America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 9 years ago by stogiemonger. 43 replies replies.
First Lady at her best...
DrafterX Offline
#1 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,555
Think Think
Disgrace.jpg
Burner02 Offline
#2 Posted:
Joined: 12-21-2010
Posts: 12,884
Did not know she had a best!
ZRX1200 Offline
#3 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,617
I'd **** her.
tailgater Offline
#4 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
I think she IS a disgrace.

But that picture isn't what you think.
the people in the background are not raising hand to hear.
Heck, the military gal behind her isn't.

It wasn't the pledge nor anthem.

But she's still despicable. It helps the cause, however, to be accurate.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#5 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,453
She has a ******!
DrafterX Offline
#6 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,555
DrMaddVibe wrote:
She has a ******!



in a box..?? Huh
DrMaddVibe Offline
#7 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,453
Ever see a pic of her preggers?
DrafterX Offline
#8 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,555
no.... sure haven't... Think Think
victor809 Offline
#9 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
tailgater wrote:
I think she IS a disgrace.

But that picture isn't what you think.
the people in the background are not raising hand to hear.
Heck, the military gal behind her isn't.

It wasn't the pledge nor anthem.

But she's still despicable. It helps the cause, however, to be accurate.


How dare you try to bring fact to the internets!
spectresquad Offline
#10 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2005
Posts: 1,061
tailgater wrote:
I think she IS a disgrace.

But that picture isn't what you think.
the people in the background are not raising hand to hear.
Heck, the military gal behind her isn't.

It wasn't the pledge nor anthem.

But she's still despicable. It helps the cause, however, to be accurate.



The Military girl could be saluting as she should but you could not see her right arm to know. This is not the first time the O's have dissed the flag, separately or together just to be accurate.
cacman Offline
#11 Posted:
Joined: 07-03-2010
Posts: 12,216
She doesn't look very "Proud"!!!
Buckwheat Offline
#12 Posted:
Joined: 04-15-2004
Posts: 12,251
tailgater wrote:
I think she IS a disgrace.

But that picture isn't what you think.
the people in the background are not raising hand to hear.
Heck, the military gal behind her isn't.

It wasn't the pledge nor anthem.

But she's still despicable. It helps the cause, however, to be accurate.


Pretty easy to see that this is a Photoshopped pic as well.
DrafterX Offline
#13 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,555
Buckwheat wrote:
Pretty easy to see that this is a Photoshopped pic as well.




true... true...
I can't imagine Obama looking at the flag that way.. was prolly his pic on a billboard or somethin... Mellow
jetblasted Offline
#14 Posted:
Joined: 08-30-2004
Posts: 42,595
Just for a damn flag ?!!
NJ Navy Chief Offline
#15 Posted:
Joined: 08-25-2011
Posts: 913
This isn't photo shopped, I found the exact same photo as released by whitehouse.gov, it was aboard he USS Carl Vinson (CVN-70). Disgraceful nonetheless
victor809 Offline
#16 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
NJ Navy Chief wrote:
This isn't photo shopped, I found the exact same photo as released by whitehouse.gov, it was aboard he USS Carl Vinson (CVN-70). Disgraceful nonetheless



How's it disgraceful if it isn't true?

http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/photos/veteransday2011.asp
Buckwheat Offline
#17 Posted:
Joined: 04-15-2004
Posts: 12,251
DrMaddVibe wrote:
Ever see a pic of her preggers?


WTF? If you don't like their politics that is cool but giving her flack for being pregnant is just below the belt. How about we post pictures of everyone's fat ass mothers when they were pregnant with them? I expect more from you Dr. fog
tailgater Offline
#18 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
Buckwheat wrote:
WTF? If you don't like their politics that is cool but giving her flack for being pregnant is just below the belt. How about we post pictures of everyone's fat ass mothers when they were pregnant with them? I expect more from you Dr. fog


Yes. Thank goodness Barbara Bush, Nancy Reagan and Laura Bush were never made sport of...

Buckwheat Offline
#19 Posted:
Joined: 04-15-2004
Posts: 12,251
tailgater wrote:
Yes. Thank goodness Barbara Bush, Nancy Reagan and Laura Bush were never made sport of...




I stand by my statement. Yes all were made fun of but attacking the appearance of a pregnant women is just low.
DrafterX Offline
#20 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,555
Buckwheat wrote:
I stand by my statement. Yes all were made fun of but attacking the appearance of a pregnant women is just low.



you missed it... the point he was trying to make was she's never been pregnant cause she's really a dude and the kids are adopted.... Mellow
victor809 Offline
#21 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
tailgater wrote:
Yes. Thank goodness Barbara Bush, Nancy Reagan and Laura Bush were never made sport of...



Come on Tail...
It's not even comparable.

I'll say this, the eras were completely different. It may be simply because these days there's the internet, and that gives a voice to every fringe idiot out there, and encourages completely false rumors to spread like wildfire and encourages this blind hate...

But there's definitely a difference in how this first lady has been treated.
gryphonms Offline
#22 Posted:
Joined: 04-14-2013
Posts: 1,983
1 obvious reason, the 4 listed together are


























REPUBLICANS!
Sarcasm
Buckwheat Offline
#23 Posted:
Joined: 04-15-2004
Posts: 12,251
gryphonms wrote:
1 obvious reason, the 4 listed together are




REPUBLICANS!
Sarcasm


"Then, shalt thou count to three. No more. No less. Three shalt be the number thou shalt count, and the number of the counting shall be three. Four shalt thou not count, nor either count thou two, excepting that thou then proceed to three. Five is right out."

Sarcasm
tailgater Offline
#24 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
Buckwheat wrote:
"Then, shalt thou count to three. No more. No less. Three shalt be the number thou shalt count, and the number of the counting shall be three. Four shalt thou not count, nor either count thou two, excepting that thou then proceed to three. Five is right out."

Sarcasm


Awesome!
tailgater Offline
#25 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
victor809 wrote:
Come on Tail...
It's not even comparable.

I'll say this, the eras were completely different. It may be simply because these days there's the internet, and that gives a voice to every fringe idiot out there, and encourages completely false rumors to spread like wildfire and encourages this blind hate...

But there's definitely a difference in how this first lady has been treated.


Actually, she's the first rock-star first lady.

If you go on Sally-Jesse or Oprah to fashion your new $50k dress, then you're fair game.
If you have a fat azz and want new federal laws to limit your Big Gulp intake, then you deserve to be made fun of.
Nancy took crap because of her "Just Say No" campaign, and nobody was shooting the messenger back then.
But today if you poke fun at the wookie people think you're a bigot or overly partisan. When in fact, she is a nuisance to our freedoms, she has openly dissed America, and she has an uncanny resemblance to Chewbacco. Or at least a big ewok. I can't decide which.

T Z Offline
#26 Posted:
Joined: 05-28-2008
Posts: 3,120
What a PIG
victor809 Offline
#27 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
tailgater wrote:
Actually, she's the first rock-star first lady.

If you go on Sally-Jesse or Oprah to fashion your new $50k dress, then you're fair game.
If you have a fat azz and want new federal laws to limit your Big Gulp intake, then you deserve to be made fun of.
Nancy took crap because of her "Just Say No" campaign, and nobody was shooting the messenger back then.
But today if you poke fun at the wookie people think you're a bigot or overly partisan. When in fact, she is a nuisance to our freedoms, she has openly dissed America, and she has an uncanny resemblance to Chewbacco. Or at least a big ewok. I can't decide which.



Come on Tail, you're feeding into the machine.
1 - I see no evidence that she spent $50,000 on a dress ever... but that's your defense for going after her?
2 - She doesn't really have a fat ass. Look at her body, this is not a woman carrying a lot of extra fat. She may have a big azz, but it's probably more muscle. I'd put her body up against most of the slobs wives here.
3 - I have no problem with giving her crap for the Big Gulp thing, same as Nancy Reagan... but I don't recall anyone calling Nancy a wookie, or fat, or ugly just because she wanted to take away our drugs.
4 - When has she "openly dissed America"? Are you still talking about that "first time I've been proud" thing? That's old...
5 - She doesn't look like either a wookie or ewok. And this is where things DO get close to bigotry, because the same traits which everyone claims make her look like a wookie are the same traits everyone used to claim made blacks look like monkeys. All that happened is the racist people realized that calling Michelle Obama a monkey or ape caught them a lot of crap. So they switched to "wookie". Try describing specifically why you think she's a wookie without ending up describing a lot of facial or physical traits common to black people, I don't think you can do it.
DrafterX Offline
#28 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,555
I thought she was a bigfoots.... Mellow
gryphonms Offline
#29 Posted:
Joined: 04-14-2013
Posts: 1,983
Cone of shame, 1, 2, 3, uh oops. Buckwheat I agree, awesome! LMAO.
tailgater Offline
#30 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
victor809 wrote:
Come on Tail, you're feeding into the machine.
1 - I see no evidence that she spent $50,000 on a dress ever... but that's your defense for going after her?
2 - She doesn't really have a fat ass. Look at her body, this is not a woman carrying a lot of extra fat. She may have a big azz, but it's probably more muscle. I'd put her body up against most of the slobs wives here.
3 - I have no problem with giving her crap for the Big Gulp thing, same as Nancy Reagan... but I don't recall anyone calling Nancy a wookie, or fat, or ugly just because she wanted to take away our drugs.
4 - When has she "openly dissed America"? Are you still talking about that "first time I've been proud" thing? That's old...
5 - She doesn't look like either a wookie or ewok. And this is where things DO get close to bigotry, because the same traits which everyone claims make her look like a wookie are the same traits everyone used to claim made blacks look like monkeys. All that happened is the racist people realized that calling Michelle Obama a monkey or ape caught them a lot of crap. So they switched to "wookie". Try describing specifically why you think she's a wookie without ending up describing a lot of facial or physical traits common to black people, I don't think you can do it.


Chill out.
Go find outrage elsewhere.
teedubbya Offline
#31 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
From his look in the pic it may be something as innocent as the Big O was just daydreaming about Allah
DrafterX Offline
#32 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,555
you can't say 'Allah' anymore unless you're Muslim... Shame on you
tailgater Offline
#33 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
Allah spelled backwards is still dog.
DrafterX Offline
#34 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,555
Think
teedubbya Offline
#35 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
DrafterX wrote:
you can't say 'Allah' anymore unless you're Muslim... Shame on you



Who says I'm not? Being critical of GWB made me instantly a libtard.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#36 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,453
DrafterX wrote:
you can't say 'Allah' anymore unless you're Muslim... Shame on you




**** Allah!
DrafterX Offline
#37 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,555
OhMyGod
victor809 Offline
#38 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
tailgater wrote:
Chill out.
Go find outrage elsewhere.


My outrage currently only hits 0.5 milli-rages... Just stating my observations regarding some individuals.
gryphonms Offline
#39 Posted:
Joined: 04-14-2013
Posts: 1,983
If you hit 100.00 rages combined this year I would start to worry about cancer.
Buckwheat Offline
#40 Posted:
Joined: 04-15-2004
Posts: 12,251
DrafterX wrote:
I thought she was a bigfoots.... Mellow


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6p3QhnRTp1M

jetblasted Offline
#41 Posted:
Joined: 08-30-2004
Posts: 42,595
DrafterX wrote:
I thought she was a bigfoots.... Mellow


Bigfoot was found in North Georgia about 5 years ago . . .

Funny thing is, there's a new theory circulating the internets here lately that Mrs. Obama is actually a man . . .
mikey1597 Offline
#42 Posted:
Joined: 05-18-2007
Posts: 14,162
She's a Bigfoot Wookie Moochella with a big fat deek.
















I feel better now
stogiemonger Offline
#43 Posted:
Joined: 06-25-2009
Posts: 4,185

The black heart on her blouse seems weird, but appropriate for her on such an occasion.
Users browsing this topic
Guest