Brewha wrote:Yes – but that is not what I wrote.
Look at it this way. There is no real evidence on the god thing either way. You can’t prove he’s there, you can’t prove he’s not. Now you can say you don’t know – that would take zero conviction. But to assert that you believe ether of the two unknowns would take conviction. Would it not?
" It does take conviction to believe that there is no god."
-Brewha (from an above post)
You did say it.
And the only reason that there is "no evidence" that god doesn't exist is because you can't prove a negative.
Otherwise the evidence is quite clear. There is indeed NO proof.
Nobody ever tells an atheist "prove there is no god".
You may hear someone quote scripture to "prove" a point, but a non-believer is never called to task to show evidence.
It's called Faith for this very reason.
I don't fault you for not believing. But don't claim that you need conviction to do so because that's rubbish.