bloody spaniard wrote:You say that like huffing paint is a bad thing.
In all seriousness, my wife and her friends (structural civil engineers) cannot explain the almost symmetrical "telescoping" of both towers. The heat/positioning of the fires could not have been more perfect. We'll never know other than what the folks in charge want us to know. Maybe it WAS just the work of wild-eyed, booze swilling, white woman leering, fervent Saudi muslims. Who knows? I don't trust the "experts" trotted out for mass consumption any more.
I'm no engineer. But I'll take
lex parsimoniae in this case.
Multiple floors were compromised in the original event. Upon failure, it would make sense they would drop vs. going in some horizontal direction. As the floors piled upon floors, each would fail faster and it would seem it would exactly telescope to the pavement.
I've seen the documentaries that included engineers who were involved in the construction of the towers. They are able to explain how and why it failed. I believe the building was designed to withstand an air plane strike, but the assumption was it would be an errant private plane, not a fully fueled passenger jet at several hundred mph.
I can't watch any of the 9/11 truther stuff without some booze, Xanax, a foil hat, and a liberal willingness to reach out and let go of reality for a while. Those who buy into it still base it all on the dumbest president in the history of the world was somehow able to mastermind this gigantic tragedy (9 months into his first term), and no one on the "team" has stepped forward to rat him out. At least no one who isn't a fugitive from a strait jacket.
Hell, no one had a problem believing some skinhead hick could roll up in front of the Alfred P. Murrah building in a U-haul loaded with nitro methane and fertilizer and take the place down. Don't know why the twin towers is such a stretch.
I've about had my fill of Muslim drama for another week. Heading back over to see if there's anything new in the oatmeal cookie thread.