Luckily for them that's a rhetorical question, because with corporations are people and money is free speech rulings from the Supreme Court, sponsored through the generous contributions of Exxon Mobil and not so much by viewers like you, and gerrymandering of congressional districts, the vast majority of incumbents of any stripe will be bought, owned and have their pervasive propaganda campaigns funded by corporate entities whose interests are only aligned to those of the citizenry to the extent they can extract cash from them until that source is sucked dry and they can move on to lower cost, prison labor based, 3rd world labor sources. little realizing that once they've managed to concentrate wealth into the greedy paws of the few that there won't be enough actual productive, industrially based economic activity to create the wealth they parasitically steal through finance sector shell games, that have become legal theft through legislative actions that are the return on their investments in the purchase of those same politicians.
It's a perpetual motion machine until the money source, an actual economy based on producing things of value to people who have the money to buy them, dries up. But not to worry as we enter the phase of the global economy where the average worker is reduced to buying overpriced shovels at the company store, it will take a few decades to get to the point where none of them can even afford to buy that shovel to dig their own graves.
But really, no, look, it's people on food stamps that are the real problem...
