America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 5 years ago by frankj1. 56 replies replies.
2 Pages12>
Trump's Temperment During His Speech...
rfenst Offline
#1 Posted:
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,323
He behaved more "presidential" than I have ever seen him. Hey stayed on script without personal attacks. Seemed to have some temperment, but his daily argument with the press negates that. OK show... for Trump.
DrafterX Offline
#2 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,551
Didn't get to see it... Mellow
Abrignac Offline
#3 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,278
Pelosi said it’s a nogo. Now the ball is in her court.
DrafterX Offline
#4 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,551
She's F'd in da head for sure... She's already stated Trump could give her everything she wanted and she'd still say no... Then claims she's negotiating.. Mellow
frankj1 Offline
#5 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,221
anyone ever been involved in almost-all-or-nothing negotiations? How about going all in and getting your bluff called?

it's called hardball. Love her or hate her, Nancy knows how to play for real. Trump claimed to be the bestest at it. But the Dems have new reinforcements.

As a businessman who owed contractors money upon completion of contract terms, the contractors didn't have much leverage when offered 10 cents on the dollar after dealing in good faith. they got scewed by citizen Trump.

Too easy to win. He thought it was because he was slick...turned out the deck was stacked in his favor (how many bankruptcies?)

This is the real art of the deal time He never had so much to lose and needs to decide if it's time to save face/legacy yet.

He's already thrown in DACA. Why say "yes" now? he may cave even more. If the Dems caved in to x amount of miles of "fence", he'd hold out for more...as a great playah should., he wouldn't settle now either if he was in their camp.

He might finally be learning what we used to say here, as insulting as it was then...Presidentin' Be Hard.
tailgater Offline
#6 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
frankj1 wrote:
anyone ever been involved in almost-all-or-nothing negotiations? How about going all in and getting your bluff called?

it's called hardball. Love her or hate her, Nancy knows how to play for real. Trump claimed to be the bestest at it. But the Dems have new reinforcements.

As a businessman who owed contractors money upon completion of contract terms, the contractors didn't have much leverage when offered 10 cents on the dollar after dealing in good faith. they got scewed by citizen Trump.

Too easy to win. He thought it was because he was slick...turned out the deck was stacked in his favor (how many bankruptcies?)

This is the real art of the deal time He never had so much to lose and needs to decide if it's time to save face/legacy yet.

He's already thrown in DACA. Why say "yes" now? he may cave even more. If the Dems caved in to x amount of miles of "fence", he'd hold out for more...as a great playah should., he wouldn't settle now either if he was in their camp.

He might finally be learning what we used to say here, as insulting as it was then...Presidentin' Be Hard.



So the shut down is a good thing?

You agree with what Pelosi is doing.

Noted.




frankj1 Offline
#7 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,221
tailgater wrote:
So the shut down is a good thing?

You agree with what Pelosi is doing.

Noted.





well, he boasted about owning it. It was in all the papers, fake and conservative...HA! I know you saw it.

Then it happened.

Bluff called. Spin in play. Political background noise ensues.

Meanwhile a new hand has been dealt. In reality, he knows his hand is weaker than it was. Less pro votes. Less public support. No emotion or hope on my part in my previous post, not about me, just seeing reality and commenting.

I know what I'd do, but I'm trying to be an observer here, not a lefty partisan hack, not a Trumpette apologizer.

My post was pretty much a play-by-play game call of where he is now at the poker table. Cuz that's a real life analogy to which many can relate. It's how I see it so far, not sure what I said made you guess my personal hopes...and you ignored the yuuuge wall. it's not just the shutdown.

He doesn't have to bust out at the card table, but he does have to realize he blinked and Pelosi called and raised. Her hand improved after the midterms and recent popularity polls. his shutdown did not make the Dems cave. That's a real loss and error in judgement of the opposition.

He might be able to get her to take today's offer, add some chocolates and flowers (she's oooold school)...but he can't blink again.

As for me, I might have said thanks for reconsidering DACA, let's wrap this up.
But I'm not a one-call closer anymore.
Speyside Offline
#8 Posted:
Joined: 03-16-2015
Posts: 13,106
Say what? Donald shut it down, Donald said he is proud to own it. A 3 year temporary DACA fix isn't going to get it done. This isn't on Nancy or Chuck. Donald owns it. Tail, why don't you give me $100 and I'll loan you $5 for 3 years. Sounds like a great compromise to me.
dstieger Offline
#9 Posted:
Joined: 06-22-2007
Posts: 10,889
Abrignac wrote:
Pelosi said it’s a nogo.

So did Ann Coulter. Took her almost 3 minutes to attack Trump. Wonder if that stung....especially after backing up for her a few weeks ago
Phil222 Offline
#10 Posted:
Joined: 10-01-2017
Posts: 1,911
I happen to agree with most of Trump’s ideas for immigration reform, but not the wall. I would rather see the robot dogs that Drafter was talking about.

Serious question: Why didn’t Trump pass immigration reform and get the wall funding when he had control of the House? And why should the Democrats get his wall funding through the House when his own party wouldn’t?
frankj1 Offline
#11 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,221
rocket dogs. not robot dogs.
DrafterX is on to something
frankj1 Offline
#12 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,221
dstieger wrote:
So did Ann Coulter. Took her almost 3 minutes to attack Trump. Wonder if that stung....especially after backing up for her a few weeks ago

better for both of us if she backed up for me

Frankie Tripod
Phil222 Offline
#13 Posted:
Joined: 10-01-2017
Posts: 1,911
frankj1 wrote:
rocket dogs. not robot dogs.
DrafterX is on to something

I would accept either of them. How’s that for compromise? Ha! Beer
frankj1 Offline
#14 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,221
#13
works for me.
Speyside Offline
#15 Posted:
Joined: 03-16-2015
Posts: 13,106
Close Drafter, So very close. We'll drop dog rockets and matches along the border on the Mexican side. Make em sick enough they want to turn back. Then we launch the rocket dogs, a great multi layered deterant starting with natural defense and improved with the latest technology and additional paw power on the ground and in the air. Frank, do you have guys to train the dogs? Or you want I should send them?
frankj1 Offline
#16 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,221
allow me to confab with Drafter. The rocket dogs was his conception, but your idea to have them drop dog rockets is intriguing.
tailgater Offline
#17 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
frankj1 wrote:
well, he boasted about owning it. It was in all the papers, fake and conservative...HA! I know you saw it.

Then it happened.

Bluff called. Spin in play. Political background noise ensues.

Meanwhile a new hand has been dealt. In reality, he knows his hand is weaker than it was. Less pro votes. Less public support. No emotion or hope on my part in my previous post, not about me, just seeing reality and commenting.

I know what I'd do, but I'm trying to be an observer here, not a lefty partisan hack, not a Trumpette apologizer.

My post was pretty much a play-by-play game call of where he is now at the poker table. Cuz that's a real life analogy to which many can relate. It's how I see it so far, not sure what I said made you guess my personal hopes...and you ignored the yuuuge wall. it's not just the shutdown.

He doesn't have to bust out at the card table, but he does have to realize he blinked and Pelosi called and raised. Her hand improved after the midterms and recent popularity polls. his shutdown did not make the Dems cave. That's a real loss and error in judgement of the opposition.

He might be able to get her to take today's offer, add some chocolates and flowers (she's oooold school)...but he can't blink again.

As for me, I might have said thanks for reconsidering DACA, let's wrap this up.
But I'm not a one-call closer anymore.


And at the end of the day, you're good with the shut down.
Because it exposes Trump.
Or some other reason that ends with "Trump".


I've gone on record as saying the shut down was OK, but it's gone on for too long.
Two sides are doing damage. Both.
We can criticize the deal-maker POTUS for unscrupulous tactics in the 1980's.
Or we can call our politicians to task.

Trump was on a belated mission. (should have pushed with the GOP majority).
Pelosi and Chuckie are simply being spiteful.

But your words allude to being OK with that.
Because, well, Trump.
That Muthafuqer.


Side note: maybe we need more Tin Men in congress.

Side note part deux: I mean tin persons.

tailgater Offline
#18 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
Speyside wrote:
Say what? Donald shut it down, Donald said he is proud to own it. A 3 year temporary DACA fix isn't going to get it done. This isn't on Nancy or Chuck. Donald owns it. Tail, why don't you give me $100 and I'll loan you $5 for 3 years. Sounds like a great compromise to me.


Your allegiance to the Pelosi campaign is duly noted.


Trump shut the government down. He owned it. I've never said otherwise. Although it's fun to see you argue that point even further.
But the continuation of the shutdown is on BOTH sides.
50/50
Half and half.
6 of one. Half dozen the other.

If you need me to draw a pie chart you'll have to come over for a smoke.


Speyside Offline
#19 Posted:
Joined: 03-16-2015
Posts: 13,106
It's on Trump, 100% IMO. I do not blame the Republicans. I would expect them to back a Republican president. They came up with a compromisee with the Democrats, Trump would not accept it. I do not blame the Democrats. They came up with the same compromise Trump did not accept. Trump offered an unacceptable compromise. The Democrats have said open the government and we will work to find a compromise. I don't expect them to allow Trump to force them to accept his terms because he is holding the government hostage. Is it cherry pie? If so I'll be right over. I do so love deep dish cherry pie. And some vanilla bean ice cream on top. Mmmmm.
Speyside Offline
#20 Posted:
Joined: 03-16-2015
Posts: 13,106
BTW both sides are playing hardball politics and it is shameful.
Ewok126 Offline
#21 Posted:
Joined: 06-25-2017
Posts: 4,356
rfenst wrote:
He behaved more "presidential" than I have ever seen him. Hey stayed on script without personal attacks. Seemed to have some temperament.


I am thinking someone just loaded his morning Ice cream with some weed and didn't tell him.fog
Mr. Jones Offline
#22 Posted:
Joined: 06-12-2005
Posts: 19,423
Frank bangs Ann Coulter "TWICE NIGHTLY" when she visits Boston...he takes his time @ the downtown HILTON, but
Gets home before sunrise.
frankj1 Offline
#23 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,221
tailgater wrote:
And at the end of the day, you're good with the shut down.
Because it exposes Trump.
Or some other reason that ends with "Trump".


I've gone on record as saying the shut down was OK, but it's gone on for too long.
Two sides are doing damage. Both.
We can criticize the deal-maker POTUS for unscrupulous tactics in the 1980's.
Or we can call our politicians to task.

Trump was on a belated mission. (should have pushed with the GOP majority).
Pelosi and Chuckie are simply being spiteful.

But your words allude to being OK with that.
Because, well, Trump.
That Muthafuqer.


Side note: maybe we need more Tin Men in congress.

Side note part deux: I mean tin persons.


one of your sillier attempts to turn the discussion over to a sidebar critique of what you believe you are reading into my words.
I've been a lot less passionate than you for sure!

Let's try this stream of logic...

you are against the wall.
the dem leaders agree with you.
The prez wants to keep pushing the wall, even forced the shutdown.
the dems say no negotiations until you reopen the government.
the prez walked out.

you're still against the wall. but you aren't demanding he drop the wall condition to reopen the government.

instead, you have switched to saying it's now Pelosi's fault that the shutdown continues, and for some reason feel it's important to tie me into it too.

but clearly no discussions about the subject you are against (the wall) will take place until the prez...who shut down the government...drops his demand to fund the wall (that you oppose) in order to reopen government.

sounds like a case of Party over Country.



rfenst Offline
#24 Posted:
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,323
You go Frank!
frankj1 Offline
#25 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,221
I ain't goin' nowhere!
It's freeeezing outside.

maybe I'll lick a stop sign post.
delta1 Offline
#26 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,788
Trump appeared even more Presidential yesterday at his appearance at the MLK memorial, to honor a man who championed equality and civil rights for all. Trump gave the best speech of his term, knocking back some of his earlier divisiveness, quoting from MLK's famous speech at the Washington monument....he said he shared that vision...

maybe he's growing into the POTUS afterall...
dstieger Offline
#27 Posted:
Joined: 06-22-2007
Posts: 10,889
dstieger wrote:
So did Ann Coulter. Took her almost 3 minutes to attack Trump. Wonder if that stung....especially after backing up for her a few weeks ago


I think Coulter is singularly responsible for a couple/few extra weeks. again.

She, and then Pence, pulled half the negotiable drug out from under Trump this weekend. I suspect without her, DACA fix was going to be permanent. Now, with Administration screaming "This ain't no amnesty!!"...just to try to shut her up....it is no longer a negotiable point.
Ewok126 Offline
#28 Posted:
Joined: 06-25-2017
Posts: 4,356
frankj1 wrote:
I ain't goin' nowhere!
It's freeeezing outside.

maybe I'll lick a stop sign post.


Don't do it! Have you not seen "A Christmas Story"

Gave me nightmares for months!
frankj1 Offline
#29 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,221
is that why it says "STOP"?
Ewok126 Offline
#30 Posted:
Joined: 06-25-2017
Posts: 4,356
frankj1 wrote:
is that why it says "STOP"?



That and have you not noticed all the tongues just hanging there with no head?

By the way if you see mine please send it back.
delta1 Offline
#31 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,788
tail and his wife share responsibility for the household budget...they are poised to go another year with the same expenditures as this year...then, his wife says I want a new 3K diamond ring, and if you don't let me buy it with our money, I'm shutting down the honey hole...

is tail 50% responsible for getting the honey hole open again?

Ewok126 Offline
#32 Posted:
Joined: 06-25-2017
Posts: 4,356
delta1 wrote:
tail and his wife share responsibility for the household budget...they are poised to go another year with the same expenditures as this year...then, his wife says I want a new 3K diamond ring, and if you don't let me buy it with our money, I'm shutting down the honey hole...

is tail 50% responsible for getting the honey hole open again?





It does require 2 to bargain. I would say yes if tail is wanting the honey hole open. If tail don't gaf about the honey hole then no. But here is the major question, Is everyone else also closed out from Tails honey hole? Cause if so, then WE ALL GOTS A SERIOUS PROBLEM! Angry
victor809 Offline
#33 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
You really want access to tails honey hole?
victor809 Offline
#34 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Cuz that doesn't smell like honey coming out of there....
rfenst Offline
#35 Posted:
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,323
Ewok126 wrote:
It does require 2 to bargain.


They are negotiating. Brinkmanship is just an ugly technique.
tailgater Offline
#36 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
delta1 wrote:
tail and his wife share responsibility for the household budget...they are poised to go another year with the same expenditures as this year...then, his wife says I want a new 3K diamond ring, and if you don't let me buy it with our money, I'm shutting down the honey hole...

is tail 50% responsible for getting the honey hole open again?



There are other places to put it...
Ewok126 Offline
#37 Posted:
Joined: 06-25-2017
Posts: 4,356
tailgater wrote:
There are other places to put it...


I like the eye socket myself! Once you break through the bone its not bad. Just be careful of the supra-orbital notch. You crack that puppy and you will have lacerations that are hard to explain. fog
Ewok126 Offline
#38 Posted:
Joined: 06-25-2017
Posts: 4,356
victor809 wrote:
You really want access to tails honey hole?


Brother at my age and my mental conditions do you really want to know that answer? Mind you, I am not saying yes or no, I am just asking.fog
victor809 Offline
#39 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Well...at least he can say one person in the world is willing to fk him....

:)
frankj1 Offline
#40 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,221
Ewok126 wrote:
Brother at my age and my mental conditions do you really want to know that answer? Mind you, I am not saying yes or no, I am just asking.fog

ever consider aural sex?


correct response is "huh" or "what"
RMAN4443 Offline
#41 Posted:
Joined: 09-29-2016
Posts: 7,683
Is that what they mean when they talk about an ear worm????Think Anxious
frankj1 Offline
#42 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,221
RMAN4443 wrote:
Is that what they mean when they talk about an ear worm????Think Anxious

huh?
RMAN4443 Offline
#43 Posted:
Joined: 09-29-2016
Posts: 7,683
Good job...Applause LOL
delta1 Offline
#44 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,788
wha...
frankj1 Offline
#45 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,221
meanwhile, I find it sad that two years in we feel the need to give the POTUS a participation trophy for speaking almost like a real president.
the bar can not be lowered any more.
victor809 Offline
#46 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
...and the people cheering him on are the same ones who bemoan participation trophies in school...
frankj1 Offline
#47 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,221
I was searching for that irony
tailgater Offline
#48 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
frankj1 wrote:
meanwhile, I find it sad that two years in we feel the need to give the POTUS a participation trophy for speaking almost like a real president.
the bar can not be lowered any more.


True.
But with the caveat that his detractors have yet to speak like a real human with their own thoughts.
The media would have to reach UP to help lower that bar.

frankj1 Offline
#49 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,221
tailgater wrote:
True.
But with the caveat that his detractors have yet to speak like a real human with their own thoughts.
The media would have to reach UP to help lower that bar.


huh?
got something in my ear...
tailgater Offline
#50 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
frankj1 wrote:
huh?
got something in my ear...


You on Nantucket?

Users browsing this topic
Guest
2 Pages12>