gryphonms wrote:I feel that nationally we are beating a dead horse with the liberal/conservative debate and gridlock.
I think we need to take a pragmatic direction of fixing what needs fixed which might mean a liberal solution or a conservative solution depending on the problem.
Your thoughts.
Pragmatism is what has been practiced since the 1950s, and is the reason we have the mess we have today.
After preaching limited government and low taxes, Reagan thought that by passing taxes with an open door to spend more money that he was holding true to his principles? No, he was being pragmatic for the same of compromise. He wanted the tax cuts to spur growth.
Nixon, Bush 43 all did similar things.
Pragmatism and compromise only lets stupidity flourish. In fact, left-wingers and those scum-sucking progressives count on Conservatives being "pragmatic" so that they can continue to erode away our liberties and replace them with their top-down dystopian nightmare.
Pragmatism is only half as bad as being a scum-sucking progressive, as you are going full progressive at half-speed. Nevertheless, you are still going "progressive."
The country was founded upon the notion that the individual was able to govern their own affairs. That is the core of Conservative dogma and principles. To be pragmatic is to throw that over the side of the boat in favor for what is expedient. Tyranny has all sorts of forms and flavors: mob rule, fascism, communism, socialism, monarchies, Obamacare, and so on. Enlightenment has very few.
We don't need more pragmatic people in government. What we need are Conservative ideologues who believe in the same things that mark the underpinnings of this nation.
There will always be evil in the world. Progressives, communists, and that whole bunch are just minions of the same hellspawn that has plagued human existence before recorded time. It would be refreshing for one if someone to actually go a different direction once in a while, as opposed to repeating the same sorry tale of oppression over and over again, like a broken record.
So no...we don't need pragmatism.