America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 7 years ago by DrafterX. 26 replies replies.
Interesting hillary moment, eh?
bs_kwaj Offline
#1 Posted:
Joined: 02-13-2006
Posts: 5,214

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hd4NH9jKNas

Think
bs_kwaj Offline
#2 Posted:
Joined: 02-13-2006
Posts: 5,214

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JDa9eArn4SQ

Beer

DrafterX Offline
#3 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,555
Goofballs.... she's on the Goofballs.... Not talking
Gene363 Offline
#4 Posted:
Joined: 01-24-2003
Posts: 30,820
bs_kwaj wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JDa9eArn4SQ

Beer



Evil, rots from the inside out.
tonygraz Offline
#5 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2008
Posts: 20,262
Yes, and the outside starts turning orange.
Brewha Offline
#6 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,182
And the hands start to shrink.....
ZRX1200 Offline
#7 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,615
Schitting your pants (suit), constant brain fades.......
DrafterX Offline
#8 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,555
No wonder she's always pissed off....Mellow
mikey1597 Offline
#9 Posted:
Joined: 05-18-2007
Posts: 14,162
In what is looking to many in the law enforcement community like a snub, Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton has decided not to seek the endorsement of the nation's largest police union. She has instead—rather conspicuously—sought the endorsement of Black Lives Matter activists



What a POS!!
DrafterX Offline
#10 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,555
No surprise there.... Did you happen to notice there were absolutely no uniformed police officers on the floor at the DNC..?? Huh

no chit... Mellow
Covfireman Offline
#11 Posted:
Joined: 09-03-2015
Posts: 809
DrafterX wrote:
No surprise there.... Did you happen to notice there were absolutely no uniformed police officers on the floor at the DNC..?? Huh

no chit... Mellow



LOL the DNC didn't mind using metro in Vegas to run the Bernie supporters out.
TMCTLT Offline
#12 Posted:
Joined: 11-22-2007
Posts: 19,733
mikey1597 wrote:
In what is looking to many in the law enforcement community like a snub, Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton has decided not to seek the endorsement of the nation's largest police union. She has instead—rather conspicuously—sought the endorsement of Black Lives Matter activists



What a POS!!




And we can only hope that they ( the LEO's union reps. ) force the B*tch to hire her own personal policing force for the remainder of her campaign ( Oh that's right she DID.....she's going with the BLM Security Forces!!!
I know if I were an officer....I'd REFUSE to give her security cover....Let that broad go it ALONE...she's disgusting
victor809 Offline
#13 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
... So, if you were a cop you would only serve and protect people you liked...

Good thing our actual police force operates with more dignity and professionalism than you say you would.
DrafterX Offline
#14 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,555
I'd never write a hot chick a ticket... Mellow
teedubbya Offline
#15 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
DrafterX wrote:
I'd never write a hot deke a ticket... Mellow


freak
DrafterX Offline
#16 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,555
Mad
TMCTLT Offline
#17 Posted:
Joined: 11-22-2007
Posts: 19,733
victor809 wrote:
... So, if you were a cop you would only serve and protect people you liked...

Good thing our actual police force operates with more dignity and professionalism than you say you would.



If your choice for POTUS can lack dignity and professionalism ( which she does ) while running for the highest office....I'd certainly give the LEO's a PASS. If she want's to make the choice between the BLM radicals and the nations Law Enforcement....like I saidlet her choice be the cost of doing business in that manner.
victor809 Offline
#18 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
No. What you said is you would refuse to give her "security cover" even if she requested it.

You're willingness to protect citizens is based on your liking or disliking them. You clearly don't have the professionalism our current police force has, as they are willing and able to provide security to any number of citizens with whom they may disagree. That's fine, no one is asking you to be professional. We do ask that of our law enforcement.
DrafterX Offline
#19 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,555
Good luck finding a Secret Service Dude to take a bullet for her... Mellow
TMCTLT Offline
#20 Posted:
Joined: 11-22-2007
Posts: 19,733
DrafterX wrote:
Good luck finding a Secret Service Dude to take a bullet for her... Mellow



NO Chit....I would NOT and I have no problem saying it right out loud. How that for your professionalism meter Victor?


victor809 wrote:
No. What you said is you would refuse to give her "security cover" even if she requested it.

You're willingness to protect citizens is based on your liking or disliking them. You clearly don't have the professionalism our current police force has, as they are willing and able to provide security to any number of citizens with whom they may disagree. That's fine, no one is asking you to be professional. We do ask that of our law enforcement.



I'm well aware of what I said and yes I stick to it , this woman wanted No LEO presence on the floor @ her DNC convention.....that speaks volumes as to what she deserves IMHO.
And you mark my words IF many of these LEO's had a choice on giving her cover if their jobs weren't on the line....they wouldn't
teedubbya Offline
#21 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Secret Service will do their job and you would not. Meh.
DrafterX Offline
#22 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,555
A secret service war puppy-dog wouldn't... Not talking
teedubbya Offline
#23 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
yes they would. they love the biotches
DrafterX Offline
#24 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,555
well, I bet Louie-dog isn't sporting a Hillary collar is he.. Not talking
victor809 Offline
#25 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Both secret service and LEO would defend her, because they are better people than you are.

Protection under the law isn't given a "as long as you show sufficient deference to the police" clause. And the secret service are utmost professionals.
DrafterX Offline
#26 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,555
Laugh
I'm sure most of them are.... but a few of them have made headlines in the past year... Mellow
Users browsing this topic
Guest