America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 8 years ago by Covfireman. 11 replies replies.
Failed ObamaCare co-ops have not repaid $1.2B in federal loans, docs say
Burner02 Offline
#1 Posted:
Joined: 12-21-2010
Posts: 12,884
Fox News.com - The dozen failed ObamaCare cooperatives have not repaid any of the $1.2 billion in federal loans they received and still owe more than $1 billion in additional liabilities, according to recent financial statements cited Thursday at a congressional hearing.

“We shouldn’t hold our breath on repayment,” Sen. Rob Portman, R-Ohio, chairman of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, said in his opening statement at the hearing.

“In some states, these losses will be absorbed by other insurance companies—which means, by the policyholders of other insurance companies who have to pay increased … premiums,” he said. “In other states, doctors, hospitals and individual patients stand to suffer large out-of-pocket losses due to the co-op failures—as our report details.”

Portman’s statement, first obtained by Fox News, refers to an investigation by the committee’s majority staff.

It claims the most recent balance sheets provided to the subcommittee show the failed cooperatives owe more than $700 million to doctors and hospitals for plan year 2015.

The failed cooperatives lost $376 million and exceeded the projected worst-case-scenario losses outlined in their loan applications by more than $260 million in 2014. They lost an additional billion dollars in 2015, according to the report.

“Once the co-ops got going in 2014, things went south in a hurry—both in terms of financial losses and enrollment figures that wildly deviated from the co-ops’ own projections,” Portman said. “Despite getting regular reports that the co-ops were hemorrhaging cash, HHS [the Department of Health and Human Services] took essentially no corrective action for over a year.”

Deloitte Consulting initially granted the cooperatives a passing grade based on an HHS-designed grading scale. However it added seven of the 12 had serious deficiencies in their enrollment strategy, according to the report. Others submitted budgets that were “incomplete, unreasonable, not cost-effective” and several “relied on unreasonable projections about their own growth.”

The report cited in Portman’s statement also claims that from 2014–2015, the administration lent an additional $848 million to the failed cooperatives, as they lost more than $1.4 billion.

In previous testimony, administration officials have told congressional panels that the administration scrutinized cooperative business plans and then placed them on corrective oversight when necessary.

“In 2015 we conducted 27 financial and operational reviews, 16 in-person visits, and had 43 formal communications,” Andy Slavitt, the acting administrator of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, told the Senate Finance Committee earlier this year. “Not to mention hundreds of phone calls. And we've kept the states up to speed on every important interaction to help inform their regulatory actions.”

When questioned how much money the government could salvage from the failed cooperatives, officials said they were only beginning to determine amounts.

“We are in the process of recouping that loan money right now,” said Dr. Mandy Cohen, the chief operating officer and chief of staff of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid, last month to a House panel. “We’ll look at their excess revenue and then use all the tools available to us through their loan agreements and state and federal law to pull back federal tax dollars.”

ObamaCare provided $2.4 billion in federal loans to establish 23 non-profit cooperatives. A dozen failed and the administration has required eight of the remaining eleven to adhere to a “corrective action plan” designed to fix business flaws and prevent additional failures. The closed cooperatives account for $1.2 billion in federal loans.

Defenders of the law and cooperatives say these non-profit insurers operated in difficult markets and that it often takes years of financial commitment to build a viable business.

The failed cooperatives left hundreds of thousands of customers searching for a new insurance company. In some states, the loss was significant.

“HHS gave the New York co-op $90 million to prolong its financial life, rather than allow it to scale down, that co-op went on to lose another $544 million in 2015,” according to Portman’s statement, citing his staff’s report.

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, the frontrunner in the Democratic presidential delegate count, pledged she would address the market void left by the failed cooperatives.

“We need to get more companies, more nonprofits, to fill this space. The ones that knew what they were doing have provided good services, but a lot of them have failed because they didn't have the right support,” she said Monday at a Democratic presidential forum hosted by Fox News.

“Even in those markets where those co-ops had previously operated, we have seen a commitment on the part of those who are administering the markets to try to facilitate greater competition,” said White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest. “And creating the co-ops was just one way to do that, but we certainly are going to be open to other ways to encourage other entities, private or public, to get engaged in this process.”

When previously questioned by Congress, administration officials declined to forecast how many of the remaining cooperatives would survive this year.

“The co-ops themselves are really the ones who are going to be the ones to determine whether or not they ultimately will be successful,” said Cohen. “They have a lot of work to do to rapidly mature their entities, their small businesses as you know and they’re still getting their foothold on this business.”


cacman Offline
#2 Posted:
Joined: 07-03-2010
Posts: 12,216
Explain why Obamacare is a good thing?
The fine is still less than the insurance, which is freakin outrageously expensive.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#3 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,554
Not next year....Whistle
cacman Offline
#4 Posted:
Joined: 07-03-2010
Posts: 12,216
But it will be appealed, or have completely collapsed by then…
DrMaddVibe Offline
#5 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,554
Just remember Pelosi and Co.

"Gotta pass the bill to find out what's in the bill" line.

They didn't even read it.

That alone should've been a tip to the Supreme Court to rip it apart. Instead they were in on the swindle and voted it to be a tax.


VIOLA!


Ths ****axtic brew of theirs is upon us.
Burner02 Offline
#6 Posted:
Joined: 12-21-2010
Posts: 12,884
FoxNews.com - Republican lawmakers slam 'diversion' of ObamaCare funds from Treasury

Republican critics say an ObamaCare program is breaking the law by shorting the U.S. Treasury -- and therefore U.S. taxpayers-- billions of dollars collected from the insurance industry.

Rep. Joe Pitts, R-Pa., chairman of the health subcommittee of the Energy and Commerce Committee, called it “an illegal wealth transfer from hard-working taxpayers to (insurers).”

He recently joined Republican colleagues in grilling Health and Human Services Secretary Sylvia Burwell about the shortfall of money supposed to be flowing into Treasury coffers - as mandated in the Affordable Care Act of 2010.

They followed up that hearing by sending a letter this week seeking clarification from the administration, according to The Hill.

Under the law, money is collected each year from insurers for the ACA’s reinsurance program, which helps plans taking on higher costs associated with sicker enrollees.

While $10 billion was supposed to go back to the market to pay those costs in 2014, the first year, an additional $2 billion was supposed to go to the U.S. Treasury under the law. It never arrived.

That was because not enough money was brought in to cover both, so the administration prioritized. Then HHS published a new rule saying payments would be made to insurers first in the event of a shortfall.

The rule, set in 2014, was published publicly for comment and received no reaction at the time, Burwell told a Senate Appropriations Committee hearing when the matter was raised again by lawmakers last week.

According to health care law expert Tim Jost, a professor at Washington & Lee University School of Law, the reinsurance program is not permanent and was instituted as a way to shoulder some of the burden for the new costs connected with new, at-risk enrollees who weren’t able to get adequate coverage before ObamaCare.

The reinsurance program was to collect $10 billion from insurance companies in 2014, $6 billion in 2015, and $4 billion in 2016. The Treasury would get $2 billion in 2014 and 2015 and $1 billion in 2016.

In 2014, according to reports, only $9.7 billion was collected from the industry , and 2015 totals were expected to be short, as well.

Critics say the law is clear: the Treasury gets the money and it cannot be transferred elsewhere, even if that “elsewhere” is to the insurance companies for the reinsurance program.

According to The Hill, presidential candidate Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., teamed up with Sen. Orrin Hatch, R- Utah, to write a letter decrying the administration’s moves.

“The statute in question is unambiguous, and the HHS regulation and recent practice violates its clear directive,” the letter read.

Jost is not so sure. He says it all depends on how the mandate is interpreted. “(The administration’s) reading of the statute is, that the reason for adopting this program was to establish a reinsurance program, and therefore if there was a shortfall the money collected should first go to reinsurance,” and if more is collected, “only then would it go to the Treasury,” Jost told Foxnews.com. “(Republicans) say that reading is wrong.”

“It’s a disagreement on how to read the statute,” he added, “but I don’t think there is anything illegal, unconstitutional or immoral in respect to what the administration is doing.”
Brewha Offline
#7 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,201
Maybe the coops were just doing the right thing for themselves by filing bankruptcy -
Like Trump did.
Over and over.

I mean why blame them?
DrafterX Offline
#8 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,582
Think
not enough rich people in da hood to take money from..??Think
ZRX1200 Offline
#9 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,661
Brewha, don't folks with your bent feel that corporations aren't people? How can governments be?
Brewha Offline
#10 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,201
ZRX1200 wrote:
Brewha, don't folks with your bent feel that corporations aren't people? How can governments be?

Folks of my "bent"? Any man in the room of life looks upon it from is own 360 degrees slice of view and sees what he see. No bending required. Now I was "bent" by a shameless lass in my youth - but that's another story.....

Anyway, the coops we not govmut proper. Just folks working the teat. like lord Donnie.....
Covfireman Offline
#11 Posted:
Joined: 09-03-2015
Posts: 809
The majority of the failed co-ops were set up just to funnel money into several physician groups and 2 of the large health care corporations . They were setup in under served markets, allowing them special exceptions from the minimal scrutiny the ACA gives the insurance companies . The co-ops targeted areas with poor health and then set generous payment schedules. At times the payments to providers were 10 times reasonable and customary cost . The premium collection of the co-ops underperformed by 20-30% .

Don't worry though this feature of the ACA will continue to cost the taxpayers for years . Reinsurance contracts are being quoted renewal increases up to 10 % in the standard market . The reinsurance contracts increases not only affect health insurers but also property and casualty insurers .

When your auto, homeowners or commercial insurance rate increases in the near future remember you have to pass the bill to see what it contains.

Thanks Nancy and Barry great job I'd appreciate a little lube the next time.


Brewha wrote:
Folks of my "bent"? Any man in the room of life looks upon it from is own 360 degrees slice of view and sees what he see. No bending required. Now I was "bent" by a shameless lass in my youth - but that's another story.....

Anyway, the coops we not govmut proper. Just folks working the teat. like lord Donnie.....



Brewha is correct the co-ops were meant to be markets of last resort to help the communities in our country that had the least access to Healthcare .thank god some good mericans used capitol ism to exploit the system . If they would of been socialists heaven forbid people may have received the care they needed at an affordable cost .


I didn't know Brewha was from Kent and how did you know he was bent ?
Users browsing this topic
Guest