America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 3 months ago by frankj1. 25 replies replies.
Would you trust the postal service...
MACS Offline
#1 Posted:
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,823
Do you trust the postal service enough to put $500 in cash in an envelope and mail it to yourself? Or even to anyone else?

If you don't... and I'd wager most of us would absolutely NOT do that... why mail in your ballot?

Vote in person.
deadeyedick Offline
#2 Posted:
Joined: 03-13-2003
Posts: 17,120
You do you. Mailing mine for many years without issue.

I have received many cigar and wine packages that were worth $500 without any issues also.
RayR Offline
#3 Posted:
Joined: 07-20-2020
Posts: 8,927
There is a big difference between cigar and wine packages and mail-in ballots.
Although you'll know when your packages arrive, how do you know if your vote was counted correctly from your mail-in ballot?
deadeyedick Offline
#4 Posted:
Joined: 03-13-2003
Posts: 17,120
Maybe you think my mail carrier is in cahoots with the democrats?
Gene363 Offline
#5 Posted:
Joined: 01-24-2003
Posts: 30,838
The USPS is generally OK, mail-in ballots and how they are handled, nope, nada, period.

We need to get our voting systems open, transparent, and fair so people can be confident in the results.
HockeyDad Offline
#6 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,163
RayR wrote:
There is a big difference between cigar and wine packages and mail-in ballots.
Although you'll know when your packages arrive, how do you know if your vote was counted correctly from your mail-in ballot?


California sends you a confirmation that your vote was counted before you even send it in. Super efficient!
RayR Offline
#7 Posted:
Joined: 07-20-2020
Posts: 8,927
deadeyedick wrote:
Maybe you think my mail carrier is in cahoots with the democrats?


He or she could be, the union is in cahoots with the Democrats because USPS is in a perpetual state of insolvency and the Democrats can always be relied on to bail them out with stolen loot.


HockeyDad wrote:
California sends you a confirmation that your vote was counted before you even send it in. Super efficient!


Man! Those California Commies sure are smart.
Mr. Jones Offline
#8 Posted:
Joined: 06-12-2005
Posts: 19,443
I bet your confirmation letter was hand written and signed by
"Pretty boy GAVIN NEWSOME"
rfenst Offline
#9 Posted:
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,360
MACS wrote:
Do you trust the postal service enough to put $500 in cash in an envelope and mail it to yourself? Or even to anyone else?

If you don't... and I'd wager most of us would absolutely NOT do that... why mail in your ballot?

Vote in person.

My county gives mail and drop-off voters a random ballot number so they can make certain what they mailed in or put in a drop box was received and counted according to their vote. Yours probably does too. It is the same as standing at the ballot scanner in person and the screen showing your vote was counted.
Stogie1020 Offline
#10 Posted:
Joined: 12-19-2019
Posts: 5,371
https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/election-fraud-atlantic-city/2024/02/02/id/1152037/
8trackdisco Offline
#11 Posted:
Joined: 11-06-2004
Posts: 60,090
Gene363 wrote:
The USPS is generally OK, mail-in ballots and how they are handled, nope, nada, period.

We need to get our voting systems open, transparent, and fair so people can be confident in the results.


+1.
KingoftheCove Offline
#12 Posted:
Joined: 10-08-2011
Posts: 7,644
Stogie1020 wrote:
https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/election-fraud-atlantic-city/2024/02/02/id/1152037/

But……….but……..all that mail in ballot election fraud stuff was just fake news!!!
Stogie1020 Offline
#13 Posted:
Joined: 12-19-2019
Posts: 5,371
KingoftheCove wrote:
But……….but……..all that mail in ballot election fraud stuff was just fake news!!!

It started with "There is NO evidence of ballot manipulation"

Then it became "There is no WIDESPREAD evidence of ballot manipulation"

The thing is, all you need to do is throw a single county in a few swing states and blammo, you got a winner.
rfenst Offline
#14 Posted:
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,360
MACS wrote:
Do you trust the postal service enough to put $500 in cash in an envelope and mail it to yourself? Or even to anyone else?

If you don't... and I'd wager most of us would absolutely NOT do that... why mail in your ballot?

Vote in person.

I would buy insurance, but doubt they would insure cash.
RobertHively Offline
#15 Posted:
Joined: 01-14-2015
Posts: 1,893
OP

No, and, we have elections in this country now? When did they get rid of selections?
frankj1 Offline
#16 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,223
Stogie1020 wrote:
It started with "There is NO evidence of ballot manipulation"

Then it became "There is no WIDESPREAD evidence of ballot manipulation"

The thing is, all you need to do is throw a single county in a few swing states and blammo, you got a winner.

so, as always I respect your politics, as you know.
Indulge me here before you consider it nit picking, please.

The charges that have been levied for several years (since prior to Trump winning!) have been alleging a widespread organized campaign by Democrats that stole the presidential election from Trump and would have been the cause had he not won the first time(huh?)...and so far, 8 years into it, there has not been a single substantiated claim. Several promoters of the conspiracy have even admitted their willingness to advance lies in an effort to change the election.

This is not to say there have not been individual instances of voter fraud in likely every election...typically a handful of people are convicted nationally, ironically they are far more often to be pro-GOP cases (DMV inadvertently posted a link to a conservative site several years ago that provided the complete record going back several years).

More often transgressions have been limited to people being registered to vote in more than one place, almost always because they neglected to unregister when they changed residences, but also almost always did not realized it and did not attempt to vote multiple times. There were a few cases early in Trump's term when several of his staff members were shown to be examples of this. When I posted about this ages ago, a few people here discovered they too were registered in more than one place! I believe that many places have since found ways to make unregistering automatic, but I can't swear to that. They should, though.

Here's the potential nit picking part: the case involving Callaway is more of an example of "for profit" crime than "for power" crime...he has been paid by Dems and Reps alike to cheat, and this case was actually for a GOP candidate!
But it's not really the kind of case that Trump and Trumpers have been alleging for nearly a decade now.

Your last sentence is still just pointing out possibilities, it doesn't show a clear way that it has happened as Trump et al have claimed. But it's good to uncover potential threats, that's how they can be corrected and strengthen trust in the process.

It sounds like career criminals like Callahan have been clever enough to find loopholes in local systems that are unexplainable. For example, where I live I receive a mailing with a form to fill out to request mail-in ballots for specific elections and/or election cycles, which I fill out and mail back in (or drop off at Town Hall). I then receive my mail-in ballot(s) and either use them or vote in person. One may try to do both, but there is a system in place that will automatically reject whichever attempt was second. It is inconceivable that random people can pick up ballots to deliver to voters...I'm betting the case you shared will lead to correcting that insane system.

My last thought on election fraud is that people who disparage Biden by citing dementia and worse also are trying to make me believe he is a criminal mastermind who has been stealing the GOP's lunch for years.
I say, pick one! Can't both be true as they are claims that can not coexist in one old man.

As to trusting the mail...absolutely. I mail and receive checks and stuff and have never had an incident. I even mail small amounts of cash for young relatives birthdays and the like. Tax returns and other yuuugely important documents go certified mail.

I'd also trust the mail for ballots...and there is even a locked box right in front of Town Hall where I live.










Stogie1020 Offline
#17 Posted:
Joined: 12-19-2019
Posts: 5,371
Frank, as always, I appreciate the discourse and the tone. We need more of it in this world.

From day one of the claims, (some of which actually warranted investigation) the immediate, widespread broadcast by the DNC and all its tentacles (MSM, spokepersons, politicians who read the DNC talking points, etc.) was lock step and formulated, right down to the precise verbiage used. This was highly suspicious, especially in light of the fact that there were, in fact, situations that should have been investigated. Instead, though, the party line (litterally) was to yell as loudly as posisble "there is no proof of widespread voter fraud!" over and over.

Well, it's pretty clear if you look at swing states that all you really need to do to win a close election is to make sure you win a few specific counties in a few specific swing states. Those counties will litterally decide the outcome of those states, and tip the balance for the total electoral college count. Add in the massive efforts to allow mail-in ballots (which undeniably is less secure than in-person voting) along with instances of Republican polling workers pointing out suspicious issues that were summarily dismissed or explained in unbelievable ways instead of having an actual open investigation, and it becomes entirely understandable why half the country doesn't trust the system anymore. Stories like the one I linked/posted (I have mentioned previously other ballot harvesting fraud) simply show that, given the opportunity and the stakes, cheating does happen. Just because you personally follow the rules of mail in balloting and dont try to vote twice doesn't mean that ballots cannot be printed for dead people (look at the genrally-D resistance to purge voter rolls), extra ballots with odd signatures being "provisionally" accepted and tip the balance of a county, software errors and anomolies like ballot dumps so vastly in favor of one candidate despite the locale being evenly D/R split, etc.

I think the handling of the last election (not just the claims of fraud) did more to damage confidence in the voting process than any of us realize.
rfenst Offline
#18 Posted:
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,360
Stogie1020 wrote:
Frank, as always, I appreciate the discourse and the tone. We need more of it in this world.

From day one of the claims, (some of which actually warranted investigation) the immediate, widespread broadcast by the DNC and all its tentacles (MSM, spokepersons, politicians who read the DNC talking points, etc.) was lock step and formulated, right down to the precise verbiage used. This was highly suspicious, especially in light of the fact that there were, in fact, situations that should have been investigated. Instead, though, the party line (litterally) was to yell as loudly as posisble "there is no proof of widespread voter fraud!" over and over.

Well, it's pretty clear if you look at swing states that all you really need to do to win a close election is to make sure you win a few specific counties in a few specific swing states. Those counties will litterally decide the outcome of those states, and tip the balance for the total electoral college count. Add in the massive efforts to allow mail-in ballots (which undeniably is less secure than in-person voting) along with instances of Republican polling workers pointing out suspicious issues that were summarily dismissed or explained in unbelievable ways instead of having an actual open investigation, and it becomes entirely understandable why half the country doesn't trust the system anymore. Stories like the one I linked/posted (I have mentioned previously other ballot harvesting fraud) simply show that, given the opportunity and the stakes, cheating does happen. Just because you personally follow the rules of mail in balloting and dont try to vote twice doesn't mean that ballots cannot be printed for dead people (look at the genrally-D resistance to purge voter rolls), extra ballots with odd signatures being "provisionally" accepted and tip the balance of a county, software errors and anomolies like ballot dumps so vastly in favor of one candidate despite the locale being evenly D/R split, etc.

I think the handling of the last election (not just the claims of fraud) did more to damage confidence in the voting process than any of us realize.

Trump has proved nothing.
He and his minions are responsible for mass election distrust.
frankj1 Offline
#19 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,223
as Rudy said...we have theories, we are looking for proof.

still waiting for Trump to prove that Emmy Awards were stolen from The Apprentice.

There's a loooong history here.
HockeyDad Offline
#20 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,163
rfenst wrote:
Trump has proved nothing.
He and his minions are responsible for mass election distrust.


Elon Musk proved everything.
ZRX1200 Offline
#21 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,628
Confirmation bias info filtering is a thing.

Especially old people who don’t like freedom.
Brewha Offline
#22 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,201
ZRX1200 wrote:
Confirmation bias info filtering is a thing.

Especially old people who don’t like freedom.

I thought you liked freedom.... Think
delta1 Offline
#23 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,810
Trump and the GOP has filed lawsuits in every state demanding that the results of the 2020 elections be suspended , alleging fraud. He lost every single one, including those in red states.

Here's an article that discusses investigations by the GOP into voter fraud in key battleground states; Pennsylvania, Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada and Wisconsin. Their findings, in "the ‘Lost, Not Stolen’ report says Trump’s failed legal challenges should inspire more trust in our election security."

https://www.witf.org/2022/09/01/these-republicans-did-a-deep-dive-into-2020-election-lawsuits-including-in-pa-heres-why-most-of-them-failed/


I urge everyone of you who believes that the left has stolen and rigged elections to read this...otherwise, your allegations, like those made by Trump, are baseless allegations. Unless you can produce evidence...not slogans...you're just making fake news.



Why are mail-in ballots acceptable and unquestioned in solid Red states. They look, feel and function the same, and are handled by the same USPS.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#24 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,507
Would I???


Hairlip...hairlip...hairlip!



Old joke. Had to.
frankj1 Offline
#25 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,223


Project Veritas admits there was no evidence of election fraud at Pennsylvania post office in 2020
Updated 3:40 PM EST, February 6, 2024
Share
ERIE, Pa. (AP) — The conservative group Project Veritas and its former leader are taking the unusual step of publicly acknowledging that claims of ballot mishandling at a Pennsylvania post office in 2020 were untrue.

The statements from Project Veritas and founder James O’Keefe came as a lawsuit filed against them by a Pennsylvania postmaster was settled Monday.

The group produced videos in the wake of the 2020 presidential election based on claims from a postal worker in Erie, Pennsylvania, who said he had overheard a conversation between the postmaster and a supervisor about illegally backdating mail-in presidential ballots.

Pennsylvania is a battleground state in presidential elections and had been a key target for unfounded claims of election fraud by former President Donald Trump and his supporters after he lost the election to Democrat Joe Biden. The claims about the Erie postmaster sparked calls for an investigation from Republicans and were cited in court by the Trump campaign to support voter fraud allegations.

The admission Monday was the latest evidence that Trump’s claims of widespread voter fraud in the 2020 election were baseless. The former president’s allegations of massive voting fraud have been dismissed by a succession of judges and refuted by state election officials and his former attorney general, William Barr.

The Erie postal worker, Richard Hopkins, said in a statement Monday that he was wrong and apologized to the postmaster and his family, as well as the Erie post office.

“I only heard a fragment of the conversation and reached the conclusion that the conversation was related to nefarious behavior,” he wrote. “As I have now learned, I was wrong.”

Both Project Veritas and O’Keefe said in their statements posted on X, formerly known as Twitter, that they are not aware of any evidence or other allegation of election fraud in Erie during the 2020 election. The conservative nonprofit, which is known for its hidden camera stings aimed at embarrassing news outlets, labor organizations and Democratic politicians, removed O’Keefe last year amid reports of mistreated workers and misspent organization funds.

Erie postmaster Robert Weisenbach sued the group, as well as O’Keefe and Hopkins, for defamation in 2021.

Weisenbach’s attorneys included the group Protect Democracy, which confirmed the settlement, as did Stephen Klein, an attorney who represented Project Veritas and O’Keefe. Both sides said the “case was resolved in a manner acceptable to all the parties.”

An attorney for Hopkins did not immediately return a message seeking comment.

Weisenbach, who voted for Trump, has previously said the false ballot backdating accusations destroyed his reputation and forced him to flee his home after his address was circulated online and he was confronted by a man yelling at him as he pulled into his driveway, according to court documents.

The U.S. Postal Service also investigated Hopkins’s claims, but found no evidence of backdated ballots, according to a report released in February 2021.

Elections officials previously told The Associated Press the county had received about 140 ballots after the election and just five had an Erie postmark.

Users browsing this topic
Guest