America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 12 days ago by MACS. 626 replies replies.
13 Pages«<2345678910>»
#FIREFAUCI
Jump to Bottom | Previous Topic | Next Topic
DrMaddVibe Offline
#251 Posted: Thu, Oct 28 2021, 7:06 AM EST
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,431
"EcoHealth failed to report this finding right away, as was required by the terms of the grant,' Tabak wrote in his letter. 'EcoHealth is being notified that they have five days from today to submit to NIH any and all unpublished data from the experiments and work conducted under this award.'

Fauci has testified on several occasions before Congress that American taxpayers never financed what is called 'gain of function' research in China - which would make a virus more contagious or deadly.

In May, Fauci testified that the NIH 'has not ever and does not now fund gain of function research in the Wuhan Institute of Virology.'

However, in September, The Intercept revealed it had received 900 pages of documents detailing the work of EcoHealth Alliance's research in Wuhan, China.

The files showed that in 2014, the National Health Institute approved a five-year, yearly grant of $666,000 a year for five years ($3.3million) for EcoHealth Alliance, a US research organization, into bat coronavirus.

EcoHealth Alliance, in its proposal to the NIH, acknowledged the risks involved were 'the highest risk of exposure to SARS or other CoVs' among staff, who could then carry it out of the lab.

The NIH gave them the money anyway - something Fauci was previously forced to admit when testifying before Congress in May this year. EcoHealth Alliance then gave $599,000 of the money to the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

The approval notice for the grant is 528 pages long. It describes how EcoAlliance would receive yearly payments, totaling $3.3million over five years.

The funding was renewed in 2019 but was abruptly cut short in April 2020, once COVID-19 had spread throughout the world."

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10129521/NIH-tortured-monkeys-acid-toy-snake-Fauci-faces-calls-resign-dog-torture-tests.html

Bats. dogs, mice, monkeys...the world is his twisted laboratory. Have some more taxpayer money...Nazis at Nuremberg faced more scrutiny than this mass serial killer.
RayR Offline
#252 Posted: Thu, Oct 28 2021, 11:56 AM EST
Joined: 07-20-2020
Posts: 8,888
SCUM OF THE EARTH FRANKING PUPPY MURDERER!

#FIREFAUCI

It Wasn’t Just Beagles and Monkeys – Fauci’s NIH Also Funded Medical Experiments on AIDS Orphans in NY City

By Jim Hoft
Published October 26, 2021 at 8:07am

Quote:
In August Gateway Pundit contributor Cassandra Fairbanks broke the story on Dr. Fauci’s use of taxpayer money to torture beagles in barbaric animal testing.

Dr. Fauci funded a study in Tunisia where beagle dogs were eaten alive by parasite-infected flies.

Dr. Fauci also spent over $16 million in taxpayer funds on disturbing “toxic brain injection” experiments on monkeys in 2018.

And Dr. Fauci was more recently caught funding gain-of-function research in Wuhan, China laboratory blamed for the production and leak of the coronavirus.
Fauci lied about his funding of the lab under oath numerous times.

Now this…
Dr. Fauci’s NIH was also caught funding experiments on AIDS orphans at a New York City hospital in 2004.

More...

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/10/wasnt-just-beagles-monkeys-faucis-nih-also-funded-medical-experiments-aids-orphans-ny-city/
Brewha Offline
#253 Posted: Thu, Oct 28 2021, 2:21 PM EST
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,175
You all should also be selling that Fauci stole the election.

Come on boys, swing for the bleachers!
DrMaddVibe Offline
#254 Posted: Thu, Oct 28 2021, 4:10 PM EST
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,431
The slippery semantics of Anthony Fauci

Fauci’s absolutist answer on gain-of-function research from May has proven to be false




“I do not have any accounting of what the Chinese may have done, and I’m fully in favor of any further investigation of what went on in China. However, I will repeat again: the NIH and NIAID categorically has not funded ‘gain-of-function’ research to be conducted in the Wuhan Institute of Virology.” 

That was Dr Anthony Fauci during a May 2021 congressional hearing. It kicked off a months-long national media effort to frame questions around gain-of-function research and US-taxpayer-funded virus manipulation as a Royal Rumble between Fauci and Senator Rand Paul.

When he testifies or sits for friendly network interviews, Fauci depends on semantics. He relies on the naivety of the interviewer and the audience, employing terminology and definitions he believes only he understands.

But like the ponytailed Chad in Good Will Hunting attempting to flex his big brain, Fauci’s arguments fall apart in front of the initiated.

Last week, Lawrence Tabak, the principal deputy director of the NIH, sent a letter to Congress saying that EcoHealth Alliance failed to report certain aspects of the experimental work it had been conducting in China on bats and bat-borne viruses. Tabak pledged that the NIH and Fauci’s NIAID would take administrative action, but not much more than that.

So Fauci’s absolutist answer from May has proven to be false. At the very least, the doctor needs to answer directly why he chose to deflect questions on gain-of-function research, something his own agency is claiming it had no idea was happening. How could have Fauci have denied back in May something so “categorically” if EcoHealth Alliance, run by Fauci ally Peter Daszak, had failed to report the full extent of their experiments?

When Fauci sat for a cozy Sunday interview with ABC’s George Stephanopoulos, he once again deployed his semantic game on the interviewer. Stephanopoulos framed the revealing letter from Tabak as “critics pouncing”:

“Some critics and analysts have seized on that to say you and others have misled the public about US funding of this so-called gain-of-function research. The NIH says that’s false.”

Fauci addressed Senator Rand Paul directly by responding, “The framework under which we have guidance about the conduct of research that we fund, the funding at the Wuhan Institute was to be able to determine what is out there in the environment, in bat viruses in China. And the research was very strictly under what we call a framework of oversight of the type of research.”

Fauci then went on to say “And under those conditions which we have explained very, very clearly, does not constitute research of gain-of-function of concern.” In his answer, Fauci hedges by admitting that there was US funding directed to the Wuhan Institute, but, now, that funding did not directly fund “gain-of-function of concern.”

“Of concern” is the new caveat Fauci has added to get around answering the question. He had never used the terminology “gain-of-function of concern” in prior interviews or testimony. He just slipped it in there because hardly anyone notices. Furthermore he knows that the general public and most of the press has no idea what “of concern” means.

We know that gain-of-function research was happening in Wuhan and we know Fauci categorically denied US involvement in it. So now he’s attempting to sneak one by the audience and change the terminology, on what the definition of “gain-of-function of concern” means. So what does it mean?

It all comes down to intent. “Of concern” is the term used to differentiate studying and manipulating viruses in the scientific environments as a purposeful method to produce bioweapons. Fauci said as much in 2012 when he testified that his department worked with the Defense Department on such experiments. What Fauci is seeking to do is tweak the argument with semantics and write off his critics and the critics of gain-of-function as people accusing Fauci and the Wuhan Institute of developing bioweapons. No one has done so. It’s a game: “Sure we funded gain-of-function, but how dare you insinuate we funded bioweapon research, you kook!”

These are not the actions of a medical professional, with a serious interest in a transparent inquiry into the origins of the virus that has led to the deaths of 16 million people worldwide, including 750,000 Americans. These are the games a bureaucrat plays when they are attempting to cover their own ass, their career and their life’s work. Pulling this thread leads to one place: more discovery, more leaks and more gleam off Fauci’s armor in the media. How much more damning information needs to come out before he retires?

https://spectatorworld.com/topic/slippery-semantics-anthony-fauci-gain-function-coronavirus/



It's no longer a matter of if he lied. Now, it's a matter of when he's held accountable for the millions of lives he snuffed out so he could play mad scientist with US taxpayer money.
MACS Offline
#255 Posted: Thu, Oct 28 2021, 4:14 PM EST
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,776
The rubes who are convinced CNN, MSDNC, or any other number of mainstream media outlets are telling them the truth and not manipulating them still think Fauci's bold-faced lying ass is the bee's knees.
Stogie1020 Offline
#256 Posted: Thu, Oct 28 2021, 4:28 PM EST
Joined: 12-19-2019
Posts: 5,335
^ this. And they even have their Fauci pillows to bury their faces in when they are getting reamed from behind with the truth.
rfenst Online
#257 Posted: Thu, Oct 28 2021, 5:05 PM EST
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,323
Stogie1020 wrote:
^ this. And they even have their Fauci pillows to bury their faces in when they are getting reamed from behind with the truth.

I heard that pillow is still better than "My Pillow". LOL



Sarcasm
BuckyB93 Offline
#258 Posted: Thu, Oct 28 2021, 5:15 PM EST
Joined: 07-16-2004
Posts: 14,190
It's becoming more and more evident that he played a role (intentionally or unintentionally, knowingly or unknowingly) in one of the biggest pandemics in history yet some folks want to defend him.
Brewha Offline
#259 Posted: Fri, Oct 29 2021, 11:50 AM EST
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,175
BuckyB93 wrote:
It's becoming more and more evident that he played a role (intentionally or unintentionally, knowingly or unknowingly) in one of the biggest pandemics in history yet some folks want to defend him.

Dude, that was Trump.

The real Fauci infraction was offending the trumpanzees….
HockeyDad Offline
#260 Posted: Fri, Oct 29 2021, 12:00 PM EST
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,134
Brewha wrote:
Dude, that was Trump.

The real Fauci infraction was offending the trumpanzees….


TRUMP! Argh!
Brewha Offline
#261 Posted: Fri, Oct 29 2021, 12:35 PM EST
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,175
HockeyDad wrote:
TRUMP! Argh!

As Drafter would say, Mellow
HockeyDad Offline
#262 Posted: Fri, Oct 29 2021, 3:27 PM EST
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,134
I’m waiting for the new movie….Resident Evil: Fauci
Brewha Offline
#263 Posted: Fri, Oct 29 2021, 4:10 PM EST
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,175
You know he was who they based the Cloverfield monster on, don’t you?
HockeyDad Offline
#264 Posted: Fri, Oct 29 2021, 4:58 PM EST
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,134
Fauci likely caused Godzilla.
Brewha Offline
#265 Posted: Fri, Oct 29 2021, 5:02 PM EST
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,175
I heard that if you wait till midnight, darken the room and look in the mirror, that saying “Fauci” 5 time will cause him to appear………
and vaccinate you!!




OhMyGod
HockeyDad Offline
#266 Posted: Sat, Oct 30 2021, 5:33 PM EST
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,134
Brewha wrote:
I heard that if you wait till midnight, darken the room and look in the mirror, that saying “Fauci” 5 time will cause him to appear………
and vaccinate you!!


OhMyGod


And after he vaccinates you, two weeks later you catch The ‘Rona.
MACS Offline
#267 Posted: Sat, Oct 30 2021, 7:18 PM EST
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,776
Let's look at some facts.

#1 By definition a "vaccine" is supposed to make you immune to a disease. This does not. You can still catch the rona and you can still spread the rona. It IS a therapeutic and makes your symptoms more bearable.

#2 Follow the science... doctors and scientists agree that natural immunity to covid is better than the shot. Full disclosure, they also believe natural immunity plus the shot is even better. (but it still won't help stop the spread, since people who got the shot can still get it and spread it).

#3 The IFR (Infection Fatality Rate) is, at worst, 1.15% according to studies. So if you are unfortunate enough to get the rona, you have a 98.85% chance of surviving it.

Just the facts, folks...
HockeyDad Offline
#268 Posted: Sat, Oct 30 2021, 10:57 PM EST
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,134
I’ve prolly got ‘Rona right now because I have no symptoms.
BuckyB93 Offline
#269 Posted: Sun, Oct 31 2021, 7:41 AM EST
Joined: 07-16-2004
Posts: 14,190
RIP

HockeyDad.

Too sexy NINE!
DrMaddVibe Offline
#270 Posted: Sun, Oct 31 2021, 8:33 AM EST
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,431
MACS wrote:
Let's look at some facts.

#1 By definition a "vaccine" is supposed to make you immune to a disease. This does not. You can still catch the rona and you can still spread the rona. It IS a therapeutic and makes your symptoms more bearable.

#2 Follow the science... doctors and scientists agree that natural immunity to covid is better than the shot. Full disclosure, they also believe natural immunity plus the shot is even better. (but it still won't help stop the spread, since people who got the shot can still get it and spread it).

#3 The IFR (Infection Fatality Rate) is, at worst, 1.15% according to studies. So if you are unfortunate enough to get the rona, you have a 98.85% chance of surviving it.

Just the facts, folks...


yes...facts.

Playing God (badly)Alex BerensonOct 29

As I write this, I’m finishing A Shot to Save the World, the new book about the hunt for a Covid vaccine.

Which - surprisingly - I don’t hate. Written by Gregory Zuckerman of the Wall Street Journal, the book is a serious look at the decades of scientific work that helped produce the mRNA and DNA/AAV Covid vaccines.

Even better, it contains this line about Stephane Bancel, Moderna’s chief executive, from Derrick Rossi: “He was asking me to steal from a hospital that treats children. Stephane is someone without a moral compass.”

Who’s Derrick Rossi? Some crazy ivermectin-loving anti-vaxxer, no doubt!

Cofounder of Moderna? Oh, that was my second guess. Meantime, Stephane has $10 billion in Moderna stock to buy a new moral compass.

But to read this book is to see that these new biotechnologies are to ordinary small-molecule drug development as a manned mission to Mars is to a cross-country road trip. They are so complicated that even explaining them coherently is hard.

Old-school small-molecule drugs like aspirin are usually relatively simple chemicals with atomic structures that can be sketched out on a napkin.

Aspirin:

In general, these drugs work in straightforward ways, by attaching to receptors on the surface of our cells and either activating them or blocking them from being activated.

The body then breaks them down, usually quite fast, and their cellular effects wear off. They must be dosed again after a few hours or a day. At this point, after generations of developing them, scientists and physicians understand how they work quite well. Even so they need to be carefully tested because they can have off-target effects or be toxic in unexpected ways.

But we’re pretty good at making them. In fact even 20 years ago we were so good at making them that we had hit most of the obvious targets for them, like cholesterol and blood pressure and diabetes.

Unfortunately, fiddling with cell receptors can only do so much. Most cancers, brain diseases, autoimmune diseases, and genetic disorders are simply not amenable to small-molecule treatments. Treating them requires larger and more complicated proteins and enzymes that mimic the body’s existing proteins, attach to specific parts of deranged cells (cancer or other), or have other effects.

For decades, those proteins were generally grown outside the body and then injected into it.

Artificially produced erythropoietin, or EPO - a molecule our own kidneys make to help stimulate the production of red blood cells - is a relatively simple example of such a treatment.

But mRNA/LNP and DNA/AAV vaccines go still further.

They involve not using a simple chemical to interfere with a single receptor or injecting a protein we have grown in specifically purified cells but hijacking the body’s own fundamental processes of biological creation.

AND OUR BODIES DO NOT LIKE HAVING THEIR FUNDAMENTAL PROCESSES OF BIOLOGICAL CREATION HIJACKED. NOT BY VIRUSES, AND NOT BY SCIENTISTS. They fight the process at every step. This is why we have immune systems.

Thus using mRNA or DNA to make our cells produce proteins carries risk at every stage. At the moment of injection, the mRNA must be both disguised AND hidden inside a tiny ball of fat (and the DNA attached to a cold virus), or our bodies will likely destroy it before it can even reach our cells.

As Zuckerman explains in his book, “The [Moderna] scientists ran into a huge new problem… subsequent administrations saw the protein production plummet. It was as if the body’s defenses had learned to fend off the injected molecule and its genetic payload.”

Moderna wound up turning away from making mRNA drugs for repeated dosing and focusing on vaccines for just this reason; a successful vaccine should need only one or two doses to produce a sustained if not permanent immune response, thus eliminating the need for regular dosing.

But the problems don’t end there. If the injected particles drop their genetic payload into the wrong cells, they can also do damage.

Scientists have also now repeatedly demonstrated that the spike proteins the mRNA Covid vaccines create can be toxic - especially to blood vessel cells - all by themselves, without the rest of Sars-Cov-2 attached. (See, for example: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2021.687783/full)

Which doesn’t matter, the Covid vaccine fanatics told us, because the spike protein the vaccines generate doesn’t circulate.


People will be taking shots every 6 months to keep their new immunity to Covid19.
RayR Offline
#271 Posted: Sun, Oct 31 2021, 10:17 AM EST
Joined: 07-20-2020
Posts: 8,888
Where are the science guys here? They said this is a "pandemic of the unvaccinated". They said only when most people were jabbed will we get to herd immunity. Somebody has been lyin' and some people have been bamboozled.


High Recorded Mortality in Countries Categorized as “Covid-19 Vaccine Champions”. The Vaccinated Suffer from Increased Risk of Mortality compared to the Non-vaccinated

Data on Mortality in the Most Vaccinated Countries. Increased Hospitalizations of the Vaccinated

First published on September 30, 2021

Quote:
Since the beginning of the health crisis, the French government has claimed that early treatment was ineffective. It has imposed major restrictions on our freedoms, in particular on doctors’ prescriptions,[1]

It has also promised that vaccination would achieve collective immunity, the end of the crisis and a return to normal life.

But the failure for 18 months of this so-called “health strategy” based on false simulations, innumerable lies, promises never kept, as well as the propaganda and fear campaign has become unbearable.

In turn this has been followed by the extortion of consent to be vaccinated, by outright blackmail, while curtailing our freedoms to move and socialize, our right to work and engage in leisure activities.

Are the current vaccines that they want to impose on us effective?

Can they lead to a collective immunity or is it only a myth? To answer this question, we will make the current sanitary assessment of the most vaccinated countries according to the figures provided by the World Health Organization and the curves of OurWorldinData. (From Vaccine outset in December 2020 to September 15, 2021)

More...

https://www.globalresearch.ca/high-recorded-mortality-in-countries-categorized-as-covid-19-vaccine-champions-increased-hospitalization/5757173
DrMaddVibe Offline
#272 Posted: Sun, Oct 31 2021, 10:20 AM EST
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,431
They ran off with their low IQ and shoddy data.

They were exposed as LIARS.

The ones that still carry the lies are the bottom barrel variety.
zitotczito Offline
#273 Posted: Sun, Oct 31 2021, 10:55 AM EST
Joined: 08-21-2006
Posts: 6,441
Well I just got the Moderna Booster and the only side effect I had was my arm swelled at the injection site and is very sore. I will let you all know if I grow horns or other stuff.
BuckyB93 Offline
#274 Posted: Sun, Oct 31 2021, 11:03 AM EST
Joined: 07-16-2004
Posts: 14,190
I just hope and pray that you are all wearing your masks and getting the shots. It's the patriotic thing to do. Just think of the kids, the elderly, your neighbors, friends and family. They will all die if you don't wear a mask and get the shots every 6 months.

"Science" tells us so.

At what point are we willing to face the facts? I'm thinking never. Too much money, politics, ego invested in it to see as it is.
Dg west deptford Offline
#275 Posted: Sun, Oct 31 2021, 12:12 PM EST
Joined: 05-25-2019
Posts: 2,836
Bill Gates promised a vaccine to cure over population years ago.
It's about time he started delivering
MACS Offline
#276 Posted: Sun, Oct 31 2021, 3:06 PM EST
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,776
And the shot proponents won't admit they were wrong... they'll just double down on their stupidity.

Damn shame.
HockeyDad Offline
#277 Posted: Sun, Oct 31 2021, 3:15 PM EST
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,134
MACS wrote:
And the shot proponents won't admit they were wrong... they'll just double down on their stupidity.

Damn shame.


The shots work great but you need three doses.
MACS Offline
#278 Posted: Sun, Oct 31 2021, 4:40 PM EST
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,776
HockeyDad wrote:
The shots work great but you need three doses.


And you can still get the rona and spread it... don't forget that part.
tailgater Offline
#279 Posted: Sun, Oct 31 2021, 8:00 PM EST
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
Saw on the news this past week: A fourth jab is in the works.

Only for the immunocompromised, the elderly, and those who embraced the fear mongering.

BuckyB93 Offline
#280 Posted: Sun, Oct 31 2021, 8:31 PM EST
Joined: 07-16-2004
Posts: 14,190
Just get the shot you sissy, UnAmerican anti vaxer. If you don't get the shot and you catch it, you have a 1% chance of dying.

Can we get back to the topic of the post? Who here can still support or defend Fauci after learning what we are learning on his role for approving funding for R&D project in China on a man made developed version of a virus that led to one of history's biggest pandemic?

Don't give me the "but Trump" BS, "But Biden" BS. This is not about Biden, Trump, Bush, Clinton... Fauci has his fingerprints on this thing. Whether intentionally or unintentionally, knowingly or unknowingly he signed off or allowed sign offs for R&D on this thing.

I'm told that he's a well respected and highly regarded world wide official in this field. I get it, R&D is cool. Maybe he thought it would lead to something beneficial for mankind. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't. But it didn't.

"Hold my beer, watch this..."
izonfire Offline
#281 Posted: Mon, Nov 1 2021, 1:37 AM EST
Joined: 12-09-2013
Posts: 8,647
I’m taking my fourth shot tonight.
And I feel great…
zitotczito Offline
#282 Posted: Mon, Nov 1 2021, 1:00 PM EST
Joined: 08-21-2006
Posts: 6,441
Hey what's the big deal here. Fauci helped get millions of people killed, but then Democrats love killing people. The one thing unfortunately they are good at.
RayR Offline
#283 Posted: Thu, Nov 4 2021, 9:19 AM EST
Joined: 07-20-2020
Posts: 8,888

NIH Begins Damage Control To Cover Fauci’s Lies

Posted Nov 3, 2021 by Martin Armstrong

Quote:
The National Institute of Health (NIH) has begun quietly covering up Fauci’s unspeakable crimes. The White Coat Waste Project, a non-profit watchdog, blew the whistle on a Fauci funded experiment that tortured beagle puppies in the name of science.

“Our investigators show that Fauci’s NIH division shipped part of a $375,800 grant to a lab in Tunisia to drug beagles and lock their heads in mesh cages filled with hungry sandflies so that the insects could eat them alive,” White Coat Waste Project stated. “They also locked beagles alone in cages in the desert overnight for nine consecutive nights to use them as bait to attract infectious sand flies.” Rep. Nancy Mace (R-S.C.) joined with 24 bipartisan lawmakers to demand answers for Fauci’s “reprehensible misuse of taxpayer funds.”

More...

https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/world-news/corruption/nih-begins-damage-control-to-cover-faucis-lies/
Brewha Offline
#284 Posted: Thu, Nov 4 2021, 12:28 PM EST
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,175
I heard that Fauci started the Chicago Fire.....

And that the cracks his knuckles.
tonygraz Offline
#285 Posted: Thu, Nov 4 2021, 12:45 PM EST
Joined: 08-11-2008
Posts: 20,253
zitotczito wrote:
Hey what's the big deal here. Fauci helped get millions of people killed, but then Democrats love killing people. The one thing unfortunately they are good at.


They should have gone with trump's suggestions on the in-body infrared lights and disinfectants. Only he could fix it. Seems his election fix didn't work that well, no matter hoe hard he tried.
Brewha Offline
#286 Posted: Thu, Nov 4 2021, 12:47 PM EST
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,175
tonygraz wrote:
They should have gone with trump's suggestions on the in-body infrared lights and disinfectants. Only he could fix it. Seems his election fix didn't work that well.

Wait - Have you no respect for the value of Horse dewormer?
RayR Offline
#287 Posted: Thu, Nov 4 2021, 12:55 PM EST
Joined: 07-20-2020
Posts: 8,888
RFK Jr. tells LifeSite ‘sadistic’ Fauci funded research of grafting scalps of aborted babies onto rats

This makes Brewha and Tony happy.

https://www.lifesitenews.com/episodes/rfk-jr-tells-lifesite-sadistic-fauci-funded-research-of-putting-scalps-of-aborted-babies-onto-rats/
tonygraz Offline
#288 Posted: Thu, Nov 4 2021, 12:57 PM EST
Joined: 08-11-2008
Posts: 20,253
Better to go with hexacloraphine - you get a free MAGA chinese made hat with it.
BuckyB93 Offline
#289 Posted: Thu, Nov 4 2021, 11:29 PM EST
Joined: 07-16-2004
Posts: 14,190
Why are the libs so fixated on Trump? They've been wanting to have him disappear for many years but bring him up at every chance they can in order to deflect any criticism of the babbling, bed wetting idiot that currently sits in the Oval Office.

You guys really should seek some therapy.

By the way, the topic of this thread is about Fauci. How anyone can still defend this guy after what has been brought to light is beyond me. Why he is not under investigation for and held responsible for his actions is beyond me. The guy lied under oath in Congressional hearings. He allowed US tax payer money to be used by a communist government to experiment with creating a more effective and deadly virus that (ooops...) escaped the labs leading to one most destructive pandemics in human history.

But tony and Brew don't want to face the facts and just do the

Argh!

TRUMP!

I'd like to hear from you guys who have put Fauci on a pedestal and your take with respect to what we are leaning about his involvement in this whole thing. Again, intentionally or unintentionally, knowingly or unknowingly his finger prints are all over this thing.

You guys kept telling me that he is well respected "Doctor" (quotation fingers) worldwide in his field. If that's the case then he had to definitely know what he was doing, definitely knew what he was approving, and what the potential outcome might be. After all, they have well established models, that are rather vanilla, that can predict what will happen.

He can't hide behind plausible deniability. It's becoming more and more evident that he played an active roll in this thing from it's inception.

Do I think he's evil? NO.
Do I think he intended this to happen? NO.
But it did... under his watch and with his help.
RayR Offline
#290 Posted: Fri, Nov 5 2021, 11:40 AM EST
Joined: 07-20-2020
Posts: 8,888
Zzzzzzzz... Sleep Sleep Sleep Sleep Sleep

I'll just waiting patiently for Tony and Brewha to respond with something other than

Argh!


TRUMP!
Brewha Offline
#291 Posted: Sat, Nov 6 2021, 11:16 AM EST
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,175
BuckyB93 wrote:
Why are the libs so fixated on Trump? They've been wanting to have him disappear for many years but bring him up at every chance they can in order to deflect any criticism of the babbling, bed wetting idiot that currently sits in the Oval Office.

You guys really should seek some therapy.

By the way, the topic of this thread is about Fauci. How anyone can still defend this guy after what has been brought to light is beyond me. Why he is not under investigation for and held responsible for his actions is beyond me. The guy lied under oath in Congressional hearings. He allowed US tax payer money to be used by a communist government to experiment with creating a more effective and deadly virus that (ooops...) escaped the labs leading to one most destructive pandemics in human history.

But tony and Brew don't want to face the facts and just do the

Argh!

TRUMP!

I'd like to hear from you guys who have put Fauci on a pedestal and your take with respect to what we are leaning about his involvement in this whole thing. Again, intentionally or unintentionally, knowingly or unknowingly his finger prints are all over this thing.

You guys kept telling me that he is well respected "Doctor" (quotation fingers) worldwide in his field. If that's the case then he had to definitely know what he was doing, definitely knew what he was approving, and what the potential outcome might be. After all, they have well established models, that are rather vanilla, that can predict what will happen.

He can't hide behind plausible deniability. It's becoming more and more evident that he played an active roll in this thing from it's inception.

Do I think he's evil? NO.
Do I think he intended this to happen? NO.
But it did... under his watch and with his help.


Well, to stay “on topic”: I heard that Fauci can only be killed with a silver bullet.

And that he created the lizard peeps.






Oh, and Trump is still an azzhole.
RayR Offline
#292 Posted: Sat, Nov 6 2021, 1:02 PM EST
Joined: 07-20-2020
Posts: 8,888
Brewha wrote:
Well, to stay “on topic”: I heard that Fauci can only be killed with a silver bullet.

And that he created the lizard peeps.


Actually, it's sunlight and garlic.
He's probably funding the creation of a new breed of super bat lizard peeps in a Chicom lab.

Brewha wrote:
Oh, and Trump is still an azzhole.


You are so predictable.
RayR Offline
#293 Posted: Tue, Nov 9 2021, 10:48 AM EST
Joined: 07-20-2020
Posts: 8,888
FAUCI LIED, BABIES DIED

2,433 Dead Babies in VAERS as Another Study Shows mRNA Shots Not Safe for Pregnant Women

By Brian Shilhavy
Global Research, November 08, 2021

Quote:
There have now been 2,433 fetal deaths recorded in VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) from pregnant women who have been injected with one of the COVID-19 shots. (Source.)

The vast majority of these have been from the Pfizer shot (1,862 deaths) and the Moderna shot (656 deaths.)

There have been more fetal deaths in the past 11 months following COVID-19 shots than there have been for the past 30+ years following ALL vaccines

More...

https://www.globalresearch.ca/2433-dead-babies-vaers-another-study-shows-mrna-shots-not-safe-pregnant-women/5760969
Brewha Offline
#294 Posted: Tue, Nov 9 2021, 6:09 PM EST
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,175
This just in -

Dr. Sarah Parkerson, a senior staffer of the CDC, reviled egregious past actions by Dr. Fauci that call his professional honor into question.

Yeas ago Dr. Fauci took Dr. Parkerson on a date. Good food, conversation and even a first kiss good night.

- and then he never called her.
HockeyDad Offline
#295 Posted: Tue, Nov 9 2021, 6:50 PM EST
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,134
Brewha wrote:
This just in -

Dr. Sarah Parkerson, a senior staffer of the CDC, reviled egregious past actions by Dr. Fauci that call his professional honor into question.

Yeas ago Dr. Fauci took Dr. Parkerson on a date. Good food, conversation and even a first kiss good night.

- and then he never called her.


That’s prolly cause he was working funding some gain of function research in some third world country where it was legal.
Brewha Offline
#296 Posted: Tue, Nov 9 2021, 7:21 PM EST
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,175
Stop defending him HD. You know he is a MONSTER!
bgz Offline
#297 Posted: Wed, Nov 10 2021, 8:17 AM EST
Joined: 07-29-2014
Posts: 13,023
Isn't that Fauci guy the one who somehow managed to get all those poor white people to not trust the shot?

You know... the ones who believe in Q and stuff.

The real conspiracy is that the idiots fell for the trap. It was really a ploy to cut down our poor white population... you ever been to a poverty stricken trailer park? Hood don't have nothin on that sh*t.
RayR Offline
#298 Posted: Wed, Nov 10 2021, 9:10 AM EST
Joined: 07-20-2020
Posts: 8,888
Oh sure! Talk about dead babies and BGZ shows up.

KidCOVE Code word for infant lab rats.

Moderna testing COVID-19 vaccine on infants nationwide despite 'negligible' risk from virus
Vaccine safety pioneer challenges trial leader's claim about COVID risk to children under age 1.

Quote:
The Moderna COVID-19 vaccine is being tested on infants across the country, even as medical experts question the wisdom of moving so fast on novel vaccine development in a population with such low risk from COVID.

Seventy-nine locations in 31 states are listed as participating in the so-called KidCOVE study, which started with children ages 6 to "less than 12," followed by ages 2 to less than 6, and finally 6 months to less than 2 years.

The infant trials have received sporadic media attention. CBS Miami and WCNC Charlotte ran features on local infant participants a month ago, followed by features last week for Colorado's KDVR and Oklahoma's Fox 23.

New attention came Monday when the University of Wisconsin medical school announced that "dozens" of children under age 6 were participating in its trial at American Family Children's Hospital.

https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/coronavirus/moderna-testing-covid-19-vaccine-infants-nationwide-despite-negligible
bgz Offline
#299 Posted: Wed, Nov 10 2021, 9:50 AM EST
Joined: 07-29-2014
Posts: 13,023
RayR wrote:
Oh sure! Talk about dead babies and BGZ shows up.

KidCOVE Code word for infant lab rats.

Moderna testing COVID-19 vaccine on infants nationwide despite 'negligible' risk from virus
Vaccine safety pioneer challenges trial leader's claim about COVID risk to children under age 1.



All this talk about fetus lives matter, but once they're born, Ray don't gaf about them anymore.

No vaccines for kids... so how slow would be slow enough... no movement at all?

World according to RayRay... F*ck the kids, they only matter when they're in the womb.
RayR Offline
#300 Posted: Wed, Nov 10 2021, 10:00 AM EST
Joined: 07-20-2020
Posts: 8,888
Up to your old straw man routine again with a touch of gaslighting, aren't you Ben?

Memo to Ben: Read the article.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
13 Pages«<2345678910>»
Back to Top