 Posted:
Joined: 11-01-2006
Posts: 50,119
victor809 wrote:
I'm with snowwolf on this. I cannot in good conscience claim that the idiot bush was able to mastermind himself into his slacks every morning, let along pull something like this off.

In all honesty, people aren't clever, smart or loyal enough to pull off conspiracies for any length of time. All it takes is one person.



well !!
It's all settled then !!!!!!!!!!!!!

Victor has verbosely Pontificated !!!!!!!!!!!


next topic !


p.s.
you have no conscience, You support baby killing in the womb .and Global warming.Which is weird because there is 1000000xs more evidence that a third trimester fetus is alive than that the Polar Bears are in trouble...


hmmm ?

wheel,
Brewha Offline
#41 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,201
This is one of America's great problems; science and dispassionate observation are now maters of politics or religious instruction.

What the hell, checkers sells more than chess.
dpnewell Offline
#42 Posted:
Joined: 03-16-2009
Posts: 7,491
Actually, I prefer chess. Around 20 years ago, my employer required all upper management to take an intensive (25 page) monitored and timed aptitude/IQ test, given by a third party consulting firm . My aptitude match was that of an owner of a manufacturing company, and my IQ was 156. It's too bad that my employer wasted all that money on defective testing. Since I believe in God, vote conservative and question man made global warming, everyone knows that I'm just an ignorant, knuckle dragging Neanderthal. Ask any liberal or atheist. I also don't buy into the 9/11 conspiracy theories. Man, I'm stupid. It's a wonder I can dress and feed myself.
HockeyDad Offline
#43 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,179
One of the problems with the 9/11 conspiracy theories is they all tried to point it back to Bush and Cheney.

"Follow the money" is usually a better approach than "pin it on a political opponent." If there was a conspiracy, there wasn't a single component of it that needed Bush or Cheney or even anyone in the government.
Brewha Offline
#44 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,201
dpnewell wrote:
Actually, I prefer chess. Around 20 years ago, my employer required all upper management to take an intensive (25 page) monitored and timed aptitude/IQ test, given by a third party consulting firm . My aptitude match was that of an owner of a manufacturing company, and my IQ was 156. It's too bad that my employer wasted all that money on defective testing. Since I believe in God, vote conservative and question man made global warming, everyone knows that I'm just an ignorant, knuckle dragging Neanderthal. Ask any liberal or atheist. I also don't buy into the 9/11 conspiracy theories. Man, I'm stupid. It's a wonder I can dress and feed myself.

DP, I’m sorry that those mean old liberal atheist have been so hard on you. You know they only pick on you because you’re smarter than they are . . . .

But kidding aside, to me this is a question of critical thinking - which is not a hallmark of conservatism. I am not floating a theory. I am only saying that it could not have happened as the government has theorized. And I take issue with their near omission of WTC 7.

I think it is a sad commentary when we as a country don’t question things like this, and accept the dogma as manna even when it is plainly in error.
bloody spaniard Offline
#45 Posted:
Joined: 03-14-2003
Posts: 43,802
Brewha wrote:
DP, I’m sorry that those mean old liberal atheist have been so hard on you. You know they only pick on you because you’re smarter than they are . . . .

But kidding aside, to me this is a question of critical thinking - which is not a hallmark of conservatism. I am not floating a theory. I am only saying that it could not have happened as the government has theorized. And I take issue with their near omission of WTC 7.

I think it is a sad commentary when we as a country don’t question things like this, and accept the dogma as manna even when it is plainly in error.


This, the crap from the Warren Commission, corporate/government "altruism", outsourcing of complete industries, hybrid seeds, vaccines, Obamacare... There is just so much that makes no sense when you analyze its components carefully. Just enough truth mixed with bullshiite to make it palatable for the lemming masses.

As you said, the unique collapse of the towers by jets may have been a once in a lifetime irrefutable happening but it hasn't been structurally explained to our satisfaction so far. Perhaps some day it will be. Perhaps, perhaps, perhaps...
Brewha Offline
#46 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,201
I don’t think we will ever unravel this one. It’s not really something people what to see done.

Just pretend that the government knew about the coming attack on Pearls Harbor and allowed it to happen (not that they did – let’s just pretend). Who would really want it to come out? Who would believe it even if it were true? Who would want the history books to read that our government pulled a fast one just to get us into the war? Think about it.

No, this does not prove “evil wrong doing” (thanks for the phrase George!) on the part of the 9/11 commission. But it is why questioning 9/11 makes you lunatic fringe.

May God help us all.
DrafterX Offline
#47 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,571
ya, same happpens if you question Bengazi... Mellow
Brewha Offline
#48 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,201
But I don't speak no Arab . . . .
Users browsing this topic
Guest