America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 9 years ago by victor809. 35 replies replies.
Poll Question : How will the SEnate Races leave the balance of pow
Choice Votes Statistics
R 55-45 2 12 %
R54-46 5 31 %
R 53- 47 1 6 %
R 52-48 2 12 %
R 51-49 1 6 %
R 50 49-1 0 0 %
R50 D 50 1 6 %
The end of the world 0 0 %
Time to eat some Hemp Seeds 1 6 %
By by Daffy Duck Starts in 5 minutes 3 18 %
Total 16 100%

I Predict 54 to 46 (POLL)
Jump to Bottom | Previous Topic | Next Topic
jackconrad Offline
#1 Posted: Mon, Nov 3 2014, 10:33 AM EST
Joined: 06-09-2003
Posts: 67,461
Most seat holders stink but Dems seats are smellier...
teedubbya Offline
#2 Posted: Mon, Nov 3 2014, 11:02 AM EST
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
I blame tofu
DrMaddVibe Offline
#3 Posted: Mon, Nov 3 2014, 12:17 PM EST
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,453
Remember when Rick was on here talking about taking back the House AND the Senate????
mikey1597 Offline
#4 Posted: Mon, Nov 3 2014, 8:03 PM EST
Joined: 05-18-2007
Posts: 14,162
You can send my "I Voted Sticker" to me.
Buckwheat Offline
#5 Posted: Tue, Nov 4 2014, 1:50 PM EST
Joined: 04-15-2004
Posts: 12,251
I personally think that the Republicans are going to be shocked at the outcome of today's Senate races. I've seen too many Democratic yard signs in rich neighborhoods here in Louisville, KY which can't make Mitch feel overly confident. These are areas that usually vote Strong Republican. I think that whoever wins today will just be more of the same BS.
MACS Offline
#6 Posted: Tue, Nov 4 2014, 3:12 PM EST
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,800
Buckwheat wrote:
I personally think that the Republicans are going to be shocked at the outcome of today's Senate races. I've seen too many Democratic yard signs in rich neighborhoods here in Louisville, KY which can't make Mitch feel overly confident. These are areas that usually vote Strong Republican. I think that whoever wins today will just be more of the same BS.


You have many years of past experience to back that up. Two party system is broken.

Neither the dems or reps give a damn about "the people". Just "the money" being contributed to the campaign fund.
Buckwheat Offline
#7 Posted: Tue, Nov 4 2014, 3:18 PM EST
Joined: 04-15-2004
Posts: 12,251
I read the other day that our representatives are full time fundraisers and part time legislators.
ZRX1200 Offline
#8 Posted: Tue, Nov 4 2014, 3:21 PM EST
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,617
Julian I think you're going to be right.
DrafterX Offline
#9 Posted: Tue, Nov 4 2014, 3:35 PM EST
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,555
If the Dems win will there be another round of Obamaphones..?? Cause I never got mine last time..... Mellow
jackconrad Offline
#10 Posted: Tue, Nov 4 2014, 5:55 PM EST
Joined: 06-09-2003
Posts: 67,461
This time they are called Ibamaphoneys..^ But yeah if they win count on it, China needs the business..
DrafterX Offline
#11 Posted: Wed, Nov 5 2014, 9:12 AM EST
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,555
Think
Buckwheat Offline
#12 Posted: Wed, Nov 5 2014, 10:23 AM EST
Joined: 04-15-2004
Posts: 12,251
Clearly, I was dead wrong about how last night was going to play out. I voted for the Libertarian in the KY Senate race yesterday. I was not a fan of either Grimes or Mitch. Mitch has had 30 years in the Senate and Kentucky during his tenure has ranked in the bottom of the States in just about every Matrix. So I didn't buy into the hype that he was going to become the leader of the Senate and it would mean wine and caviar for Kentucky. Mitch also ran on the platform that he was against everything Obama which is basically a platform of nothing. He didn't put forth any new ideas that could get the economy going or solve any of the other problems that our State and Country face. Grimes was just more of the same failed Obama ideas.

Welcome to more constipated governance in the country. Obama is going to become the Vetoer in Chief for the rest of his term. It really is sad. fog
blackfoot11 Offline
#13 Posted: Wed, Nov 5 2014, 1:44 PM EST
Joined: 02-11-2004
Posts: 9,593
the mojority of the countries voice was heard last night.

the president's policies were on the ballot. he said so. it's about time the people woke up, although, buckwheat has a point with vetoer in chief, but it's a good solid start.



if things are handled correctly, look for a conservative president in 2 years.............
8trackdisco Offline
#14 Posted: Wed, Nov 5 2014, 2:52 PM EST
Joined: 11-06-2004
Posts: 60,082
blackfoot11 wrote:
the mojority of the countries voice was heard last night.

the president's policies were on the ballot. he said so. it's about time the people woke up, although, buckwheat has a point with vetoer in chief, but it's a good solid start.



if things are handled correctly, look for a conservative president in 2 years.............


As long as the Repubs don't pull the steering wheel too far to the right over the next two years.

If they make that mistake, we'll all be looking down the barrel of a new President Clinton.

Only God could help us then.
victor809 Offline
#15 Posted: Wed, Nov 5 2014, 3:27 PM EST
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
On the up-side I look forward to absolutely no whining from the wing nuts for the next two years.

Appropriate topics for whining now consist of:
The president vetoed the bill I want.

That is it. They've got the House and the Senate... all the whining for the past 6 years should cease.
dstieger Offline
#16 Posted: Wed, Nov 5 2014, 3:30 PM EST
Joined: 06-22-2007
Posts: 10,889
I guess 'they' were right....you really are nucking futs and out of touch with reality, aren't you?
victor809 Offline
#17 Posted: Wed, Nov 5 2014, 3:35 PM EST
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
dstieger wrote:
I guess 'they' were right....you really are nucking futs and out of touch with reality, aren't you?


What? Nonsense. I expect the only whining from the Politics forum for the next 2 years to be from the occasional liberal Cbid poster, with the exception of any Obama vetoes.

It'll be nice to have some peace and quiet. :)
Buckwheat Offline
#18 Posted: Wed, Nov 5 2014, 3:40 PM EST
Joined: 04-15-2004
Posts: 12,251
I think that we can generally agree that it would be a bad thing to have anyone named Clinton or Bush in the Whitehouse again.
victor809 Offline
#19 Posted: Wed, Nov 5 2014, 3:46 PM EST
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Buckwheat wrote:
I think that we can generally agree that it would be a bad thing to have anyone named Clinton or Bush in the Whitehouse again.


The democrats are already consoling themselves with data analysis which they believe proves Clinton will win 2016 based on this abysmal showing.

I think they're missing some important factors in their assessments of the numbers, but hey, who am I to burst their bubble.
blackfoot11 Offline
#20 Posted: Wed, Nov 5 2014, 9:10 PM EST
Joined: 02-11-2004
Posts: 9,593
victor809 wrote:
On the up-side I look forward to absolutely no whining from the wing nuts for the next two years.

Appropriate topics for whining now consist of:
The president vetoed the bill I want.

That is it. They've got the House and the Senate... all the whining for the past 6 years should cease.


libs don't whine? oh yeah, that's right, they just run away to another state, for 30 days, demand to collect there checks for there unworked time, and avoid the beatdown because "they didn't get there way"................fuggin pussies........
jetblasted Offline
#21 Posted: Wed, Nov 5 2014, 9:30 PM EST
Joined: 08-30-2004
Posts: 42,595
Berkeley is now taxing sugar drinks Mellow
victor809 Offline
#22 Posted: Wed, Nov 5 2014, 11:17 PM EST
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Blackfoot... Don't be silly. Of course liberals whine. But they don't really whine much on here (a very conservative skewed board)... I'm talking about the microcosm that is cbid, which has been whining nonstop for the past 6 years.
ZRX1200 Offline
#23 Posted: Wed, Nov 5 2014, 11:25 PM EST
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,617
And you've done well with the tacit racist card Victor.
victor809 Offline
#24 Posted: Wed, Nov 5 2014, 11:30 PM EST
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Huh?

Cbid members being racists has nothing to do with their incessant whining. I think they'd probably whine of they weren't racist too....
cacman Offline
#25 Posted: Thu, Nov 6 2014, 2:49 AM EST
Joined: 07-03-2010
Posts: 12,216
victor809 wrote:
Cbid members being racists has nothing to do with their incessant whining. I think they'd probably whine if they weren't racist too....

Some like you call it whining, while others call it making their voices heard. And the People voiced a clear message.
DrafterX Offline
#26 Posted: Thu, Nov 6 2014, 8:04 AM EST
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,555
I think there was more whining here before obama took office.... Mellow
dkeage Offline
#27 Posted: Thu, Nov 6 2014, 8:20 AM EST
Joined: 03-05-2004
Posts: 15,152
DrafterX wrote:
I think there was more whining here before obama took office.... Mellow

I wonder how Rick is doing...Think
DrafterX Offline
#28 Posted: Thu, Nov 6 2014, 8:23 AM EST
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,555
I heard he was banned.... Mellow
MACS Offline
#29 Posted: Thu, Nov 6 2014, 8:43 AM EST
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,800
DrafterX wrote:
I think there was more whining here before obama took office.... Mellow


FACT!
Buckwheat Offline
#30 Posted: Thu, Nov 6 2014, 9:23 AM EST
Joined: 04-15-2004
Posts: 12,251
victor809 wrote:
The democrats are already consoling themselves with data analysis which they believe proves Clinton will win 2016 based on this abysmal showing.

I think they're missing some important factors in their assessments of the numbers, but hey, who am I to burst their bubble.


Then I guess the Democrats are delusional idiots. fog

Plus there will always be a lot of whining in the Politic's forum.
cacman Offline
#31 Posted: Thu, Nov 6 2014, 1:45 PM EST
Joined: 07-03-2010
Posts: 12,216
Buckwheat wrote:
Then I guess the Democrats are delusional idiots.

Finally something that makes some sense...
victor809 Offline
#32 Posted: Fri, Nov 7 2014, 12:41 AM EST
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
I suspect it's the same as two years ago when the republicans were convinced all the polls showed they were going to get a huge win.

Both parties exert a conscious and unconscious delusion. It's good business to do it. That's how they raise money. If you think one party is any worse than the other in this matter then you're deluding yourself.
jackconrad Offline
#33 Posted: Fri, Nov 7 2014, 12:59 AM EST
Joined: 06-09-2003
Posts: 67,461
It's not really the system or the parties, It's the People today. They have LOST IT !
opelmanta1900 Offline
#34 Posted: Fri, Nov 7 2014, 1:13 AM EST
Joined: 01-10-2012
Posts: 13,954
Buckwheat wrote:
I think that we can generally agree that it would be a bad thing to have anyone named Clinton or Bush in the Whitehouse again.


I would vote for someone named Bush McClinton... maybe even someone named Clinton McBush... but probably not...
victor809 Offline
#35 Posted: Fri, Nov 7 2014, 3:14 AM EST
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Just out of amusement I would vote for that candidate.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Back to Top