America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Fixed it!

A lying, cheating, manipulating b|tch.

Yep, that about sums it up for me.

Definitely not a "person" I could vote for as long as the republicans nominate anyone but Ted Cruz. That is honestly the only person I could think of that would send me crying into the voting booth knowing things are completely effed up and there is no one to vote for. The republicans could run ted kazinski and I'd vote for him over hill dog. Cruz.... not so much.

Teedubya hates Canadian cubans?

She has no gag reflex

Cruz?

prolly both.

TREY GOWDY: HILLARY WIPED SERVER CLEAN, REFUSED TO TURN IT OVER
New York, Hillary Rodham ClintonThe Associated Press
by BREITBART NEWS
27 Mar 2015
24
Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton wiped her private email server clean and did not turn over a single new email to the House Select Benghazi Committee after it subpoenaed Clinton’s private emails, according to Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-SC), who chairs the Committee.
Gowdy said he learned on Friday that Clinton “unilaterally decided to wipe her server clean and permanently delete all emails from her personal server.”
“While it is not clear precisely when Secretary Clinton decided to permanently delete all emails from her server, it appears she made the decision after October 28, 2014, when the Department of State for the first time asked the Secretary to return her public record to the Department,” he said in a statement.
Gowdy, saying that Clinton should not be able to essentially grade her own papers, had also requested that Clinton turn over her server to a third-party arbiter, but Clinton refused. Gowdy has said that Congress may take legal action to get Clinton’s server, and he said that he and the House leadership are considering the “next steps” in the matter.
“After seeking and receiving a two week extension from the Committee, Secretary Clinton failed to provide a single new document to the subpoena issued by the Committee and refused to provide her private server to the Inspector General for the State Department or any other independent arbiter for analysis,” Gowdy said. “In light of the Secretary’s unprecedented email arrangement with herself and her decision nearly two years after she left office to permanently delete all emails… we will work with the leadership of the House of Representatives as the Committee considers next steps.”
Gowdy has previously said that there were “huge gaps” in the emails the Committee has received from Clinton, who admitted that she deleted more than 30,000 emails that she and her team deemed to be “personal” and not “work-related.”
“There are gaps of months and months and months. And if you think to that iconic picture of her on a C-17 flying to Libya, she has sunglasses on and she has her handheld device in her hand, we have no e-mails from that day. In fact, we have no e-mails from that trip,” Gowdy said in a recent appearance on CBS’s Face the Nation. “So, it’s strange credibility to believe that if you’re on your way to Libya to discuss Libyan policy that there’s not a single document that has been turned over to Congress. So, there are huge gaps. And with respect to the president, it’s not up to Secretary Clinton to decide what is a public record and what’s not.”

what's your problem with Cruz ?

wheel..

say any words you want. I'll fight for your right to do so.

I miss ****ree

Hitlary has announced it's sexist to call her by her first name - true story. Gotta add that to the list in the first post.

So how's "Skankles" roll off the tongue? I kinda like it.

Monica Lewinski's ex-boyfriends wife could work. Well, not literally, I know she doesn't "work", but...yeah.

ever notice that the press never publishes any photos of her that reveal her ankles? Its because they look just like Golda Meir's.......just sayin.

Don't bet the bank on it.

Hilldo has so much bad history I think even her own party is sick of it. And she's not liberal enough for most of the communists in the demoncrat pary besides. I've long thought it isn't about anything but the money for her anyway. Fluff up those campaign contributions, and fade away with the booty.

Polls show her tied with Rand Paul befor even announcing. Well she's now unofficially pre-announced for an announcement, so I think that counts...maybe.

They'll run Crazy Uncle Joe and Pocahontas Warren before its over with.

I think we might finally be ripe for The Donald and Carly.

That would be a debate worth popping some corn over right there. Couple on couple violence...

Faptastic.

Is Putin liberal?

BIIIITCH!!!!!

"What does it matter?"

prolly... former members of the He-man Woman Haters Club looking for redemption and stuff...

running off to work now, so no time to check my old memory, but didn't it turn out Perot was burning the candle at both ends on NAFTA? There is something way in the back of my mind about property of his in Texas, something to do with airport proximity...I really wish I could recall or had time to investigate, but I seem to think he stood to make (more) billions even if it lived.

But he pulled in like 20% of the votes! Not bad, but no momentum resulted, sadly, for any kind of option.

Al, with all due respect.....if those three words are enough to make her qualified as a candidate WE ARE IN DEEP DEEP DOO DOO. Please enlighten us on the liberal left messages that have held up after being elected????

Most transparent administration.....not on your life!!!
The ONLY thing this admin. has kept it's word on is his /their promise to" transform the United States " into something many find Unrecognizable as anything other than socialism.

They accuse the Republicans of waging war on women.....HOW...in what way? They say things that ring hollow when backing them up with facts or proof.....BUT they sure sound good to the lemmings.

And please.....tell me how we can possibly do MORE for all the poor poor minorities.....for Chrissakes in the case of the latinos we have all but rolled out the fuggin red carpet for ( the majority ) a bunch of law breakers. BOTH PARTIES are and remain so culpable for EVERYTHING that has landed us where we are. They have to be pleased with themselves with their success in keeping us ( the citizenry ) divided and argumentative towards one another. And as long as the argument over just WHO ( which parties politics )is responsible ( both ARE ) we will get nowhere but degrade further as a nation.

From the New York Times:

The headline in Pravda trumpeted President Vladimir V. Putin’s latest coup, its nationalistic fervor recalling an era when the newspaper served as the official mouthpiece of the Kremlin: “Russian Nuclear Energy Conquers the World.”

The article, in January 2013, detailed how the Russian atomic energy agency, Rosatom, had taken over a Canadian company with uranium-mining stakes stretching from Central Asia to the American West. The deal made Rosatom one of the world’s largest uranium producers and brought Mr. Putin closer to his goal of controlling much of the global uranium supply chain.

But the untold story behind that story is one that involves not just the Russian president, but also a former American president and a woman who would like to be the next one.

At the heart of the tale are several men, leaders of the Canadian mining industry, who have been major donors to the charitable endeavors of former President Bill Clinton and his family. Members of that group built, financed and eventually sold off to the Russians a company that would become known as Uranium One.

Beyond mines in Kazakhstan that are among the most lucrative in the world, the sale gave the Russians control of one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States. Since uranium is considered a strategic asset, with implications for national security, the deal had to be approved by a committee composed of representatives from a number of United States government agencies. Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton.

As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.

And shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock.