Recent PostsForum Rules
Next Topic Sign In to ReplyPrev Topic
FirstPrev12NextLast
Kellyanne Conway.
1. Author: SpeysideDate: Fri, 3/15/2019, 3:13PM EST
Does she ever shut up?
2. Author: ZRX1200Date: Fri, 3/15/2019, 5:04PM EST
She is female so.......


Appreciate your rhetorical post just the same
3. Author: rfenstDate: Fri, 3/15/2019, 7:59PM EST

Her mouth spews dog crap.
4. Author: dstiegerDate: Fri, 3/15/2019, 8:32PM EST
Say what you will...I think she is incredibly good at her job
5. Author: Ewok126Date: Fri, 3/15/2019, 11:10PM EST
I just watched the video Cuomo and Conway spar over Trump's 'tough people' remark. I got to say, I would have slapped the piss out of both of em. Hes butt hurt over his perception of what "Trump meant when he said what he did, She's butt hurt because Cuomo takes it as such. The whole damn video was them arguing over butt hurtness instead of having an intellectual conversation or debate.

Now in all fairness I have not watched any other stuff of her and after that 10 minutes of what I just seen I never will so, I can not say but I will say this. Both her and Cuomo do not have the ability to keep their emotions in check when someone feels differently than they do. Which seems to be an issue with both our people of the US and of our government. The lack of willingness to have an open mind or even listen without berating one another has gotten so stupidly out of hand.

I feel this is her issue as well which leads to more of the immoral behavior and feeds more gas on the fire. People as a whole have come to behave in this manor which sucks. It has become a "who can interrupt who the most, the loudest,with name calling and shaming in hopes the other will give in which Cuomo did. So nope the only way she or Cuomo will ever shut up is if people quit feeding the animals. Everyone needs to learn to not let the others pull you up that emotional ladder because that is where they gain their power.

Just my 0.02
6. Author: tailgaterDate: Sat, 3/16/2019, 10:30AM EST
Speyside wrote:
Does she ever shut up?


She's in a contest with Squaw E. Warren.



7. Author: SpeysideDate: Sun, 3/17/2019, 9:43PM EST
True dat.
8. Author: rfenstDate: Mon, 3/18/2019, 9:52AM EST
dstieger wrote:
Say what you will...I think she is incredibly good at her job


At what? Turning people off?
9. Author: dstiegerDate: Mon, 3/18/2019, 10:03AM EST
IDK...wasn't aware that was her job....or that others are turned off. IMO, she does a good job of supporting and explaining a man who can be contradictory, inflammatory, even unsupportable, at times. She is smart and quick witted. I didnt say she turns you on (or anyone else except maybe Mr Conway.)
Considering the challenges that nearly everyone in Trump's orbit eventually succumb to, she manages to hang on and even thrive so far. Biggest controversy I recall was her saying something about Ivanka's clothes line being great....I may not agree with her and even get pissed at her seeming blind allegiance, but I admire her just the same.
10. Author: dstiegerDate: Mon, 3/18/2019, 10:06AM EST
I almost forgot...she was the only campaign manager for a presidential candidate in 2016 that won...
11. Author: frankj1Date: Mon, 3/18/2019, 10:09AM EST
dstieger wrote:
I almost forgot...she was the only campaign manager for a presidential candidate in 2016 that won...

shares the award with Manafort, no?
12. Author: dstiegerDate: Mon, 3/18/2019, 10:14AM EST
I suppose he, Bannon and Lewendowski have to get some credit, also....but, IIRC, she's the one who got the ball in the red zone
13. Author: tailgaterDate: Mon, 3/18/2019, 10:18AM EST

A while back, she got attacked by the Main Stream Media for sitting cross-legged on a couch in the Oval Office.
When simple things like that can set people off, you know there is something else driving the hatred.




Her husband is from my hometown.
Makes for interesting discussions involving her within my local breadth of friends.
14. Author: tailgaterDate: Mon, 3/18/2019, 10:19AM EST
dstieger wrote:
I suppose he, Bannon and Lewendowski have to get some credit, also....but, IIRC, she's the one who got the ball in the red zone


I thought Stormy Daniels took it in the end zone?

I gotta get a different news feed.


15. Author: rfenstDate: Mon, 3/18/2019, 10:32AM EST
dstieger wrote:
I almost forgot...she was the only campaign manager for a presidential candidate in 2016 that won...

So what. She is still unsuitable for public representation of the President and Presidency. And, I almost forgot something too. She is also the creator of "alternative facts".
16. Author: dstiegerDate: Mon, 3/18/2019, 10:35AM EST
rfenst wrote:
So what. She is still unsuitable for public representation of the President and Presidency..

Why?
17. Author: dstiegerDate: Mon, 3/18/2019, 10:36AM EST
rfenst wrote:
So what.".

The 'so what' is that it supports my contention that she is good at her job.
18. Author: victor809Date: Mon, 3/18/2019, 2:22PM EST
I actually agree with dstieg.... She's good at her job within the strict context of what she is trying to achieve.

I don't think she's "explaining" in a way that rfenst might recognize (ie, provide clarity of a point)....

Her job is less nuanced than that. It's more about throwing out just enough probable deniability that it gives cover to a moron president who says ridiculous things... She provides that explanations that people who already believe him want to hear. (Ie "bowling Green massacre"). She then gets all the media to televise it.

People who aren't idiots then ask why someone would hire such an idiot. Yet on the other side, his base is lapping it up and cheering. So it's successful.
19. Author: victor809Date: Mon, 3/18/2019, 2:44PM EST
Kellyanne Conway and her ilk are the trump administration's version of a phishing letter.

Those nigerian prince scams or any of the other email scams trying to get the victim to send an initial deposit, or send their bank account number aren't poorly written because the author isn't a native english speaker. They're poorly written to preemptively filter out anyone savvy enough to not send their money in at the end. The scammers don't want to waste their time going back and forth with someone who has a high likelihood of backing out at the last step (that step where $$ gets sent). They really only want responses from the very trusting/gullible/naive. They send millions and millions of emails.... if they sent more believable emails, imagine how much time they would lose talking to people who ultimately aren't gullible enough to buy the scam.

So think of the trump administration in that light. The message conway and her ilk are sending out isn't meant to convince rfenst, or frank that trump really is a smart guy who intended to tweet "covfefe" and those who are in the know got the message. They have a dumber audience they are trying to reach.
20. Author: frankj1Date: Mon, 3/18/2019, 3:42PM EST
victor809 wrote:
Kellyanne Conway and her ilk are the trump administration's version of a phishing letter.

Those nigerian prince scams or any of the other email scams trying to get the victim to send an initial deposit, or send their bank account number aren't poorly written because the author isn't a native english speaker. They're poorly written to preemptively filter out anyone savvy enough to not send their money in at the end. The scammers don't want to waste their time going back and forth with someone who has a high likelihood of backing out at the last step (that step where $$ gets sent). They really only want responses from the very trusting/gullible/naive. They send millions and millions of emails.... if they sent more believable emails, imagine how much time they would lose talking to people who ultimately aren't gullible enough to buy the scam.

So think of the trump administration in that light. The message conway and her ilk are sending out isn't meant to convince rfenst, or frank that trump really is a smart guy who intended to tweet "covfefe" and those who are in the know got the message. They have a dumber audience they are trying to reach.

as seen on T.V....rfenst and I are here to replace you.
21. Author: victor809Date: Mon, 3/18/2019, 3:58PM EST
frankj1 wrote:
as seen on T.V....rfenst and I are here to replace you.


No way you two could muster enough bitterness and hate to make even half of one of me! :)
22. Author: frankj1Date: Mon, 3/18/2019, 4:04PM EST
then why are the nazis scared we will?
23. Author: victor809Date: Mon, 3/18/2019, 4:05PM EST
They're scared of everything....
24. Author: frankj1Date: Mon, 3/18/2019, 4:05PM EST
oh, and Kellyanne creeps me out
25. Author: rfenstDate: Tue, 3/19/2019, 6:29AM EST
victor809 wrote:

So think of the trump administration in that light. The message conway and her ilk are sending out isn't meant to convince rfenst, or frank that trump really is a smart guy who intended to tweet "covfefe" and those who are in the know got the message. They have a dumber audience they are trying to reach.

Exactly!
26. Author: rfenstDate: Tue, 3/19/2019, 6:39AM EST
frankj1 wrote:
as seen on T.V....rfenst and I are here to replace you.


I'm "all in" as needed!
27. Author: fishinguitarmanDate: Tue, 3/19/2019, 6:57AM EST
victor809 wrote:
No way you two could muster enough bitterness and hate to make even half of one of me! :)





And you are proud of it, obviously

pathetically sadThumbDown
28. Author: victor809Date: Tue, 3/19/2019, 7:35AM EST
Speaking of her intended audience....
29. Author: bgzDate: Tue, 3/19/2019, 10:48AM EST
victor809 wrote:
No way you two could muster enough bitterness and hate to make even half of one of me! :)


Would take 1.5 rfensts and 3 franks.
30. Author: victor809Date: Tue, 3/19/2019, 11:05AM EST
bgz wrote:
Would take 1.5 rfensts and 3 franks.


Yep.... I'm glad you got the official conversion memo.

now, if we know that there's 6 franks of bitterness in 1 rfenst (he is a lawyer after all), and 10 franks worth of hate in 1 rfenst, how many rfensts does it take to make 1 victor worth of bitterness and hate?


31. Author: RMAN4443Date: Tue, 3/19/2019, 12:46PM EST
victor809 wrote:
Yep.... I'm glad you got the official conversion memo.

now, if we know that there's 6 franks of bitterness in 1 rfenst (he is a lawyer after all), and 10 franks worth of hate in 1 rfenst, how many rfensts does it take to make 1 victor worth of bitterness and hate?



Is this a trick question? Think


32. Author: SpeysideDate: Tue, 3/19/2019, 12:53PM EST
3.14159265. There is no exact number due to your uniqueness.
33. Author: bgzDate: Tue, 3/19/2019, 12:57PM EST
victor809 wrote:
Yep.... I'm glad you got the official conversion memo.

now, if we know that there's 6 franks of bitterness in 1 rfenst (he is a lawyer after all), and 10 franks worth of hate in 1 rfenst, how many rfensts does it take to make 1 victor worth of bitterness and hate?




It would only require 4 rfensts, where it would require 36 franks.

36 franks would be significantly more bitter than 1 victor where 4 rfensts would be slightly more hateful than 1 victor.
34. Author: bgzDate: Tue, 3/19/2019, 1:40PM EST
No comments, guess I should show my work...

We know that 3F + 1.5R = (1/2)v.

Let F be the baseline at b + h.
Therefore R = 6b + 10h.

6(b + h) + 3(6b + 10h) = v

so v = 24b + 36h
35. Author: dstiegerDate: Tue, 3/19/2019, 1:45PM EST
Are bitterness and hatred factors equally weighted when evaluating one whole v? Which is the greater a$$hole component?
36. Author: RMAN4443Date: Tue, 3/19/2019, 1:57PM EST
Think it does not compute...there aren't enough rfensts and/or franks to equal 1/2 victor
37. Author: victor809Date: Tue, 3/19/2019, 1:59PM EST
RMAN4443 wrote:
Think it does not compute...there aren't enough rfensts and/or franks to equal 1/2 victor


Now that's definitely a fat joke.
38. Author: bgzDate: Tue, 3/19/2019, 2:00PM EST
It's subjective, that's why we can't directly mix the units.

Be kinda like adding apples and oranges.
39. Author: victor809Date: Tue, 3/19/2019, 2:02PM EST
bgz wrote:
No comments, guess I should show my work...

We know that 3F + 1.5R = (1/2)v.

Let F be the baseline at b + h.
Therefore R = 6b + 10h.

6(b + h) + 3(6b + 10h) = v

so v = 24b + 36h


Dammit. Now I have to figure it out.
40. Author: victor809Date: Tue, 3/19/2019, 2:10PM EST
So I'm treating bitterness and hate as separate variables.

For instance - 3(Fb+Fh) + 1.5 (Rb+Rh) = Vb + Vh

Now, we've never established a bitterness to hate conversion ratio, so we have to assume that the contribution of bitterness and hate cannot be converted.

We also know that 6 Fb = Rb
and we know that 10Fh = Rh

So we could say - 3 [(Rb/6) + (Rh/10)] + 1.5 (Rb+Rh) = Vb + Vh
or
Rb/2 + Rh/3.33 + 1.5Rb +1.5 Rh = Vb + Vh

.... so it takes 2 Rfents worth of bitterness to equal the bitterness of a victor
and 1.833 Rfents' worth of hate to equal the hatefulness of a victor.

So, to achieve the total Bitternmess and Hate of a victor, it would require 1.833 Rfenst's and you would have a little extra bitterness

It would take significantly more Frank's if we were to substitute Rfenst for Frank.

41. Author: bgzDate: Tue, 3/19/2019, 2:22PM EST
Mine was simpler... and you forgot that the initial equation was equivalent to 1/2 V, not a whole V (I initially made the same mistake).
42. Author: victor809Date: Tue, 3/19/2019, 2:24PM EST
bgz wrote:
Mine was simpler... and you forgot that the initial equation was equivalent to 1/2 V, not a whole V (I initially made the same mistake).


Ah, you're right.
Double my numbers to get a full Vh and Vb then. :)

43. Author: rfenstDate: Tue, 3/19/2019, 3:33PM EST
RMAN4443 wrote:
Think it does not compute...there aren't enough rfensts and/or franks to equal 1/2 victor

You do not know my potency...
44. Author: frankj1Date: Tue, 3/19/2019, 6:38PM EST
I'm good wif words, not so good wif numbahs.
45. Author: fishinguitarmanDate: Tue, 3/19/2019, 7:08PM EST
vicki=v.i.p.











vicki is perfect
46. Author: frankj1Date: Tue, 3/19/2019, 7:22PM EST
tailgater wrote:


Her husband is from my hometown.
Makes for interesting discussions involving her within my local breadth of friends.

not sure what I really know about her husband (liberal? or conservative who does not like Trump?) but I scanned a newspaper article yesterday or today which said that Mr Conway believes Trump is insane, or something close to that.
47. Author: teedubbyaDate: Tue, 3/19/2019, 7:30PM EST
Life long conservative. Unlike trump.
48. Author: frankj1Date: Tue, 3/19/2019, 7:33PM EST
teedubbya wrote:
Life long conservative. Unlike trump.

so, more like the FBI directors and Mueller?
Gotcha.
Well, you know how liberal those lifelong conservatives are.
49. Author: teedubbyaDate: Tue, 3/19/2019, 7:36PM EST
Strange world we live in.
50. Author: DrafterXDate: Wed, 3/20/2019, 7:03AM EST
Faces look ugly... Mellow
FirstPrev12NextLast
Sign In to Reply
Next TopicJump to TopPrev Topic