America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 14 years ago by gringococolo. 65 replies replies.
2 Pages12>
What do you think about this?
JTokash Offline
#1 Posted:
Joined: 02-12-2007
Posts: 5,234
Ok, I'm a bit of a noob when it comes to cigars, but I seem to have some conflicting information about temperature and humidity. Let me know what you think.

So, being a grad student with infinite free time (yeah right) I decided to plot the humidity versus temperature for a fixed value of water vapor and see what it looks like. I've read that 70 degrees and 70 percent humidity is "ideal" so I took that as "fixing" the amount of water vapor in the humidor. Then, this plot is what I get by keeping the amount of water vapor constant and seeing what happens as the temperature changes. The box is there just to give a reference as to the typical temperature range I would expect to be common.

This seems to go against what I've read in other forum posts about people losing humidity as the temperatures get lower. It seems to me though, if the humidor has a good seal, then you should actually see the humidity go up. This is exactly what I am seeing on my humidor - it's 66 degrees with 80 percent humidity, but if I turn up the heat to about 70, it drops down to about 71-72 percent (I have two hygrometers, 1 digital and 1 analog, and salt tested both).

So what's up with everyone else seeing their humidity go DOWN as the temperature goes down - other than the fact that the air is more dry in the winter? But that point is a matter of how well sealed the humidor is, right?

Anyone care to help out a noob and give me their two cents?

Thanks - JT
986032.jpg
JTokash Offline
#2 Posted:
Joined: 02-12-2007
Posts: 5,234
The awkward silence is killing me... LOL

Anyone??
jackconrad Offline
#3 Posted:
Joined: 06-09-2003
Posts: 67,461
We kinda like ...shall we say, Curves, yeah curves, around here.
jbu Offline
#4 Posted:
Joined: 11-01-2006
Posts: 1,690
I spoke of this in one of my post, temp and humidity are somewhat proportionately linked due to the temp required for water to vaporize, aka humidity.
donutboy2000 Offline
#5 Posted:
Joined: 11-20-2001
Posts: 25,000
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/kinetic/relhum.html
Buddha Daddy Offline
#6 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2003
Posts: 2,999
You're giving me a freaking headache.
jbu Offline
#7 Posted:
Joined: 11-01-2006
Posts: 1,690
Yes this is not a humidity problem.....its called obsessive compulsive disorder. Ever wonder if the humidity drops when there is no light in the humi.

You have to be really quick opening and closing the lid to check the gauge. I use a camera.

Seriously though dude.the prob may be in the method u r using to heat the humi....may be that method is drying the air out. Or when we say that the humidity is lower in the colder months we mean the ambient air is much drier....a house is much drier.
Homebrew Offline
#8 Posted:
Joined: 02-11-2003
Posts: 11,885
Yep,
The graph looks bassakwards.
Dave (A.K.A. Homebrew)
pacman357 Offline
#9 Posted:
Joined: 02-27-2006
Posts: 42,596
The answer is 42.
Cycleman Offline
#10 Posted:
Joined: 12-29-2005
Posts: 8,400
I'm horney now,,,,,





****!
pgje51 Offline
#11 Posted:
Joined: 01-13-2006
Posts: 5,013

THis is NOT a thread I can deal with before morning coffee.

But I'll give an A+ for effort and continue to be satisfied that I didn't
pursue a career in math or physics.
BeatDragon Offline
#12 Posted:
Joined: 02-28-2003
Posts: 4,754
Humidity test...

Place smokey treat between thumb and 4 fingers.

Apply preasure (Scream "get a job you withless POS")

If they are squishy...to high
If they crackle...to low
In between ..fire it up
315press Offline
#13 Posted:
Joined: 03-31-2005
Posts: 1,960
Warning!!!
Very boring material ahead!!
Proceed at your own risk!!!!!

this is primarily for JTkash's reading.

I would think that the temp and humidity are not related.

This is why

The humidor is a relatively closed environment. You have a source of water (in this case the sponge) and the air. The water will release water molecules into the air until the point that the water molecules in the air and in the sponge reach an equilibrium.

The way the humidity level would change is by absorbtion into the humidor itself and through leaking (or when you open the humidor lid). As you probably know, the amount of a molecular substance is finite and measurable. It doesn't disappear but will exist in it's current molecular form or go through a chemical reaction which causes it to change form (the bonds to be broken and new ones formed, usually with other present molecules).

I don't think there are any chemical reactions going on in the humidor that are breaking the bonds of the H20 molecules. Thus the level would stay constant in a perfectly closed environment or increase as the humidor is opened and decreased due to the examples above.

The temperature is dependant on the location of where the humidor is stored. As humidity changes, it does not cause a change in temperature.

The only way I could see the humidity level changing in response to temperature is when temps are so low as to turn the H20 molecules into their solid form (and thus lower the amount of H20 gas molecules in the air), or temps are very high and thus turn present liquid molecules into their gas form. But the temps fro freezing and boiling water are very extreme, 0 and 100 celsius.

The only other factor i see in this is the humidification device. This may have an effect on the molecules present and chemical bonds and molecular attributes. For example, salt, when added to water will slightly lower the temperature of the water and will lower its freezing point. I don't believe the humidification device is having a related chemical impact on the temperature, however, but that is a guess.

Now I am not a graduate chemist or a scientist, but I did sleep in a Holiday Inn last night.
MACS Offline
#14 Posted:
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,800
I keep the humidity in my humidor at about 65% at all times regardless of temperature. The temperature fluctuates with the seasons from between 65 degrees and about 78 degrees.

I have had zero issues, so far, with the quality of my cigars or beetles.
jbu Offline
#15 Posted:
Joined: 11-01-2006
Posts: 1,690
^LOL
jbu Offline
#16 Posted:
Joined: 11-01-2006
Posts: 1,690
^I read that wrong. I thought you said your beetles were healthy. LOL
315press Offline
#17 Posted:
Joined: 03-31-2005
Posts: 1,960
That would be funny and the kind of humor i would expect to hear form MACS
JTokash Offline
#18 Posted:
Joined: 02-12-2007
Posts: 5,234
Re: #5

donutboy2000 is exactly correct, I found that page just before coming here and it says pretty much what I did.

I guess you can't argue with thermodynamics. Well, maybe you can, but I tried once and it hurts!

Thanks to all for the input.

-JT
sw48362 Offline
#19 Posted:
Joined: 09-14-2004
Posts: 9,746
^ I've seen that graph in #5 before. JT you are right!
But the rest of the team disagrees with you. You haven't explained the information well enough to become a leader!
Just going to do what's necessary!

Your Fired! lol!

I agree with you don't tell the rest of the team.
plinytheelder Offline
#20 Posted:
Joined: 10-24-2006
Posts: 8,838
JT, your box looks fine, but your line has some problems with splotching.
MikeyRavioli Offline
#21 Posted:
Joined: 10-10-2005
Posts: 2,105
The air temp in the room I keep my humi in probably doesn't ever move outside of a 10 degree range. 65 to 75.

The difference is what outside measures I have to do to keep the room in that range. I keep my humi in my finished basement.

It is cold down there in the winter months so I have to use an artificial heat source. Gas heat is incredibly dry.

The summer it is fairly cool but since I run central ac and heat rises and cool air sinks it stays chilly. I actually have to run a dehumidifier in the laundry room part of the basement or else the clothes get a musty smell.

So while the temp remains pretty constant, the outside forces I use to control the temp have serious effects on my RH.
JTokash Offline
#22 Posted:
Joined: 02-12-2007
Posts: 5,234
Topped for jpotts.

-JT
JHC Offline
#23 Posted:
Joined: 12-27-2005
Posts: 19,283
It's all relative.
Goathead50 Offline
#24 Posted:
Joined: 01-22-2007
Posts: 21,809
Looks like my stocks lately.
jpotts Offline
#25 Posted:
Joined: 06-14-2006
Posts: 28,811
As the temperature drops, there is less activity in the humidor. The humidity settles at the bottom in stale (uncirculated) air. Whereas in higher temps, humidity is better distributed because of the heat causing the water vapor to become more active.

My question is, did you measure humidity at the top of the container, or at the bottom?
JTokash Offline
#26 Posted:
Joined: 02-12-2007
Posts: 5,234
None of that was measured, it was all calculated from an isoperm equation (not isotherm).

I took 70/70 as the "ideal" cigar storage environment, figured out what the partial pressure of water vapor was in that situation, found the mass of water per unit dry air, then used the isoperm equation to calculate the data points shown on the plot for various temperatures.

What this data (line) shows is the conditions that are identical to a 70/70 environment in terms of absolute moisture content. The line is a "best fit" curve just to help see the trend of the calculated data.

This plot only applies to hygrometers that do not autoatically compensate for temperature changes. The hygrometers that have built-in temperature compensation already figure this out and 70% RH is 70% RH regardless of temperature.

-JT
ducati996 Offline
#27 Posted:
Joined: 01-02-2000
Posts: 3,475
aaahhhhh,

I kinda miss thermodynamics class.
vegasryan777 Offline
#28 Posted:
Joined: 11-17-2007
Posts: 1,085
Way to much going into this J. Buy some 65% (HI)beads, keep them moist and monitor the temperature. No mold/beetles and cigars taste/feel good...well done. Just my 2 cents.

Ryan
Jordo Offline
#29 Posted:
Joined: 02-29-2008
Posts: 136
errr....so, if I keep 'em in a humi with some device device designed by someone understands all of this, they won't be brittle or squooshy?
jpotts Offline
#30 Posted:
Joined: 06-14-2006
Posts: 28,811
JTokash:

My only argument against this plot is that it's calculated, and not measured.

It's been a while since I've taken things like Chemisty and Physics, and I'm a little new to fiddling with humidity sensors, and it's been a LONG tine since electronics...well...anyways, from the sensor data sheets that I found, it looks as if temperature is taken into account by the sensor, but there is an additional compensation factor that need to be calculated to get a final humidity reading.

Plus, from what I know, stale air causes a seperation of water vapor, as the more humid air sinks, and the dryer air rises. Which MIGHT explain why some people observe that with colder temps, there seems to be less humidity, because they pull their sticks from the top of the humidor, as opposed to the bottom.

Here's a link to a simple linear voltage sensor:

http://sccatalog.honeywell.com/pdbdownload/images/hih-4000.series.chart.1.pdf

Notice the sections on the left-hand section on page #1 titled "Voltage Output 2nd Order Curve Fit" and
jpotts Offline
#31 Posted:
Joined: 06-14-2006
Posts: 28,811
...and "Temperature Compensation". I have to use the "Voltage Output" to give me a humidity reading (actually, I have to transpose this because I need to get a voltage from the relative humidity reading), and then apply a the temperature compensation formula.

Or, let's say I'm wrong (shudder the thought), and I actually have TWO formulas: one temperature-compensated, and one that's not (which I think is the case).




Where the hell was I going with this anyway?
JTokash Offline
#32 Posted:
Joined: 02-12-2007
Posts: 5,234
That looks like a nice sensor, but is the accuracy good enough for your use? If you're using this to drive some fans, it sould be fine.

On the left side of the schematic, it looks like the one formula for Vout is specifically only for 25 degrees C, but the other Vout formula (the lower one) is for any temperature and will provide the temperature compensation.

I'm about to head off to get some sleep, but if you want to discuss this through email, I'm at: jct154 at psu dot edu.

-JT
pabloescabar Offline
#33 Posted:
Joined: 02-25-2005
Posts: 30,183
...ooops
neopuritan Offline
#34 Posted:
Joined: 01-01-2007
Posts: 9,648
Rrr?
MACS Offline
#35 Posted:
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,800
Not having read any of the replies... here is my take.

Don't nuke it. Keep the cigars 'around' 70 degrees (meaning somewhere between 60 and 80) and 'around' 65% humidity (meaning 60-70) and you should be fine. I've not had any issues.

In the summer, when my house is at about 78 degrees, I keep my cigars at about 62% or so.

Worrying about it is of no use. It's not an exact science.
cigar breath Offline
#36 Posted:
Joined: 04-28-2006
Posts: 960
i agree with slarty bartfast the answer is 42
JTokash Offline
#37 Posted:
Joined: 02-12-2007
Posts: 5,234
Yeah, but think about how long it took to get that answer.

-JT
madspackler Offline
#38 Posted:
Joined: 03-07-2000
Posts: 3,608
The graph above represents the theoretical based upon maintaining the same amount of water in a fixed volume of air. This is not a practical application. The ability of air to hold the water molecules in suspension (ie. humidity) is directly effected by temperature. Warm air is more capable of holding moisture, while cooler air causes the air to condense out as rain or condensation. As the air cools, the molecules of water slow down, get closer together until they merge together, and settle out as rain.

A dry day in the Caribbean is usually 50% humidity, while a dry day in a Canadian winter will have 10% humidity. If the humidity level gets too high in a canadian winter, it snows. In the Carribean the air can have 99.5% humidity before it settles as rain.

Your equation assumes that the water constantly remains "in solution" in the air and temperature is the sole variable.

Eric
Cereal City Cigar Smoker Offline
#39 Posted:
Joined: 03-30-2006
Posts: 14,587
I am actually understanding this thread - that is scary!

c3s
Cereal City Cigar Smoker Offline
#40 Posted:
Joined: 03-30-2006
Posts: 14,587
I don't see how you are taking the outside air temp. into consideration. Here is a real case study:

Last summer I lost my A/C for 2 days. The temp in the house increased and the humidity in my humidors also increased. Had to move most of my cigars to the basement until the A/C was fixed. While I would agree that my Aristocrat Humidors are not "Perfectly" airtight, they are pretty darn close to it.

c3s
lou2row Offline
#41 Posted:
Joined: 12-22-2006
Posts: 9,995
So, the short and fast of it:

My freezer ador is in my basement wine cellar where it is roughly 55-60 degrees currently (will be 60-65 in the summer). What should I shoot for on my $10 digital hygrometers?
JTokash Offline
#42 Posted:
Joined: 02-12-2007
Posts: 5,234
Ok, this is for an "ideal" situation, in other words a box without cigars or a humidifier, the only thing inside it is air and a tiny bit of water vapor.

Ken, the reason your humidity went up when it got warm isn't because this graph or physics is wrong, it's because you have a practically sealed container with a source of humidity inside it. So as the temperature went up, your humidifier became more "active" and pumped out more moisture than it did when the A/C was running.

Lou, this all depends on if your $10 hygrometer is temperature compensated. At this point, it's say that if you're on the cool side of things, try to keep the humidity a bit higher than normal, but I wouldn't go too far above 70% so you don't promote mold growth. The basic idea is that as it gets warmer, you can drop the humidity a bit, and as it get cooler you can afford to raise the humidity a bit.

------------------------------------------------

Now then, the scientist in me is going to go buy a "Lock-n-Lock" container and perform a little experiment. These containers, if you've never seen them at the grocery store or your local jumbo-mart, have a gasket seal and four locking tabs (one on each side) and are nothing more than a really fancy Rubbermaid container.

Then, I'll take the container into my lab where I have an inert atmosphere glovebox with 99.9999% pure argon sealed air-tight inside it (less than 1 part per million of water) and it has constant HEPA filtration as well as active oxygen and water traps... yeah, it costs a hundred thousand dollars, it's fancy, LOL.

Here's a picture of what the glovebox looks like, but this is at another university (in China):

http://www.pcoss.org/manager/images/mbraun.jpg

This glovebox has two vacuum antechambers attached to it, so I'll take the Lock-n-Lock container, a micro-pipette of water (yes I know taking water into a drybox is a no-no, but a few drops is no problem for it), and a digital hygrometer and load them into the vacuum chamber, remove all the air, and refill it with the pure (dry) argon so we know it's at 0%RH. Then I'll add one drop of water so the total amount of moisture is fixed (as is the case for the theoretical curve shown above) and I'll seal up the box with the hygrometer inside it. The one drop of water should be enough to give the container some measurable RH value once it's sealed up. If that one drop of water doesn't make an appreciable RH register on the hygrometer, I'll add more, drop-wise, until it's looking good (around 50% or so) and no drops are visible so that it's all in the vapor phase. Then I'll take it out of the glovebox, keeping it perfectly sealed, and I'll use a thermostated water bath to vary the temperature up and down by 10 degrees (or more depending on how much time I can spare) and I'll record the RH inside the box at each temperature. This should replicate the theoretical "ideal" conditions as close as possible.

After this is done, I'll repeat this experiment, but this time I'll use a Humi-Gel humidifier inside the Lock-n-Lock box rather than a drop or so of water.

Hopefully I can do this over the weekend and get some results, but I have other work to do first... sigh. LOL

In the meantime, light up a good one guys.

-JT
JTokash Offline
#43 Posted:
Joined: 02-12-2007
Posts: 5,234
Lou, there's no need to go to 125% RH since you're at 55-60 degrees, LOL, things would be a bit drippy.

At those temperatures, 70% RH just that means is that has less water vapor in the air. So 70% RH at 60 degrees is roughly equal to 40% RH at 70 degrees. Likewise, 70% RH at 55 degrees is roughly equal to 25% RH at 70 degrees.

-JT
JTokash Offline
#44 Posted:
Joined: 02-12-2007
Posts: 5,234
Re #40

I tried a simple little experiment. Took my Lock-n-Lock container, tossed in a humipack and a digital hygrometer (not temperature compensating) that was recently salt tested (when this hygrometer reads 66%, it's actually 70%, so it reads too low by 4%).

I sealed it all up and ran my fiancee's hair dryer to blow some warm air across the sealed container evenly. It got up to 73 degrees and the hygrometer was reading 86%, so it was actually 90% RH.

So, with a humidifications source that pumps out more humidity as the temperature increases, that's the worst case since you actually want the RH to drop as the temperature increases to maintain the same moisture content.

OK, I'm off to watch a movie.

-JT
Whistlebritches Offline
#45 Posted:
Joined: 04-23-2006
Posts: 22,128
OK let me see if I got this straight.If I walk by my large desktop humi in my bedroom and fart in their general direction my sticks are ok.............but if I $hit my pants within 30 meters of said location my sticks take a barnyard odor??????

Inquiring minds and all that sheet

Ron
JTokash Offline
#46 Posted:
Joined: 02-12-2007
Posts: 5,234
No, it's the other way around. If you crap on top of your humidor, your cigars will be fine. But if you fart within 30 feet the cigars will taste like poop, even if your humidor was closed.

I hope that clears things up. Man, I wasn't even thinking about foul odors. Temperature and humidity are hard enough to control... now odors, this is getting serious!

-JT
jpotts Offline
#47 Posted:
Joined: 06-14-2006
Posts: 28,811
First, the humidity sensor is not going the be the component that drives that fans. I'd use the humidity sensor just to display the humidity on some 7-segment LED displays. However, because of the slow reaction time, I'd have to put the sensor in the middle of the airflow to get a decent response.

Second, it sounds that your results with the hair drier contradict the graph, so that when the temp goes up, so does the humidity.
lou2row Offline
#48 Posted:
Joined: 12-22-2006
Posts: 9,995
I had a cupido from the basement freezador that was running around 64% RH. Once fired up, it became so soft and moist I could barely keep it lit. It had been in there for @ a month. Is it pulling moisture from the air when lit up and warming, like glasses fog when coming inside on a cold day?
JTokash Offline
#49 Posted:
Joined: 02-12-2007
Posts: 5,234
47. Author: jpotts

First, the humidity sensor is not going the be the component that drives that fans. I'd use the humidity sensor just to display the humidity on some 7-segment LED displays. However, because of the slow reaction time, I'd have to put the sensor in the middle of the airflow to get a decent response.

Second, it sounds that your results with the hair drier contradict the graph, so that when the temp goes up, so does the humidity.

------------------------------------------------------

Yeah, a slow response time would benefit from having the sensor in the middle of the air flow, but how often will you be looking at the readout? Do you need it to have a fast response time?

Also, the results of the hair dryer test are backasswards because there was a humidifier inside the box. The graph above is for the "ideal" (theoretical) situation of an empty box with no source of humidity, the only moisture inside the box is what was there when it was sealed up. Adding the humidifier completely invalidates this graph because the humidifier behaves in the opposite manner... higher temperature = more moisture provided to the humidor.

------------------------------------------------------

48. Author: lou2row

I had a cupido from the basement freezador that was running around 64% RH. Once fired up, it became so soft and moist I could barely keep it lit. It had been in there for a month. Is it pulling moisture from the air when lit up and warming, like glasses fog when coming inside on a cold day?

------------------------------------------------------

That could be the case. 64% RH at a cool temperature simply translates into an even lower RH value at a higher temperature. So as it was burning, the moisture created by the burning tobacco was probably enough to make it feel soft.

I've had a couple of somewhat dry cigars that turned soggy when smoked. It seems that if the tobacco is too dry then it burns at a higher temperature (like seasoned wood burns hotter than green wood) and will produce more moisture from the combustion. It seems that if the tobacco is "just right" (a.k.a. properly humidified) then the combustion temperature is lower and it produces less moisture from burning... and you have a less soggy cigar.

------------------------------------------------------

I'm going to try the RH vs. Temp experiment in a more controlled environment and see how things go. Adding the humidifier was just done to see if in fact they do pump out more moisture as they are heated up - and they do.

-JT
dstieger Offline
#50 Posted:
Joined: 06-22-2007
Posts: 10,889
This horse dead or just sleeping? Either way, I can't seem to let it lie.

JTokash,
Have you seen the discussion in 5.0a here: http://www.cigargroup.com/faq/#5.0a ?

Not sure if that'll get yanked or not. If it does, google

' "variable humidity myth" Patton ',

and refer to FAQ 5.0a. If true, seems to indicate some incorrect assumptions that either cloud the waters or even contradict much of what's been discussed here.
-dave


Users browsing this topic
Guest
2 Pages12>