America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 9 years ago by gryphonms. 9 replies replies.
Annie get your gun
Abrignac Offline
#1 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,278
EMILY MILLER: Federal judge rules DC ban on gun carry rights unconstitutional

By Emily Miller
Published July 26, 2014
FoxNews.com

Reuters

A federal judge in the District of Columbia on Saturday overturned the city’s total ban on residents being allowing to carry firearms outside their home in a landmark decision for gun-rights activists.

Judge Frederick Scullin Jr. wrote in his ruling in Palmer v. District of Columbia that the right to bear arms extends outside the home, therefore gun-control laws in the nation’s capital are “unconstitutional.”

“We won,” Alan Gura, the lead attorney for the Second Amendment Foundation, told Fox News in a phone interview. “I’m very pleased with the decision that the city can’t forbid the exercise of a fundamental constitutional right."

Gura said he expects the District to appeal this decision but added, “We’ll be happy to keep the fight going.”

The decision leaves no gray area in gun-carrying rights.

Judge Sculin extensively referenced the Supreme Court decisions in District of Columbia v. Heller (2008) and McDonald v. Chicago (2010) to concluding “there is no longer any basis on which this court can conclude that the District of Columbia's total ban on the public carrying of ready-to-use handguns outside the home is constitutional under any level of scrutiny.”

The court ordered the city to now allow residents from the District and other states to carry weapon within its boundaries.

Judge Scullin wrote that the court “enjoins Defendants from enforcing the home limitations of [D.C. firearms laws] unless and until such time as the District of Columbia adopts a licensing mechanism consistent with constitutional standards enabling people to exercise their Second Amendment right to bear arms.”

The defendants are the city government and Police Chief Cathy L. Lanier.

This case has dragged in the courts for five years. Gura has twice asked the federal appeals court to force Judge Scullin to issue a decision. The five plaintiffs filed in 2009, and the case was argued twice, most recently in Oct. 2012.

George Lyon, a D.C. resident and registered gun owner is one of the plaintiffs in Palmer.

“I am gratified that after a long wait our right to protect ourselves and our families has been vindicated,” Lyon, a lawyer, said Saturday.

He urged Mayor Vincent Gray, a Democrat, and the Democrat-controlled City Council to “swiftly enact a concealed carry law that protects the rights of law abiding citizens to protect themselves.”

Gray and D.C. City Council Chairman Phil Mendelson did not respond immediately for a request for comment.

Emily Miller is the chief investigative reporter for Fox 5 DC. She is the author of Emily Gets Her Gun (Regnery/2013).

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/07/26/emily-miller-federal-judge-rules-dc-ban-on-gun-carry-rights-unconstitutional/
wheelrite Offline
#2 Posted:
Joined: 11-01-2006
Posts: 50,119
Neato !

Marion Barry with a Crack Pipe and a Glock 19...


wheel,
Abrignac Offline
#3 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,278
wheelrite wrote:
Neato !

Marion Barry with a Crack Pipe and a Glock 19...


wheel,


Funny I lived in Northern VA when that went down.
cacman Offline
#4 Posted:
Joined: 07-03-2010
Posts: 12,216
wheelrite wrote:
Neato !

Marion Barry with a Crack Pipe and a Glock 19...


wheel,

Shame on you
Bloomberg hopped-up on sugary drinks with a 1911…
gryphonms Offline
#5 Posted:
Joined: 04-14-2013
Posts: 1,983
Kind of that there are still some people in the legislative branch who honor the constitution instead of interpreting it to align with their agenda.
Abrignac Offline
#6 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,278
gryphonms wrote:
Kind of that there are still some people in the legislative branch who honor the constitution instead of interpreting it to align with their agenda.



You sure you're a liberal?
gryphonms Offline
#7 Posted:
Joined: 04-14-2013
Posts: 1,983
I see my political beliefs and my personal beliefs being two sesperate parts of me. Maybe I am misstatementing who I am personally. I involve myself with causes I care about. I need to think about this, but perhaps the best answer is personally I am myself. As a civil libertarian I want the government to follow the constitution and be as minimally invasive as possible in our lives.
Abrignac Offline
#8 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,278
gryphonms wrote:
I see my political beliefs and my personal beliefs being two sesperate parts of me. Maybe I am misstatementing who I am personally. I involve myself with causes I care about. I need to think about this, but perhaps the best answer is personally I am myself. As a civil libertarian I want the government to follow the constitution and be as minimally invasive as possible in our lives.



Libertarian is something I can relate to. I thought you labeled yourself a Liberal in one of the other threads a month or so back.

Minimally invasive governing is something neither the Dems or the Repubs know anything about.
gryphonms Offline
#9 Posted:
Joined: 04-14-2013
Posts: 1,983
I might have labeled myself a liberal personally because I get involved in causes. But when I really think about it that makes no sense. Anyone can become involved with causes they believe in without having to label themselves a liberal. Also the causes I involve myself with are non political.
Users browsing this topic
Guest