America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 9 years ago by frankj1. 8 replies replies.
High Court: Cops Can’t Search Cellphone, Must Ask NSA
jetblasted Offline
#1 Posted:
Joined: 08-30-2004
Posts: 42,595
(2014-06-25) — In a rare unanimous ruling on a civil rights issue, the U.S. Supreme Court today ruled that it’s unconstitutional for local police to search the contents of your cellphone.

The Court declared that if local law enforcement wants to access that data, they’ll have to ask the National Security Agency (NSA) to provide it.

“The Fourth Amendment to the Constitution guarantees the right of the people to be secure in their persons and property from unreasonable searches and seizures,” wrote Chief Justice John Roberts on behalf of the Court. “Allowing Barney Fife to poke around your Pinterest violates the letter and the spirit of the Constitution.”

The Chief Justice noted that the practice is not only unconstitutional, but unnecessary, since the NSA already has all of that data and more, stored in its secret server farms.

“Why should the local district attorney waste resources hacking a phone,” Roberts wrote, “when the NSA could simply send him the zip file?”
DrMaddVibe Offline
#2 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,513
jetblasted wrote:
(2014-06-25) — In a rare unanimous ruling on a civil rights issue, the U.S. Supreme Court today ruled that it’s unconstitutional for local police to search the contents of your cellphone.

The Court declared that if local law enforcement wants to access that data, they’ll have to ask the National Security Agency (NSA) to provide it.

“The Fourth Amendment to the Constitution guarantees the right of the people to be secure in their persons and property from unreasonable searches and seizures,” wrote Chief Justice John Roberts on behalf of the Court. “Allowing Barney Fife to poke around your Pinterest violates the letter and the spirit of the Constitution.”

The Chief Justice noted that the practice is not only unconstitutional, but unnecessary, since the NSA already has all of that data and more, stored in its secret server farms.

“Why should the local district attorney waste resources hacking a phone,” Roberts wrote, “when the NSA could simply send him the zip file?”


See?


It's EXACTLY what I wrote in an earlier post isn't it?
jetblasted Offline
#3 Posted:
Joined: 08-30-2004
Posts: 42,595
um . . .
DrMaddVibe Offline
#4 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,513
jetblasted wrote:
um . . .



No "um..."


It's exactly like I said.
teedubbya Offline
#5 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
I think he is saying the op was satire or a joke.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#6 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,513
DrMaddVibe wrote:
Is this going to stop the NSA? The FBI? The CIA? Any Homeland Security cottage industry division that pops up like dandelions all over the side of highways?








NO!










This is just to make the SCOTUS appear like there's some type of "fairness" and when...yes WHEN the riots start...they don't want them happening at their workplace or homes.



It's not like we're going to go full Nazi Party and have people asking for papers...hell, we just let people stream across the borders anyways....



I really hate repeating myself, but sometimes it's necessary.
jetblasted Offline
#7 Posted:
Joined: 08-30-2004
Posts: 42,595
um . . .

It's a satire piece . . .

I don't follow all your postings DMV, so I don't know what you're talking about.

frankj1 Offline
#8 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,228
jetblasted wrote:
um . . .

It's a satire piece . . .

I don't follow all your postings DMV, so I don't know what you're talking about.


he missed the joke...but one might say there is truth in jest?
Users browsing this topic
Guest