Recent PostsForum Rules
Next Topic Sign In to ReplyPrev Topic
FirstPrev34567NextLast
Rickamaven
201. Author: jetblastedDate: Tue, 4/18/2006, 9:17PM EST
Dang . . .
202. Author: KazamaDate: Tue, 4/18/2006, 9:18PM EST
I want to be Homebrew because of how well he stated my frustrations with GWB's fiscal irresponsibility, our rapidly diminishing rights, and those who cheer him on.

Victor AKA Kazama, (or is it Adroomi?)
203. Author: jetblastedDate: Tue, 4/18/2006, 9:21PM EST
A-HA ! ! !
204. Author: victor808Date: Tue, 4/18/2006, 9:24PM EST
Hey Kazama.

How's it in seattle? (Grew up in Shoreline, parents still in Woodinville)
205. Author: erkwgzDate: Tue, 4/18/2006, 11:39PM EST
All you guys are really me. {At least in Drathaars mind}

BWAHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAHAAAAAAAAAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!
206. Author: RICKAMAVENDate: Wed, 4/19/2006, 1:20AM EST
i am that i am.
207. Author: RICKAMAVENDate: Wed, 4/19/2006, 1:30AM EST
posters come and they go.

some of them show cleavage and try in vain to act sexy when they are way past their prime.

some of them are banned because they can't control themselves. you can see a lot of the type of you watch airline or airpot, i don't know what it is called, but jetblasted knows.

some of them just move on to someplace else where they are appreciated more, which means someplace where the other posters are impressed with their rhetoric.

i could care less, but i predict drathaar will be gone from the boards sooner rather then later.
208. Author: DrathaarDate: Wed, 4/19/2006, 2:58AM EST
HD, at work and posting from my phone I don't have the time to switch between posts and forums. And the long threads take forever to load. They take even longer to get to the end of them. I don't have a mouse. But since I've mentioned that many times, I'm sure you are aware of it.

Now, private business makes no difference. I'm not asking for his credit card info, his address, his name, or any other personal information. But, they can release all of it publicly except the cc#. All I'm asking is they look at the accounts and confirm doomi has more than one user name. There is nothing illegal or unethical about it...especially if doomi gives his permission.

Doesn't it make you curious why he doesn't? If he has nothing to hide, it would be an easy decision.

Vicdoomi, grow up.
209. Author: HomebrewDate: Wed, 4/19/2006, 3:02AM EST

*****THREADJACK ON*****
HEY KAZAMA!!!!!!
Great to see you posting Bro. Where ya been????
Hope all is well with you and yours.
Have a great day
*****THREADJACK OFF*****
Dave (A.K.A. Homebrew)
210. Author: HockeyDadDate: Wed, 4/19/2006, 3:25AM EST
Drathaar,

Yes, I am curious. Inquiring minds want to know.

You had made it perfectly clear that you have already conducted an exhausive investigation into the matter and have concluded that four or five usernames are all really Adroomi. You should be proud of your thorough work and name the names instead of asking CigarBid to do your dirty work. You want CigarBid to flirt with Federal and State privacy laws or at least violate the trust of their customer base because you are scared to name the names. It is clear that you have no real confidence in your investigation.

Stop pussing out and name the names. Then we'll see who authorizes what.

1. Victor808
2.
3.
4.
5.

Your investigation appears to be a sham.
211. Author: DrathaarDate: Wed, 4/19/2006, 3:51AM EST
Ok HockeyDad, I'm about to prove you wrong. Get ready:

Remember the Osama bin Laden thread? doomi accused Tuckersdad of being Osama. Tuck denied it and publicaly gave cbid permission to reveal if it was true. Steve checked Tucks account and revealed that Tuck was not Osama. Cbid not only CAN do it, they HAVE done it. Hmmm...I detect an apology is in order.

So doomi, what say you? Man or mouse?
212. Author: DrathaarDate: Wed, 4/19/2006, 3:57AM EST
...and the crowd got silent...
213. Author: HockeyDadDate: Wed, 4/19/2006, 4:03AM EST
Drathaar,

You also then will recall that CigarBid did not reveal who's account it was. They only verified at TuckersDad's request that it was not his account and CigarBid deleted it because it was offensive. CigarBid did not do a blanket search to identify all of TuckersDad's accounts.

Name the names.

Then maybe the specific users will ask CigarBid to do the same thing that TuckersDad did. You won't name the names and want some kind of blanket search of all user accounts.

Stop pussing out and name the names and maybe you'll get the authorizations you want and be vindicated.


Attention CigarBid:

1. Will you release you account database to Drathaar so he can determine which accounts accounts are Adroomi?

2. What authorization will you require to perform a blanket search of all accounts in your database to determine which ones are Adroomi and release that information to Drathaar?

214. Author: HomebrewDate: Wed, 4/19/2006, 4:04AM EST
I remember the thread you mention, I also remember Tuck giving permission. I don't remember Steve reporting back, but the thread disappeared while I was at work, so he might have, and I didn't know it.
Still I think, if you are going to make accusations, the "Burden of proof", lies with you, and not Adroomie.
Adroomie has posted here, for longer than I have, and will probably be posting here for quite some time. You have not even been posting here for a whole year, and stir up waay more crap, with your onesided unsupported, unless you mean those biased citations you use, arguements, meant to incite rather than inform. If anyone had a reason to have mulitple accounts, it would be you. I have admitted to having another alias, "Ficken Liberal", which was in response to you and rugrunner alluding that I was a liberal. I think that alias has 3 posts to it's credit.
Jeez. Give it a rest, or show your evidence. But then, I don't believe that you have any evidencem besides the vast leftwing conspiracy theory that has become your world.
Dave (A.K.A. Homebrew)
P.S. I probably shouldn't be arguing with you. I might end up on a "NoFly List".
Dave (A.K.A. Homebrew)
215. Author: DrathaarDate: Wed, 4/19/2006, 4:06AM EST
Somehow I didn't think you'd apologize. It takes a man, after all.

I haven't asked for the accounts to be revealed. Get this through your thick head:

I'm only asking them to confirm doomi has MORE THAN ONE ACCOUNT. Period. How many times do I have to say it? Should I write in in Kindergarten for you?
216. Author: HomebrewDate: Wed, 4/19/2006, 4:07AM EST
LOL And Drathaar finally got silent. LOL
Wow, this is nice. I could get used to this. LOL
Dave (A.K.A. Homebrew)
217. Author: DrathaarDate: Wed, 4/19/2006, 4:09AM EST
The difference between me and doomi is I HAVE given my permission for them to check my account and report if I have more than one name.

I have also said if you don't like my sources, too bad. At least I don't quote Al Franken (and then not report I'm quoting Al Franken). Give it up Homebrew, you've lost this one.
218. Author: DrathaarDate: Wed, 4/19/2006, 4:11AM EST
Silent? No, just checking my email.
219. Author: HomebrewDate: Wed, 4/19/2006, 4:15AM EST
My poor disillusioned Drathaar.
It is too bad you didn't finish college, you would be able to see how wrong you are. LOL
Dave (A.K.A. Homebrew)
220. Author: HomebrewDate: Wed, 4/19/2006, 4:15AM EST
P.S. If I am wrong, and you did finish college,
I would ask for a refund.
221. Author: DrathaarDate: Wed, 4/19/2006, 4:18AM EST
Getting desperate I see. Its all on doomi now. What will he do? Probably ignore this thread like the plague. Then call me a bunch of names on every other thread. Except the GOOD NIGHT, & GOOD LUCK thread. He's avoiding that one too.
222. Author: DrathaarDate: Wed, 4/19/2006, 4:18AM EST
Then you better ask for a refund.
223. Author: tailgaterDate: Wed, 4/19/2006, 4:21AM EST
I know you are, but what am I?
224. Author: HockeyDadDate: Wed, 4/19/2006, 4:23AM EST
Drathaar,

You don't need to ask the names to be revealed. Your exhaustive investigation has already identified the accounts. Stop pussing out and name the names and maybe they come forward exactly like TuckersDad did when he was falsely accused. Why are you so terrified to name the names?

Have you noticed that CigarBid has not checked up on your account, run a blanket search against the entire database, and reported back? I don't know what the heck they're waiting for but I at least asked them a few posts up as to what they would require to run this for you as you expand your investigation against the account known as Adroomi.

Now if you would just name the names, that would make the authorization process so much easier.

By the way, I have more than one account.


Now name the names. Its all on you. This is your 15 minutes.
225. Author: DrathaarDate: Wed, 4/19/2006, 4:41AM EST
Give it up HD, you aren't getting the names. Again, you are wrong. Its all on doomi. I don't even care if they release the names he is using, its not the point. Since I don't take orders from you, you might as well quit asking. Ain't gonna happen.

You are obviously clueless about the situation and what websites can and can't do. Or are you just trying to push POST NUMBER 211 up so people don't see it? My question is, why are you trying so hard to protect doomi? If he's using an alias to back himself up, don't you want to know?
226. Author: HomebrewDate: Wed, 4/19/2006, 4:44AM EST
In court,
The burden of proof lies on the plaitiff. Or the prosecution. It is the same in an arguement. Those who make an accusation, have the burden of proof, to support their allegations, not the accused.
Dave (A.K.A. Homebrew)
227. Author: adroomiDate: Wed, 4/19/2006, 4:48AM EST
"Remember the Osama bin Laden thread? doomi accused Tuckersdad of being Osama. Tuck denied it and publicaly gave cbid permission to reveal if it was true."

I posted ONE time on that thread, and my post said, "me too." It was in response to Jetblasted posting, "I'm not sure why, but this thread bothers me."

That was MACS I believe that busted on Tuckersdad for the Osama thing....not me.

Get your conspirators names correct, you borderline paranoid dumb*ss.
228. Author: DrathaarDate: Wed, 4/19/2006, 4:52AM EST
Ohhh, there's the name calling! So predictable! You seem to have missed the point doomi. Cbid can provide the service. All you have to do is GIVE YOUR PERMISSION. You don't have anything to hide do you? Say it.
229. Author: DrathaarDate: Wed, 4/19/2006, 4:53AM EST
HB, we aren't in court. And 99.9% of the time that is a true statement. Slander is the exception to the rule.
230. Author: HomebrewDate: Wed, 4/19/2006, 4:57AM EST
True,
but your assertion that Adroomie posts under more than one username, has nothing to do with slander. So the burden of proof still lies on you.
Dave (A.K.A. Homebrew)
231. Author: HockeyDadDate: Wed, 4/19/2006, 5:05AM EST
Drathaar,

I'm not pushing any post up. By the way, Adroomi is correct. MAC(SW) was the one the falsely accused TuckersDad regarding the Bin Laden account.

Now stop pussing out and name the names. Why can't you do it?

Maybe I'm protecting Adroomi because I actually am Adroomi. Maybe! Now name the names. Feel free to add mine to the list if you wish. I already said I have more than one account. Can you guess the others?



Attention CigarBid:

1. Will you release you account database to Drathaar so he can determine which accounts accounts are Adroomi?

2. What authorization will you require to perform a blanket search of all accounts in your database to determine which ones are Adroomi and release that information to Drathaar?

232. Author: DrathaarDate: Wed, 4/19/2006, 5:07AM EST
We're not in court. If he wants to clear his name, and he is innocent of the charges, he'd give permission. But since he hasn't given permission it has to make you wonder, no?

And to remind you, I'm not the only one accusing him. I'm just the only one saying it out loud. There are those who wish to remain silent, and I'm not going to tell anyone who they are. I might have stayed silent at one point as well. But doomi called me one too many names for no other reason than he was getting spanked in debate. Now I will not let it go. I hope that last sentance made sense. I'm starting to get tired. Its past my bedtime, but I'm staying up just a little late to see if he will give permission.
233. Author: DrathaarDate: Wed, 4/19/2006, 5:10AM EST
You sure are trying hard HD. Missing the point and adding to it. I'm asking for a TARGETED SEARCH and no names. Just confirmation. Did you ride the short bus to school?
234. Author: HockeyDadDate: Wed, 4/19/2006, 5:11AM EST
Drathaar,

Take it upon yourself in the name of the silent majority who wish to remain quiet and out Adroomi now. You have the opportunity to be the champion of the quiet.

Maybe you are actually right!

Name the names.

235. Author: HomebrewDate: Wed, 4/19/2006, 5:12AM EST
Hey Bro,
Get some rest. I enjoy sparring with you, but our nations security comes first. Don't want you to miss anything dangerous at work, due to lack of sleep.
Night Bro.
Dave (A.K.A. Homebrew)
236. Author: HockeyDadDate: Wed, 4/19/2006, 5:13AM EST
"Did you ride the short bus to school?"

Drathaar,

Don't make fun of people that ride the short bus to school. That's mean spirited.

Name the names so that the accused can come forward and face their accuser just like TuckersDad did when he was wrongly accused.

Name the names.
237. Author: DrathaarDate: Wed, 4/19/2006, 5:22AM EST
Um, Tuck was in the same position doomi is in now. There is no difference. Osama didn't have to come forward. Tuck stood up because he knew he was innocent. Why can't doomi stand up? Probably because he's guilty.
238. Author: DrathaarDate: Wed, 4/19/2006, 5:23AM EST
Oh, and screw the PC police.
239. Author: HomebrewDate: Wed, 4/19/2006, 5:28AM EST
Drathaar Posted,
"Um, Tuck was in the same position doomi is in now. There is no difference. Osama didn't have to come forward. Tuck stood up because he knew he was innocent. Why can't doomi stand up? Probably because he's guilty."

Sorry,
but this is totally different.
Here you accuse him of having multiple usernames.
There Tuck, was accused of having a specific username. You haven't even posted the username you accuse him of having. To find out if Tuck was not Osama, is not as broad a scope, as to ask about all usernames. Sorry, but this is comparing apples to oranges.
Go get some rest bro. This is a message board. It is not worth losing sleep over.
Dave (A.K.A. Homebrew)
240. Author: DrathaarDate: Wed, 4/19/2006, 5:35AM EST
Ah, but I did give a name. A few of them in fact. Just not ALL of them. I will only give the full list to cbid to check. Again, they don't have to tell me or anyone which ones are his (but it would be nice!). Only that he uses more than the name Adroomi. His silence has GOT to have you wondering though. I get more confident the longer he doesn't give permission.

Me lose sleep? Never! I'll just set my alarm clock for a later time. I value my sleep. But it does appear that he isn't going to comply. So I'm off to bed. Don't have too much fun without me.
241. Author: HomebrewDate: Wed, 4/19/2006, 5:44AM EST
Don't forget the time difference. He probably keeps similar hours to you.
Dave (A.K.A. Homebrew)
P.S. What names did you list???
Victor???
any others that you have posted, that I may have missed. I must admit, you have my curiosity peaked.
242. Author: victor808Date: Wed, 4/19/2006, 7:27AM EST
Is it just me or did Drathaar completely ignore the very specific information I have given him to prove my "non-adroominess"?
243. Author: victor808Date: Wed, 4/19/2006, 11:18AM EST
Topping this. I wouldn't want Drathaar to not be able to find it.
244. Author: RICKAMAVENDate: Wed, 4/19/2006, 11:23AM EST
Drathaar re 215

how do write something in kindergarten. is it some special kind of writing?

incidently while i am on this post, you are one nasty bugger.
245. Author: RICKAMAVENDate: Wed, 4/19/2006, 11:38AM EST
Drathaar

whoever "he" is, so many names have been bantered about, doesn't have to clear his name. this is america. he is innocent of whatever you are accusing him of doing or being.

if you wish to continue bantering someone's name and accusing whoever he/she is, better you prove what you are saying.

i predict you will soon leave us anyway, once you realize you are not a role model.
246. Author: RICKAMAVENDate: Wed, 4/19/2006, 11:48AM EST
Drathaar

you have done me a personal favor without even knowing about it.

i used to get jumped for posting so many negative posts about bush. now that you are here cluttering up the boards with your frivolous, "i can name the names of several commu, excuse me, i mean several names that doomi, i like to change his name because i think that makes some kind of impression."

i can sneak in an occasional anti war, anti bush, anti administration, without raising so much ire. i am now considered a little tamer.
247. Author: teedubbyaDate: Wed, 4/19/2006, 12:24PM EST
I've seen adroomi's picture, he looks nothing like Ann Coulter.

Yall remind me of my 9 year old and my 12 year old... "quit touching me" "he's looking at me"

your funny. I think adroomi is the boogie man.... actually he's like the undertaker on the WWE and he's getting into Draathers head.....


this is so juvenile I like it. keep it going.
248. Author: HockeyDadDate: Wed, 4/19/2006, 12:54PM EST
Drathaar,

Stop pussing out and name the names.

1. Victor808
2.
3.
4.
5.

Fill in the blanks! Maybe you are right. Maybe you are wrong.
249. Author: DrathaarDate: Wed, 4/19/2006, 1:54PM EST
Blah blah blah. Say it doomi.
250. Author: HockeyDadDate: Wed, 4/19/2006, 2:02PM EST
Blah blah blah.

Name the names. Don't be afraid to face the accused.
FirstPrev34567NextLast
Sign In to Reply
Next TopicJump to TopPrev Topic