America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 3 months ago by Brewha. 91 replies replies.
2 Pages<12
January 6 Memorial Holiday
Jump to Bottom | Previous Topic | Next Topic
ZRX1200 Offline
#51 Posted: Thu, Jan 11 2024, 12:34 PM EST
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,628
1.
That’s the approved narrative

2.
Speculation

3.
Ok

4.
Might wanna revisit the timeline….

5.
Don’t completely disagree, but the people who hate him are just as infatuated some willingly some conditioned. And that brings me to, there’s no difference between those three groups. Remove him from the equation, the things that have been done are far more treasonous than loud obnoxious visitors with a smattering of violent people.

And I’m not talking about one day I’m talking about starting from illegally surveilling a political opponent.

You care more about Cheeto than I do. (Not an attack on you btw).

His rise shouldn’t be a shock if you have a basic understanding of base human reactions. People hate the government. Their side is either good or less bad, and somehow….both sides are fed up with how they’re wronged. It’s almost like a perfect storm where people naturally opposed to a shifting change back to where we should be because they’re too afraid of the other guys.

So you get a candidate that’s smart enough and in touch enough to know how to not sound like he’s a schill for either team and yet continue the pep rally against one of the squads. Then the whole time in office the majority of his policies were Clinton/Bush/Obama esque.

This is really amazing stuff. And the manipulation of our population is still an afterthought.
Abrignac Offline
#52 Posted: Thu, Jan 11 2024, 1:16 PM EST
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,313
Here’s the thing. No one wants to compromise. Without both sides willing to give and take we will never get to sustainable spending. On one hand you have the no-way-come-hell-or-high-water-will-I insert any of a myriad of positions. If they aren’t willing to budge the other side isn’t going to give an inch. So here we are.
8trackdisco Offline
#53 Posted: Thu, Jan 11 2024, 2:17 PM EST
Joined: 11-06-2004
Posts: 60,087
You care more about Cheeto than I do. (Not an attack on you btw).
Not taking it personally. Nor should you either. Questioning thoughts and ideas we have.
Think where you are rightish about that line is I care more about him NOT being the Republican nominee, because there are likely more Never Trumpers than there are Always Trumpers.

As far as your support of Trump, do you want him to be the Republican nominee?
Are you an Always Trumper?

His rise shouldn’t be a shock if you have a basic understanding of base human reactions. People hate the government. Their side is either good or less bad, and somehow….both sides are fed up with how they’re wronged. It’s almost like a perfect storm where people naturally opposed to a shifting change back to where we should be because they’re too afraid of the other guys.

Not shocked at his rise. I’ve never voted for him (I’m a Never Trumper). Best thing about November 2016 was Hillary not becoming President. Wasn’t thrilled the president was Trump.
I feel your last line is dead on.

This is really amazing stuff. And the manipulation of our population is still an afterthought. [/quote]

It is. The chilling poll I saw was 31% of Democrats and 29% of Republicans consider the other side Enemies of the State.
If the mindset is 31% are perceived Fascists and 29% are perceived as Socialists, that pressures the other 50% of the country to be the adults in the room.

It could get scarier yet.
ZRX1200 Offline
#54 Posted: Thu, Jan 11 2024, 5:10 PM EST
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,628
Yeah but of those two groups, nobody is claiming or running as a fascist where we do have non-apologetic socialists.

I never voted for Cheeto. He’s a better candidate than Haley. I’m not sold on Desantis having it nationally.

One final thing….again Cheeto’s policies. Something that’s either ignored completely or projected by people that have no clue and parrot their conformation bias info they’ve been fed.

What policies did you not like?


Maybe I don’t mind an azzwhole if he’s not a commie as much as the lefty bunch. The people that think of that position as an ideal bother me, it is supposed to be a leader. I’ve had a few good bosses and I had the best dad ever. One thing they had in common was occasional rubbing people the wrong way when achieving an outcome. I don’t like leaders that wait for the wind to blow to know where to stand and I don’t like empty vessels for dummies to pour their projections into.
Abrignac Offline
#55 Posted: Thu, Jan 11 2024, 5:59 PM EST
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,313
ZRX1200 wrote:
1.
That’s the approved narrative

2.
Speculation

3.
Ok

4.
Might wanna revisit the timeline….

5.
Don’t completely disagree, but the people who hate him are just as infatuated some willingly some conditioned. And that brings me to, there’s no difference between those three groups. Remove him from the equation, the things that have been done are far more treasonous than loud obnoxious visitors with a smattering of violent people.

And I’m not talking about one day I’m talking about starting from illegally surveilling a political opponent.

You care more about Cheeto than I do. (Not an attack on you btw).

His rise shouldn’t be a shock if you have a basic understanding of base human reactions. People hate the government. Their side is either good or less bad, and somehow….both sides are fed up with how they’re wronged. It’s almost like a perfect storm where people naturally opposed to a shifting change back to where we should be because they’re too afraid of the other guys.

So you get a candidate that’s smart enough and in touch enough to know how to not sound like he’s a schill for either team and yet continue the pep rally against one of the squads. Then the whole time in office the majority of his policies were Clinton/Bush/Obama esque.

This is really amazing stuff. And the manipulation of our population is still an afterthought.


I think we both equally detest Trump. I didn’t vote for him because I liked him. When he ran in 2016 I felt his agenda was better for America than Clinton’s, Johnson’s and Stein’s. In 2000 I voted for him because I felt his policies were better for the United States than Biden’s, Jorgenson’s and Hawkins. As far as the other candidates in the two elections, I couldn’t tell you anything about them. They were so far down in the polls they had no chance of winning.

That said, I’m not a fan of name calling. IMHO, it makes an argument seem weak in the sense of “I don’t have anything factual, so I’ll make fun of someone” situation.

As far as character, I think it’s extremely important for a world leader to exercise a minimal level of diplomacy. One can be right about absolutely everything, but if the act like an azzhole no one wants to work with them so the are effectively inconsequential. Kinda like what happened between 2016 and 2000.
8trackdisco Offline
#56 Posted: Thu, Jan 11 2024, 9:39 PM EST
Joined: 11-06-2004
Posts: 60,087
ZRX1200 wrote:
Yeah but of those two groups, nobody is claiming or running as a fascist where we do have non-apologetic socialists.

I never voted for Cheeto. He’s a better candidate than Haley. I’m not sold on Desantis having it nationally.

One final thing….again Cheeto’s policies. Something that’s either ignored completely or projected by people that have no clue and parrot their conformation bias info they’ve been fed.

What policies did you not like?

Maybe I don’t mind an azzwhole if he’s not a commie as much as the lefty bunch. The people that think of that position as an ideal bother me, it is supposed to be a leader. I’ve had a few good bosses and I had the best dad ever. One thing they had in common was occasional rubbing people the wrong way when achieving an outcome. I don’t like leaders that wait for the wind to blow to know where to stand and I don’t like empty vessels for dummies to pour their projections into.


Policy wise, I liked a lot of it.
The Muslim Country Travel Ban seemed arbitrary.
Ran up the debt by 7 trillion. And everytime the governemnt shuts down, it adds to the deficit.
What, if anything came of his trade deal with China? It got inked, and the Chinese did not have their feet held to the fire.
Kim Jung Un "Rocket Man" kept and keeps updating his rocket capability. He didn't stop nor slow them.
He didn't toss The Dreamers. That would have been the most consequntial immigration reform possible. And a real deterrent.

The one that bugged me the most is the tax cuts. The rich get permanent cuts. Everyone else- temporary.

His devisiveness that he's created in the country has torn the fabric like nothing since Watergate. This united the Democrats and helped usher in the ridiculous, complete and wild swing to the far left. How many people have been been forced out or felt compelled to leave because they were White, Straight, Christian and Male? So devisive, a corpse beat him in an election.

His pushing his handpicked people (Masterson, Oz, Walker) cost the the Republicans the Senate. And now that the Gaetz Squad of 8 have their position, the only thing Republicans in the House can accomplish is to overthrow their speaker. But I have confidence they have enough disunity to accomplish that again.

For me it's not the color of the Cheetoh's skin, but the lack of content in his character.
A Grandiose Narcassist. Lacks impulse control. Surrounds himself with Yes-People instead of people who will challenge him.

GN's are endlessly insecure and have to always turn it up to eleven to reassure themselves. And at what price?
MACS Offline
#57 Posted: Fri, Jan 12 2024, 6:25 AM EST
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,817
TRUMP 2024!!

America, fuck yeah!
ZRX1200 Offline
#58 Posted: Fri, Jan 12 2024, 12:56 PM EST
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,628
8 were pretty close on this.

Big thing I'd disagree with is him dividing. Much of what (sometimes how) he said was a fool to the approved narrative. The press is a propaganda machine. He didn’t create division he gave light to disagreement with the platform of the podium. You don’t have to like what or how he said but this country needs to get away from half truths and qualified statements and name calling for the sake of isolation of opponents.
Abrignac Offline
#59 Posted: Fri, Jan 12 2024, 8:13 PM EST
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,313
ZRX1200 wrote:
8 were pretty close on this.

Big thing I'd disagree with is him dividing. Much of what (sometimes how) he said was a fool to the approved narrative. The press is a propaganda machine. He didn’t create division he gave light to disagreement with the platform of the podium. You don’t have to like what or how he said but this country needs to get away from half truths and qualified statements and name calling for the sake of isolation of opponents.


So no more “Cheeto”? Asking for a friend.
ZRX1200 Offline
#60 Posted: Fri, Jan 12 2024, 8:44 PM EST
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,628
Oh I’m gonna name call…..
Abrignac Offline
#61 Posted: Fri, Jan 12 2024, 10:50 PM EST
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,313
ZRX1200 wrote:
Oh I’m gonna name call…..


Good. You haven’t changed. The world needs assholes like you and I. Have to balance out the nice guys somehow.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#62 Posted: Fri, Feb 2 2024, 11:24 AM EST
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,498
ZRX1200 wrote:
1.
That’s the approved narrative

2.
Speculation

3.
Ok

4.
Might wanna revisit the timeline….

5.
Don’t completely disagree, but the people who hate him are just as infatuated some willingly some conditioned. And that brings me to, there’s no difference between those three groups. Remove him from the equation, the things that have been done are far more treasonous than loud obnoxious visitors with a smattering of violent people.

And I’m not talking about one day I’m talking about starting from illegally surveilling a political opponent.

You care more about Cheeto than I do. (Not an attack on you btw).

His rise shouldn’t be a shock if you have a basic understanding of base human reactions. People hate the government. Their side is either good or less bad, and somehow….both sides are fed up with how they’re wronged. It’s almost like a perfect storm where people naturally opposed to a shifting change back to where we should be because they’re too afraid of the other guys.

So you get a candidate that’s smart enough and in touch enough to know how to not sound like he’s a schill for either team and yet continue the pep rally against one of the squads. Then the whole time in office the majority of his policies were Clinton/Bush/Obama esque.

This is really amazing stuff. And the manipulation of our population is still an afterthought.



Preach it.


However...

J6 Committee Admits Its Show Trials Were An Election-Year Publicity Stunt



Key members of the Jan. 6 Committee admit in a new PBS documentary that the operation was an election-year publicity stunt.

Key members of the since-disbanded Select Committee on January 6th admit in a new PBS documentary that the entire operation was an election-year publicity stunt.

On Wednesday, Frontline PBS published a new documentary, “Democracy on Trial,” chronicling the House committee’s work. Pivotal players on the partisan probe conceded in the two-and-half-hour documentary that the panel’s public performances produced for prime-time television were orchestrated as entertainment media.

“The one thing that we knew was the information that we have is compelling,” said Illinois congressman-turned CNN commentator Adam Kinzinger. “The thing we needed to do was tell that to the American people in a compelling way.”

The Jan. 6 Committee turned to former ABC News President James Goldston to produce their hearings that occurred just months before the 2022 midterms. The panel also hired another producer whose résumé included stints at Bloomberg, ABC News “Nightline,” and “Good Morning America.”

“I got a call pretty much out of the blue from the January 6th committee,” Goldson told the documentary. “They wanted a storyteller.”

“While they were brilliant lawyers,” Goldston added, “storytelling for a mass audience is not what they do.”

“To bring in a guy like this who would think outside the box really did prove to be fruitful,” Robert Draper of New York Times Magazine tells the PBS documentarians. “It was Golston who really began to envision this as in a way a kind of miniseries that there would be sort of nine episodes and that these episodes would tackle particular themes.”

The first episode in the summer series ultimately pulled dismal ratings despite the committee’s biggest fans attempting to encourage viewership with free ice cream watch parties. Months before the season premier, House Democrats conceded the committee’s investigation was central to the party’s plans to maintain the majority in the November midterms.

“Jan. 6 committee faces a thorny challenge,” read a March 2022 headline from the Washington Post: “Persuading the public to care.” The article continued, “They hope their recommendations to prevent another insurrection will be adopted, but also that their work will repel voters from Republicans who they say helped propel the attack.”

The Soviet-style committee eventually became the legacy project for ousted Wyoming Rep. Liz Cheney, who served as vice chair of the panel. By August, Cheney’s futile bid for re-election among one of the nation’s most conservative electorates was characterized as a “Kamikaze Campaign” by New York Magazine. Cheney overwhelmingly lost her effort for a fourth term and published a memoir last December. In the book, Cheney reflected on the committee’s hiring of Goldston to dramatize the hearings to boost Democrats’ electoral prospects.

“He came on board and brought with him a number of individuals with years of experience in network news,” Cheney wrote. “Goldston and his team were exceptionally helpful in facilitating that type of presentation. And our outline for each hearing — which took the form of a trial presentation — closely paralleled that structure.”

https://thefederalist.com/2024/02/01/j6-committee-admits-its-show-trials-were-an-election-year-publicity-stunt/


Oh how it was swallowed up by the "Must See TV" crowd. Biscuits meet gravy.

The irony

https://youtu.be/9OuFbyyt8k0?si=ZXGleZY_SljCu6iX


The iron...eee
8trackdisco Offline
#63 Posted: Fri, Feb 2 2024, 12:54 PM EST
Joined: 11-06-2004
Posts: 60,087
DrMaddVibe wrote:
Preach it.


However...

J6 Committee Admits Its Show Trials Were An Election-Year Publicity Stunt



Key members of the Jan. 6 Committee admit in a new PBS documentary that the operation was an election-year publicity stunt.

Key members of the since-disbanded Select Committee on January 6th admit in a new PBS documentary that the entire operation was an election-year publicity stunt.

On Wednesday, Frontline PBS published a new documentary, “Democracy on Trial,” chronicling the House committee’s work. Pivotal players on the partisan probe conceded in the two-and-half-hour documentary that the panel’s public performances produced for prime-time television were orchestrated as entertainment media.

“The one thing that we knew was the information that we have is compelling,” said Illinois congressman-turned CNN commentator Adam Kinzinger. “The thing we needed to do was tell that to the American people in a compelling way.”

The Jan. 6 Committee turned to former ABC News President James Goldston to produce their hearings that occurred just months before the 2022 midterms. The panel also hired another producer whose résumé included stints at Bloomberg, ABC News “Nightline,” and “Good Morning America.”

“I got a call pretty much out of the blue from the January 6th committee,” Goldson told the documentary. “They wanted a storyteller.”

“While they were brilliant lawyers,” Goldston added, “storytelling for a mass audience is not what they do.”

“To bring in a guy like this who would think outside the box really did prove to be fruitful,” Robert Draper of New York Times Magazine tells the PBS documentarians. “It was Golston who really began to envision this as in a way a kind of miniseries that there would be sort of nine episodes and that these episodes would tackle particular themes.”

The first episode in the summer series ultimately pulled dismal ratings despite the committee’s biggest fans attempting to encourage viewership with free ice cream watch parties. Months before the season premier, House Democrats conceded the committee’s investigation was central to the party’s plans to maintain the majority in the November midterms.

“Jan. 6 committee faces a thorny challenge,” read a March 2022 headline from the Washington Post: “Persuading the public to care.” The article continued, “They hope their recommendations to prevent another insurrection will be adopted, but also that their work will repel voters from Republicans who they say helped propel the attack.”

The Soviet-style committee eventually became the legacy project for ousted Wyoming Rep. Liz Cheney, who served as vice chair of the panel. By August, Cheney’s futile bid for re-election among one of the nation’s most conservative electorates was characterized as a “Kamikaze Campaign” by New York Magazine. Cheney overwhelmingly lost her effort for a fourth term and published a memoir last December. In the book, Cheney reflected on the committee’s hiring of Goldston to dramatize the hearings to boost Democrats’ electoral prospects.

“He came on board and brought with him a number of individuals with years of experience in network news,” Cheney wrote. “Goldston and his team were exceptionally helpful in facilitating that type of presentation. And our outline for each hearing — which took the form of a trial presentation — closely paralleled that structure.”

https://thefederalist.com/2024/02/01/j6-committee-admits-its-show-trials-were-an-election-year-publicity-stunt/


Oh how it was swallowed up by the "Must See TV" crowd. Biscuits meet gravy.

The irony

https://youtu.be/9OuFbyyt8k0?si=ZXGleZY_SljCu6iX


The iron...eee


Have watched it yet? 2 hours and 24 minutes.

Use to love Frontline. Then the6 went from Lean Left to so fare left they were spinning in circles.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#64 Posted: Fri, Feb 2 2024, 1:12 PM EST
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,498
8trackdisco wrote:
Have watched it yet? 2 hours and 24 minutes.

Use to love Frontline. Then the6 went from Lean Left to so fare left they were spinning in circles.


What Tucker Carlson showed was the unvarnished video. Capitol Hill policemen opening doors, removing barricades and unlocking windows. Providing guided tours throughout the entire Capitol was a bit of a surprise, but hey when the FBI asks...you deliver and Ray Epps and Co. had a picture to deliver of total anarchy when in reality it was all a DNC psyops.

Did you swallow what they sold?

The truth was there. Posted all up here too.
Abrignac Offline
#65 Posted: Fri, Feb 2 2024, 1:55 PM EST
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,313
The article headline “J6 Committee Admits Its Show Trials Were An Election-Year Publicity Stunt” is yet another example of a non-sequitur argument put forth by a highly partisan outlet.

Not saying it’s not a true statement, but by saying the committee did something the author implies that a consensus existed between at least a majority of the members. However, the article only quotes one member of the committee. Since when does one member not authorized to speak on behalf of an entire committee become the voice of that committee? The article goes on to say key members, but never names any of them nor does it provide quotes from any other member.

Again not saying something did or did not happen, just pointing out that when one relies on HIGHLY partisan outlets for his information he can easily be misled. The simpler the mind, the easier it’s misled.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#66 Posted: Fri, Feb 2 2024, 2:36 PM EST
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,498
That's why I ALWAYS post the links to what I'm saying.

If you would've taken the time out of washing your ass you'd see that there are hyper links. These links go to other articles that CLEARLY state the freaking obvious you choose to ignore.

https://youtu.be/Y44fyh4ap7k?si=mIM7i9Xfkm9rPIAy


Reading and even listening/watching a video is simply too hard for some.
Abrignac Offline
#67 Posted: Fri, Feb 2 2024, 6:05 PM EST
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,313
DrMaddVibe wrote:
That's why I ALWAYS post the links to what I'm saying.

If you would've taken the time out of washing your ass you'd see that there are hyper links. These links go to other articles that CLEARLY state the freaking obvious you choose to ignore.

https://youtu.be/Y44fyh4ap7k?si=mIM7i9Xfkm9rPIAy


Reading and even listening/watching a video is simply too hard for some.


Since seemingly ever article you post is from some far-right leaning source it’s safe to assume for every gram of fact in said article you post there will be a corresponding ton of opinion. So why would the videos be any different. Personally I’d rather watch 2 dogs fuck than waste 2 hours and 38 minutes watching a show produced by a partisan hack.

On the other hand, why post someone else’s work? Is it because you’re so simple-minded you’re incapable of formulating your own thoughts into anything meaningful?

A more effective post would have been “According to the sources 1, 2 and 3 Reps A, B, C who were members of the Jan 6 Select Committee etc stated that the reason for x was z.” Short, sweet, fact based and to the point. Including accessible links to your sources not links to the drivel you cut and pasted would make your posts much more effective. Instead you simply posted another example of Henny Penny running around in circles screaming that the sky is falling when it clearly is not.

But, I’m not surprised. You’re nothing but the one-trick-pony who absolutely abhors anything that doesn’t nicely fit into a finely defined place in your narrative. You hate half of the population of the US because they disagree with your myopic views. So when you’re not busy posting about the DNC being a terrorist organization or posting some opinion article usually with a catchy title but whose body lacks any facts to back up the ascertains made in the article’s title you post about how something that you have absolutely knowledge of needs to be changed.

If you weren’t the one I’m speaking of you’d probably agree that you are in fact the village idiot.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#68 Posted: Fri, Feb 2 2024, 6:39 PM EST
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,498
Abrignac wrote:
Since seemingly ever article you post is from some far-right leaning source it’s safe to assume for every gram of fact in said article you post there will be a corresponding ton of opinion. So why would the videos be any different. Personally I’d rather watch 2 dogs fuck than waste 2 hours and 38 minutes watching a show produced by a partisan hack.

On the other hand, why post someone else’s work? Is it because you’re so simple-minded you’re incapable of formulating your own thoughts into anything meaningful?

A more effective post would have been “According to the sources 1, 2 and 3 Reps A, B, C who were members of the Jan 6 Select Committee etc stated that the reason for x was z.” Short, sweet, fact based and to the point. Including accessible links to your sources not links to the drivel you cut and pasted would make your posts much more effective. Instead you simply posted another example of Henny Penny running around in circles screaming that the sky is falling when it clearly is not.

But, I’m not surprised. You’re nothing but the one-trick-pony who absolutely abhors anything that doesn’t nicely fit into a finely defined place in your narrative. You hate half of the population of the US because they disagree with your myopic views. So when you’re not busy posting about the DNC being a terrorist organization or posting some opinion article usually with a catchy title but whose body lacks any facts to back up the ascertains made in the article’s title you post about how something that you have absolutely knowledge of needs to be changed.

If you weren’t the one I’m speaking of you’d probably agree that you are in fact the village idiot.


I don't agree at all with you and you're not intelligent. At all.
Mr. Jones Offline
#69 Posted: Fri, Feb 2 2024, 8:16 PM EST
Joined: 06-12-2005
Posts: 19,434
DrafterX owns 50 Hawaiian shirts...
He is a secret "PROUD BOY" SUBVERSIVE HURTIN UNIT...
RayR Offline
#70 Posted: Fri, Feb 2 2024, 8:23 PM EST
Joined: 07-20-2020
Posts: 8,918
DrMaddVibe wrote:
I don't agree at all with you and you're not intelligent. At all.


Hey MAN! Welcome to the "one-trick-pony" club! LOL
And don't ever compliment Abrignac, he's an ingrate.
Abrignac Offline
#71 Posted: Fri, Feb 2 2024, 8:51 PM EST
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,313
DrMaddVibe wrote:
I don't agree at all with you and you're not intelligent. At all.


Idiots usually don’t understand logic. So I see why you feel that way.
Brewha Offline
#72 Posted: Sun, Feb 4 2024, 11:58 AM EST
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,201
Abrignac wrote:
Since seemingly ever article you post is from some far-right leaning source it’s safe to assume for every gram of fact in said article you post there will be a corresponding ton of opinion. So why would the videos be any different. Personally I’d rather watch 2 dogs fuck than waste 2 hours and 38 minutes watching a show produced by a partisan hack.

On the other hand, why post someone else’s work? Is it because you’re so simple-minded you’re incapable of formulating your own thoughts into anything meaningful?

A more effective post would have been “According to the sources 1, 2 and 3 Reps A, B, C who were members of the Jan 6 Select Committee etc stated that the reason for x was z.” Short, sweet, fact based and to the point. Including accessible links to your sources not links to the drivel you cut and pasted would make your posts much more effective. Instead you simply posted another example of Henny Penny running around in circles screaming that the sky is falling when it clearly is not.

But, I’m not surprised. You’re nothing but the one-trick-pony who absolutely abhors anything that doesn’t nicely fit into a finely defined place in your narrative. You hate half of the population of the US because they disagree with your myopic views. So when you’re not busy posting about the DNC being a terrorist organization or posting some opinion article usually with a catchy title but whose body lacks any facts to back up the ascertains made in the article’s title you post about how something that you have absolutely knowledge of needs to be changed.

If you weren’t the one I’m speaking of you’d probably agree that you are in fact the village idiot.




Uh, Anthony….we all have been trying not to say that to his face……. d'oh!
RobertHively Offline
#73 Posted: Sun, Feb 4 2024, 12:44 PM EST
Joined: 01-14-2015
Posts: 1,884

"Yes, these guys are so ridiculous, you post someone else's thoughts, then they accuse you of not having any original thoughts of your own. If you post only your own thoughts, they want links to someone else's thoughts to support your thoughts. I think they'd only be happy if we didn't have any thoughts at all."

-RayRay The Wise
RobertHively Offline
#74 Posted: Sun, Feb 4 2024, 12:47 PM EST
Joined: 01-14-2015
Posts: 1,884
Brewha Offline
#75 Posted: Sun, Feb 4 2024, 2:10 PM EST
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,201
RobertHively wrote:


-RayRay The Wise


Plainly, this is the lowest bar for wisdom I have ever seem…..
DrMaddVibe Offline
#76 Posted: Sun, Feb 4 2024, 4:22 PM EST
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,498
Brewha wrote:
Uh, Anthony….we all have been trying not to say that to his face……. d'oh!


Sniveling coward. I'm the same in person as appear here. I Lmao at you and the crap you push. Maybe you can meet up at a truck stop glory hole and shower.


I've explained myself time and time again as to why I post what I post. As for the sources, the infamous truck stop bathroom groupie didn't care to me tion the articles I post from CNN, MSnbc, NY post, wash post and whatever site that contains information I choose to share. Why? Because he's stupid like you. You sop up whatever the government pitches you to do and you're 1st in line. Cheerleading and telling us to take useless shots, provide vaccine passports, buy an ev...doesn't matter. Useful tool. He's a bit different than you. He questions some but hates opposing sites and viewpoints that destroy the narratives he believes in.

Don't like it tough. What you can't do is find the lies. I do a pretty good job of not pushin them and setting what you push down the drain where it belongs. So please, you 2 knuckleheads keep on being yourselves and show the board who and what you really are.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#77 Posted: Sun, Feb 4 2024, 4:31 PM EST
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,498
Brewha wrote:
Plainly, this is the lowest bar for wisdom I have ever seem…..



Your constant dismissal has me questioning how little you read and comprehend. It appears you lack the ability to look at an opposing viewpoint and see perhaps where you could learn.

To this date...you have posted nothing of value.

Nothing.

If you have to denigrate a poster for what he posts, prove him wrong with an articulate viewpont. If you have links to articles that back up what you need do that. If you can't do that be prepared to be tossed out with the chum.

You could be politically opposed to what he says but...if you're looking to share your pov...and provide nothing...STFU. He's doing it with panache and you're not even allowed at the kiddie table with your crayons.
RayR Offline
#78 Posted: Sun, Feb 4 2024, 9:47 PM EST
Joined: 07-20-2020
Posts: 8,918
If Brewha didn't have dismal, denigrating posts, he'd have no thoughts at all. Wink
8trackdisco Offline
#79 Posted: Mon, Feb 5 2024, 7:49 AM EST
Joined: 11-06-2004
Posts: 60,087
And there you have it. A microcosm of our society.

As long as there is such a large segment of Always Trumpers and Never Trumpers, the Dems will continue to dunk on the Reps.

Congrats, Brewha. You’ve got scoreboard and will probably continue that way until the Trump Trance is broken.

I don’t like it, but it is the state of things.
HockeyDad Offline
#80 Posted: Mon, Feb 5 2024, 10:26 AM EST
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,160
8trackdisco wrote:
And there you have it. A microcosm of our society.

As long as there is such a large segment of Always Trumpers and Never Trumpers, the Dems will continue to dunk on the Reps.

Congrats, Brewha. You’ve got scoreboard and will probably continue that way until the Trump Trance is broken.

I don’t like it, but it is the state of things.



So basically the Democrats win unless the Republicans capitulate. This is why I bet on the Democratic Socialists winning.

Perhaps the Republicans should run Mitch McConnell for president.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#81 Posted: Mon, Feb 5 2024, 10:37 AM EST
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,498
Pretty sure his wife won't let him.
Brewha Offline
#82 Posted: Mon, Feb 5 2024, 4:09 PM EST
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,201
DrMaddVibe wrote:
Sniveling coward. I'm the same in person as appear here. I Lmao at you and the crap you push. Maybe you can meet up at a truck stop glory hole and shower.


I've explained myself time and time again as to why I post what I post. As for the sources, the infamous truck stop bathroom groupie didn't care to me tion the articles I post from CNN, MSnbc, NY post, wash post and whatever site that contains information I choose to share. Why? Because he's stupid like you. You sop up whatever the government pitches you to do and you're 1st in line. Cheerleading and telling us to take useless shots, provide vaccine passports, buy an ev...doesn't matter. Useful tool. He's a bit different than you. He questions some but hates opposing sites and viewpoints that destroy the narratives he believes in.

Don't like it tough. What you can't do is find the lies. I do a pretty good job of not pushin them and setting what you push down the drain where it belongs. So please, you 2 knuckleheads keep on being yourselves and show the board who and what you really are.


Of course, I was just trying to be sensitive about your feelings.

Remember, we call you Captain Cut-n-Paste out of respect for the sheer volume of words you manage to move with your text buffer. Bravo! And yes, they not only state your opinion better than you can, but they also provide it to you in a quick ctrl-C, ctrl-V. Poetry in motion, I say.

And you never stoop to debate - just middle school name calling. It's really poets a fine point on you view...



Oh, I forgot:
DrMaddVibe wrote:
Sniveling coward.

Scum drinking saki!!
DrMaddVibe Offline
#83 Posted: Mon, Feb 5 2024, 4:18 PM EST
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,498
Do you have a decoder for that psychospeak?

Someone might want to know what you had to say.
Brewha Offline
#84 Posted: Mon, Feb 5 2024, 4:20 PM EST
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,201
DrMaddVibe wrote:
Your constant dismissal has me questioning how little you read and comprehend. It appears you lack the ability to look at an opposing viewpoint and see perhaps where you could learn.

To this date...you have posted nothing of value.

Nothing.

If you have to denigrate a poster for what he posts, prove him wrong with an articulate viewpont. If you have links to articles that back up what you need do that. If you can't do that be prepared to be tossed out with the chum.

You could be politically opposed to what he says but...if you're looking to share your pov...and provide nothing...STFU. He's doing it with panache and you're not even allowed at the kiddie table with your crayons.


I did not know you felt that way towards Ray.
I think it's sweet....

But seriously, when I posted things from NASA about climate change you said is was a lie.
My posted from the EPA about EVs; "political fantasy"
Clips and links from the CDC; "a conspiracy"

Take that dookie head!
(yes, i'm trying to get in the sprit here)
Brewha Offline
#85 Posted: Mon, Feb 5 2024, 4:23 PM EST
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,201
8trackdisco wrote:
And there you have it. A microcosm of our society.

As long as there is such a large segment of Always Trumpers and Never Trumpers, the Dems will continue to dunk on the Reps.

Congrats, Brewha. You’ve got scoreboard and will probably continue that way until the Trump Trance is broken.

I don’t like it, but it is the state of things.


Dude, I wasn't even talking politics.
Just goofing on the local clowns.

You know that guy they list at the end of a movie, in the credits; "Projectionist"
That could be you.....
DrMaddVibe Offline
#86 Posted: Mon, Feb 5 2024, 4:28 PM EST
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,498
Brewha wrote:


But seriously, when I posted things from NASA about climate change you said is was a lie.
My posted from the EPA about EVs; "political fantasy"
Clips and links from the CDC; "a conspiracy"



Climate change is a lie.

Your ev experience is yours alone. Manufacturers are ditching them. Ford, GM, Honda, Volvo and Toyota know a lot more about cars than you downloading a fart ap.

As far as the CDC...take that garbage up with Teedub.

So...what are you crying about?
Brewha Offline
#87 Posted: Mon, Feb 5 2024, 5:27 PM EST
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,201
I was mourning critical thinking….
frankj1 Offline
#88 Posted: Mon, Feb 5 2024, 7:16 PM EST
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,223
we're sitting Shiva for it tomorrow at sunset
RayR Offline
#89 Posted: Mon, Feb 5 2024, 7:56 PM EST
Joined: 07-20-2020
Posts: 8,918
Brewha wrote:
I did not know you felt that way towards Ray.
I think it's sweet....

But seriously, when I posted things from NASA about climate change you said is was a lie.
My posted from the EPA about EVs; "political fantasy"
Clips and links from the CDC; "a conspiracy"

Take that dookie head!
(yes, i'm trying to get in the sprit here)


You're just jealous, We're in the "one-trick-pony" club! You don't even have a pony to ride on. 🏇🏇🏇🏇
DrMaddVibe Offline
#90 Posted: Mon, Feb 5 2024, 8:40 PM EST
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,498
Brewha wrote:
I was mourning critical thinking….


Why? Not like you were using it to begin with!
Brewha Offline
#91 Posted: Tue, Feb 6 2024, 8:16 AM EST
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,201
frankj1 wrote:
we're sitting Shiva for it tomorrow at sunset


LOL
Users browsing this topic
Guest
2 Pages<12
Back to Top