Your argument is either specious or insincere. Bush worked with a coalition to free Kuwait, and did so, remember? They were "occupied"; once Kuwait was liberated, we were chasing their troops back up toward Baghdad and killing them en-masse. The press on that was very bad, "oh how can you kill those defenseless murderous rapists.” I’m sure you were cheering the troops onward? Chanting Baghdad, Baghdad, Baghdad (or bust?) I don’t think so… I think you were protesting then, and you’re protesting now. And looking for excuses…
Our mandate was to liberate Kuwait. You know that don't you? Do you really think we should have driven on to Baghdad regardless of our military objectives and the coalition? I would have liked to see it, but the political reality of the day said, "stop". No immanent threat as identified today and concerns over a power vacuum if they were taken out. You should understand the whole vacuum theory being liberal and familiar with Democrats “sucking”.
Well, today the same reality says "GO!" are there any lights on the way to work? Do you have a job? Or am I paying you to sit at home and watch soaps? :-)