America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 8 years ago by ZRX1200. 91 replies replies.
2 Pages12>
Would you hire her..??
Jump to Bottom | Previous Topic | Next Topic
DrafterX Offline
#1 Posted: Fri, Nov 13 2015, 12:37 PM EST
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,559
http://video.foxbusiness.com/v/4609384375001/students-want-top-earners-to-pay-their-tuition/?intcmp=hphz27#sp=show-clips

d'oh!
tonygraz Offline
#2 Posted: Fri, Nov 13 2015, 2:27 PM EST
Joined: 08-11-2008
Posts: 20,280
Can't say yes or no without doing an interview myself.
DrafterX Offline
#3 Posted: Fri, Nov 13 2015, 2:33 PM EST
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,559
tonygraz wrote:
Can't say yes or no without seeing her boobs.




OhMyGod

Shame on you
tailgater Offline
#4 Posted: Fri, Nov 13 2015, 3:03 PM EST
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
tonygraz wrote:
Can't say yes or no without doing an interview myself.


You should just leave these forums.

We deal exclusively in hypotheticals and innuendo.

Now, if you simply put the word "interview" in quotations, and follow up with an obscene smiley face, then we can accept your post verbatim.
Watch:

Can't say yes or no without doing an "interview" myself.
Wink

See?
DrafterX Offline
#5 Posted: Fri, Nov 13 2015, 3:13 PM EST
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,559
ThumpUp
victor809 Offline
#6 Posted: Fri, Nov 13 2015, 3:17 PM EST
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Ok... that was really funny. He was toying with her the entire time.

That girl does not have a strong grasp of math, Northeastern University should be ashamed of themselves.
DrafterX Offline
#7 Posted: Fri, Nov 13 2015, 3:19 PM EST
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,559
I'm sure she walked out of there thinking he was an idiot... Mellow
tailgater Offline
#8 Posted: Fri, Nov 13 2015, 3:36 PM EST
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
victor809 wrote:
Ok... that was really funny. He was toying with her the entire time.

That girl does not have a strong grasp of math, Northeastern University should be ashamed of themselves.


It would be funny if the voting booth were verboten to people like her. Instead, this is what we're dealing with in the very near future.
The flower children of the late 60's didn't want to work, but neither did they demand to get paid and to take down the "hoarders" who actually earn money.
This is dangerous.
deadeyedick Offline
#9 Posted: Fri, Nov 13 2015, 7:18 PM EST
Joined: 03-13-2003
Posts: 17,117
She ain't getting $15 an hour to pay off her student loans because she can't make change at Mcdonald's.

DED
victor809 Offline
#10 Posted: Fri, Nov 13 2015, 8:07 PM EST
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Careful what you wish for tail.
Both sides are convinced they have a lock on the "smart" people. Some test to keep people from voting could just as easily land you in a world of 90% liberal voters.

... How many Joe sixpack remember their high school algebra?
tonygraz Offline
#11 Posted: Fri, Nov 13 2015, 9:38 PM EST
Joined: 08-11-2008
Posts: 20,280
tailgater wrote:
It would be funny if the voting booth were verboten to people like her. Instead, this is what we're dealing with in the very near future.
The flower children of the late 60's didn't want to work, but neither did they demand to get paid and to take down the "hoarders" who actually earn money.
This is dangerous.



Of course you could always draft them and send them off to Vietnam or some other country to suppress the vote.
99cobra2881 Offline
#12 Posted: Sat, Nov 14 2015, 7:40 AM EST
Joined: 11-19-2013
Posts: 2,472
You still get to vote in the military.

Getting drafted might do these people some good, build character, a love of country and a strong self reliance instead of the misguided victim status they think they have been limited to by the oppressive society here in the U.S.
Burner02 Offline
#13 Posted: Sat, Nov 14 2015, 8:03 AM EST
Joined: 12-21-2010
Posts: 12,884
Give her a free zone, that should do it!
mikey1597 Offline
#14 Posted: Sat, Nov 14 2015, 9:17 AM EST
Joined: 05-18-2007
Posts: 14,162
I'd bet she has a hairy cooter.
tonygraz Offline
#15 Posted: Sat, Nov 14 2015, 9:46 AM EST
Joined: 08-11-2008
Posts: 20,280
99cobra2881 wrote:
You still get to vote in the military....


Only if you survive.
99cobra2881 Offline
#16 Posted: Sat, Nov 14 2015, 10:29 AM EST
Joined: 11-19-2013
Posts: 2,472
tonygraz wrote:
Only if you survive.


It's a shame but I can tell you never had the honor of raising your right hand and swearing an oath to defend this country.

Must suck to have such a negative view of the country that you live in.
tailgater Offline
#17 Posted: Sat, Nov 14 2015, 10:56 AM EST
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
tonygraz wrote:
Of course you could always draft them and send them off to Vietnam or some other country to suppress the vote.


Yes.
Because we are at war with Vietnam.
And we don't let those in the military vote.

Otherwise, this is a very well thought out post.
tailgater Offline
#18 Posted: Sat, Nov 14 2015, 11:03 AM EST
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
victor809 wrote:
Careful what you wish for tail.
Both sides are convinced they have a lock on the "smart" people. Some test to keep people from voting could just as easily land you in a world of 90% liberal voters.

... How many Joe sixpack remember their high school algebra?


A risk I'm willing to take.

My vote doesn't count in statewide elections because of the Boston public unions.
My town actually votes R more than D.
But public unions are a self perpetuating petrie dish of brainwashed democrat votes.
A litmus test would likely purge out the lifers and shake some sense into the process.
CruzJ Offline
#19 Posted: Sat, Nov 14 2015, 11:35 AM EST
Joined: 04-17-2014
Posts: 222
tonygraz wrote:
Only if you survive.


Not every person that joins the military goes into a combat role. Of the 1% that join the military only about 1 in 10 are actually in a combat arms spot. Everybody else is support. There's your Fun Fact for the day.
tonygraz Offline
#20 Posted: Sat, Nov 14 2015, 11:59 AM EST
Joined: 08-11-2008
Posts: 20,280
[quote=99cobra2881]It's a shame but I can tell you never had the honor of raising your right hand and swearing an oath to defend this country.
/quote]


Obviously you can't"
tonygraz Offline
#21 Posted: Sat, Nov 14 2015, 12:03 PM EST
Joined: 08-11-2008
Posts: 20,280
tailgater wrote:
Yes.
Because we are at war with Vietnam.
And we don't let those in the military vote.

Otherwise, this is a very well thought out post.


We were at war with North Vietnam and many were drafted and sent over there. Despite republican stories the dead didn't get to vote.
ZRX1200 Offline
#22 Posted: Sat, Nov 14 2015, 12:24 PM EST
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,627
LBJ was such a great guy.

Just like Trolly.
99cobra2881 Offline
#23 Posted: Sat, Nov 14 2015, 1:41 PM EST
Joined: 11-19-2013
Posts: 2,472
tonygraz wrote:
[quote=99cobra2881]It's a shame but I can tell you never had the honor of raising your right hand and swearing an oath to defend this country.
/quote]


Obviously you can't"



Ok then what branch of the armed services were you in?
tonygraz Offline
#24 Posted: Sat, Nov 14 2015, 1:46 PM EST
Joined: 08-11-2008
Posts: 20,280
ZRX1200 wrote:
LBJ was such a great guy.

Just like Trolly.


More poop from the pooper.
tonygraz Offline
#25 Posted: Sat, Nov 14 2015, 1:54 PM EST
Joined: 08-11-2008
Posts: 20,280
99cobra2881 wrote:
Ok then what branch of the armed services were you in?


Are you writing a book ?
tailgater Offline
#26 Posted: Sat, Nov 14 2015, 2:04 PM EST
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
tonygraz wrote:
We were at war with North Vietnam and many were drafted and sent over there. Despite republican stories the dead didn't get to vote.


You're spinning out of control.
Time to slow down and enjoy a good smoke.
tonygraz Offline
#27 Posted: Sat, Nov 14 2015, 5:04 PM EST
Joined: 08-11-2008
Posts: 20,280
Tried a yard gar. Too damn cold and windy outside.
TMCTLT Offline
#28 Posted: Sun, Nov 15 2015, 8:10 AM EST
Joined: 11-22-2007
Posts: 19,733
tailgater wrote:
You're spinning out of control.
Time to slow down and enjoy a good smoke.


Maybe we should send him a couple...




tonygraz wrote:
Tried a yard gar. Too damn cold and windy outside.



From what I've seen....that's all you smoke. Could esplain alot Think
Thunder.Gerbil Offline
#29 Posted: Sun, Nov 15 2015, 9:40 AM EST
Joined: 11-02-2006
Posts: 121,359
mikey1597 wrote:
I'd bet she has a hairy cooter.



You forgot to log in as Pedro before posting that.
tonygraz Offline
#30 Posted: Sun, Nov 15 2015, 10:15 AM EST
Joined: 08-11-2008
Posts: 20,280
TMCTLT wrote:

From what I've seen....that's all you smoke. Could esplain alot Think


I don't think you are bright enough to envision all the possibilities and I certainly doubt you could select the correct reason even if all possible reasons were presented to you.
ZRX1200 Offline
#31 Posted: Sun, Nov 15 2015, 11:55 AM EST
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,627
More college genius.
http://www.thepcgraveyard.com/2015/11/13/protesters-at-college-demand-conservatives-be-sent-to-reeducation-camps/
TMCTLT Offline
#32 Posted: Sun, Nov 15 2015, 12:31 PM EST
Joined: 11-22-2007
Posts: 19,733
tonygraz wrote:
I don't think you are bright enough to envision all the possibilities and I certainly doubt you could select the correct reason even if all possible reasons were presented to you.




There you go again.....trying to think. d'oh! I'm curious, did you REALLY watch this interview?? And you would hire this little socialist?



Burner02 wrote:
Give her a free zone, that should do it!



THIS.....and for her it would be double down good!!! Free edumication and a " free space " in which to trash talk and lie with impunity!!!!
mikey1597 Offline
#33 Posted: Sun, Nov 15 2015, 4:01 PM EST
Joined: 05-18-2007
Posts: 14,162
Thunder.Gerbil wrote:
You forgot to log in as Pedro before posting that.



i'm not pedro
DrafterX Offline
#34 Posted: Sun, Nov 15 2015, 4:42 PM EST
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,559
I'm Pedro... Mellow
tonygraz Offline
#35 Posted: Sun, Nov 15 2015, 4:43 PM EST
Joined: 08-11-2008
Posts: 20,280
TMCTLT wrote:
There you go again.....trying to think. d'oh! I'm curious, did you REALLY watch this interview?? And you would hire this little socialist?

THIS.....and for her it would be double down good!!! Free edumication and a " free space " in which to trash talk and lie with impunity!!!!



It is apparent that you hate education. Gives credence to the saying - Ignorance is bliss.
TMCTLT Offline
#36 Posted: Mon, Nov 16 2015, 7:16 AM EST
Joined: 11-22-2007
Posts: 19,733
tonygraz wrote:
It is apparent that you hate education. Gives credence to the saying - Ignorance is bliss.



Tony. I will guarantee you @ the end of her edumication....she'll be a hater and socialist just like you are now, and won't know ANY more about REALITY and facts than she does now...kinda like you. Perhaps if they stopped all the PC crap and social re wiring.....they'd actually learn something of VALUE!!!
tamapatom Offline
#37 Posted: Mon, Nov 16 2015, 7:36 AM EST
Joined: 03-19-2015
Posts: 7,381
Interviewer was kind and really let her make her case without being judgmental..........I hate the brow beating "never let a word in edgewise" talk show style interview - this was not one of those. She still failed miserably to sell her case. Worse part, for a plan so incredibly expensive, it sounded like she really never previously studied how it would be paid for.
TMCTLT Offline
#38 Posted: Mon, Nov 16 2015, 8:39 AM EST
Joined: 11-22-2007
Posts: 19,733
tamapatom wrote:
Interviewer was kind and really let her make her case without being judgmental..........I hate the brow beating "never let a word in edgewise" talk show style interview - this was not one of those. She still failed miserably to sell her case. Worse part, for a plan so incredibly expensive, it sounded like she really never previously studied how it would be paid for.





Hmmm, sounds interestingly just like Obamacare and countless other " social welfare " programs dreamed up by the Democrats. Think
tonygraz Offline
#39 Posted: Mon, Nov 16 2015, 9:37 AM EST
Joined: 08-11-2008
Posts: 20,280
TMCTLT wrote:
Tony. I will guarantee you @ the end of her edumication....she'll be a hater and socialist just like you are now, and won't know ANY more about REALITY and facts than she does now...kinda like you. Perhaps if they stopped all the PC crap and social re wiring.....they'd actually learn something of VALUE!!!


You hate women too. I suppose you think she should be learning how to use a hammer.
TMCTLT Offline
#40 Posted: Mon, Nov 16 2015, 9:45 AM EST
Joined: 11-22-2007
Posts: 19,733
tonygraz wrote:
You hate women too. I suppose you think she should be learning how to use a hammer.




Might be a better use of her pumpkin head!!! ( mebbe she could show YOU how to use one and then you'd both be more useful.

Yes Tony....I hate women ( just ask my wife of 35 years ) and anyone else for that matter

My Gawd your an ignorant SLUG d'oh!
99cobra2881 Offline
#41 Posted: Mon, Nov 16 2015, 10:07 AM EST
Joined: 11-19-2013
Posts: 2,472
tamapatom wrote:
Interviewer was kind and really let her make her case without being judgmental..........I hate the brow beating "never let a word in edgewise" talk show style interview - this was not one of those. She still failed miserably to sell her case. Worse part, for a plan so incredibly expensive, it sounded like she really never previously studied how it would be paid for.


Yes she did, keely stated tax the 1% at a near 100% tax rate to pay for it all. She in her dimwitted mind with such a limited view of how things really work thought she had it all figured out. Sad that so many think this way.

I use the lottery analogy, if said person proposing such high tax rates just won $100k would they be ok with the government taking $99k and leaving them with just $1k of their lottery winnings? Anyone that says they are ok with that like I suppose keely would be, is a liar.
tonygraz Offline
#42 Posted: Mon, Nov 16 2015, 10:27 AM EST
Joined: 08-11-2008
Posts: 20,280
TMCTLT wrote:
Might be a better use of her pumpkin head!!! ( mebbe she could show YOU how to use one and then you'd both be more useful.

Yes Tony....I hate women ( just ask my wife of 35 years ) and anyone else for that matter

My Gawd your an ignorant SLUG d'oh!


Calling names indicates there is no intelligent conversation to be had.
ZRX1200 Offline
#43 Posted: Mon, Nov 16 2015, 10:34 AM EST
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,627
You're some kind of pathetic.
tonygraz Offline
#44 Posted: Mon, Nov 16 2015, 1:54 PM EST
Joined: 08-11-2008
Posts: 20,280
You too !
TMCTLT Offline
#45 Posted: Mon, Nov 16 2015, 2:02 PM EST
Joined: 11-22-2007
Posts: 19,733
tonygraz wrote:
Calling names indicates there is no intelligent conversation to be had.



Not talking .....LOL
victor809 Offline
#46 Posted: Mon, Nov 16 2015, 7:49 PM EST
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
99cobra2881 wrote:
Yes she did, keely stated tax the 1% at a near 100% tax rate to pay for it all. She in her dimwitted mind with such a limited view of how things really work thought she had it all figured out. Sad that so many think this way.

I use the lottery analogy, if said person proposing such high tax rates just won $100k would they be ok with the government taking $99k and leaving them with just $1k of their lottery winnings? Anyone that says they are ok with that like I suppose keely would be, is a liar.


To be fair, that wasn't her idea... that was the interviewer's suggestion. She didn't have a concrete idea as to what level she wanted to tax anyone... She kept complaining about the 1% so the interviewer focused on that and started doing a little math for her to help her work out what tax level you would need to get the necessary money from them. She wasn't smart enough to understand that the tax rates he was talking about were very large percentages.

Rudimentary math skills. I blame our national education system.
banderl Offline
#47 Posted: Mon, Nov 16 2015, 8:23 PM EST
Joined: 09-09-2008
Posts: 10,153
victor809 wrote:
To be fair, that wasn't her idea... that was the interviewer's suggestion. She didn't have a concrete idea as to what level she wanted to tax anyone... She kept complaining about the 1% so the interviewer focused on that and started doing a little math for her to help her work out what tax level you would need to get the necessary money from them. She wasn't smart enough to understand that the tax rates he was talking about were very large percentages.

Rudimentary math skills. I blame our national education system.



I blame our Universities of higher learning.

Knowledge is good!
victor809 Offline
#48 Posted: Mon, Nov 16 2015, 8:33 PM EST
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
banderl wrote:
I blame our Universities of higher learning.

Knowledge is good!




... if we're expecting universities to teach students that 10% is a small amount of 100%.... and that 100% is the total...

well then we've really let our elementary school system slide.
banderl Offline
#49 Posted: Mon, Nov 16 2015, 8:40 PM EST
Joined: 09-09-2008
Posts: 10,153
victor809 wrote:
... if we're expecting universities to teach students that 10% is a small amount of 100%.... and that 100% is the total...

well then we've really let our elementary school system slide.



I'm expecting our Universities of higher learning to do that.
I really need to trademark that phrase.
victor809 Offline
#50 Posted: Mon, Nov 16 2015, 8:52 PM EST
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
banderl wrote:
I'm expecting our Universities of higher learning to do that.
I really need to trademark that phrase.


After you steal TCMetcs trademark are you gonna make millions on tshirts?
Users browsing this topic
Guest
2 Pages12>
Back to Top