America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 3 hours ago by 8trackdisco. 82 replies replies.
2 Pages12>
Trump Said..... Do you agree with him?
8trackdisco Offline
#1 Posted:
Joined: 11-06-2004
Posts: 60,084
Motivated by DMV's Presidentin' Is...The Thing...You Know...The Thing!
It is a cool journal of what has been going on with Biden over the years.
Like to have a similar library for the Trump quotes and actions- and whether the people who visit here agree with Trump or not.

So let's get the ball rolling with this one.

Trump suggested he would not protect a NATO ally who is not living up to their miltary spending commitments.
He (Trump) said he would encourage Russia to "Do whatever the hell they want."

Make your case for your response.
Yes, I agree with Trump's direction because......
No, I disagree with Trump's direction because....

Go!
deadeyedick Offline
#2 Posted:
Joined: 03-13-2003
Posts: 17,112
Trump talks stupid all the time. That said, I agree that all NATO "partners" need to pay up and he is the only one that has pressed the point. Buncha dead beats that have sucked of the US teets for many years.
8trackdisco Offline
#3 Posted:
Joined: 11-06-2004
Posts: 60,084
deadeyedick wrote:
Trump talks stupid all the time. That said, I agree that all NATO "partners" need to pay up and he is the only one that has pressed the point. Buncha dead beats that have sucked of the US teets for many years.


Do you agree with Trump that if a NATO partner isn't paid up, the United States should let Russia do whatever the helll they want to him?

Agree Trump says stupid chit regularly. His apologists just go the routes of either....
-He was making a joke!
-He was just making a point.
-Hell yeah, Merika!


Simply trying to apply the same standard to Trump as there is to Biden.




ZRX1200 Offline
#4 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,626
You really think he was ok with Russia just going into Poland for not contributing? BTW they contribute a higher % now than us…..after that speech.

What do I think?

I think NATO is a joke. I think our aid relief needs a complete overhaul.

I think our foreign policy is overreaching.

I think our government is out of touch and control and every agency not within the federal government’s enumerated powers needs permanently suspended until a revamp that aligns with the FG’s mandate power is reigned in.

I think no federal Senator or Congressman should live in DC. They should live in their district no exceptions.

I think Legislators and elected and non-permanent appointments should be granted NO benefits after leaving their position. It’s a service not an industry.

I also think that any state or federal political positions pay should be based off of a percentage of their districts average income.

Some of the people you’ve been sword fighting with in the cbid restroom known as the politics boards POSTED about stuff Cheeto Jesus did wrong on that thread you mentioned. I specifically mentioned him abusing Executive power using an agency to enforce a law that doesn’t exist. And when I did every response I got from the Anti Cheeto crowd was about Cheeto….well guess what. He was far from the worst about abusing Chevron Deference with government agencies whom CANNOT CREATE LAW but have been. But nobody wanted to talk about that. Abuse is abuse and pretending he’s new and this is the worst ever was and is a joke. I get why you’d post this and in a vacuum is a very logical and fair post. But I’m not of that same agreement with what and how things went with outside circumstances acted against Cheeto Jesus to hold him to a HIGHER standard?

First off we’re starting with a false equivalency because traditional politicians are groomed as are their personas. The very reason Cheeto Jesus was elected was a rejection of the norms. Now with that the establishment having a freak out reaction isn’t past reason. But with what happened people of all political stripes should be upset with what’s happened. And no I’m not going into it because if you don’t know by now there is literally no use in going through it.


RayR Offline
#5 Posted:
Joined: 07-20-2020
Posts: 8,912
OK..I agree with Z.
frankj1 Offline
#6 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,223
8 years...Presidentin' Be Hard

4 years...ssshhhhhhh

almost 4 years...Presidentin' is the thing, you know, the thing


the dye is cast
Abrignac Offline
#7 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,306
ZRX1200 wrote:
You really think he was ok with Russia just going into Poland for not contributing? BTW they contribute a higher % now than us…..after that speech.

No, but to say so is stupid. Ranks right there if not worse than the stupidest Biden quote one can think of.

What do I think?

I think NATO is a joke. I think our aid relief needs a complete overhaul.

Why?

I think our foreign policy is overreaching.

Why?

I think our government is out of touch and control and every agency not within the federal government’s enumerated powers needs permanently suspended until a revamp that aligns with the FG’s mandate power is reigned in.

Which agency or agencies are you speaking of? Unless I’m mistaken the Constitution clearly spells out the duties of Congress and the Presidency. In doing so it gives those two branches of government the enumerated powers to govern by passing laws. Unless I’m mistaken EVERY existing Federal agency was created by passage of a law.

I think no federal Senator or Congressman should live in DC. They should live in their district no exceptions.

Can’t live in DC? So are you saying they should fly home at the end of every day? Who foots that bill? BTW, a Senator and a Representative are both considered Congressmen as the US Congress is composed of the US Senate and the US House of Representatives.

I think Legislators and elected and non-permanent appointments should be granted NO benefits after leaving their position. It’s a service not an industry.

So if I understand correctly you pretty much feel that one’s entire public service should be limited say 2-6 years? Otherwise, who in their right mind would dedicate any more time to a career that has no retirement benefits? BTW, what is your body of public service? Surely you have served. Since no one will hang around long absent an incentive everyone will need to participate.

I also think that any state or federal political positions pay should be based off of a percentage of their districts average income.

A percentage you say? Does that mean that they should be paid between 1% and 98.2% of the average pay in their district? Or say 100% to 300%? Let’s say it’s pegged at 50% of the district average. For Medford, OR the 2022 per capita income was $33,822 so 50% of that is $16,911; the median is $65,647 and 50% of that is $32,823.50. So you’re good with that? Enough so you’re going to file your candidacy papers tomorrow for the election this November?

Some of the people you’ve been sword fighting with in the cbid restroom known as the politics boards POSTED about stuff Cheeto Jesus did wrong on that thread you mentioned. I specifically mentioned him abusing Executive power using an agency to enforce a law that doesn’t exist. And when I did every response I got from the Anti Cheeto crowd was about Cheeto….well guess what. He was far from the worst about abusing Chevron Deference with government agencies whom CANNOT CREATE LAW but have been. But nobody wanted to talk about that. Abuse is abuse and pretending he’s new and this is the worst ever was and is a joke. I get why you’d post this and in a vacuum is a very logical and fair post. But I’m not of that same agreement with what and how things went with outside circumstances acted against Cheeto Jesus to hold him to a HIGHER standard?

First off we’re starting with a false equivalency because traditional politicians are groomed as are their personas. The very reason Cheeto Jesus was elected was a rejection of the norms. Now with that the establishment having a freak out reaction isn’t past reason. But with what happened people of all political stripes should be upset with what’s happened. And no I’m not going into it because if you don’t know by now there is literally no use in going through it.
MACS Offline
#8 Posted:
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,809
Was NATO really created to help "allies" or was it created so the USA could put bases in European countries to protect our own interests?

Shouldn't NATO be a mutually beneficial relationship? It's been all USA and very little of anyone else until Trump called them on it.

If you've not paid your premiums... is the insurance company still obligated to pay your claims??
8trackdisco Offline
#9 Posted:
Joined: 11-06-2004
Posts: 60,084
ZRX1200 wrote:
You really think he was ok with Russia just going into Poland for not contributing? BTW they contribute a higher % now than us…..after that speech.

What do I think?

I think NATO is a joke. I think our aid relief needs a complete overhaul.

I think our foreign policy is overreaching.

I think our government is out of touch and control and every agency not within the federal government’s enumerated powers needs permanently suspended until a revamp that aligns with the FG’s mandate power is reigned in.

I think no federal Senator or Congressman should live in DC. They should live in their district no exceptions.

I think Legislators and elected and non-permanent appointments should be granted NO benefits after leaving their position. It’s a service not an industry.

I also think that any state or federal political positions pay should be based off of a percentage of their districts average income.

Some of the people you’ve been sword fighting with in the cbid restroom known as the politics boards POSTED about stuff Cheeto Jesus did wrong on that thread you mentioned. I specifically mentioned him abusing Executive power using an agency to enforce a law that doesn’t exist. And when I did every response I got from the Anti Cheeto crowd was about Cheeto….well guess what. He was far from the worst about abusing Chevron Deference with government agencies whom CANNOT CREATE LAW but have been. But nobody wanted to talk about that. Abuse is abuse and pretending he’s new and this is the worst ever was and is a joke. I get why you’d post this and in a vacuum is a very logical and fair post. But I’m not of that same agreement with what and how things went with outside circumstances acted against Cheeto Jesus to hold him to a HIGHER standard?

First off we’re starting with a false equivalency because traditional politicians are groomed as are their personas. The very reason Cheeto Jesus was elected was a rejection of the norms. Now with that the establishment having a freak out reaction isn’t past reason. But with what happened people of all political stripes should be upset with what’s happened. And no I’m not going into it because if you don’t know by now there is literally no use in going through it.




You really think he was ok with Russia just going into Poland for not contributing? BTW they contribute a higher % now than us…..


That is the question I’m asking you. He said what he said. I’m asking YOU. Trump made the statement the Russians can do whatever the hell he wants to the NATO countries that haven’t meant their financial commitments.

On this issue, do you support Trump’s statement or not?
8trackdisco Offline
#10 Posted:
Joined: 11-06-2004
Posts: 60,084
MACS wrote:
Was NATO really created to help "allies" or was it created so the USA could put bases in European countries to protect our own interests?

Shouldn't NATO be a mutually beneficial relationship? It's been all USA and very little of anyone else until Trump called them on it.

If you've not paid your premiums... is the insurance company still obligated to pay your claims??


Good questions. My question remains the same.

Trump said what he said about not protecting underfunded NATO countries and the Russians can do whatever the hell they want to those countries.

Do you support Trumps position or not?
MACS Offline
#11 Posted:
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,809
First I'd like to see what he actually said, in the context of which he said it.

Do I agree that Russia should be able to do "whatever the hell they want"? No.

Is it our responsibility to control them, though? Our trying to control them is part of what is making them do some of the stuff they're doing. We look out for our interests. They look out for theirs. At this point fighting is not an option, as we'd both destroy civilization as we know it.

Maybe make a mutually beneficial agreement instead of always trying to maintain the upper hand? There's no "upper hand" any more. Nuclear war would be the result and neither of us can survive it.

Antagonizing them is, as you would say, counterintuitive. Angel
DrMaddVibe Offline
#12 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,489
ZRX1200 wrote:
You really think he was ok with Russia just going into Poland for not contributing? BTW they contribute a higher % now than us…..after that speech.

What do I think?

I think NATO is a joke. I think our aid relief needs a complete overhaul.

I think our foreign policy is overreaching.

I think our government is out of touch and control and every agency not within the federal government’s enumerated powers needs permanently suspended until a revamp that aligns with the FG’s mandate power is reigned in.

I think no federal Senator or Congressman should live in DC. They should live in their district no exceptions.

I think Legislators and elected and non-permanent appointments should be granted NO benefits after leaving their position. It’s a service not an industry.

I also think that any state or federal political positions pay should be based off of a percentage of their districts average income.

Some of the people you’ve been sword fighting with in the cbid restroom known as the politics boards POSTED about stuff Cheeto Jesus did wrong on that thread you mentioned. I specifically mentioned him abusing Executive power using an agency to enforce a law that doesn’t exist. And when I did every response I got from the Anti Cheeto crowd was about Cheeto….well guess what. He was far from the worst about abusing Chevron Deference with government agencies whom CANNOT CREATE LAW but have been. But nobody wanted to talk about that. Abuse is abuse and pretending he’s new and this is the worst ever was and is a joke. I get why you’d post this and in a vacuum is a very logical and fair post. But I’m not of that same agreement with what and how things went with outside circumstances acted against Cheeto Jesus to hold him to a HIGHER standard?

First off we’re starting with a false equivalency because traditional politicians are groomed as are their personas. The very reason Cheeto Jesus was elected was a rejection of the norms. Now with that the establishment having a freak out reaction isn’t past reason. But with what happened people of all political stripes should be upset with what’s happened. And no I’m not going into it because if you don’t know by now there is literally no use in going through it.




This thread certainly didn't age well.
8trackdisco Offline
#13 Posted:
Joined: 11-06-2004
Posts: 60,084
MACS wrote:
First I'd like to see what he actually said, in the context of which he said it.

Do I agree that Russia should be able to do "whatever the hell they want"? No.


Thank you Brother for answering the question as presented.
I assure you I didn’t twist or turn his words.
Words have consequences. And there is a continual drumbeat for equal Justice in how Trump and Biden are treated.
I’d also like to see Trump and Biden being held equally accountable for their words.
Abrignac Offline
#14 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,306
As long as one side of any equation is obsessed with making the other side bend a knee there will never be peace. The side complying will simplify do so to live another day. In the interim they’ll recharge, replenish and reevaluate. At some point they will launch a new offensive aimed at their original goal.

Then you have those whose goal is to reach past glory. I think this is Putin’s vision. It seems he wants to be remembered for rebuilding the old USSR so anything short of that is failure and thus unacceptable.

NATO was created to confront both of these scenarios. Unfortunately, many member countries figured out that the USA would unilaterally fund NATO to meet its stated mission. It’s past time putting up with that nonsense.

If NATO didn’t exist and adversaries were allowed to take over it would no doubt affect our own national security. We are dependent on certain foreign goods that cannot be produced in the USA.
HockeyDad Offline
#15 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,156
What Trump said was correct but needs to remain behind closed doors.

Think of it this way, if NATO country X doesn’t want to spend enough money on their own defense, I’m not sending 8trsckdisco’s kids there to fight and die.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#16 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,489
HockeyDad wrote:
What Trump said was correct but needs to remain behind closed doors.

Think of it this way, if NATO country X doesn’t want to spend enough money on their own defense, I’m not sending 8trsckdisco’s kids there to fight and die.



Well, Bosnia yes...Rwanda no.
RayR Offline
#17 Posted:
Joined: 07-20-2020
Posts: 8,912
MACS wrote:
Was NATO really created to help "allies" or was it created so the USA could put bases in European countries to protect our own interests?

Shouldn't NATO be a mutually beneficial relationship? It's been all USA and very little of anyone else until Trump called them on it.

If you've not paid your premiums... is the insurance company still obligated to pay your claims??


NATO was created so the USA could put bases in European countries, to expand the reach of the empire, and protect it from the Soviet commie expansion that FDR freely gave to his buddy Uncle Joe Stalin which threw most of the Eastern European people under the authoritarian bus.
That made the US the insurance company of last resort for the Western European countries that couldn't/wouldn't pay for their own protection.


Mr. Jones Offline
#18 Posted:
Joined: 06-12-2005
Posts: 19,434
Russia went into Poland WAY BEFORE NATO U DUMBOS...
LIKE 1945 WWII STUFF...
8trackdisco Offline
#19 Posted:
Joined: 11-06-2004
Posts: 60,084
HockeyDad wrote:
What Trump said was correct but needs to remain behind closed doors.

Think of it this way, if NATO country X doesn’t want to spend enough money on their own defense, I’m not sending 8trsckdisco’s kids there to fight and die.


So you agree with and support Trump on this. Got it. Thanks, HD.
8trackdisco Offline
#20 Posted:
Joined: 11-06-2004
Posts: 60,084
DrMaddVibe wrote:
Well, Bosnia yes...Rwanda no.


Do you agree with Trumps position on this? Let Russia do whatever the hell they want?
HockeyDad Offline
#21 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,156
8trackdisco wrote:
So you agree with and support Trump on this. Got it. Thanks, HD.


So what’s your opinion on it?
8trackdisco Offline
#22 Posted:
Joined: 11-06-2004
Posts: 60,084
HockeyDad wrote:
So what’s your opinion on it?


I disagree with his comment, I don’t support him.
frankj1 Offline
#23 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,223
something like 10 years ago NATO member nations agreed to have a goal of 2% of their country's GDP toward their own national defense...
Not toss in a specified amount into the pot as there is no NATO Army per se, each nation sends some of their own if NATO intervenes...fighters, equipment, etc. to that hot spot in the world.

It's not a rule, and most have failed, though most have increased since then.

There is a common pot for other costs, and I believe the bigger hitters like us, England, Germany have been, by agreement, paying an outsized share, and this may be what Trump really meant though he likely didn't know it.

But the countries lagging on the GDP goal have not caused us to kick in more, they do not owe us.

at least this has been my understanding.

and no, I do not agree with telling Russia to do as they wish with our allies.

All this from a guy infamous for forcing small businesses to go under because he would not meet his contractual obligations, knowing they did not have the resources to pursue him endlessly in court upon completing their end of the contract.
DrafterX Offline
#24 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,559
Didn't they recently spend like a billion dollars on a new building to hang out in..?? Think
frankj1 Offline
#25 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,223
we weren't invited...again
DrafterX Offline
#26 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,559
Ya.. bassards... Mad


prolly cause we're black... Mellow
8trackdisco Offline
#27 Posted:
Joined: 11-06-2004
Posts: 60,084
8trackdisco wrote:
Do you agree with Trumps position on this? Let Russia do whatever the hell they want?


Wellllllllll (Judge Smails voice) we’re waiaiaiaiaiting!

DMV,
Do you agree with Trump that if NATO members have fallen behind on their 2% of GDP to be invested in their military, Russia 🇷🇺 can do “whatever the hell they want to them”?

Sure hope Canada isn’t underfunded. I’m practically a border state.
rfenst Offline
#28 Posted:
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,345
HockeyDad wrote:
What Trump said was correct but needs to remain behind closed doors.

Another callous, dangerous, stupid comment. No matter whether it gets NATO nations to pay in more, it should have been a private conversation without a threat of openly giving Putin a "green light." And, it should never have been made public before he is President. Without any doubt, we have a serious enough economic interests in NATO countries remaining free of Russian expansion. Take a look at the percentages of U.S. imports and exports involving NATO countries.
HockeyDad Offline
#29 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,156
Canada is always underfunded. You better start learning the language. Dasvidaniya.

(By the way, this has already exited the news cycle.)

Have you heard about the national security threat involving Russia and space?

HockeyDad Offline
#30 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,156
rfenst wrote:
Another callous, dangerous, stupid comment. No matter whether it gets NATO nations to pay in more, it should have been a private conversation without a threat of openly giving Putin a "green light." And, it should never have been made public before he is President. Without any doubt, we have a serious enough economic interests in NATO countries remaining free of Russian expansion. Take a look at the percentages of U.S. imports and exports involving NATO countries.


That’s why I said it should have remained behind closed doors. It absolutely should have been said but we should never know about it. I also think he was talking about something from back when he was president, not anything current. Trump’s complaint with NATO is nations routinely underfunded their own defense with the assumption that the USA would come to their defense.

The USA got reluctantly dragged into WW1. The USA reluctantly got dragged into WW2. The NATO assumption is that this time the USA will jump in at the first sign of trouble for WW3.
ZRX1200 Offline
#31 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,626
Well I shouldn’t expect people who think “Grab me in the 🐱”
and asking Russia to share Hillary info was real talk to get out of an old mindset.

Russia didn’t move on Ukraine because of Cheeto Jesus. Despite his HORRIBLE OUTRAGEOUS language. There was a coup we helped.

If you voted for Biden YOU aided and abetted Purim’s actions don’t complain to me.
ZRX1200 Offline
#32 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,626
8trackdisco wrote:
You really think he was ok with Russia just going into Poland for not contributing? BTW they contribute a higher % now than us…..


That is the question I’m asking you. He said what he said. I’m asking YOU. Trump made the statement the Russians can do whatever the hell he wants to the NATO countries that haven’t meant their financial commitments.

On this issue, do you support Trump’s statement or not?


It’s a bit more complicated than do I support his statement.
I laid that out…

Do you think Putin took said statement in the way you’re perceiving it? I sure don’t….
HockeyDad Offline
#33 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,156
Last I checked Putin hasn’t attacked any NATO countries but I hear a lot of about he is going to soon unless I find 100 billion dollars.
8trackdisco Offline
#34 Posted:
Joined: 11-06-2004
Posts: 60,084
ZRX1200 wrote:
It’s a bit more complicated than do I support his statement.
I laid that out…

Do you think Putin took said statement in the way you’re perceiving it? I sure don’t….


I can't tell and wouldn't guess at what Putin is thinking, other than he smells weakness like a vicious dog.
You can tell me it is more complex and you can filibuster answering for as long as you like.

You either support Trumps statement or you don't.

Am a little surprised (not a whole lot) that some of you don't want to take a stand on these things. So much easier to tear down Biden than make a clear statement, based of Trumps words, on whether you support his statement or not.

(I'll make believe this is the spot where you are going to still not answer the question and point to things that Biden has said that blah, blah, blah, blah. blah.)
frankj1 Offline
#35 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,223
Trump maybe got that blood poisoning of our country that's been going around
HockeyDad Offline
#36 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,156
frankj1 wrote:
Trump maybe got that blood poisoning of our country that's been going around


Covid?
HockeyDad Offline
#37 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,156
The inverse of this is if you disagree with what Trump said, you are committing to send money and troops to fight in a NATO war even if that country spent nothing on their defense. So I ask…..who you sending? I’m looking for family member names.
Gene363 Offline
#38 Posted:
Joined: 01-24-2003
Posts: 30,834
NATO countries have been screwing US taxpayers for years.

I recall Admiral Zumwalt saying something like, If the US reduced our defense spending NATO countries will assume everything is so good they can reduce defence spending and if the US increased defense spending they will assume everything is so good they can reduce defense spending. Brick wall Brick wall Brick wall
DrafterX Offline
#39 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,559
He was just kiddin. Mellow
ZRX1200 Offline
#40 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,626
Well stay upset at him 8, you’re being a good voter.

Like DMV said that thread didn’t age well.

I’ve been here since W was in office and when engaged in these conversations I try to keep the filter of my time here with the responses of the past and present in mind.

Keep pressing us unworthy voters with poisoned questions, you either get the answer you want to justify your stance or claim high ground for being more intellectually honest by answering your question.

frankj1 Offline
#41 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,223
HockeyDad wrote:
The inverse of this is if you disagree with what Trump said, you are committing to send money and troops to fight in a NATO war even if that country spent nothing on their defense. So I ask…..who you sending? I’m looking for family member names.

which country spent nothing? The Grand Duchy of Fenwick (hoping somebody remembers The Mouse That Roared)
frankj1 Offline
#42 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,223
HockeyDad wrote:
Covid?

nope.
Holocaust.
HockeyDad Offline
#43 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,156
frankj1 wrote:
which country spent nothing? The Grand Duchy of Fenwick (hoping somebody remembers The Mouse That Roared)


As t turns out the ones that spend the most border Russia and are in the former sphere of influence. So who you sending?
frankj1 Offline
#44 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,223
HockeyDad wrote:
As t turns out the ones that spend the most border Russia and are in the former sphere of influence. So who you sending?

Probably no one will hafta send anyone if Russia/Trump aren't able to end the resistance.

Remember how they sold the nuke as the ultimate peace weapon. When was the last time you heard sirens telling you to duck and cover, or not to eat snow cuz Russian "fall-out" was in it?

Decades.
HockeyDad Offline
#45 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,156
Diuck cover, and hold. Same drill for earthquakes!
8trackdisco Offline
#46 Posted:
Joined: 11-06-2004
Posts: 60,084
ZRX1200 wrote:
Well stay upset at him 8, you’re being a good voter.

Like DMV said that thread didn’t age well.

I’ve been here since W was in office and when engaged in these conversations I try to keep the filter of my time here with the responses of the past and present in mind.

Keep pressing us unworthy voters with poisoned questions, you either get the answer you want to justify your stance or claim high ground for being more intellectually honest by answering your question.



Poison questions? More like a poison candidate. Wondered where your line and others would be. Didn’t take long. HD gave the most comprehensive answer. He answered and explained his Yes Answer. MACS didn’t answer it as much, saying he was interested in the context the words were spoken. He hasn’t followed up.


You guys are smart enough to pick either Yes I agree with Trump because….. or No, I don’t agree with Trump because….

You and DMV are working the filibuster and non answer routes, which is the most disappointing of all. Like your burning out your clutch while applying the gas. Like cyborgs waiting for their Cheeto programmer to tell you what to say.

For two decades (a little less so in the last year or so) I thought of you two as being authentic, American originals. Instead of three, it’s become two dimensional personas.

Trump good
Biden bad

You are both better than that.
Abrignac Offline
#47 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,306
8trackdisco wrote:
Poison questions? More like a poison candidate. Wondered where your line and others would be. Didn’t take long. HD gave the most comprehensive answer. He answered and explained his Yes Answer. MACS didn’t answer it as much, saying he was interested in the context the words were spoken. He hasn’t followed up.


You guys are smart enough to pick either Yes I agree with Trump because….. or No, I don’t agree with Trump because….

You and DMV are working the filibuster and non answer routes, which is the most disappointing of all. Like your burning out your clutch while applying the gas. Like cyborgs waiting for their Cheeto programmer to tell you what to say.

For two decades (a little less so in the last year or so) I thought of you two as being authentic, American originals. Instead of three, it’s become two dimensional personas.

Trump good
Biden bad

You are both better than that.


I think part of it has to do with the choices given.

Chris Christie - A never was, never will be.
Nikki Haley - Accused of being a globalist, but yet no actual proof of any nefarious activity
Asa Hutchinson - A dinosaur who came out of nowhere
Vivek Ramaswamy - A tech billionaire with no compelling message other than being a Trump cheerleader
Ron DeSantis - A political opportunist with a penchant for grandstanding
Tim Scott - A decent person who lacks national appeal
Mike Pence - Hated by far right for breaking with Trump

Farticus Offline
#48 Posted:
Joined: 11-25-2023
Posts: 20
I disagree with what Rapey McFraud said about NATO. It was reckless and dangerous, with no real value.

As for the comments that say he was kidding when he says things like he did about grabbing ****, let’s not forget that he was found guilty of doing just that and fined for continuing to publicly lie about it. Yes, the court ruled he did it. It’s just true. When he said it he meant it because he had done it. One proved in court, but likely part of his lifestyle based on the accusations routinely dismissed in here that would never be dismissed for slick Willy.

Some in here, conveniently haven’t read the actual cases because it’s easier to listen to what people tell them to say or they simply can’t understand the cases. And that is being kind.

There is no way for anybody with any intellectual integrity to be OK with what he said, cute deflections aside.You can be against NATO, you may want the NATO partners to pay more, but what he said was absolutely irresponsible for anybody who could remotely be close to power If you are OK with it, you are not be a Republican. Certainly not a Reagan Republican. You are a RINO like Trump.

If you say, you want to see the actual comments in context, but haven’t been able to do so you are either really dumb or really lazy. And you know it

It used to be cute when people defended the rapist by saying oh, he’s just being him, and he talks differently Now it is dangerous and shows a high-level of ignorance. Unfortunately, sometimes that ignorance is intentional.

Facts are hell of a drug. Choosing not to recognize them doesn’t make you any less fucked up, It just means you have no chance of recovery.

I am Farticus!
frankj1 Offline
#49 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,223
poisoning the blood of our country...that one is special for me.
Burner02 Offline
#50 Posted:
Joined: 12-21-2010
Posts: 12,884
Outgoing Dutch PM tells Europe to stop 'whining and nagging about Trump'
Trump came under fire this week for saying the U.S. would not honor its NATO commitments
By Chris Pandolfo, Fox News, Feb 17, 2024

Outgoing Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte, who is likely to be the next secretary-general of NATO, urged fellow European leaders to stop "whining" about former President Trump.

The blunt admonition comes days after the GOP 2024 front-runner suggested the U.S. should not honor its NATO commitments if European countries do not increase their defense contribution to the North Atlantic alliance. Trump's comments sparked outrage throughout Europe and provoked an immediate condemnation from President Biden's White House.

"We should stop moaning and whining and nagging about Trump," Rutte said Saturday at the Munich Security Conference.

"It's up to the Americans. I'm not an American, I cannot vote in the U.S. We have to work with whoever is on the dance floor," he added.

He also said it was in the continent's interests to increase support for Ukraine against Russia's invasion.

Rutte is the front-runner to succeed NATO secretary-general Jens Stoltenberg, who will step down in October, according to Reuters. He has said he would not campaign for the job.

Stoltenberg was among those who lambasted Trump's comments this week, stating that the forme president's rhetoric "undermines" the security of its members.

"The whole idea of NATO is that an attack on one ally will trigger a response from the whole alliance, and as long as we stand behind that message together, we prevent any military attack on any ally," Stoltenberg said at a press conference Wednesday.

He continued, "Any suggestion that we are not standing up for each other, that we are not going to protect each other, that does undermine the security of all of us."

The warning came after Trump offered harsh words for NATO allies at a campaign rally last week, going so far as to suggest that the U.S. would not defend NATO allies that do not contribute their full share.

Trump recalled a conversation he had with the president "of a big country," who he says asked him if they did not increase their defense contribution to the North Atlantic alliance "and we’re attacked by Russia, will you protect us?"

"NATO was busted until I came along," Trump said. "I said, ‘Everybody’s gonna pay.' They said, ‘Well, if we don’t pay, are you still going to protect us?' I said, 'Absolutely not.' They couldn't believe the answer."

While Stoltenberg expressed concern at Trump's remarks, the former president's comment did spark a rush to confirm member countries' contributions in the coming year.

The NATO chief announced that 18 of the alliance's 31 members are on track to meet their pledges of contributing 2% of GDP to the group. European states are on track to contribute $380 billion this year, and Germany will meet its 2% pledge for the first time since the Cold War.

Rutte suggested that focusing on Trump's comments only serves to distract from supporting Ukraine and meeting NATO's commitments.

"And all that whining and moaning about Trump. I hear that constantly over the last couple of days. Let's stop doing that," Rutte said, adding that after talking with U.S. politicians in Munich he was "cautiously optimistic" that Congress will pass the national security supplemental package with funding for Ukraine.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
2 Pages12>