victor809 wrote:You're willing to spend 5 words telling us your name, but only 6 for your post.... which was theoretically so important to you it required a brand new thread.
You're on the internet. Presumably you know how it works.
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Vaguebooking&defid=9593977
http://vaguebook.org/
Ok Chief, thanks for the info.
I thought a brand new thread, because no-one had one on the speech today. I'd have gladly added my opinion to it, if it existed. So, no 'theory' involved. I guess some things are more, or less, important.
I also figured those 6 words were concise, to the point, and yet detailed enough to make people understand what, exactly, I was trying to say. Clearly it did. But, I suppose, if you want to be a d!ck, I guess you'll write whatever blather you want.
And if I closed with "Jack", there'd be some ambiguity, as to why. I made a stupid username. I don't think I can take it back. I suppose I could start over. But, f*ck it. It stays.
Yeah, I'm on the Net. I get sh*t, I take sh*t, and if I can't take a joke, then I get the f*ck out. Or be an opinionated a$$hole. Because there's more than a few of those, amirite? Because the more I read this: ..."which was theoretically so important to you it required a brand new thread.", the more I figure you're one. Or, you can do the second sentence of this paragraph. As can I.
Because I'm free. Free fallin'.