America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 8 years ago by Gene363. 63 replies replies.
2 Pages12>
DOJ to Legalize Bestiality And Pedophilia
Jump to Bottom | Previous Topic | Next Topic
Gene363 Offline
#1 Posted: Sun, Jul 26 2015, 6:08 PM EST
Joined: 01-24-2003
Posts: 30,822
Former House Majority Leader Tom Delay has a very big scoop coming out about the government's shadowy plan to boost the number of new perversions allowed by 12. In a stunning revelation, Tom Delay exposes the DOJ for its role in promoting perverse behavior.


Quote:
"We've already found a secret memo coming out of the Justice Department," DeLay claimed. "They're now going to go after 12 new perversions, things like bestiality, polygamy, having sex with little boys and making that legal. Not only that, but they have a whole list of strategies to go after the churches, the pastors, and any businesses that tries to assert their religious liberty. This is coming and it's coming like a tidal wave."


https://youtu.be/HUhoTzJ5Rvc
banderl Offline
#2 Posted: Sun, Jul 26 2015, 6:45 PM EST
Joined: 09-09-2008
Posts: 10,153
Then he should release it to the general public, if in fact it does exist.
I won't hold my breath while waiting for this to happen.
tonygraz Offline
#3 Posted: Sun, Jul 26 2015, 7:01 PM EST
Joined: 08-11-2008
Posts: 20,266
Another Delay, Delay. The man is nucking futs.
Abrignac Offline
#4 Posted: Sun, Jul 26 2015, 7:14 PM EST
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,278
Not sure why he would make such claims without presenting evidence to support them.

The polygamy aspect doesn't surprise me. If one reads the recent SCOTUS decision legalizing same sex marriages, there is language that at face value seems to back that up.

The decision speaks of the hardships faced by partners and children of unmarried couples and the need to remedy such hardships. Which brings us to the concept of extended families. We all know that there are many instances of men fathering children to multiple women and women giving birth to children fathered by multiple men.

It would seem that these people would have just as strong of a case to be wedded to multiple spouses so they can benefit from the same rights granted to same sex spouses.

Whatever the case, it will be interesting to see how this progresses.
banderl Offline
#5 Posted: Sun, Jul 26 2015, 7:27 PM EST
Joined: 09-09-2008
Posts: 10,153
Has he released this memo yet?
Abrignac Offline
#6 Posted: Sun, Jul 26 2015, 7:37 PM EST
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,278
I'm guessing we will see that memo the day after Hillary turns her mail server over to Congress.
banderl Offline
#7 Posted: Sun, Jul 26 2015, 7:50 PM EST
Joined: 09-09-2008
Posts: 10,153
One has nothing to do with the other.
I hope that she does turn it over.
That will be the end of certain members of congress constantly wasting their time and our money.
Burner02 Offline
#8 Posted: Sun, Jul 26 2015, 8:25 PM EST
Joined: 12-21-2010
Posts: 12,884
banderl wrote:
One has nothing to do with the other.
I hope that she does turn it over.
That will be the end of certain members of congress constantly wasting their time and our money.




Just curious, do you know anything about the proper procedures for handling classified information?
banderl Offline
#9 Posted: Sun, Jul 26 2015, 8:42 PM EST
Joined: 09-09-2008
Posts: 10,153
If they prove that she mishandled classified info she should pay the price.
If once again they find nothing, then they should STFU and get back to solving some of the many problems which plague this country.
frankj1 Offline
#10 Posted: Sun, Jul 26 2015, 9:15 PM EST
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,222
Abrignac wrote:
Not sure why he would make such claims without presenting evidence to support them.

The polygamy aspect doesn't surprise me. If one reads the recent SCOTUS decision legalizing same sex marriages, there is language that at face value seems to back that up.

The decision speaks of the hardships faced by partners and children of unmarried couples and the need to remedy such hardships. Which brings us to the concept of extended families. We all know that there are many instances of men fathering children to multiple women and women giving birth to children fathered by multiple men.

It would seem that these people would have just as strong of a case to be wedded to multiple spouses so they can benefit from the same rights granted to same sex spouses.

Whatever the case, it will be interesting to see how this progresses.

having sexual relations does not equal having a relationship akin to a partnership akin to a union/marriage.
A committed gay couple is much more of a marriage than getting pregnant by several men or impregnating several women...
It is not because of children that makes a partner deserving of benefits, it is because of commitment to that partner.

There is no correlation to nor does gay marriage open the door to condoned beastiality or any other fantasy weirdos have who express the loudest fears.
Abrignac Offline
#11 Posted: Sun, Jul 26 2015, 9:37 PM EST
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,278
frankj1 wrote:
having sexual relations does not equal having a relationship akin to a partnership akin to a union/marriage.
A committed gay couple is much more of a marriage than getting pregnant by several men or impregnating several women...
It is not because of children that makes a partner deserving of benefits, it is because of commitment to that partner.

There is no correlation to nor does gay marriage open the door to condoned beastiality or any other fantasy weirdos have who express the loudest fears.


You may want to read the decision. It specifically mentions children and the hardships of same sex couples when the partner is not married to the child's biological parent.

As far as the bestiality comment, I never said anything about that. That's another topic in of itself.
frankj1 Offline
#12 Posted: Sun, Jul 26 2015, 9:52 PM EST
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,222
I did not read it, that's true. I did surmise, based on the thread title which included "bestiality" and your mention of same sex marriages, that Delay was claiming gay marriage opens the door for pedophiles marrying young victims and other sickos marrying animals, and on and on, which I may have spotted here in the past too.

The way gays overcame the same hardships faced by unmarried couples with children was to fight for the right to BE married to the one they love. if same sex couples are just as committed to each other, they could have been married long ago without a struggle...unless they are having children because they are unwilling to prevent pregnancy and are not really a union by any definition of the word after the pe-nis pulls out.
tonygraz Offline
#13 Posted: Sun, Jul 26 2015, 10:38 PM EST
Joined: 08-11-2008
Posts: 20,266
Just another bunch of BS to rally the looney religious fanatics against gay marriage.
ZRX1200 Offline
#14 Posted: Sun, Jul 26 2015, 10:46 PM EST
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,617
Yup Tony, nothing like a goat/child fuggin story to make people excited about something they already believe.
TMCTLT Offline
#15 Posted: Mon, Jul 27 2015, 8:46 AM EST
Joined: 11-22-2007
Posts: 19,733
tonygraz wrote:
Just another bunch of BS to rally the looney religious fanatics against gay marriage.



No Tony the BS is the mentally deficient militant gays that are causing all the trouble and Everyone knows it. Is there something you'd like to share with us....Whistle
Speyside Offline
#16 Posted: Mon, Jul 27 2015, 8:52 AM EST
Joined: 03-16-2015
Posts: 13,106
I personally doubt there is any truth to Delay's comments. If there is he would leak the secret memo. As it stands this is unverifiable BS.
banderl Offline
#17 Posted: Mon, Jul 27 2015, 9:16 AM EST
Joined: 09-09-2008
Posts: 10,153
This says a lot about the people that believe this kind of crap.
TMCTLT Offline
#18 Posted: Mon, Jul 27 2015, 9:29 AM EST
Joined: 11-22-2007
Posts: 19,733
banderl wrote:
This says a lot about the people that believe this kind of crap.




I don't think it says any more than when Barry said he'd have " the most transparent administration we'd EVER seen, and all those who voted for him bought it....lock, stock and barrel!!
HOPE and CHANGE.......we'll we got the change, just falling a bit short on HOPE d'oh!
Being completely honest here, I NEVER imagined we'd be witnessing the " freak show " that this lifestyle has become either. In fact I remember telling the first person who explained what " ghey " was.....your full of chit.....nobody would want that!!! And looks where we are now as a society.....Barnum would be thrilled to be alive today.
teedubbya Offline
#19 Posted: Mon, Jul 27 2015, 12:43 PM EST
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
In a few years it will be better. Barnum could charge to see the endangered homophobes.

as fot the OP come on man.
DrafterX Offline
#20 Posted: Mon, Jul 27 2015, 1:03 PM EST
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,555
So, we can marry our cousins. .?? Huh
teedubbya Offline
#21 Posted: Mon, Jul 27 2015, 1:36 PM EST
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
DrafterX wrote:
So, we can marry our cousins. .?? Huh



yes
banderl Offline
#22 Posted: Mon, Jul 27 2015, 2:08 PM EST
Joined: 09-09-2008
Posts: 10,153
So has Delay released this memo yet?
Gene363 Offline
#23 Posted: Mon, Jul 27 2015, 3:29 PM EST
Joined: 01-24-2003
Posts: 30,822
How can Obama be a muslim id he applauds gay marriage? He throws them a bone, so to speak, legalizing plural marriage, bestiality and pedophilia, things that are apparently just fine with the musilm cult members.
victor809 Offline
#24 Posted: Mon, Jul 27 2015, 4:03 PM EST
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Umm... I think you were the ones who said he was Muslim.

You can't accuse him of being Muslim when he never said he was, then whine that he isn't acting like a Muslim.
Burner02 Offline
#25 Posted: Mon, Jul 27 2015, 5:37 PM EST
Joined: 12-21-2010
Posts: 12,884
banderl wrote:
If they prove that she mishandled classified info she should pay the price.
If once again they find nothing, then they should STFU and get back to solving some of the many problems which plague this country.


I agree that Hill should be punished if she mishandled classified material which I believe she did and subsequently will pay the price.

I take it that you are not up to speed on classified requirements by your answer to my question. But that is ok because most US citizens are not either and are not expected to be. And that is what Hill and the Dem power brokers are counting on. If the masses do not understand what she did then why would it be a big deal.

There is no way an individual serving as Secretary of State can perform their duties effectively/proficiently while generating/receiving over 50,000 emails using one com device, a personnel server, and not violate classified material requirements.

A few of the basics: Emailing/receiving classified material requires the use of a classified approved laptop/desktop. Then the computer has to be used in an approved room/facility and not just anywhere. Depending on the room/facility the laptop and or the desktop hard drive may have to be secured in a GSA approved safe when not in use. Then there is the matter of classified telephone calls which require the use of specialized telephones by all parties involved. I could continue but I think this enough for today's lesson.
Brewha Offline
#26 Posted: Mon, Jul 27 2015, 5:43 PM EST
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,182
victor809 wrote:
Umm... I think you were the ones who said he was Muslim.

You can't accuse him of being Muslim when he never said he was, then whine that he isn't acting like a Muslim.

No Victor, Gene can whine.
Brother can he.....




Jk Herfing
banderl Offline
#27 Posted: Mon, Jul 27 2015, 6:06 PM EST
Joined: 09-09-2008
Posts: 10,153
Burner02 wrote:
I agree that Hill should be punished if she mishandled classified material which I believe she did and subsequently will pay the price.

I take it that you are not up to speed on classified requirements by your answer to my question. But that is ok because most US citizens are not either and are not expected to be. And that is what Hill and the Dem power brokers are counting on. If the masses do not understand what she did then why would it be a big deal.

There is no way an individual serving as Secretary of State can perform their duties effectively/proficiently while generating/receiving over 50,000 emails using one com device, a personnel server, and not violate classified material requirements.

A few of the basics: Emailing/receiving classified material requires the use of a classified approved laptop/desktop. Then the computer has to be used in an approved room/facility and not just anywhere. Depending on the room/facility the laptop and or the desktop hard drive may have to be secured in a GSA approved safe when not in use. Then there is the matter of classified telephone calls which require the use of specialized telephones by all parties involved. I could continue but I think this enough for today's lesson.




Great, but what does this have to do with bestiality?
Gene363 Offline
#28 Posted: Mon, Jul 27 2015, 6:18 PM EST
Joined: 01-24-2003
Posts: 30,822
victor809 wrote:
Umm... I think you were the ones who said he was Muslim.

You can't accuse him of being Muslim when he never said he was, then whine that he isn't acting like a Muslim.


Oh, but I can, besides I think that is what I just posted. Seriously though, who really knows what is in his mind? His actions and his words, "...nothing sweeter than the call to prayers..." or something like that, take away from his protestations of being a Christian. His former minister, Reverend Wright, certainly is muslim, but then his beliefs and sermons are not very reassuring or very Christian either. Meh, don't really care what he believes in, just what he does or doesn't do. It doesn't really matter if his decisions are clouded by his beliefs.
Gene363 Offline
#29 Posted: Mon, Jul 27 2015, 6:19 PM EST
Joined: 01-24-2003
Posts: 30,822
Brewha wrote:
No Victor, Gene can whine.
Brother can he.....




Jk Herfing


Thank you, I think. d'oh!
Burner02 Offline
#30 Posted: Mon, Jul 27 2015, 6:39 PM EST
Joined: 12-21-2010
Posts: 12,884
banderl wrote:
Great, but what does this have to do with bestiality?



Nothing, goes back to your #7.
watchurai Offline
#31 Posted: Mon, Jul 27 2015, 6:40 PM EST
Joined: 09-17-2008
Posts: 9,289
banderl wrote:
Great, but what does this have to do with bestiality?


That depends. Did Hil send any sex picks anywhere?
banderl Offline
#32 Posted: Mon, Jul 27 2015, 7:41 PM EST
Joined: 09-09-2008
Posts: 10,153
Does the animal have to be gay for gay/homo human sex?
This whole gay/homo bestiality thing is very confusing.
teedubbya Offline
#33 Posted: Mon, Jul 27 2015, 8:10 PM EST
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Maybe now that the Supreme Court mandated that men must marry men and women must marry women doing a young animal will be a good change of pace? That's what Tom delay said anyway.
banderl Offline
#34 Posted: Mon, Jul 27 2015, 8:14 PM EST
Joined: 09-09-2008
Posts: 10,153
Did he release that memo yet?
Abrignac Offline
#35 Posted: Mon, Jul 27 2015, 8:14 PM EST
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,278
banderl wrote:
Does the animal have to be gay for gay/homo human sex?
This whole gay/homo bestiality thing is very confusing.


Not sure about that, but to avoid being racist wear one white boot and one black boot.
banderl Offline
#36 Posted: Mon, Jul 27 2015, 8:17 PM EST
Joined: 09-09-2008
Posts: 10,153
Abrignac wrote:
Not sure about that, but to avoid being racist wear one white boot and one black boot.



Boots?
Why would I wear boots?
Brewha Offline
#37 Posted: Mon, Jul 27 2015, 8:28 PM EST
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,182
banderl wrote:
Boots?
Why would I wear boots?

Uh, for kicks?
Gene363 Offline
#38 Posted: Mon, Jul 27 2015, 9:48 PM EST
Joined: 01-24-2003
Posts: 30,822
banderl wrote:
Does the animal have to be gay for gay/homo human sex?
This whole gay/homo bestiality thing is very confusing.


As slaves, their sexuality is not a concern, just the pervert's sexual predilection.
teedubbya Offline
#39 Posted: Mon, Jul 27 2015, 10:24 PM EST
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Must be a southern thing.
Gene363 Offline
#40 Posted: Mon, Jul 27 2015, 11:14 PM EST
Joined: 01-24-2003
Posts: 30,822
teedubbya wrote:
Must be a southern thing.



Yes, they have ranches that cater to northerners and guests from the middle east.
tonygraz Offline
#41 Posted: Mon, Jul 27 2015, 11:24 PM EST
Joined: 08-11-2008
Posts: 20,266
Sounds like they approve of the ideas.
Gene363 Offline
#42 Posted: Mon, Jul 27 2015, 11:48 PM EST
Joined: 01-24-2003
Posts: 30,822
tonygraz wrote:
Sounds like they approve of the ideas.


So you wouldn't bake a cake for a gay wedding?
DrafterX Offline
#43 Posted: Tue, Jul 28 2015, 7:05 AM EST
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,555
Bloody should be all over this...... Mellow
Brewha Offline
#44 Posted: Tue, Jul 28 2015, 7:24 AM EST
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,182
Gene363 wrote:
So you wouldn't bake a cake for a gay wedding?

Not if they have gluten issues….
DrafterX Offline
#45 Posted: Tue, Jul 28 2015, 8:02 AM EST
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,555
do chikens have glutens..?? Huh
tonygraz Offline
#46 Posted: Tue, Jul 28 2015, 8:28 AM EST
Joined: 08-11-2008
Posts: 20,266
Gene363 wrote:
So you wouldn't bake a cake for a gay wedding?


I haven't baked a cake in ages, but if I was in the business for profit I would bake a cake for anyone who ordered one. To not do so would be stupid.
TMCTLT Offline
#47 Posted: Tue, Jul 28 2015, 8:31 AM EST
Joined: 11-22-2007
Posts: 19,733
tonygraz wrote:
I haven't baked a cake in ages, but if I was in the business for profit I would bake a cake for anyone who ordered one. To not do so would be stupid.



Unless you happened to have moral and or religious groundings that prevented you from doing so. An Atheist has no issues with those sort of things....for some, money is NOT everything.
Brewha Offline
#48 Posted: Tue, Jul 28 2015, 8:39 AM EST
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,182
DrafterX wrote:
do chikens have glutens..?? Huh

Sure. But note everyone with gluten issues is chicken….
Gene363 Offline
#49 Posted: Tue, Jul 28 2015, 9:43 AM EST
Joined: 01-24-2003
Posts: 30,822
tonygraz wrote:
I haven't baked a cake in ages, but if I was in the business for profit I would bake a cake for anyone who ordered one. To not do so would be stupid.


Ergo the guest ranches; nothing to do with the approval of anything except making a profit.
Brewha Offline
#50 Posted: Tue, Jul 28 2015, 10:25 AM EST
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,182
Circle get the square.

Tony pick a celebrity....
Users browsing this topic
Guest
2 Pages12>
Back to Top