America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 8 years ago by DrMaddVibe. 88 replies replies.
2 Pages12>
Cruz = Wall Street's Little Bitch.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#1 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,554
Who Is The Real Ted Cruz?

Vladimir Lenin said, “There are no morals in politics; there is only expedience. A scoundrel may be of use to us just because he is a scoundrel.”

I can’t think of a better description of Ted Cruz’s relationship with the DC-Wall Street Establishment – Cruz being the scoundrel of course. Cruz’s claim of not being a tool of the political elite is like Bill Clinton telling the world, “I did not have sexual relations with that woman.”

Webster’s definition of a scoundrel is a dishonest or unscrupulous person, and Cruz has become quite adroit at saying one thing while his history shows him doing the other. Rather than the outsider he claims to be, Ted Cruz is the ultimate insider, former top Bush 41 policy aide and globalist, Ivy Leaguer, and establishment insider.

Not many conservatives coming out of Princeton and Harvard. “I’m just sayin,'” Ted, as said in the debate.

There is no better example of this than Calgary Ted’s actions surrounding the big Wall Street banks and their secret funding of his political ascension. Cruz has been gorging at the table of the ultimate insider of all insiders – Goldman Sachs and Citibank .

You may recall in a recent Fox Business Network debate that Cruz, in Mr. Haney from Green Acres voice, declared to one of the moderators, “The opening question [moderator Jerry Seib] asked — would you bailout the big banks again — nobody gave you an answer to that. I will give you an answer — absolutely not.”

What else would you expect a scoundrel to say who had secretly secured big sweetheart loans from Goldman and Citibank — by leveraging his retirement accounts –– to fund his 2012 U.S. Senate campaign. Loans which the Calgary Ted conveniently forgot to disclose to the Federal Election Commission. These are the very retirement accounts that he said he and his wife said he cashed in to fund his senate race. In other words, Ted lied.

At the same time Ted’s bulging 2016 campaign accounts and supporting Super-PACs are stuffed with big oil and gas money. He knows how to play the game.


And perhaps the ultimate hypocrisy of the native born Canadian is that his spouse, Heidi, by all accounts a lovely wife and mother, has been employed by Goldman Sachs since 2005. She is on leave as managing director and regional head of private wealth management. Heidi is a proud member of the lefty Council on Foreign Relations, advocates of one world government and the New World Order.

Heidi is not a bit player in the Cruz campaign with those credentials but rather an integral part of the campaign’s fundraising efforts. As reported by CNN last year, “She works the phones the way she worked them when she was at Goldman,” said Chad Sweet, the Cruz campaign’s chairman, who recruited Heidi to work at the giant investment bank.”

Yet we are to believe that the big Wall Street banks have no leverage over Ted Cruz? Why didn’t Heidi Cruz resign from Goldman Sachs instead of taking a leave of absence? That’s like saying Bill Ayers and Saul Alinsky have had no influence on Barack Obama.

The other inside connection that hits one like a baseball bat is the Bush connection.

Ted was George W.’s brain when he ran for President. A top policy adviser. Ted maneuvered for Solicitor General in Bush World but settled for a plum at the Federal Trade Commission. Ted’s a Bushman with deep ties to the political and financial establishment.

Ted and Heidi brag about being the first “Bush marriage” – they met as Bush staffers which ultimately led to marriage. Cruz was an adviser on legal affairs while Heidi was an adviser on economic policy and eventually director for the Western Hemisphere on the National Security Council under Condoleezza Rice. Condi helped give us the phony war in Iraq.

Also conveniently missing from Heidi’s Wikipedia bio is her service as Deputy U.S. Trade Representative to USTR head Robert Zoellick. At USTR Heidi worked on U.S.-China trade policy- the one Donald Trump talks about so much.

And Chad Sweet, Ted Cruz’s campaign chairman, is a former CIA officer. Michael Chertoff, George W. Bush’s former Secretary of Homeland Security, hired Sweet from Goldman Sachs to restructure and optimize the flow of information between the CIA, FBI and other members of the national security community and DHS. Chertoff and Sweet co-founded the Chertoff Group upon leaving the administration.

A known tactic of the intelligence community is the use of strategic communications as a “soft power” weapon against it adversaries — the creation of false narratives by the effective use of all media — social, digital, newspaper, print, etc. Combined with denial and deception, it can be a potent force. Glenn Beck and Mark Levin are abetting this.

Despite his ability to lie with a straight face (sadly Nixonian) on his support for amnesty and TPP, he got nailed by Senator Marco Rubio on the debate. Acting like a prick in the U.S. Senate was the core of Ted’s disciplined effort to bury his old school ties and reinvent himself as a modern-day Jesse Helms and supposed Conservative outsider. It’s a ruse.

As we get closer to the Iowa Caucus and New Hampshire Primary, Cruz and his establishment puppet masters are engaged in an aggressive strategy against Trump. The false narrative of course being that Cruz is the outsider while Trump is the insider. Nothing could be farther from the truth.

In its most simplistic terms – the power elite have no leverage over Trump – nothing.

Cruz, on the other hand, is the establishments quisling, spawned by the Bushes and controlled by Wall Street, who became a strident “outsider” only four years ago.

The U.S. Constitution does not defined “native born” citizen, nor have the courts. That Ted was eligible to run for office as a citizen only 15 months ago is weird. Trump’s right the Democrats would have a field day with Calgary Ted, the Manchurian, Canadian Candidate.

Don’t get me wrong. Ted Cruz is a smart, canny, talented guy who has run a great “long race” campaign. He aspires to be Reagan but trust me he’s Nixon. Right down the incredible discipline and smarts playing the political game. Ted Cruz is not who he appears to be. As the bible says, “Beware of false prophets, who come to you in the clothing of sheep, but inwardly they are ravening wolves.” In this case we must beware a Canadian bearing gifts.


Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2016/01/26/who-is-the-real-ted-cruz/#ixzz42Dl99XMk




Choke it down with a side of Trump.
teddyballgame Offline
#2 Posted:
Joined: 09-16-2015
Posts: 592
..this article written by Roger Stone (the Daily Caller mens fashion editor) who self proclaimed "I am the ultimate Trump Loyalist."


On Saturday, Trump’s campaign issued a statement saying it had fired Stone because “Roger wanted to use the campaign for his own personal publicity.”

Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/422353/donald-trump-roger-stone-interview


So the little bitch is the guy writing this article.

getting CPAC funds from big businesses doesn't make you a sell out.
What, can only self funded billionaires run for office now?
How does a guy not worth multi millions run for office?
ZRX1200 Offline
#3 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,661
I have issues with his wife's connections...

But the amnesty, TPP and establishment thing is asinine.
jackconrad Offline
#4 Posted:
Joined: 06-09-2003
Posts: 67,461
He is scum..
DrMaddVibe Offline
#5 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,554
teddyballgame wrote:
..this article written by Roger Stone (the Daily Caller mens fashion editor) who self proclaimed "I am the ultimate Trump Loyalist."


On Saturday, Trump’s campaign issued a statement saying it had fired Stone because “Roger wanted to use the campaign for his own personal publicity.”

Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/422353/donald-trump-roger-stone-interview


So the little bitch is the guy writing this article.

getting CPAC funds from big businesses doesn't make you a sell out.
What, can only self funded billionaires run for office now?
How does a guy not worth multi millions run for office?



Only a bottom feeding dreck would read the above article and somehow what not do any research on Cruz?

Teddyballgag, you are a critical thinking zero. I bet your handlers buy you brown or black underwear.

Dig a little on your god.

He's a shill.
teddyballgame Offline
#6 Posted:
Joined: 09-16-2015
Posts: 592
You keep worshiping Bernie brother.

I don't worship false idols.

The one true God is the only one for me baby.


DrMaddVibe Offline
#7 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,554
teddyballgame wrote:
You keep worshiping Bernie brother.

I don't worship false idols.

The one true God is the only one for me baby.




Pray for brain power. You don't have ANY.

The OP is SPOT on in regards to the slime that IS Ted Cruz.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#8 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,554
http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2016/02/23/ted-cruz-attacks-donald-trump-on-federal-land-ownership/


Somebody should nail him to the cross in that pic of this article and get it over with.

Can someone please explain the dumbass senator why the feds do land management or do we really have to hold a basic civics class?
teddyballgame Offline
#9 Posted:
Joined: 09-16-2015
Posts: 592
What, the states can't control their own land? So much for that whole federalism thing.
Why is the Fed Government in the business of massive land ownership in the west anyway?

Why do you think Federal Government needs so much power? Why is the Bureau of Land Management armed to the teeth?
Is the EPA and their bungling of toxic wastes in old gold mines in Colorado working with the BLM, or are they just being inept on their lonesome and trying to cover it up?- (Also arming up is this agency.)


At the end of the article you site is this sentence:

"Though it ended in one death and with several protesters in facing federal felony charges, some said it drew attention to their frustrations with the U.S. government’s dominance over public lands in the West, a cause little understood in much of the country."

So MUCH of the country doesn't understand this because the Feds own a HUGE percentage of land in 12western states- anywhere from 30% to 85%- not so much elsewhere.

The fed only owns 0.3% of NY and CT, 1% of Ill.,3% of MD. How do those states manage to keep up their forests and parks and whatnot?

Seems sort of antithetical to that whole liberty thing.

But please enlighten us with your basic civics class on why the federal government must own all this land, that we peasants in the west would not know what to do with.

(picking my teeth as I will try and grasp your sure to be, condescending lesson.)
tonygraz Offline
#10 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2008
Posts: 20,314
So you like the welfare by demand militants too. T-ball, you are as sick as Cruz, just not quite as devious.



69
teddyballgame Offline
#11 Posted:
Joined: 09-16-2015
Posts: 592
tony, you don't even add to the discussion. Where did I say anything about welfare?

Put down your hash pipe before you start your ''smoke and type'' routine.




5027
tonygraz Offline
#12 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2008
Posts: 20,314
Moron, you even underlined part of the sentence I was referring to. Apparently a lot Cruzes right over your head.
teddyballgame Offline
#13 Posted:
Joined: 09-16-2015
Posts: 592
hmmm none of my posts have underlined areas

It may be your wording in your post that is confusing me:

"So you like the welfare by demand militants too."

Is that proper english?
Brewha Offline
#14 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,201
Not to change the pace of the thread, but does anyone else think Ted Cruz looks like Eddie Munster?
teddyballgame Offline
#15 Posted:
Joined: 09-16-2015
Posts: 592
I can see that.

Judge Napolitano is Eddie Munster, however
tonygraz Offline
#16 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2008
Posts: 20,314
I meant to say High lighted.
DrafterX Offline
#17 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,582
I heard he's playing with shenanigans with Marco's campaign and stuff.... Mellow
teddyballgame Offline
#18 Posted:
Joined: 09-16-2015
Posts: 592
tonygraz wrote:
I meant to say High lighted.



I still don't understand your heckle about me stating that much of the country doesn't understand the frustration in the West with government owning so much of the land.
tonygraz Offline
#19 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2008
Posts: 20,314
They want free land and free grazing, hence welfare militants. Pub's want the land for profit too.
teddyballgame Offline
#20 Posted:
Joined: 09-16-2015
Posts: 592
My point is about the fed government owning too much land and the fact that others can be better stewards of said land. Whether the states sell it to private individuals or manage it themselves.

If a rancher needs the land, let him buy it, or lease it from the state or individual that owns it. I am not for handouts to Wall Street firms that handle too much risk, or to ranchers if that is their angle. I know there is ranching in other states where the feds are not so intrusive, they must know a way it can be done.
Mr. Jones Offline
#21 Posted:
Joined: 06-12-2005
Posts: 19,464
T.C....

he da'

BOOGIE MANS' FO' SHO'
DrMaddVibe Offline
#22 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,554
teddyballgame wrote:
My point is about the fed government owning too much land and the fact that others can be better stewards of said land. Whether the states sell it to private individuals or manage it themselves.

If a rancher needs the land, let him buy it, or lease it from the state or individual that owns it. I am not for handouts to Wall Street firms that handle too much risk, or to ranchers if that is their angle. I know there is ranching in other states where the feds are not so intrusive, they must know a way it can be done.



You fool...Canadian bacon wants to sell it off to special interest parties that he'd control. You already knew that though because it was spelled out in the OP.

STILL need that Civics lesson? That's a bit above your head I can see. You need: http://www.hmhco.com/products/assessment-solutions/
teddyballgame Offline
#23 Posted:
Joined: 09-16-2015
Posts: 592
Oh, the OP, by the fashion editor who is a Trump sycophant?

I knew I could count on you to be your condescending self.
Thank you sooo much for that.

I see you still haven't told the class in your basics civics lesson why the fed needs to own those huge percentages of land vs. the states and individuals owning it. Regale us with your genius.

Is there an example on say the east coast where the feds hardly own states' land that you can point to as an example of how great the fed ownership of the land would be?

Learn us good!
gummy jones Offline
#24 Posted:
Joined: 07-06-2015
Posts: 7,969
the funniest thing of all is to pretend that one of these guys has ties to big money while the others somehow dont

of all of them i think cruz has some of the least ties but to each his own
DrafterX Offline
#25 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,582
Think
So, we should put the poor peoples in charge of everything..?? Huh
gummy jones Offline
#26 Posted:
Joined: 07-06-2015
Posts: 7,969
i keep checking but, to this day, someone poorer than me has never handed me my paycheck

outrage!
teddyballgame Offline
#27 Posted:
Joined: 09-16-2015
Posts: 592
+1


LOGIC
Buckwheat Offline
#28 Posted:
Joined: 04-15-2004
Posts: 12,251
DrafterX wrote:
I heard he's playing with shenanigans with Marco's campaign and stuff.... Mellow


Did you just call Shenanigans? WTF?

Every candidate is a POS because they only care about getting elected and then staying in office. horse
teedubbya Offline
#29 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
My biggest complaint is when someone claims to be something they are not or claims not to have ties when they do. It's a pet peeve of mine and I view it as a fundamental characetr flaw.
DrafterX Offline
#30 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,582
I have like a dozen ties... but I hardly ever wear one... Mellow
tonygraz Offline
#31 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2008
Posts: 20,314
Good thing- you probably don't look good in bow ties.
teedubbya Offline
#32 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
I heard Cruz isn't really a politician and stuff... he swore to god he isn't
DrafterX Offline
#33 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,582
he was just kiddin.... Mellow
teedubbya Offline
#34 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
he sure kids a lot. I heard he kid about ben carson, then rubio getting out, the voting violation pamphlet was a kneeslapper. Cruz is like mr mushroom... he's a fun guy. I'm sure he's great at parties....
ZRX1200 Offline
#35 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,661
A Savings and Loan Bailout, and Bush's Son Jeb
By JEFF GERTH, Special to The New York Times
Published: October 14, 1990

After Jeb Bush, a son of the President, and a partner bought a Miami office building using money an associate had borrowed from a local savings and loan, the Federal Government wound up repaying most of the loan.

After Jeb Bush, a son of the President, and a partner bought a Miami office building using money an associate had borrowed from a local savings and loan, the Federal Government wound up repaying most of the loan.

The savings institution became insolvent, and the Government paid more than $4 million to make good the loan as part of the bailout of the savings industry. Mr. Bush and his partner negotiated a settlement with regulators in which they repaid $505,000 and retained control of the building. While they still have a $7 million mortgage to pay on that property, the settlement with the Government lifted from their backs a $4.565 million second mortgage.

There is no evidence that Mr. Bush or his partner improperly influenced the settlement process. Mr. Bush, in an interview, said he was a ''victim of circumstance'' and had no involvement in the settlement talks.

Mr. Bush invited a reporter to come to Miami to review the partnership's records. ''We have nothing to fear or hide about the transaction,'' he said.

Making Good on Bad Loans

While the complex loan arrangement does not involve allegations of criminal behavior, it stands as an illustration of the poor lending practices of savings institutions that led the industry into desperate straits. The deal also illustrates how the Government has had to absorb a large portion of the thousands of bad loans that were made by savings institutions that failed in 1988. The rescue of these institutions will cost $70 billion.

The Government's repayment of the loan used by Mr. Bush and his partner was part of the bailout program approved by Congress, in which the Government guaranteed buyers of ailing institutions that it would make good on bad loans that had been made by those institutions. Had the Government not made such guarantees, it would have had trouble finding buyers for the institutions and would have had to pay off the depositors.

The loan was made by Broward Federal Savings and Loan in Sunrise, Fla., which became insolvent in 1988 because of what regulators said were poor lending practices on commercial loans in the mid-1980's. The cost of cleaning up Broward Federal has been estimated at $285 million.

Arrangement Is Defended

Federal officials defended the Government's previously undisclosed agreement with Mr. Bush and his associates, saying it was the best settlement available because of the weakened commercial real estate market in Miami and because the loan was secured by a risky second mortgage. They said no preferential treatment had been accorded the President's 37-year-old son and his partner.

When the office building was reappraised to reflect the decline in commercial real estate in the Miami area, Federal regulators concluded that it made sense to let the owners keep the building because its value was less than its first mortgage.

Evaluating the settlement is difficult, because crucial papers, including property appraisals, are not public documents. And a lawsuit about the complex loan arrangement, which might have resolved or at least provided a public discussion of various critical issues, was settled out of court.

History of a Deal
Debt Plan Causes Misunderstanding

In a series of interviews in their Miami office, Mr. Bush and his partner, Armando Codina, said the lengthy legal and regulatory process had cost them money, including Federal income taxes they are paying on the forgiven debt.

The two men attributed their problems to the failure of an associate, J. Edward Houston, to join them as an investor, as they had hoped. Instead Mr. Houston's company, the owner of another savings and loan, agreed to lend Mr. Bush and Mr. Codina the $4.565 million and borrowed the money from Broward Federal.

''The intention was to be an equity investment; instead he took a second mortgage and then at the last moment he borrowed the money from another institution,'' Mr. Bush said.

Jeb Bush's dealings in Miami are not related to those of his brother Neil, who was a director of the Silverado Banking, Savings and Loan Association in Denver. Neil Bush, who is 35, defended himself last month in Denver on civil charges by the Government that he acted improperly in his role as a director of Silverado, which failed in 1988 after making questionable loans, including some to Neil Bush's business associates.

An Active Republican

Jeb Bush has been prominent in Florida Republican politics and is state chairman of the re-election campaign of Gov. Bob Martinez. But his involvement in the complicated loan arrangement has gone unnoticed.

Mr. Bush's name is mentioned in the three volumes of records of a 1987 lawsuit filed by Broward Federal against the recipients of the loan proceeds, including a partnership owned by Mr. Bush and Mr. Codina.

According to the lawsuit, the loan transaction goes back to 1983, when Mr. Codina, a developer, obtained an option to buy a building at 1390 Brickell Avenue, the center of Miami's downtown financial district. Mr. Codina later assigned the option to a partnership, 1390 Brickell, of which he owned 80 percent and Mr. Bush the rest.

Mr. Bush is involved in the real estate business with Mr. Codina through a series of partnerships and corporations, under the umbrella of the Codina Bush Group. The Brickell Avenue building is managed by one of Mr. Bush's real estate companies.

Link to Savings Institution

Also in 1983, the J. E. Houston Financial Group, a company headed by Mr. Houston, a former Fort Lauderdale banker, acquired a small savings and loan, South Florida Savings. Mr. Houston became the president of the institution, rapidly expanded it and eventually moved its headquarters to a floor of plush offices at the five-story building at 1390 Brickell Avenue.

Mr. Bush, Mr. Codina and Mr. Houston's company were originally going to acquire the building together, the Bush-Codina partnership argued in court. Mr. Codina said all the parties expected to build a much bigger building on the land.

But one lawyer involved in the transaction said the planned investment by the Houston group had never been approved by Federal regulators, who would have had to approve any real estate transactions involving an insured savings and loan and an affiliated entity, like the Houston company.

Acquiring an Option

Instead of making the cash investment, Mr. Houston's company lent the Bush-Codina partnership $4.565 million and obtained a second mortgage on the building and an option to acquire half the partnership. Mr. Houston took that second mortgage, but not the option, and assigned it to Broward Federal as collateral for its loan. By retaining the option, Mr. Houston's company had the right to be consulted before the building could be disposed of.

''We didn't intend to get involved with a savings and loan,'' Mr. Bush said.

Mr. Houston never exercised his option to buy half the partnership and has a different view of the transaction, seeing it as a deal that turned sour for all parties. In an interview, he said, ''It was not my understanding that I was to convert into equity.'' He added, ''Both sides were unsatisfied, which is a sign of an arm's-length deal.''

The Money Flow
$11.5 Million Debt On $9 Million Sale

The deal closed on Feb. 1, 1985, and the proceeds of the Broward Federal loan passed through Mr. Houston's company to the partnership, records show. That same day the 1390 Brickell partnership purchased the office building for $9 million, according to public records.

As part of the acquisition, the partnership secured a first mortgage of $7 million from an insurance company. That and the $4.565 million loan provided $11.565 million. In addition to the $9 million sale price, the money was used for improvements costing $1.7 million and the establishment of reserve accounts of $1.16 million, Mr. Codina said.

His Role in Partnership

IntrAmerica Investments, a company controlled by Mr. Codina, is the general partner of the 1390 Brickell partnership. Court records show that Mr. Bush signed various documents in 1985 and 1986 as president of IntrAmerica. Mr. Bush said he had been active in getting the building leased but had not been involved in the subsequent litigation or settlement negotiations.

Broward Federal began the litigation in 1987, two days after regulators placed South Florida Savings, Mr. Houston's institution, into receivership. Contending that its loan to Mr. Houston's corporation was in default, Broward Federal sued the corporation and Mr. Houston, who had personally guaranteed the loan, and the Bush-Codina partnership, whose note Mr. Houston had pledged to Broward as collateral for its loan.

Seeking to protect the collateral it held on the defaulted loan, Broward Federal asked the court to declare it the owner of the partnership's second mortgage note. That note had been pledged to Broward along with the income from the building and a reserve account as collateral for the Houston note.

Disputing Who Should Pay

For two years, claims and counterclaims flew over who should pay back the $4.565 million. The 1390 Brickell partnership argued that Mr. Houston or his company should pay. Mr. Houston argued that Broward Federal, having attached the partnership's note, should seek repayment from the partnership.

The lawsuit was twice set for trial, but the case was settled out of court under the auspices of Federal regulators, who were authorized to step in because of a Dec. 31, 1988, agreement under which Broward Federal's assets and liabilities were sold, under Government supervision, to California Federal Bank, a Los Angeles savings and loan.

The Negotiations
$7 Million Mortgage Derails One Accord

The agreement, like most of the other 1988 savings and loan deals, called for the Government to guarantee any loss experienced by the California institution in taking over Broward's affairs. In addition, the Government was obligated to pay the acquiring institution's costs in managing the loans and any litigation to resolve them.

In a settlement agreement dated March 10, 1989, California Federal and the 1390 Brickell partnership agreed that the partnership would relinquish ownership of the building and that Mr. Codina would turn over his option on a nearby property. It also required the Bush-Codina partnership to pay at least $745,000, mostly the balance in an interest reserve account set up as part of the loan.

This settlement was rejected by the Government because it ''didn't make sense economically'' since whoever owned the building was liable for the $7 million first mortgage, said Dan Griffin, an official of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation who supervised the negotiations.

Revising an Appraisal

Mr. Griffin said the office building had originally been appraised at $9.5 million but that appraisals in the first half of 1989 reduced the appraised value to no more than $6.5 million. Thus, the regulators concluded that it would be better to let the owners keep the property rather than have the Government take over a $6.5 million building that carried $7 million in mortgage debt.

The new apprasials were ordered because regulators felt the first appraisal was outdated given the changes in Miami's real estate market. The F.D.I.C. declined to release the appraisals or the names of the companies that did them.

Mr. Griffin of the F.D.I.C. said the settlement delays ''had nothing to do with Jeb Bush'' but were ''because of the size of the write-off and the disparity of the appraisals.'' 10 Cents on the Dollar Charles A. Fulton, a senior lawyer at the F.D.I.C. who was involved in the negotiations, said a search by lawyers had concluded there was little legal or financial leverage to recover anything beyond 10 cents on the dollar, in part because the search found that Mr. Houston had few recoverable assets.

Mr. Griffin said the recovery rate of 10 cents on the dollar was about average for second mortgages like the one made by Broward Federal.

After the settlement was rejected by Federal regulators in June, the Codina-Bush partnership tried to settle its debt, starting with an offer of about $325,000. That was rejected, Mr. Fulton and Mr. Griffin said.

The Settlement
Leftover Money Is Used for Payment

About the same time, the reserve account, then the focus of the negotiations and the ultimate source of most of what the Government recovered, was used by Mr. Bush and Mr. Codina to pay more than $200,000 in delinquent real estate taxes, Mr. Griffin and Mr. Codina said. That step was approved by California Federal Bank, but Federal regulators, who were supposed to oversee such transactions, did not learn about it until after it had taken place, Mr. Fulton said.

The final settlement of $505,000 paid by the Bush-Codina partnership consisted of the $437,000 remainining in the interest reserve accountand the balance in a small escrow account, $68,000, according to records and the F.D.I.C. officials.

The final agreement was put together in the summer and fall of 1989, drafted in December, and entered into the court file earlier this year. During this time, legal authority for approving the settlement shifted from the Federal Home Loan Bank Board to the F.D.I.C., as a result of President Bush's signing the savings and loan rescue legislation on Aug. 9, 1989.

The Issue of Taxpayers' Money

Both Mr. Bush and Mr. Codina expressed surprise that the settlement of the loan could be interpreted as the use of taxpayers' money to make good a loan whose proceeds went for their building. Asked if they were aware that the funds for the repayment of the Broward Federal loan came from the taxpayers, both men said no.

Mr. Bush and Mr. Codina said they had incurred additional costs as a result of the transaction, the largest being a $1.316 million tax liability this year when they declared the forgiven debt as income to the Internal Revenue Service.

Photo: The Government repaid more than $4 million of a loan that helped finance the purchase of a Miami office building by Jeb Bush, a son of President Bush, and his partner. (Associated Press)
ZRX1200 Offline
#36 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,661
http://www.cnn.com/2016/03/08/politics/neil-bush-ted-cruz-finance/
SmokeMonkey Offline
#37 Posted:
Joined: 04-05-2015
Posts: 5,688
So Ted hired a guy that helped bring down an S&L, settled a related civil suit out of court and has had a few other run ins with regulators? How... Interesting....
ZRX1200 Offline
#38 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,661
Yeah buddy.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#39 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,554

Productive Life vs. Government Life


After receiving an endorsement from Carly Fiorina (yes, warmongers do stick together) Ted Cruz made a comment today that deserves a bit of contemplation.

Amongst his gratitude to Fiorina, Cruz said:
"I don't have any steaks to sell. I don't have any wine. I don't have any cleaning products."
The comment was, of course, aimed at Donald Trump. Considering the context and the source of the comment, it's actually quite revealing.

You see, Ted Cruz, with the exception of a few years as a corporate lawyer, is a career politician. He's been climbing up the greasy parasitic ladder, and is almost at the very top. F.A. Hayek wrote about those who reach the top of the parasitic class. It's not a good thing, to say the least.

Donald Trump, on the other hand, has been a member of productive society for a majority of his life. It's a shame that he's decided to leave it in order to join the criminal class. Trump should stay in the peaceful and voluntary sphere of society and continue to satisfy the real wants of consumers. But, alas, violent political power is very tempting.

In the voluntary marketplace, Trump continually tried to find ways to satisfy the wants and desires of consumers. He had no power whatsoever to force anyone to buy anything. Consumers are king, and Trump's job was to figure out how to serve them best. If consumers want steaks, then Trump would find a profitable way to sell steaks. If they want hotel rooms, golf courses, bottled water, men's clothing, Trump would satisfy those desires.

Every single consumer has the ultimate power of choosing not to buy. Many people over many years chose to buy what Trump was selling, and it provides a testament as how well he served his fellow man.

Let's now look at the other side of the coin.

Government, where Ted Cruz has spent his life, is the opposite of peace and voluntary interactions. Government is force. You pay, or government throws you in a cage. There is no incentive for government to satisfy consumers. There are no profits or losses, so government has no idea how to rationally allocate resources. There is no struggle to find out the most urgent desires of consumers, or even to satisfy them. Taxpayers have to pay, and that's it.

With that kind of setup, it should be no surprise that government is a giant black hole that sucks the life out of society with every passing moment.

Ted Cruz poked at someone who has been productive. Ted doesn't create, doesn't innovate, and doesn't serve. That's not a badge of honor, but rather a black eye.

Again, it's a shame that Donald has chosen to leave productive life in order to join the dark side. And as we've noted several times here at The Ron Paul Liberty Report, a lot of what Trump claims he'll do as president is very dark and very authoritarian.

What a pity.


http://www.ronpaullibertyreport.com/archives/productive-life-vs-government-life



From a REAL Presidential candidate.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#40 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,554
Obama Mocks Cruz: 'Where Else Could a Boy Born in Calgary Run for President of the United States?'


At tonight's state dinner with Canada, President Obama took a swipe at Republican presidential candidate Ted Cruz, who was born in Canada.

Via the pool report:

Pool was escorted into the East Room at 8:32, where POTUS had already begun delivering his toast. POTUS spoke for about 7 minutes[.]

The toast was filed with jokes. Among them: "If things get out of hand, remember the prime minister used to work as a bouncer."

Referencing singer Justin Bieber, POTUS said Trudeau in America may well be "the most popular Canadian named Justin."

POTUS also talked about shared values of equality and opportunity, saying that's having an effect on the 2016 presidential election.

"Where else could a boy born in Calgary run for president of the United States?"

POTUS raised his glass to, among other things, the "great alliance" between U.S. and Canada.

Trudeau spoke for about 8 minutes.

The PM said U.S. and Canada are more than friends and like siblings, except Canada is more "stay-at-home" and U.S. is more "rebellious."

Trudeau thanked Obama for efforts on climate change, saying it's time to discard "the outdated notion" a healthy economy and environment "stand in opposition."

The PM also made a reference to Syrian refugee crisis and 25,000 refugees resettled in Canada.

Trudeau joked after seven years as prime minister he hopes his "grey hair comes in at a slower rate" than Obama's.

Trudeau finished his toast at 8:53 and pool was promptly escorted out of East Room.


http://www.weeklystandard.com/article/2001501



From a guy born where again??
DrMaddVibe Offline
#41 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,554
https://amp.twimg.com/v/d9788e7b-6a9f-473c-988e-181ee6988498

Tell me who you're with and I'll tell you what you are.
teedubbya Offline
#42 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Cruz reminds me of Sen. McCarthy. I really beleive some will look back at their support of him with shame.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#43 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,554
teedubbya wrote:
Cruz reminds me of Sen. McCarthy. I really beleive some will look back at their support of him with shame.


Not talking Not talking Not talking

I seriously doubt it.

They're the most self-righteous pious jerks on the planet.

Why don't you know that the almighty Lord has anointed Ted Cruz to be President?

How come the rest of the candidates don't know that?
teedubbya Offline
#44 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
I blame Canada.
gummy jones Offline
#45 Posted:
Joined: 07-06-2015
Posts: 7,969
Think
ZRX1200 Offline
#46 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,661
McCarthy was right.
Brewha Offline
#47 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,201
ZRX1200 wrote:
McCarthy was right.

Wait, what did Jenny say?
frankj1 Offline
#48 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,252
Jenny, or Charlie?
Brewha Offline
#49 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,201
frankj1 wrote:
Jenny, or Charlie?

All Charlie said was "Winning!"

But what did Jenny say?
teedubbya Offline
#50 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Zrx is channeling jpotts the abbreviated version.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
2 Pages12>