America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 7 years ago by DrafterX. 83 replies replies.
2 Pages12>
Orlando shooting, politics as usual.
Speyside Offline
#1 Posted:
Joined: 03-16-2015
Posts: 13,106
It does not suprise me, but it does disgust me that both left and right are turning a tragedy into politics as usual.
MACS Offline
#2 Posted:
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,840
A muslim kills 50 people and injures as many more, in a gay bar, and the liberals defend the religion. A Christian refuses to bake a cake for a gay couple and has to endure nationwide shaming because of his religious beliefs.

Huh. Seems kind of strange to me.
frankj1 Online
#3 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,231
simply speaking for me, I condemn individuals who do sick and hatefully infused things DESPITE what their professed religions stand for, Jewish, Christian, Muslim, Hindu et al...
victor809 Offline
#4 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
MACS... Pretty sure there's already a law against shooting people because of your religious beliefs.

If you want to propose another, feel free to. Otherwise you're comparing apples and oranges
Gene363 Online
#5 Posted:
Joined: 01-24-2003
Posts: 30,850
Speyside wrote:
It does not suprise me, but it does disgust me that both left and right are turning a tragedy into politics as usual.


Man kills people in the name of islam and isis.

The left reacts with, "We have much too easy access to guns."

The right calls, "Bravo Sierra!", in reaction, not to the shooting, but to the reaction of the left, to the shooting. So, to your original point, the right agrees with your concern about the left.

FWIW, shooting people is wrong, be they gay straight or whatever, it throws a grenade of sadness and loss into the family and friends of the dead. This, BTW, also applies to the families affected by USA drone hits in countries all over the world. Even the worst goat humping terrorists has family.


Now if we could be rid of all of them, well: Beer Sarcasm
tonygraz Offline
#6 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2008
Posts: 20,292
frankj1 wrote:
simply speaking for me, I condemn individuals who do sick and hatefully infused things DESPITE what their professed religions stand for, Jewish, Christian, Muslim, Hindu et al...


+1

Pastafarians have yet to commit a hate crime - as far as I know.
gummy jones Offline
#7 Posted:
Joined: 07-06-2015
Posts: 7,969
What if, in the face of a terrorist attack on our soil, we united. United states...has a nice ring to it.
TMCTLT Offline
#8 Posted:
Joined: 11-22-2007
Posts: 19,733
victor809 wrote:
MACS... Pretty sure there's already a law against shooting people because of your religious beliefs.

If you want to propose another, feel free to. Otherwise you're comparing apples and oranges




I disagree....he's comparing the tolerance we seem to have for some Religious beliefs under the Muslim in Cheif in OUR country, while crapping all over another WELL established one that's existed here from our founding.

Have a grapefruit......that's what Barry's serving up
tailgater Offline
#9 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
victor809 wrote:
MACS... Pretty sure there's already a law against shooting people because of your religious beliefs.

If you want to propose another, feel free to. Otherwise you're comparing apples and oranges


No he's not.
He wasn't asking for new laws. He was pointing out the warped viewpoints and misplaced outrage.

Why would so many be quick to condemn Christianity for a bakers personal decision, while simultaneously defending the Muslim faith when one of theirs uses scripture to murder dozens?

If you're going to be the board contrarian, at least keep up to speed.



Edit: TMLCT nailed it in post #8.
Tolerance. The word is tolerance, and how the left use it selectively.
tailgater Offline
#10 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
tonygraz wrote:
+1

Pastafarians have yet to commit a hate crime - as far as I know.


I believe gluttony is one of the 7 deadly sins.

teedubbya Offline
#11 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
A white guy shoots blacks, gays whatever and the left wants it called a hate crime. Most of us just want it called murder. A crime is a crime we say. Race, religion, intent doesn't matter.

A Muslim does the same and we clamor to make sure it's called terrorism and we focus on the religion and intent.

This was a mass shooting. A horrible one. They happen pretty frequently. The only thing that makes this special is how successful it was. It's really no different than had the shooter been a WASP.

It looks like another nut case shot up the joint to me. I have no idea why and possibly never will. I don't really care other than to learn from it for prevention purposes. He's pretty much the same as the dude that shot up the theater, the kids that shot up the school or the "workplace violence" dude y'all got so worked up about a few days before returning to the hate crimes are stupid conversation.

We are all selective.
gummy jones Offline
#12 Posted:
Joined: 07-06-2015
Posts: 7,969
http://m.townhall.com/columnists/thomassowell/2016/06/14/will-orlando-change-anything-n2177512
ZRX1200 Offline
#13 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,630
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/why-its-time-to-repeal-the-second-amendment-right-bear-arms-20160613

Here's your sign.
Gene363 Online
#14 Posted:
Joined: 01-24-2003
Posts: 30,850
teedubbya wrote:
A white guy shoots blacks, gays whatever and the left wants it called a hate crime. Most of us just want it called murder. A crime is a crime we say. Race, religion, intent doesn't matter.

A Muslim does the same and we clamor to make sure it's called terrorism and we focus on the religion and intent.

This was a mass shooting. A horrible one. They happen pretty frequently. The only thing that makes this special is how successful it was. It's really no different than had the shooter been a WASP.

It looks like another nut case shot up the joint to me. I have no idea why and possibly never will. I don't really care other than to learn from it for prevention purposes. He's pretty much the same as the dude that shot up the theater, the kids that shot up the school or the "workplace violence" dude y'all got so worked up about a few days before returning to the hate crimes are stupid conversation.

We are all selective.


Point, however, the Orlando sh|tbag was said to be uttering, "Aloha Snackbar" during the shooting and called 911 to pledge his allegiance to isis.

OTOH, the newspaper this AM quoted someone from at the club, as saying the sh|tbag had been in the club many times; trolling or planning, who knows. If he was a 'latent' his religion's intolerance of gays may have pushed him over or it could have driven his choice to shoot gay people.

One more reason of concern as far as his religion, the 'hands off' politically correct approach is hindering the government in their investigation of potential terrorists. We can thank the current administration for their failures to follow for fear of offending muslims.
teedubbya Offline
#15 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
If he was a wasp uttering God hates f@gs would hate crime be legitimate?

As an aside I've seen many Muslim groups denouncing this and Isis very loudly. It's not the religion it's the radicals trying to hijack it.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#16 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,516
Trying?

They're past that now.
tailgater Offline
#17 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
teedubbya wrote:
A white guy shoots blacks, gays whatever and the left wants it called a hate crime. Most of us just want it called murder. A crime is a crime we say. Race, religion, intent doesn't matter.

A Muslim does the same and we clamor to make sure it's called terrorism and we focus on the religion and intent.

This was a mass shooting. A horrible one. They happen pretty frequently. The only thing that makes this special is how successful it was. It's really no different than had the shooter been a WASP.

It looks like another nut case shot up the joint to me. I have no idea why and possibly never will. I don't really care other than to learn from it for prevention purposes. He's pretty much the same as the dude that shot up the theater, the kids that shot up the school or the "workplace violence" dude y'all got so worked up about a few days before returning to the hate crimes are stupid conversation.

We are all selective.


I agree.
Mostly.

The thing is, we're at war with terrorists.
We can't just label it murder if it is rooted in that war effort.
To do so would hinder our ability to prevent it in the future.

DrMaddVibe Offline
#18 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,516
Ok...it's not a hate crime.

http://www.palmbeachpost.com/news/news/orlando-shooter-omar-mateen-was-gay-former-classma/nrfwW/
victor809 Offline
#19 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
tailgater wrote:
No he's not.
He wasn't asking for new laws. He was pointing out the warped viewpoints and misplaced outrage.

Why would so many be quick to condemn Christianity for a bakers personal decision, while simultaneously defending the Muslim faith when one of theirs uses scripture to murder dozens?

If you're going to be the board contrarian, at least keep up to speed.



Edit: TMLCT nailed it in post #8.
Tolerance. The word is tolerance, and how the left use it selectively.


You and TMC are correct here.
However you're missing a major point. This guy is an Islamic extremist. You're comparing Islamic extremists to average christians... and to be honest, average christians have a much higher chance of having a negative impact on my daily life.

On what feels like an almost weekly basis, there's politicians calling for one law or another using the christian bible as justification. That is something that has a direct impact on every person in our nation, and it's a common occurrence. I have yet to see that happen with the koran in america (and if it does, it will receive every bit of my scorn as well). Meanwhile, islamic extremists kill a handful of people every now and then. This time it was something like 1.25x10-5% of our population (0.0000125%, for the conservatives). Realistically speaking, that has very little actual impact on our nation as a whole. Until they get their hands on something a hell of a lot more impressive than a few AR-15s, Islamic Extremists don't really pose a real, actual threat to our nation, even at the soft spots.

Contrasting that, any time anyone from any religion passes laws justified solely on biblical verse, or passing laws allowing religious groups to allow the laws of their religion to trump the laws of our land... well then they are doing real and tangible damage to our nation.

People who are afraid of random violence, or terrorism are just responding to a misplaced fight or flight response.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#20 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,516
victor809 wrote:
You and TMC are correct here.
However you're missing a major point. This guy is an Islamic extremist. You're comparing Islamic extremists to average christians... and to be honest, average christians have a much higher chance of having a negative impact on my daily life.

On what feels like an almost weekly basis, there's politicians calling for one law or another using the christian bible as justification. That is something that has a direct impact on every person in our nation, and it's a common occurrence. I have yet to see that happen with the koran in america (and if it does, it will receive every bit of my scorn as well). Meanwhile, islamic extremists kill a handful of people every now and then. This time it was something like 1.25x10-5% of our population (0.0000125%, for the conservatives). Realistically speaking, that has very little actual impact on our nation as a whole. Until they get their hands on something a hell of a lot more impressive than a few AR-15s, Islamic Extremists don't really pose a real, actual threat to our nation, even at the soft spots.

Contrasting that, any time anyone from any religion passes laws justified solely on biblical verse, or passing laws allowing religious groups to allow the laws of their religion to trump the laws of our land... well then they are doing real and tangible damage to our nation.

People who are afraid of random violence, or terrorism are just responding to a misplaced fight or flight response.


Isn't it really a matter of perspective and biases?

Really.
victor809 Offline
#21 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
DrMaddVibe wrote:
Isn't it really a matter of perspective and biases?

Really.


I would argue no.

Everyone loves the idea of a law giving religious groups the opportunity to disregard american laws... as long as it's their religious group. Similarly, everyone loves the idea of a law based on a religious text, as long as it's their religious text... or even a chunk of text in their bible they follow.

But then they have a fit when another religion does the same thing... or a text is chosen that inconveniences their lives (modern christians are all about religion, as long as it doesn't inconvenience them specifically).

There's a reason we don't have religious based government, a very good reason. And as an atheist, I find any large voting block of religious people with a vested interest in using our laws to enforce their religion as an enormous danger, much more-so than a handful of tragic deaths. Again, as an atheist, I am not specifically targeting christians. If muslims started doing the same thing, I'd be just as incensed.
dstieger Offline
#22 Posted:
Joined: 06-22-2007
Posts: 10,889
victor809 wrote:
I would argue


fify
victor809 Offline
#23 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
dstieger wrote:
fify

hehehe.... ok, that made me laugh
tailgater Offline
#24 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
victor809 wrote:
You and TMC are correct here.
However you're missing a major point. This guy is an Islamic extremist. You're comparing Islamic extremists to average christians... and to be honest, average christians have a much higher chance of having a negative impact on my daily life.

On what feels like an almost weekly basis, there's politicians calling for one law or another using the christian bible as justification. That is something that has a direct impact on every person in our nation, and it's a common occurrence. I have yet to see that happen with the koran in america (and if it does, it will receive every bit of my scorn as well). Meanwhile, islamic extremists kill a handful of people every now and then. This time it was something like 1.25x10-5% of our population (0.0000125%, for the conservatives). Realistically speaking, that has very little actual impact on our nation as a whole. Until they get their hands on something a hell of a lot more impressive than a few AR-15s, Islamic Extremists don't really pose a real, actual threat to our nation, even at the soft spots.

Contrasting that, any time anyone from any religion passes laws justified solely on biblical verse, or passing laws allowing religious groups to allow the laws of their religion to trump the laws of our land... well then they are doing real and tangible damage to our nation.

People who are afraid of random violence, or terrorism are just responding to a misplaced fight or flight response.


I feel like I'm walking into a trap, but I'll bite.

What are these laws being passed based on Biblical verse?
Since it's "almost weekly" I'm sure you can name a few from this year alone.

As to your assertion that you're likely to be more highly impacted by these Christian laws, I'd like to hear even one from the last decade that has truly had a negative impact on you.

Since you've calculated the death toll out to the nth percentage I'm sure you've got data to support your notions.

And I think it's closer to 1.5, not 1.25.
You're using too many significant figures and actually lessened your accuracy by my calculation.






teedubbya Offline
#25 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
I'm all for investigating every avenue of this and learning from it for prevention sake. I'm not so sure how the insistence on the terrorism label and focusing on his religion help in that effort. It seems to me it's the same mentality as the hate crime crowd we just agree with the classification.

And DMV you are right they have hijacked the religion in the sense that the vast VAST majority of those practicing the religion completely disagree with them and know it has nothing to do with their religion. The harsh words I was hearing from their leaders in effect telling them they were going to hell was interesting but missed by many. They want is to live in fear and tear us apart. In that sense they are winning. They (the very small minority) can't hurt us in any real way unless we decide to hurt ourselves. They also want us to blame Islam. And we are doing as the wish.
victor809 Offline
#26 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
tailgater wrote:
I feel like I'm walking into a trap, but I'll bite.

What are these laws being passed based on Biblical verse?
Since it's "almost weekly" I'm sure you can name a few from this year alone.

As to your assertion that you're likely to be more highly impacted by these Christian laws, I'd like to hear even one from the last decade that has truly had a negative impact on you.

Since you've calculated the death toll out to the nth percentage I'm sure you've got data to support your notions.

And I think it's closer to 1.5, not 1.25.
You're using too many significant figures and actually lessened your accuracy by my calculation.



Fair enough. there are 4 separate states which have passed or are trying to pass "religious freedom" laws, specifically allowing someone to simply ignore a standing law if it disagrees with their religion (I'm summarizing here, I'm sure there are some clauses etc).

Heck, tennessee was voting to make the bible the state book.

Every time an anti-abortion law pops up (and those seem to pop up very frequently, if not passed), the support of the law is largely based on biblical or religious ideas, not science. In Oklahoma, they literally said "god will take care of the economy" when fighting for an anti-abortion law.

Then there was the religious basis of the cases against coverage of contraception... I honestly can't remember if they were trying to pass a new law or dissolve an existing.
teedubbya Offline
#27 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
The argument is going to be those laws are meant to protect Christianity which is under attack and oppressed and stuff. It's really quite clever and is the same tactic used by oh never mind.
Gene363 Online
#28 Posted:
Joined: 01-24-2003
Posts: 30,850
victor809 wrote:
Fair enough. there are 4 separate states which have passed or are trying to pass "religious freedom" laws, specifically allowing someone to simply ignore a standing law if it disagrees with their religion (I'm summarizing here, I'm sure there are some clauses etc).

Heck, tennessee was voting to make the bible the state book.

Every time an anti-abortion law pops up (and those seem to pop up very frequently, if not passed), the support of the law is largely based on biblical or religious ideas, not science. In Oklahoma, they literally said "god will take care of the economy" when fighting for an anti-abortion law.

Then there was the religious basis of the cases against coverage of contraception... I honestly can't remember if they were trying to pass a new law or dissolve an existing.


You're funny, talk about overreaction, your first example is going to empower giathumpers to follow their death cult rules not just allow Christians to not do things that are in conflict with their religion. FWIW, I am not in favor of such laws for just these reasons, first thing you know no alcohol or tobacco delivers as it taboo for a truck driver.

Designating the Bible as their state book isn't a law.

FYI, some atheists think abortion is wrong, just because some people cite religious justification for laws shouldn't discount them, they should stand on their own merits. Should we remove statutes outlawing murder since the sixth of the Ten Commandments?

The last example was a lawsuit, not a law.

Relax, not one state religion was imposed, not one sabbath day declared, nor any church built by the government.
Gene363 Online
#29 Posted:
Joined: 01-24-2003
Posts: 30,850
teedubbya wrote:
The argument is going to be those laws are meant to protect Christianity which is under attack and oppressed and stuff. It's really quite clever and is the same tactic used by oh never mind.


Exactly.
victor809 Offline
#30 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Gene363 wrote:
You're funny, talk about overreaction, your first example is going to empower giathumpers to follow their death cult rules not just allow Christians to not do things that are in conflict with their religion. FWIW, I am not in favor of such laws for just these reasons, first thing you know no alcohol or tobacco delivers as it taboo for a truck driver.

Designating the Bible as their state book isn't a law.

FYI, some atheists think abortion is wrong, just because some people cite religious justification for laws shouldn't discount them, they should stand on their own merits. Should we remove statutes outlawing murder since the sixth of the Ten Commandments?

The last example was a lawsuit, not a law.

Relax, not one state religion was imposed, not one sabbath day declared, nor any church built by the government.


Well,your first paragraph was exactly what I said in post 21.
I'm not sure whether declaring something a state book is a law or not. Honestly, that's part of our political system I don't understand. It has to go through a lot of the same procedures as a law... I'm not sure where the difference falls.

And yes, one can think abortion is wrong without citing religion. However, the use of religion to defend or create any law is incorrect. All laws need to stand on their own, and not based on a religious reason. This gets circumvented when one religious person tells another religious person to vote on something because their religion dictates they should. At that point, you have created a voting block which is choosing laws based on a religious tract, one which they both believe in. Currently, that happens at a much higher rate within christianity in the US than other religions (not saying it's going to be that way forever). Does it automatically mean the law is wrong? No. But it means the process is corrupted.
Gene363 Online
#31 Posted:
Joined: 01-24-2003
Posts: 30,850
victor809 wrote:
Well,your first paragraph was exactly what I said in post 21.
I'm not sure whether declaring something a state book is a law or not. Honestly, that's part of our political system I don't understand. It has to go through a lot of the same procedures as a law... I'm not sure where the difference falls.

And yes, one can think abortion is wrong without citing religion. However, the use of religion to defend or create any law is incorrect. All laws need to stand on their own, and not based on a religious reason. This gets circumvented when one religious person tells another religious person to vote on something because their religion dictates they should. At that point, you have created a voting block which is choosing laws based on a religious tract, one which they both believe in. Currently, that happens at a much higher rate within christianity in the US than other religions (not saying it's going to be that way forever). Does it automatically mean the law is wrong? No. But it means the process is corrupted.


So, you're advocating thought police to prevent anyone from using religious teachings to make a voting decision.

Why fret, a proposed law is either right or wrong, a religious origin is immaterial.
DrafterX Offline
#32 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,566
Gene363 wrote:

Why fret, a proposed law is either right or wrong,



that would depend on who you talk to of course... Mellow
teedubbya Offline
#33 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Or if it's shira or not
victor809 Offline
#34 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Gene363 wrote:
So, you're advocating thought police to prevent anyone from using religious teachings to make a voting decision.

Why fret, a proposed law is either right or wrong, a religious origin is immaterial.


A corrupted process can ensure that wrong laws are proposed and/or passed.

My point is that a religious origin can and will eventually support wrong laws... more importantly, it will eventually support laws that are wrong only for those groups not part of the religion.

And no, I'm not advocating thought police. Just because I'm saying a process is corrupted, doesn't mean I'm advocating a law against it.
Gene363 Online
#35 Posted:
Joined: 01-24-2003
Posts: 30,850
victor809 wrote:
A corrupted process can ensure that wrong laws are proposed and/or passed.

My point is that a religious origin can and will eventually support wrong laws... more importantly, it will eventually support laws that are wrong only for those groups not part of the religion.

And no, I'm not advocating thought police. Just because I'm saying a process is corrupted, doesn't mean I'm advocating a law against it.


I'm not a big fan of organized religion, (gangs), however I think your concern borders on phobia. If what you are saying was true, the only way to prevent said corruption would be thought police, well, or outlawing religion completely, for that you will need to consult with a couple of dead guys, Stalin and Mao.
frankj1 Online
#36 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,231
has Westboro weighed in on this tragedy yet?
victor809 Offline
#37 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
frankj1 wrote:
has Westboro weighed in on this tragedy yet?


a Sacramento church did with some really special opinions.

http://sacramento.cbslocal.com/2016/06/13/sacramento-baptist-preacher-praises-orlando-gay-nightclub-attack/?utm_source=fark&utm_medium=website&utm_content=link
Speyside Offline
#38 Posted:
Joined: 03-16-2015
Posts: 13,106
Dantes 9th circle is to good for him.
ZRX1200 Offline
#39 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,630
I don't recall the bigots of West Borough going on a shooting spree.
Speyside Offline
#40 Posted:
Joined: 03-16-2015
Posts: 13,106
Westboro is spewing their usual hate Frank.
frankj1 Online
#41 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,231
ZRX1200 wrote:
I don't recall the bigots of West Borough going on a shooting spree.

not my meaning. just wondering if they were cheering or if they are saving that for the funerals.


frankj1 Online
#42 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,231
Speyside wrote:
Westboro is spewing their usual hate Frank.

figures. they took me off their mailing list for...well you know what for.
teedubbya Offline
#43 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
When you caught the gay from drafter?
banderl Offline
#44 Posted:
Joined: 09-09-2008
Posts: 10,153
teedubbya wrote:
When you caught the gay from drafter?

I heard that one of the other guys got the Hep P from him.
frankj1 Online
#45 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,231
teedubbya wrote:
When you caught the gay from drafter?

no silly. cuz of the O.T. and stuff.
Mattie B Offline
#46 Posted:
Joined: 12-12-2005
Posts: 6,350
Forgive me if this was mentioned somewhere else.



I can't get over the disgust I have for the democrats, that walked out during the moment of silence. I don't even know how that can be justified. Never have I seen a more distasteful act of disrespect for lives lost.
How can these folks be elected to represent US citizens?

At some point agendas must be replaced with humanity. We must get back on track if we have any hope of moving forward.

Protesting a moment of silence CANNOT be viewed as constructive.

Pray for our country!!!
ZRX1200 Offline
#47 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,630
Oh course they were, they're lower than whale schit.
MACS Offline
#48 Posted:
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,840
frankj1 wrote:
no silly. cuz of the O.T. and stuff.


You work overtime? I thought you were like retired and stuff?
DrafterX Offline
#49 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,566
Mattie B wrote:
Forgive me if this was mentioned somewhere else.



I can't get over the disgust I have for the democrats, that walked out during the moment of silence. I don't even know how that can be justified. Never have I seen a more distasteful act of disrespect for lives lost.
How can these folks be elected to represent US citizens?

At some point agendas must be replaced with humanity. We must get back on track if we have any hope of moving forward.

Protesting a moment of silence CANNOT be viewed as constructive.

Pray for our country!!!



Condoning disrespect and violence.. fine example they're setting for our students... Not talking
frankj1 Online
#50 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,231
MACS wrote:
You work overtime? I thought you were like retired and stuff?

should I have said The Prequel?

I'm good for about 50-55 hours a week...salaried.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
2 Pages12>