| 101. Author: teedubbya | Date: Fri, 6/4/2021, 8:11AM EST | |
By the way the vilification of fauci has been amazing to watch. It started long ago but now the new discoveries from 2012 that have been public all along and the benign emails show he’s evil.
It’s amusing to me to watch the misrepresentation. You can literally tell who reads source documents and who regurgitates what their echo chamber tells them to.
Come on now. The intention to vilify him was shown long ago and now the follow through. I really thought people were smarter than this in here.
|
| 102. Author: Speyside | Date: Fri, 6/4/2021, 8:42AM EST | |
TW, assume all people are morons. This allows for an occasional pleasant surprise. |
| 103. Author: bgz | Date: Fri, 6/4/2021, 8:57AM EST | |
teedubbya wrote:Bucky I haven’t looked but I’ll take your word for the number of years Fauci has worked in a medical related position within the government as well as all the other doctors and scientists using their education and experience in their chosen field in the same way. My guess is he is surrounded by doctors doing that doctory expert stuff we all hate.
I thought beaker was in Congress like daddy was. I didn’t realize he was using his non board certified ophthalmology skills for medical purposes every day and this it’s an equivalent rather than a false one. Send his autist azz a pdf... get him on the right page with this sh*t. |
| 104. Author: teedubbya | Date: Fri, 6/4/2021, 9:16AM EST | |
I have to lay off the non board certified stuff with Beaker Paul however. He made up his own certification then pulled political levers to get it accepted in Kentucky and nowhere else to my knowledge. But technically in his state and on,y his state he is certified by the board he created to certify himself. All to avoid having to renew certification periodically to show continued knowledge and skills.... thus allowing him to not keep up on medicine and to be a politician more than a doc.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sVw0i5Rd_Is |
| 105. Author: RayR | Date: Fri, 6/4/2021, 9:42AM EST | |
teedubbya wrote:Bucky I haven’t looked but I’ll take your word for the number of years Fauci has worked in a medical related position within the government as well as all the other doctors and scientists using their education and experience in their chosen field in the same way. My guess is he is surrounded by doctors doing that doctory expert stuff we all hate.
I thought beaker was in Congress like daddy was. I didn’t realize he was using his non board certified ophthalmology skills for medical purposes every day and this it’s an equivalent rather than a false one. Yes, Fauci has spent 53 years working in government so he could avoid getting an honest job doing actual doctoring. Real doctors never last in government bureaucracies, they are soon purged because they embarrass duplicitous quacks like Fauci. Quote:For more than a year we’ve had to suffer insufferable ****libs (but I repeat myself) telling us to ‘respect the science.’ Well, their high priest of scientism just got caught saying one thing in private and telling them the exact opposite in public, validating everything those dirty spreader Republicans, anti-vaxxers and anti-maskers told them.
Moveover, from the beginning this thing was an operation designed to do exactly what it has done — leave people in love with their mask which makes them sick, genuflecting to Big Brother and doubling down on their paranoia simply because they are too ashamed to admit to themselves (no less those evil MAGA folks) that they were duped by yet another bad script from the House that Klaus Built.
Because Fauci, like all the other so-called experts paraded in front of us for the past year are nothing more than political operatives told to just keep the narrative alive for as long as possible. He’s now being sacrificed alongside Bill Gates and the other hired help like Andrew Cuomo and Gretchen Whitmer while also securing a multi-million dollar book deal as his gold watch for a job well done.
https://tomluongo.me/2021/06/02/fauci-files-wuflu-war-to-come/
|
| 106. Author: JadeRose | Date: Fri, 6/4/2021, 9:57AM EST | |
^^ My favorite part of whatever this thing posts is these websites it lists as "sources." They all look like they were created in Angelfire in 1994.  |
| 107. Author: bgz | Date: Fri, 6/4/2021, 10:13AM EST | |
Not to mention it's simply not true. I haven't had a cold or flu since covid. Masks work... think I'm going to keep wearing it cause the conspiracy theorists don't believe in germs. |
| 108. Author: JadeRose | Date: Fri, 6/4/2021, 10:17AM EST | |
bgz wrote:Not to mention it's simply not true. I haven't had a cold or flu since covid. Masks work... think I'm going to keep wearing it cause the conspiracy theorists don't believe in germs. I keep wearing my mask only because it seems Trumpy and Qtard dip$hits leave me alone when I'm wearing it. That's worth the very mild inconvenience of wearing it. |
| 109. Author: RayR | Date: Fri, 6/4/2021, 10:35AM EST | |
bgz wrote:Not to mention it's simply not true. I haven't had a cold or flu since covid. Masks work... think I'm going to keep wearing it cause the conspiracy theorists don't believe in germs. Your belief in the power of the mask is just part of your superstitious progressive Faucian religion. Your anecdotal evidence is rubbish. Never wearing a mask, I haven't had a cold or flu in I don't know how many years, I just can't remember. Never had a flu shot either. So much for your evidence that the mask of obedience works. Actually, before the cult of the mask began last year, if you had worn a mask in public, the peoples would have thought you were a robber or a crazy person or somethin. |
| 110. Author: bgz | Date: Fri, 6/4/2021, 10:45AM EST | |
You're mistaken... my belief in the mask comes from being a germophobe and knowing most you some nasty mother f*ckers. |
| 111. Author: Speyside | Date: Fri, 6/4/2021, 11:14AM EST | |
Ray you're an idiot.
There have been numerous studies on the distance different masks minimize sneezes and coughs to. If I had not chose to get vaccinated for whatever reason I would wear a mask. Since I have been vaccinated IDAF about people who chose not to. That is on them. A small percentage of people cannot get vaccinated, or vaccination is ineffective for. The only places I wear a mask to are locations that could contain a larger percentage of those people. |
| 112. Author: HockeyDad | Date: Fri, 6/4/2021, 11:16AM EST | |
We still have a mask mandate in California. Step across that Nevada line….I dare you! |
| 113. Author: Speyside | Date: Fri, 6/4/2021, 11:26AM EST | |
Why? I don't like ****holes. |
| 114. Author: RayR | Date: Fri, 6/4/2021, 11:34AM EST | |
bgz wrote:You're mistaken... my belief in the mask comes from being a germophobe and knowing most you some nasty mother f*ckers. Ah, I see, so you're like Howard Hughes was. Do you wear a mask while you are holed up in your bunker too? |
| 115. Author: RayR | Date: Fri, 6/4/2021, 11:47AM EST | |
Speyside wrote:Ray you're an idiot.
There have been numerous studies on the distance different masks minimize sneezes and coughs to. If I had not chose to get vaccinated for whatever reason I would wear a mask. Since I have been vaccinated IDAF about people who chose not to. That is on them. A small percentage of people cannot get vaccinated, or vaccination is ineffective for. The only places I wear a mask to are locations that could contain a larger percentage of those people. You've been vaccinated and you still wear a mask because you are afraid of Neanderthal super-spreaders? Don't you have faith in the Biden vaccine of invincibility? I don't care about your studies, the real-world data shows there has been no relationship between mask mandates or lockdowns and the spread of da virus. |
| 116. Author: bgz | Date: Fri, 6/4/2021, 11:56AM EST | |
RayR wrote:Ah, I see, so you're like Howard Hughes was. Do you wear a mask while you are holed up in your bunker too?
Nah, I prefer a snorkel. |
| 117. Author: HockeyDad | Date: Fri, 6/4/2021, 12:09PM EST | |
Speyside wrote:Why? I don't like ****holes. Have you figured out yet that on any and every given weekend Lake Tahoe is completely taken over by Californians from the San Francisco Bay Area!? |
| 118. Author: rfenst | Date: Fri, 6/4/2021, 1:52PM EST | |
teedubbya wrote:By the way the vilification of fauci has been amazing to watch. It started long ago but now the new discoveries from 2012 that have been public all along and the benign emails show he’s evil.
It’s amusing to me to watch the misrepresentation. You can literally tell who reads source documents and who regurgitates what their echo chamber tells them to.
Come on now. The intention to vilify him was shown long ago and now the follow through. I really thought people were smarter than this in here. They are not. |
| 119. Author: RayR | Date: Fri, 6/4/2021, 2:40PM EST | |
bgz wrote:Nah, I prefer a snorkel. Is that the one you modified to double as a bong?  |
| 120. Author: bgz | Date: Fri, 6/4/2021, 2:48PM EST | |
You might want to talk to HD about that one... you might be on to something. |
| 121. Author: DrafterX | Date: Fri, 6/4/2021, 5:14PM EST | |
I think after Fauci goes to jail we need to set up a re-edumication camp for the Fauci followers...  |
| 122. Author: RayR | Date: Fri, 6/4/2021, 6:07PM EST | |
New Study Finds Mask Use Had 'Little to No' Association with the Spread of COVID, Contradicting CDC
By Brett Kershaw June 3, 2021 at 3:53pm Quote:A recent MedRxiv study found that mask mandates and the use of masks in the continental United States were “not associated with lower SARS-CoV-2 spread” during the global outbreak of the coronavirus last year.
Measuring total coronavirus case growth and public mask use with data provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, the non-peer-reviewed study’s results ascertained that the growth rate of COVID-19 cases did not significantly vary between “mandate and non-mandate states.”
When exposed to higher transmission and spread, “surges were equivocal” across the separate states and “[m]ask mandates and use” could not be “associated with slower state-level COVID-19 spread during COVID-19 growth surges,” the researchers noted.
“Our findings do not support the hypothesis that SARS-CoV-2 transmission rates decrease with greater public mask use,” they continued. According to the researchers, coronavirus “transmission waves are independent of reported mask use,” and do not associate with case growth.
“Case growth was independent of mandates at low and high rates of community spread, and mask use did not predict case growth during the Summer or Fall-Winter waves.”
https://www.westernjournal.com/new-study-finds-mask-use-little-no-association-spread-covid-contradicting-cdc/ |
| 123. Author: drglnc | Date: Fri, 6/4/2021, 6:08PM EST | |
Lol, “after Fauci goes to jail”? Is he gonna share a cell with Hillary, Obama, and Biden after trump is reinstated this summer? |
| 124. Author: ZRX1200 | Date: Fri, 6/4/2021, 6:08PM EST | |
It’s the logical next step in anti fascism. They’ve asked for it, it’s inevitable.
“They might as well sit back and enjoy it”
~ Bobby Knight |
| 125. Author: RayR | Date: Fri, 6/4/2021, 6:24PM EST | |
DrafterX wrote:I think after Fauci goes to jail we need to set up a re-edumication camp for the Fauci followers... Fauci – Public Enemy #1 https://www.lewrockwell.com/lrc-blog/fauci-public-enemy-1/ Fauxchi’s Fall https://www.lewrockwell.com/lrc-blog/fauxchis-fall/ |
| 126. Author: tonygraz | Date: Fri, 6/4/2021, 7:10PM EST | |
DrafterX wrote:I think after Fauci goes to jail we need to set up a re-edumication camp for the Fauci followers... |
| 127. Author: teedubbya | Date: Fri, 6/4/2021, 7:17PM EST | |
this is from wiki which of course is not a decent source, but since it is about another bogus source I thought I'd include it. It can be verified other ways if you choose. This seemed more appropriate to me.
medRxiv (pronounced "med-archive") is an Internet site distributing unpublished eprints about health sciences.[1][2][3][4] It distributes complete but unpublished manuscripts in the areas of medicine, clinical research, and related health sciences without charge to the reader. Such manuscripts have yet to undergo peer review and the site notes that preliminary status and that the manuscripts should not be considered for clinical application, nor relied upon for news reporting as established information.[5] Medical photographs cannot be included in preprints on medRxiv, since the editorial team does not have the resources of a journal to do thorough checks of patient consent.
I never read RayRs posts but was on mobile and did this time. Guess what his buddy Brett Kershaw used for his news reporting. You guessed it. They specifically say not to. I wonder if there is an agenda involved?
Ray... nice to meet you. I don't think I've ever responded to you directly before but I will this one time before going back to the full site. RayR, you are an idiot.
And so is anyone lining up next to his stupidity. |
| 128. Author: teedubbya | Date: Fri, 6/4/2021, 7:28PM EST | |
Check out their front page in red letters. Then go find the "study" and actually read it rather than what this hack cherry picks.
LOL every article has the following language at the top "bioRxiv (or medrxiv) posts many COVID19-related papers. A reminder: they have not been formally peer-reviewed and should not guide health-related behavior or be reported in the press as conclusive."
https://www.medrxiv.org/
Interestingly enough there is a study about CD4+/CD8+ ratios in there I hope goes through peer review and proves meaningful. It isn't right now. No matter what Laura Ingram says. Now excuse me while I go by stock in hydroxy. |
| 129. Author: tonygraz | Date: Fri, 6/4/2021, 7:34PM EST | |
I never doubted Ben when he first called rayray an idiot, and never will. I still think he works for the russians. |
| 130. Author: DrafterX | Date: Fri, 6/4/2021, 7:55PM EST | |
But the emails... |
| 131. Author: teedubbya | Date: Fri, 6/4/2021, 8:09PM EST | |
And the server |
| 132. Author: teedubbya | Date: Fri, 6/4/2021, 8:13PM EST | |
But enough about Hillary |
| 133. Author: Speyside | Date: Fri, 6/4/2021, 8:14PM EST | |
Imagine having that much Denisovan DNA as well as being your own Grandfather. His whole life is a feuge. He is the proverbial blind squirrel, except he found Drafters nuts.
I must admit hearing folks like him is encouraging. We don't have to push real hard for the elephant to tumble over the cliff. He prolly got his degree at Dewey, Screwem, and Howe. Formerly known as Trump University.
Oh hell, I'm rambling again. |
| 134. Author: Smooth light | Date: Fri, 6/4/2021, 9:42PM EST | |
Where you the one born on the backseat of a bus, rolling down highway 41..."Rambling Man" |
| 135. Author: ZRX1200 | Date: Fri, 6/4/2021, 11:15PM EST | |
Yeah I’m sure the reason given for redaction is well know by you Teedubya? |
| 136. Author: teedubbya | Date: Fri, 6/4/2021, 11:18PM EST | |
ZRX1200 wrote:Yeah I’m sure the reason given for redaction is well know by you Teedubya? Not really. Not sure why I would know since I’m not directly involved. I have worked on foia requests and redactions. There are lots of legitimate reasons *shrug*. |
| 137. Author: ZRX1200 | Date: Fri, 6/4/2021, 11:24PM EST | |
Oh sorry I thought since you had such strong opinionated responses you’d know what’s been reported.....
My bad |
| 138. Author: teedubbya | Date: Fri, 6/4/2021, 11:26PM EST | |
Never claimed to. I guess you assumed wrong or made it up in your head? I honestly don’t know what you are talking about. |
| 139. Author: teedubbya | Date: Fri, 6/4/2021, 11:40PM EST | |
Have t been paying much attention to the emails or the fever dream to smear Fauci that’s been underway for some time to be honest. It’s so transparent.
Just read this though to try to catch up just for fun even though I think it’s all nonsense.
https://www.nationalreview.com/2021/06/what-the-fauci-emails-reveal/
‘ In any case, like most data dumps that have careful redactions, the Fauci email trove has no smoking-gun evidence of wrongdoing. You could make the case, as I and others have, that Fauci had certain prejudices and dispositions that were deeply unhelpful in his leadership of the pandemic response — and you’ll find evidence of those here. He had a very strong bias against existing drugs and for new and experimental ones. He has been slippery on masks and clearly was willing to say things in public that he thought “helped” the response even if they weren’t strictly true.“
*shrug*. Ok. Fauci bad?
|
| 140. Author: BuckyB93 | Date: Fri, 6/4/2021, 11:53PM EST | |
Wait, I thought you lived and breathed this stuff every day. It's not a hobby. It's been your focus since the beginning. You're in tune with information that nobody else has exposure to. You model a bunch of stuff to direct and provide feedback to the community. Been on conference calls and meetings of some of the biggest experts in the field...
...but now your not directly involved nor up to date on current happenings?
(You missed a nine!) |
| 141. Author: RayR | Date: Sat, 6/5/2021, 12:26AM EST | |
Looks like I made heads explode in the Fauci cult.
So desperate to disprove anybody questioning the Fauch, they refer to a Wiki page.
They don't like studies if they don't meet their desired expectations.
But regardless, this is old news, there is no data showing the masks or lockdowns did anything in the least to stop the Rona, never has been..anywhere!. If they did they'd be able to show without a doubt that our overlords saved us from sure annihilation with their draconian measures. Where's the beef boys? They predicted an unprecedented plague when mask mandates were removed, unleashing those Neanderthals who weren't following the science
Like all cultists, they are obsessed.
https://rationalground.com/why-dont-face-masks-work/
The linked peer-reviewed study (I heard the cultists like peer-reviewed stuff) of the face diapers most people have been wearing, including Fauci's stylish cloth fashion masks, shows they are rubbish.
No matter, the cultists won't believe their high priests are frauds. |
| 142. Author: BuckyB93 | Date: Sat, 6/5/2021, 1:56AM EST | |
Your mainstream media with CDC guidelines on how to make a mask. Do your patriotic duty to stop the pandemic.
https://www.today.com/video/how-to-make-a-coronavirus-face-mask-at-home-81680453611
This is your experts speaking... Even Hoda is kinda confused on how to work her hanky.. it's too sciency for her but hats off for following the expert's recommendations. A paper coffee filter or dryer sheet would probably be as effective, I wonder it that study has been done. |
| 143. Author: teedubbya | Date: Sat, 6/5/2021, 2:23AM EST | |
Bucky I’m sorry if I’ve said anything that lead you to believe I am directly involved in the issues regarding Faucis emails or that I would or should know more than I do. The whole silly storm just has very little relevance in what I do professionally or why I do it. And if I don't know I won't pretend to or say I do.
I do live and breathe this stuff every day and fortunately we are able to pivot back to some of our normal focus as of late. But by this stuff it’s not this crap. It’s covid. This really isn’t about that.
But I am sorry I confused you.
and stuff |
| 144. Author: Speyside | Date: Sat, 6/5/2021, 6:09AM EST | |
Bucky could you please provide a link to Fauci or NIH saying to use hankercheifs as masks, I can't locate one. |
| 145. Author: DrafterX | Date: Sat, 6/5/2021, 9:00AM EST | |
He turned me into a newt....  |
| 146. Author: RayR | Date: Sat, 6/5/2021, 10:43AM EST | |
BuckyB93 wrote:Your mainstream media with CDC guidelines on how to make a mask. Do your patriotic duty to stop the pandemic.
https://www.today.com/video/how-to-make-a-coronavirus-face-mask-at-home-81680453611
This is your experts speaking... Even Hoda is kinda confused on how to work her hanky.. it's too sciency for her but hats off for following the expert's recommendations. A paper coffee filter or dryer sheet would probably be as effective, I wonder it that study has been done. A blast from the past. I like that stripy patten, she probably has a matching bra and panties. But the final recommendation was this doesn't make you invincible, you should still be staying at home.  |
| 147. Author: Speyside | Date: Sat, 6/5/2021, 11:51AM EST | |
So you like chick shows too. |
| 148. Author: BuckyB93 | Date: Sat, 6/5/2021, 12:27PM EST | |
Speyside wrote:Bucky could you please provide a link to Fauci or NIH saying to use hankercheifs as masks, I can't locate one. Because they changed their recommendations along the way numerous times. If you note, their website doesn't specifically say hankies anymore. The CDC website for "approved" masks was last updated this past Feb. But early on using a bandana or a bed sheet was OK. The NBC video made mention of it along with these following links which were done around the 2020 mask mandate time frame. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4PhNiH52mXg https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d2KfbjbWVE4 https://www.cnet.com/how-to/will-homemade-face-masks-keep-you-from-getting-sick-with-coronavirus-what-to-know/ https://www.nbcchicago.com/news/local/what-you-should-know-before-making-a-homemade-mask-according-to-the-cdc/2256913/ https://www.marketwatch.com/story/this-might-be-the-simplest-no-sew-diy-coronavirus-mask-2020-04-03 Its waffling and changes in what is good and what isn't that had eroded their credibility during all this. It seemed like every month new updates were created on what is good and what is bad. |
| 149. Author: BuckyB93 | Date: Sat, 6/5/2021, 12:28PM EST | |
One four NINE! |
| 150. Author: bgz | Date: Sat, 6/5/2021, 12:53PM EST | |
So you prefer they just not give you updates on new information?
*head scratch* |
