America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 8 years ago by tonygraz. 57 replies replies.
2 Pages12>
Damn... Bad guys got 4 Good Guys...
DrafterX Offline
#1 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,555
BREAKING NEWS: Four Marines were reportedly killed Thursday at a Chattanooga, Tenn., Navy training center, in one of two attacks at area military facilities that happened nearly simultaneously and just seven miles apart.

The Marines were killed by a gunman who opened fire at a Naval Reserves Operations Center on Amnicola Highway, according to the Chattanooga Times Free Press. Marilyn Hutcheson, who works at Binswanger Glass just across the street from the Naval Reserve Center on Amnicola Highway, said she heard a barrage of gunfire around 11 a.m.

Film at 11... Sad Pray Pray
jetblasted Offline
#2 Posted:
Joined: 08-30-2004
Posts: 42,595
Thanks, Obama !!
DrafterX Offline
#3 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,555
CHATTANOOGA GUNMAN IDENTIFIED AS MUHAMMAD YOUSSEF ABDULAZEEZ, FOX NEWS CONFIRMS

Think Think
Speyside Offline
#4 Posted:
Joined: 03-16-2015
Posts: 13,106
May they rest in peace.
banderl Offline
#5 Posted:
Joined: 09-09-2008
Posts: 10,153
ISIS is involved.
Gene363 Offline
#6 Posted:
Joined: 01-24-2003
Posts: 30,822
This photo says it all. Just unreal. Marines here don't have guns, come on in!

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CKDveKEWIAAeYLw.jpg:large
Burner02 Offline
#7 Posted:
Joined: 12-21-2010
Posts: 12,884
MUHAMMAD YOUSSEF ABDULAZEEZ must be another right wing radical.
banderl Offline
#8 Posted:
Joined: 09-09-2008
Posts: 10,153
Is ISIS a right wing or left wing organization?
victor809 Offline
#9 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
banderl wrote:
Is ISIS a right wing or left wing organization?

I heard it's pretty centrist.
Burner02 Offline
#10 Posted:
Joined: 12-21-2010
Posts: 12,884
Burner02 wrote:
MUHAMMAD YOUSSEF ABDULAZEEZ must be another right wing radical.




And no doubt a Republican that is a NRA member.
victor809 Offline
#11 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Burner02 wrote:
And no doubt a Republican that is a NRA member.


To be fair, I'm pretty sure he'd be in favor of the NRA.
jespear Offline
#12 Posted:
Joined: 03-19-2004
Posts: 9,464
Speyside wrote:
May they rest in peace.


AMEN !
Burner02 Offline
#13 Posted:
Joined: 12-21-2010
Posts: 12,884
victor809 wrote:
To be fair, I'm pretty sure he'd be in favor of the NRA.




Don't think his type would want the U.S. citizenry to be armed. He would fall in line with the more gun control needed crowd.
victor809 Offline
#14 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Burner02 wrote:
Don't think his type would want the U.S. citizenry to be armed. He would fall in line with the more gun control needed crowd.


That's a pretty short sighted view of the world if you think someone who wants to obtain a weapon with which to shoot people is not going to be a fan of weapons being easier to obtain.

99cobra2881 Offline
#15 Posted:
Joined: 11-19-2013
Posts: 2,472
victor809 wrote:
That's a pretty short sighted view of the world if you think someone who wants to obtain a weapon with which to shoot people is not going to be a fan of weapons being easier to obtain.



I bet you also think gun free zones keep people safe from gun violence too don't you?
victor809 Offline
#16 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
No. I don't think gun laws keep anyone safe. I mean, I suppose they may at some extremes. If your neighbor nukes the other neighbor, you may be less safe... But I don't particularly care. I was just pointing out that he would likely have wanted less restrictions on guns over more.

You jump to assumptions when you assume that a gunman values increased likelihood of an unarmed shootee over his own easy access to weapons.

TMCTLT Offline
#17 Posted:
Joined: 11-22-2007
Posts: 19,733
Speyside wrote:
May they rest in peace.



Amen, and may we begin to PROFILE these Bastards like we should have been doing ALL ALONG.
Oscar Offline
#18 Posted:
Joined: 09-12-2012
Posts: 3,169
Yes, we need to watch out for people like TMCTLT! Lets profile him and anyone like him!

ram27bat
HockeyDad Offline
#19 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,138
We prolly need to stop fly the Marine Corps flag. Maybe he found it offensive.
DrafterX Offline
#20 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,555
just a matter of time... Mellow
TMCTLT Offline
#21 Posted:
Joined: 11-22-2007
Posts: 19,733
Oscar wrote:
Yes, we need to watch out for people like TMCTLT! Lets profile him and anyone like him!

ram27bat



Yes I'm clearly of the same cloth as these hateful MotherF*ckers.....Bite Me
Oscar Offline
#22 Posted:
Joined: 09-12-2012
Posts: 3,169
TMCTLT wrote:
Yes I'm clearly of the same cloth as these hateful MotherF*ckers.....Bite Me


That sounded pretty hateful... Can't we all just get along?

Applause
DrMaddVibe Offline
#23 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,448
Settle the f$&@ down. NOW!


This is just a workplace incident.
frankj1 Offline
#24 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,222
TMCTLT wrote:
Amen, and may we begin to PROFILE these Bastards like we should have been doing ALL ALONG.

more power to the government? really?
more power to police to stop/question/search?

Terrorists live that way. Once we do, they win...you just surrendered.

Some smaht guy said if you trade some freedom for some security, you get neither. Or something like that.

Freedom is a risky thing, take that risk.
DrafterX Offline
#25 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,555
frankj1 wrote:


Some smaht guy said if you trade some freedom for some security, you get neither. Or something like that.
.



Was it CROS..?? Huh
banderl Offline
#26 Posted:
Joined: 09-09-2008
Posts: 10,153
DrafterX wrote:
Was it CROS..?? Huh



Poor CROS.
frankj1 Offline
#27 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,222
DrafterX wrote:
Was it CROS..?? Huh

what did you hear?
banderl Offline
#28 Posted:
Joined: 09-09-2008
Posts: 10,153
I heard that CROS joined ISIS, that's what I heard.
Burner02 Offline
#29 Posted:
Joined: 12-21-2010
Posts: 12,884
victor809 wrote:
That's a pretty short sighted view of the world if you think someone who wants to obtain a weapon with which to shoot people is not going to be a fan of weapons being easier to obtain.




I really don't think this azz wipe gave a damn about gun control. He would have gotten a gun one way or another to carry out his plan. If you believe other wise then you are the one that is short sighted.
victor809 Offline
#30 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Burner02 wrote:
I really don't think this azz wipe gave a damn about gun control. He would have gotten a gun one way or another to carry out his plan. If you believe other wise then you are the one that is short sighted.


Where did I say I believed that he wouldn't have gotten a gun one way or another?

You make an awful lot of assumptions.
frankj1 Offline
#31 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,222
if we ever profiled the most likely to kill us innocents, white Christian males have done more damage than any terrorists on our soil since 9/11, yet they are not feared...until now!

From now on, I'm calling in any white Christian males walking slowly, buying fertilizer, chemicals, renting cars or pick up trucks...help me out here. What have I forgotten to be askeered of as a free American man?

I need the pOlice to sweep the streets of this menace. Please come check my house first every Thursday.
banderl Offline
#32 Posted:
Joined: 09-09-2008
Posts: 10,153
frankj1 wrote:
if we ever profiled the most likely to kill us innocents, white Christian males have done more damage than any terrorists on our soil since 9/11, yet they are not feared...until now!

From now on, I'm calling in any white Christian males walking slowly, buying fertilizer, chemicals, renting cars or pick up trucks...help me out here. What have I forgotten to be askeered of as a free American man?

I need the pOlice to sweep the streets of this menace. Please come check my house first every Thursday.



You need to learn how to use those sarcasm smiley thingies.
frankj1 Offline
#33 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,222
banderl wrote:
You need to learn how to use those sarcasm smiley thingies.

pot/kettle.

we're even. HA!
tonygraz Offline
#34 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2008
Posts: 20,267
Go for the pot.
Burner02 Offline
#35 Posted:
Joined: 12-21-2010
Posts: 12,884
frankj1 wrote:
if we ever profiled the most likely to kill us innocents, white Christian males have done more damage than any terrorists on our soil since 9/11, yet they are not feared...until now!

From now on, I'm calling in any white Christian males walking slowly, buying fertilizer, chemicals, renting cars or pick up trucks...help me out here. What have I forgotten to be askeered of as a free American man?

I need the pOlice to sweep the streets of this menace. Please come check my house first every Thursday.




BS!
frankj1 Offline
#36 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,222
Burner02 wrote:
BS!

that it?
Burner02 Offline
#37 Posted:
Joined: 12-21-2010
Posts: 12,884
frankj1 wrote:
that it?



For the time being.
TMCTLT Offline
#38 Posted:
Joined: 11-22-2007
Posts: 19,733
frankj1 wrote:
more power to the government? really?
more power to police to stop/question/search?

Terrorists live that way. Once we do, they win...you just surrendered.

Some smaht guy said if you trade some freedom for some security, you get neither. Or something like that.

Freedom is a risky thing, take that risk.



Don't talk to me about losing freedoms Frank, can you even own a gun to protect your self and family? How many hoops do you have to jump through to keep it every year? That saying you quoted.....while it sounds wonderful, we're already being STRIPPED each and every day of MORE of the Freedoms we've come to know. Sorry but I think your wrong headed as hell on this one. And the rest of us ARE already giving up a LOT so THEY can feel normal and trusted. I'm glad your okay with being treated that way....most aren't!!!!! And to address your other comment about the police coming to make sure your all safe, aren't you ALL already well versed in " sheltering in place" while the POPO keep you whole?????
frankj1 Offline
#39 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,222
TMCTLT wrote:
Don't talk to me about losing freedoms Frank, can you even own a gun to protect your self and family? How many hoops do you have to jump through to keep it every year? That saying you quoted.....while it sounds wonderful, we're already being STRIPPED each and every day of MORE of the Freedoms we've come to know. Sorry but I think your wrong headed as hell on this one. And the rest of us ARE already giving up a LOT so THEY can feel normal and trusted. I'm glad your okay with being treated that way....most aren't!!!!! And to address your other comment about the police coming to make sure your all safe, aren't you ALL already well versed in " sheltering in place" while the POPO keep you whole?????

eliminating all the off topic nonsense and other unrelated personal comments...

you are allowing fear of people that look different to you to dominate your feeling of safety. You are incorrect when you say the rest of us would gladly trade the freedoms, that I am limiting to this conversation, for false security.

But on a personal level, I already knew your feelings about taking away these freedoms from me, and I am always surprised that you will contradict yourself all over the place on other threads with rants about not trusting government.

While I don't share your bile toward government, I certainly share your desire to limit its ability to legally enter my privacy when I have done nothing to arouse suspicion...other than possibly looking enough like scary ethnic types...

for your sake, better hope they don't decide to profile white Christian males (stop on the street, pull over for "routine questioning, search you and/or your vehicle, check email accounts and sites visited) in an effort to make us "free" of mass murder attacks in schools and malls.

frankj1 Offline
#40 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,222
Burner02 wrote:
For the time being.

no need, Bander was right that I need smiley thingies. I was being ironic, that's all. Profiling the majority of American citizens? No, I really do not advocate that.

I do not fear nor hate white Christian males, just pointing out my fear of unlimited powers to "check out" private citizens due to things that make Paul scared.

However, without research (I try to NOT google) I wouldn't be surprised to learn that there have been maybe a few dozen deaths on our soil due to terrorist activities, but maybe several times that amount from " safe" looking citizens who went off their meds...

but my point is even that is not enough for me to desire profiling of either group.
TMCTLT Offline
#41 Posted:
Joined: 11-22-2007
Posts: 19,733
frankj1 wrote:
no need, Bander was right that I need smiley thingies. I was being ironic, that's all. Profiling the majority of American citizens? No, I really do not advocate that.

I do not fear nor hate white Christian males, just pointing out my fear of unlimited powers to "check out" private citizens due to things that make Paul scared.

However, without research (I try to NOT google) I wouldn't be surprised to learn that there have been maybe a few dozen deaths on our soil due to terrorist activities, but maybe several times that amount from " safe" looking citizens who went off their meds...

but my point is even that is not enough for me to desire profiling of either group.


[quote=frankj1]
for your sake, better hope they don't decide to profile white Christian males (stop on the street, pull over for "routine questioning, search you and/or your vehicle, check email accounts and sites visited) in an effort to make us "free" of mass murder attacks in schools and malls.


All of this is already being done and we both know it, and if WE weren't living in a time of CREATED Gun Free Zones....we wouldn't have near the problems we currently have. From civilian to military bases people are and have been stripped of their RIGHT TO DEFEND themselves.


Just like a liberal minded fool to first post " without research " and then follow up with " I wouldn't be surprised to learn " blah blah blag.....


We're ALREADY ALL being checked out Frank, but then you already knew that, and you can discount the other things you perceive as a personal attack on you but what I said about your not being able to protect youself and family id TRUE and you just blew past it....Not surprisingly. ( I'd be a bit ashamed if those constitutional right had already been stripped from me. Who's really scared here Frank, those of us willing and ABLE to defend ourselves or those who've already been relegated to having that done for us???
banderl Offline
#42 Posted:
Joined: 09-09-2008
Posts: 10,153
How do you sleep at night, Paul?
ZRX1200 Offline
#43 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,617
^ with your mom.
banderl Offline
#44 Posted:
Joined: 09-09-2008
Posts: 10,153
My legless Mom, that's fucked up.
frankj1 Offline
#45 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,222
to further clarify, I was referring to not googling the answer to how many terrorist related deaths on our soil since 9/11 vs deaths caused by equally crazed white Christian males here since that date...I think we both know the answer to that one too, and it isn't going to make the case that you want look good, ie to profile coffee-light skinned Americans. Yet I am not seriously calling to do it to white male Christians, I was lampooning the concept of allowing the police to do so to any group, and asking for you to explain why not do your profiling to the far more life-threatening group if you must do it at all? I mean, if profiling saves lives, then at least limit it to the ones doing the most killing, no?

My concern is that we rushed and continue to rush into a police state begun with Homeland...not started by a liberal fool btw, but probably the fool you voted for twice...and sold the idea by promising security.

I have no need to further break things down in an easier way for you to digest as long as you are unable to refrain from immature name calling if a fellow American with the same rights as you dares to differ in opinion.

If you can maintain dignity, I'll be at the grown up table...
banderl Offline
#46 Posted:
Joined: 09-09-2008
Posts: 10,153
ZRX1200 wrote:
^ with your mom.



Are you now Paul's mouthpiece?
TMCTLT Offline
#47 Posted:
Joined: 11-22-2007
Posts: 19,733
banderl wrote:
How do you sleep at night, Paul?



Usually on my side....my R side!! See that was easy now wasn't it?

banderl wrote:
Are you now Paul's mouthpiece?



We're quick on the pick up.....NO???
TMCTLT Offline
#48 Posted:
Joined: 11-22-2007
Posts: 19,733
frankj1 wrote:
to further clarify, I was referring to not googling the answer to how many terrorist related deaths on our soil since 9/11 vs deaths caused by equally crazed white Christian males here since that date...I think we both know the answer to that one too, and it isn't going to make the case that you want look good, ie to profile coffee-light skinned Americans. Yet I am not seriously calling to do it to white male Christians, I was lampooning the concept of allowing the police to do so to any group, and asking for you to explain why not do your profiling to the far more life-threatening group if you must do it at all? I mean, if profiling saves lives, then at least limit it to the ones doing the most killing, no?

My concern is that we rushed and continue to rush into a police state begun with Homeland...not started by a liberal fool btw, but probably the fool you voted for twice...and sold the idea by promising security.

I have no need to further break things down in an easier way for you to digest as long as you are unable to refrain from immature name calling if a fellow American with the same rights as you dares to differ in opinion.

If you can maintain dignity, I'll be at the grown up table...



Yes I voted for him twice....and with the Dems record it was an EASY decision to make. Do I agree with the creation of Homeland Security?.....NO especially the politically correct way in which it was implemented!!! I have a question for you, if a white male 6'4 and 250 commits a robbery murder do you put all your resources looking for a Black male who's 5'10 and 175? Grown up table.....that's rich. Lmao
frankj1 Offline
#49 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,222
TMCTLT wrote:
Yes I voted for him twice....and with the Dems record it was an EASY decision to make. Do I agree with the creation of Homeland Security?.....NO especially the politically correct way in which it was implemented!!! I have a question for you, if a white male 6'4 and 250 commits a robbery murder do you put all your resources looking for a Black male who's 5'10 and 175? Grown up table.....that's rich. Lmao

glad you laughed, was trying to be funny.

The answer is, no. i would not look for a small Black male (blackmail?) I would not put all my resources into any single "type" search either.

In return, let me ask you this: if there seems to be a faaaar greater chance of being shot in a mall, restaurant, theater etc by a white mass murderer than by a "middle east ethnicy looking guy", why would you profile the mid east guy and not the white guy?

My answer is I don't like the precedent of profiling at all, especially based on how it has worked historically elsewhere in countries from which many of our citizens already fled.

Didn't like my first famous quote from a great American? Try new Hampshire's...Live Free or Die
TMCTLT Offline
#50 Posted:
Joined: 11-22-2007
Posts: 19,733
frankj1 wrote:
glad you laughed, was trying to be funny.

The answer is, no. i would not look for a small Black male (blackmail?) I would not put all my resources into any single "type" search either.

In return, let me ask you this: if there seems to be a faaaar greater chance of being shot in a mall, restaurant, theater etc by a white mass murderer than by a "middle east ethnicy looking guy", why would you profile the mid east guy and not the white guy?


Here in flyover USA we're allowed (and do carry) to protect ourselves and others and while doing so send a BIG mssg to thumpers that these are NOT SOFT TARGETS where you can commit crimes trouble free.....


My answer is I don't like the precedent of profiling at all, especially based on how it has worked historically elsewhere in countries from which many of our citizens already fled.

So you prefer the alternative approach that IS used ( make excuses for their behavior and flat out lie ) about their motives when the Nadal Hassan's of the World do their EVIL? After all this is only....work place violence Whistle

Didn't like my first famous quote from a great American? Try new Hampshire's...Live Free or Die



I already do here in IN....aand it's NOT just an empty phrase



























Users browsing this topic
Guest
2 Pages12>