America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 10 years ago by teedubbya. 14 replies replies.
Details emerge about Americans badly injured in Benghazi attack
Burner02 Offline
#1 Posted:
Joined: 12-21-2010
Posts: 12,884
Fox News - In addition to the four Americans killed in the Benghazi terror attack last year, at least two other Americans were severely injured in the fighting that night, Fox News has learned.

The injuries were sustained by U.S. personnel after mortars struck the CIA annex rooftop they were defending. Fox News is told that one former government contractor -- who is expected to testify this week along with four other contractors in classified sessions on Capitol Hill -- has had multiple surgeries since the attack and has still not regained full use of one arm.

The blood loss after the attack was so severe that a source close to the contractor said it had been life-threatening.

As previously reported, diplomatic security agent David Ubben has also undergone multiple surgeries since that attack. As recently as August, he was still recovering at Walter Reed Medical Center in suburban Washington.

Little is known about those who survived the Benghazi attack. The State Department confirmed in March, after multiple inquiries by Fox News, that a total of three diplomatic security agents, as well as a State Department contractor, were among the Americans injured during the terrorist assault which killed the two former SEALs, Ambassador Chris Stevens, and Foreign Service Officer Sean Smith.

The latest details are emerging as the House Intelligence Committee hears this week from contractors who were on the ground in Benghazi. Fox News has learned that they will give their accounts in closed, classified sessions on Wednesday and Thursday.

Two contractors were expected to appear Wednesday, and three former government contractors from the CIA annex are expected Thursday, according to sources familiar with the meetings.

In a press release from earlier this year, the intelligence committee appeared to identify this week's witnesses, adding that they included those who signed a book deal earlier this year. "The Subcommittee will pursue interviews with three additional CIA personnel who are publishing a book and whose public comments suggest possible contradictions with testimony the Intelligence Committee has received on the record," the release said.

The lawyer who represents the authors would not comment on their Capitol Hill appearance, adding that they were part of "an elite security team" in Benghazi.

While the sessions are not open to the public, sources told Fox News that the timeline offered by some of the contractors may differ from the public narrative that there were two distinct waves to the attack -- first at the consulate at approximately 9:40 p.m. local time and then at the CIA annex the following morning, separated by a lull in the fighting.

The fighting was characterized to Fox News as being more "constant, consistent" throughout the attack's seven-hour duration. If there was no lull in the fighting, it raises more questions about the lack of a significant military response to the Benghazi assault -- during that time, Stevens' whereabouts were unknown.

In a letter to House Speaker John Boehner last week, Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Calif., stated that any discrepancies demanded further investigation. "If some answers differ substantially from the established narrative and timeline of the attack, then it would be warranted to take new measures to complete the investigation and synthesize the information obtained by the Intelligence Committees and other committees investigating the Benghazi attack."
jackconrad Offline
#2 Posted:
Joined: 06-09-2003
Posts: 67,461
We don't really need much more info , we all know what really is going on. The question is what are we going to do about it..
cacman Offline
#3 Posted:
Joined: 07-03-2010
Posts: 12,216
jackconrad wrote:
We don't really need much more info , we all know what really is going on. The question is what are we going to do about it..

Nothing. Not a damn thing. The O's administration of transparency has conveniently squirreled away the survivors, and by no means will make them available for any congressional hearing or interview as it's deemed part of national security.
TheSmokensip Offline
#4 Posted:
Joined: 03-02-2013
Posts: 1,329
Obama is not aware of this story.
rfenst Offline
#5 Posted:
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,403
Who really cares? Not many...
ZRX1200 Offline
#6 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,651
Yeah it's just 4 dead Americans and a gun running scandal.
dubleuhb Offline
#7 Posted:
Joined: 03-20-2011
Posts: 11,350
And that damn video......
cacman Offline
#8 Posted:
Joined: 07-03-2010
Posts: 12,216
dubleuhb wrote:
And that damn video......

Not to mention CNN's apology for reporting the wrong story.
How convenient is the timing of CNN's apology considering other current affairs??? The Repubs go after CNN to block certain Clinton propaganda segments, and now there's apology for misrepresenting an interview of the attack? How convenient? Especially considering the Obamacare debacle and upcoming budget debate AGAIN?!?! Let's just sweep this whole Benghazi thing under the rug so everyone forgets about it and the administration's cover-up of the incident.

No worries. You'll still get your free iPhone while the guberment discusses giving Iran further nuclear capabilities. Benghazi was only a short, hide-able nightmare that happened during the election period. The American public doesn't need to know or be made of aware of the details due to National security. It's for our good after all. We can't let them know, that we know that they know that we know how to stop it. Make sense?

I spy an O's administration cover-up worse than any Nixon taping to get re-elected and/or stay in office.

Carry on…
TMCTLT Offline
#9 Posted:
Joined: 11-22-2007
Posts: 19,733
rfenst wrote:
Who really cares? Not many...




Ok Hillary.......and I think you'd be surprised how many cared....perhaps if THiS Admin. Wasn't SO disastrous they wouldn't have to make excuses and "cover up stories" for nearly everything they try to accomplish.
(Or in this case try NOt to accomplish)
Burner02 Offline
#10 Posted:
Joined: 12-21-2010
Posts: 12,884
TMCTLT wrote:
Ok Hillary.......and I think you'd be surprised how many cared....perhaps if THiS Admin. Wasn't SO disastrous they wouldn't have to make excuses and "cover up stories" for nearly everything they try to accomplish.
(Or in this case try NOt to accomplish)




+1
teedubbya Offline
#11 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
what's the deal with all the news apologies lately. I haven't been following it. Did 60 minutes try to cover it up too?
DrafterX Offline
#12 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,576
people died.. Obama lied... Not talking
HockeyDad Offline
#13 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,187
DrafterX wrote:
people died.. Obama lied... Not talking



We'll make more people. He'll make more lies. All is good.
teedubbya Offline
#14 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Thats HOT
Users browsing this topic
Guest