America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 9 years ago by banderl. 15 replies replies.
Obama Revenge for Electing Netanyahu
Gene363 Offline
#1 Posted:
Joined: 01-24-2003
Posts: 30,834
US Declassifies Document Revealing Israel's Nuclear Program

Obama's administration outed the Israeli nuclear program by declassifying their entries in a declassified document from 1987. Other countries entries remain classified.

Quote:

Another highly suspicious aspect of the document is that while the Pentagon saw fit to declassify sections on Israel's sensitive nuclear program, it kept sections on Italy, France, West Germany and other NATO countries classified, with those sections blocked out in the document.


See: http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/193175#.VRQypWYxfj0
Burner02 Offline
#2 Posted:
Joined: 12-21-2010
Posts: 12,884
O'Blunder would never authorize such!
jetblasted Offline
#3 Posted:
Joined: 08-30-2004
Posts: 42,595
His temper tantrum continues. It's no wonder he acts this way, with no real father in his life growing up.
Speyside Offline
#4 Posted:
Joined: 03-16-2015
Posts: 13,106
Wow, that is crazy. I guess nothing he does should be a surprise. That simply defies logic. Whether he likes or dislikes Bibi, they are our ally.
teedubbya Offline
#5 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
I hate Obama so much I trust and worship Bibi as my dear leader and am willing to accept everything negative about Obama as true and any smoke about another countries leader as patently false. It's part of simply being open minded.

Likud because anything different is unAmerican.
Speyside Offline
#6 Posted:
Joined: 03-16-2015
Posts: 13,106
I accept for true what is true. This seems pretty cut and dry.
HockeyDad Offline
#7 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,156
<-------------
teedubbya Offline
#8 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Speyside wrote:
I accept for true what is true. This seems pretty cut and dry.



LMAO. really? look further.
DrafterX Offline
#9 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,559
anyone Snopesed this yet..?? Huh
Gene363 Offline
#10 Posted:
Joined: 01-24-2003
Posts: 30,834
DrafterX wrote:
anyone Snopesed this yet..?? Huh


F'ing Snopes is biased, just Google the topic.

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=obama+unclassified+israeli+nuclear+program

jetblasted Offline
#11 Posted:
Joined: 08-30-2004
Posts: 42,595
367 House lawmakers warn Obama on Iran

A veto-proof, bipartisan majority of House lawmakers have signed an open letter to President Barack Obama warning him that any nuclear deal with Iran will effectively require congressional approval for implementation.

A group of bipartisan senators have penned a bill mandating that any deal be reviewed and approved by Congress, but the House letter notes that lawmakers have another way to halt an agreement — by refusing to roll back sanctions.

"Should an agreement with Iran be reached, permanent sanctions relief from congressionally-mandated sanctions would require new legislation. In reviewing such an agreement, Congress must be convinced that its terms foreclose any pathway to a bomb, and only then will Congress be able to consider permanent sanctions relief," they write.

The letter, which was signed by 367 members of the House and released Monday by the House Foreign Affairs Committee, follows a similar one, issued to Iran's leaders and signed by 47 Republican senators, warning that any deal with Iran could be rolled back by a future president.

That letter sparked fierce criticism from Democrats, who said it was inappropriate meddling in delicate diplomatic talks and meant to undermine negotiations, and even some Republicans expressed reservations over the tactic.

The House letter lays out lawmakers' concerns in more diplomatic terms, hitting on the potential time restraints as a key sticking point for a final deal. The emerging deal would lift some restrictions on Iran's nuclear program in a decade, which critics say could allow the country to resume its pursuit of a nuclear bomb at that point.

"A final comprehensive nuclear agreement must constrain Iran's nuclear infrastructure so that Iran has no pathway to a bomb, and that agreement must be long-lasting," the lawmakers write.

"Any inspection and verification regime must allow for short notice access to suspect locations, and verifiable constraints on Iran's nuclear program must last for decades."
Gene363 Offline
#12 Posted:
Joined: 01-24-2003
Posts: 30,834
jetblasted wrote:
367 House lawmakers warn Obama on Iran

A veto-proof, bipartisan majority of House lawmakers have signed an open letter to President Barack Obama warning him that any nuclear deal with Iran will effectively require congressional approval for implementation.

A group of bipartisan senators have penned a bill mandating that any deal be reviewed and approved by Congress, but the House letter notes that lawmakers have another way to halt an agreement — by refusing to roll back sanctions.

"Should an agreement with Iran be reached, permanent sanctions relief from congressionally-mandated sanctions would require new legislation. In reviewing such an agreement, Congress must be convinced that its terms foreclose any pathway to a bomb, and only then will Congress be able to consider permanent sanctions relief," they write.

The letter, which was signed by 367 members of the House and released Monday by the House Foreign Affairs Committee, follows a similar one, issued to Iran's leaders and signed by 47 Republican senators, warning that any deal with Iran could be rolled back by a future president.

That letter sparked fierce criticism from Democrats, who said it was inappropriate meddling in delicate diplomatic talks and meant to undermine negotiations, and even some Republicans expressed reservations over the tactic.

The House letter lays out lawmakers' concerns in more diplomatic terms, hitting on the potential time restraints as a key sticking point for a final deal. The emerging deal would lift some restrictions on Iran's nuclear program in a decade, which critics say could allow the country to resume its pursuit of a nuclear bomb at that point.

"A final comprehensive nuclear agreement must constrain Iran's nuclear infrastructure so that Iran has no pathway to a bomb, and that agreement must be long-lasting," the lawmakers write.

"Any inspection and verification regime must allow for short notice access to suspect locations, and verifiable constraints on Iran's nuclear program must last for decades."


Sounds like someone served 367 servings of Awesome Sauce! Obama hate the US Constitution, so he is going to hate this letter.
Speyside Offline
#13 Posted:
Joined: 03-16-2015
Posts: 13,106
Pray tell enlighten me. When I googled this there was a lot of information that confirmed the original post.
teedubbya Offline
#14 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Speyside wrote:
Pray tell enlighten me. When I googled this there was a lot of information that confirmed the original post.



LMAO. No this is more fun.


The timing and content of the report is out there. The beginning, middle, end and mechanism of release is out there. It's relativity to other countries is out there.

If you take the time to look a little closer, and match a few things up, the conclusions drawn by this israeli news source as well as a large number of the top of the google results are entertaining. The internet is an ugly gossip column at times.

And the big O is a dolt. Make no mistake. But this is truly funny. If you can't figure it out you either don't want to or can't. Either way I am amused which is all that matters to me (picture a primate tossing one off at the zoo oblivious to everything else).

I am very pro Israel but I'm sort of pro USA first.

banderl Offline
#15 Posted:
Joined: 09-09-2008
Posts: 10,153
The pentagon released this info due to a FOI request.

But I'm 1000% sure that the Kenyan born Israeli hating Muslim commie had something to do with it.
Users browsing this topic
Guest