America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 13 years ago by rfenst. 111 replies replies.
3 Pages<123>
Planned Parenthood, The Auschwitz of the 21st Century...
borndead1 Offline
#51 Posted:
Joined: 11-07-2006
Posts: 5,216
"Pence said the amendment captures a rough public consensus that they accept legal abortions, but don't want to pay for them."



Bingo. Exactly how I feel about it.

Holy crap, a piece of legislation that I actually LIKE! OhMyGod

rfenst Offline
#52 Posted:
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,403
frankj1 wrote:
I also really resent the cavalier and inflammatory use of terms like Auschwitz here (and other Nazi terms regarding Israel) in these posts.
A little respect is in order.


No offense, and I don't disagree with you, but CBid is the last place you can expect to get or see respect.
jackconrad Offline
#53 Posted:
Joined: 06-09-2003
Posts: 67,461
Too many liberals...???. ^^^
topper7788 Offline
#54 Posted:
Joined: 06-21-2006
Posts: 4,719
^

Now that's funny !!!!!
daveincincy Offline
#55 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2006
Posts: 20,033
HockeyDad wrote:
They're trying to abort Planned Parenthood's funding!

Now they're gonna have to raise prices.


I was thinking just the opposite. With no government handout (i.e. free money), they will need to lower prices to stay competitive. I could be wrong. Think Just like lasic surgery, if insurance companies started covering that, it would cost 3x more.
frankj1 Offline
#56 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,242
jackconrad wrote:
Too many liberals...???. ^^^

I wasn't aware of there being a liberal vs conservative opinion on the Holocaust. I just assumed MOST people with measurable intelligence understand. But if it seems funny, you must be confusing this devastation with Hogan's Heroes.
frankj1 Offline
#57 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,242
rfenst wrote:
No offense, and I don't disagree with you, but CBid is the last place you can expect to get or see respect.

I didn't mean respect toward me...I have done nothing to deserve any! I meant for those that perished.

Just like I would find it ugly to make jokes about Turks slaughtering Armenians, or any African genocide...t'aint funny McGee.
daveincincy Offline
#58 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2006
Posts: 20,033
frankj1 wrote:
I wasn't aware of there being a liberal vs conservative opinion on the Holocaust. I just assumed MOST people with measurable intelligence understand. But if it seems funny, you must be confusing this devastation with Hogan's Heroes.


Pay no mind to Jack....he noze nozzing!
frankj1 Offline
#59 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,242
daveincincy wrote:
Pay no mind to Jack....he noze nozzing!

he's worth keeping around for some of his picture posts...
borndead1 Offline
#60 Posted:
Joined: 11-07-2006
Posts: 5,216
frankj1 wrote:
I wasn't aware of there being a liberal vs conservative opinion on the Holocaust.


With Jack, EVERYTHING is liberal vs. conservative.
HockeyDad Offline
#61 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,187
A Turk, an Armenian, and a mechanical engineer walk into a bar. The Armenian offers to buy the Turk a drink. The Turk shoots him.


You're right, Turk/Armenian humor does suck.
wheelrite Offline
#62 Posted:
Joined: 11-01-2006
Posts: 50,119
frankj1 wrote:
I also really resent the cavalier and inflammatory use of terms like Auschwitz here (and other Nazi terms regarding Israel) in these posts.
A little respect is in order.


Well,Frank,,,

I'm offended by the murder of babies.

The comparison of A Death Camp and an Abortion Mill is correct...

Btw,,,

Abortion is legal in Israel,they're hypocrits.
rfenst Offline
#63 Posted:
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,403
wheelrite wrote:
Btw,,,

Abortion is legal in Israel,they're hypocrits.




WTF does Israel have to do with Planned Parenthood funding by the U.S.?
hoyodude Offline
#64 Posted:
Joined: 07-17-2000
Posts: 4,395
rfenst wrote:
WTF does Israel have to do with Planned Parenthood funding by the U.S.?


Whoa,whoa,whoa...you weren't expecting a rational discussion on THIS subject HERE, were you Robert? I mean...you DO remember what form this is....right?
rfenst Offline
#65 Posted:
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,403
hoyodude wrote:
Whoa,whoa,whoa...you weren't expecting a rational discussion on THIS subject HERE, were you Robert? I mean...you DO remember what form this is....right?



LOL!!!
I just want to read the "boot-strapped" reasoning!
wheelrite Offline
#66 Posted:
Joined: 11-01-2006
Posts: 50,119
rfenst wrote:
LOL!!!
I just want to read the "boot-strapped" reasoning!




"Frank " referred to Israel for no apparent reason in his feigned outrage...

I just thought I'd outrage him some more...

frankj1 Offline
#67 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,242
wheelrite wrote:
"Frank " referred to Israel for no apparent reason in his feigned outrage...

I just thought I'd outrage him some more...


Wheel,
I did make a very broad refence when I first objected to Holocaust terms being tossed about. I incorrectly implied that your use of Auschwitz had any reference to Israel at all...what I had in mind was previous threads where terms like "concentration camp" were used to describe Israel's control of Palestinians and other nazi behaviors being used on Israel. I find that to be purposeful "Jew baiting" and I want to let you know that I was incorrect to include your useage in this thread.

In fact, I do understand your feelings on abortion and believe I am on record here as saying that despite being Pro Choice, I could never live with making the decision to abort. I choose life but do not believe in forcing my desires, no matter how benevolent, on other Americans.

Would you not be outraged if someone compared unrelated things by using statements like "after police shot the drug dealers, the apartment looked like the back room of an illegal abortion clinic"? Doesn't that cheapen and demean an issue that you feel so strongly about in your heart? It has nothing to do with abortion, and most of the times here when Holocaust terms are used, they have no connection to the real deal. If something hit close to your family, you'd want those memories respected by your American compatriots.

Also, I can see the top of your head when I stand.

wheelrite Offline
#68 Posted:
Joined: 11-01-2006
Posts: 50,119
frankj1 wrote:
Wheel,
I did make a very broad refence when I first objected to Holocaust terms being tossed about. I incorrectly implied that your use of Auschwitz had any reference to Israel at all...what I had in mind was previous threads where terms like "concentration camp" were used to describe Israel's control of Palestinians and other nazi behaviors being used on Israel. I find that to be purposeful "Jew baiting" and I want to let you know that I was incorrect to include your useage in this thread.

In fact, I do understand your feelings on abortion and believe I am on record here as saying that despite being Pro Choice, I could never live with making the decision to abort. I choose life but do not believe in forcing my desires, no matter how benevolent, on other Americans.

Would you not be outraged if someone compared unrelated things by using statements like "after police shot the drug dealers, the apartment looked like the back room of an illegal abortion clinic"? Doesn't that cheapen and demean an issue that you feel so strongly about in your heart? It has nothing to do with abortion, and most of the times here when Holocaust terms are used, they have no connection to the real deal. If something hit close to your family, you'd want those memories respected by your American compatriots.

Also, I can see the top of your head when I stand.




No you can't..
I'm really 5ft 11 inches ..

No harm no foul...Herfing
frankj1 Offline
#69 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,242
wheelrite wrote:
No you can't..
I'm really 5ft 11 inches ..

No harm no foul...Herfing


ok
wheelrite Offline
#70 Posted:
Joined: 11-01-2006
Posts: 50,119
frankj1 wrote:
ok



I really am...
frankj1 Offline
#71 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,242
wheelrite wrote:
I really am...

am what...ok, or 5-11?

I'm really ok and 6-1. I was lying when I said I could see the top of your head.
wheelrite Offline
#72 Posted:
Joined: 11-01-2006
Posts: 50,119
frankj1 wrote:
am what...ok, or 5-11?

I'm really ok and 6-1. I was lying when I said I could see the top of your head.



sadly..

There's not so much hair on the top of my head to see ....
tailgater Offline
#73 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
I saw the top of Wheel's head just this morning...

frankj1 Offline
#74 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,242
^
Suffolk County House of Correction humor?
wheelrite Offline
#75 Posted:
Joined: 11-01-2006
Posts: 50,119
tailgater wrote:
I saw the top of Wheel's head just this morning...



could'nt have been me ...

This morning I was banging my old lady...
tailgater Offline
#76 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
frankj1 wrote:
Wheel,
I did make a very broad refence when I first objected to Holocaust terms being tossed about. I incorrectly implied that your use of Auschwitz had any reference to Israel at all...what I had in mind was previous threads where terms like "concentration camp" were used to describe Israel's control of Palestinians and other nazi behaviors being used on Israel. I find that to be purposeful "Jew baiting" and I want to let you know that I was incorrect to include your useage in this thread.

In fact, I do understand your feelings on abortion and believe I am on record here as saying that despite being Pro Choice, I could never live with making the decision to abort. I choose life but do not believe in forcing my desires, no matter how benevolent, on other Americans.

Would you not be outraged if someone compared unrelated things by using statements like "after police shot the drug dealers, the apartment looked like the back room of an illegal abortion clinic"? Doesn't that cheapen and demean an issue that you feel so strongly about in your heart? It has nothing to do with abortion, and most of the times here when Holocaust terms are used, they have no connection to the real deal. If something hit close to your family, you'd want those memories respected by your American compatriots.

Also, I can see the top of your head when I stand.



Frank,
I've been on these boards since almost day one, and over those years I've seen some (and have contributed some) ignorant posts.
And while some folks have taken real offense or perhaps feigned some outrage, I've not seen any "purposeful Jew baiting".

Now, I know you're no longer including this thread, but I would like to see what you consider Jew baiting because an ill conceived comparison simply does not qualify.

Your American compatriots might use a little hyperbole by including holocaust references, but it's usually to express utter disgust with some topic. And what topic is better to use as the "pinnacle" of modern horror than the holocaust?

I'm not suggesting that holocaust references be used in daily conversations to make one's point. I'm just saying that even a classless and inappropriate usage should not be viewed a "baiting" anything.

But I could be wrong. So if specific references truly do support your claim, I'd be interested in seeing them.

tailgater Offline
#77 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
wheelrite wrote:
could'nt have been me ...

This morning I was banging my old lady...



I don't know how Hallmark hasn't snagged your talents yet.
wheelrite Offline
#78 Posted:
Joined: 11-01-2006
Posts: 50,119
tailgater wrote:
I don't know how Hallmark hasn't snagged your talents yet.



I know,,,

What's up with that ??
HockeyDad Offline
#79 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,187
frankj1 wrote:
..what I had in mind was previous threads where terms like "concentration camp" were used to describe Israel's control of Palestinians and other nazi behaviors being used on Israel. I find that to be purposeful "Jew baiting" and





Question:

This thing has 4 walls. All walls have armed guards. Nobody can leave or enter without permission. Movement within the four walls is restricted. When the people inside the walls get uppitty and revolt, they are bombed or shot. Periodically the walls are moved tighter and the land that used to be inside the walls is now used to build new houses for the guards. The guards fly jets and helicopters over the people inside the wall every day. Guards freely move within the walls to check on the people inside the walls.

Answer:

A. A concentration camp
B. The Gaza Strip
C. The West Bank
D. All of the above



It is time to give that land its freedom or they and others will eventually take it. Stop funding the camps with USA taxpayer money. Stop staffing the walls with USA taxpayer supplied equipment. Israel staffs the walls and the USA is the only nation left on the planet that supports the continued operation of the camps. Speak out against and you will be called an anti-semite. Be a Jew and speak out against it and you will be called self-loathing. The terms have been overplayed and have become meaningless.

End it now. Tear down the walls.
frankj1 Offline
#80 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,242
I may get to elaborate after work, delighted to have caused critical thought.

So many answers to ABC and D that may also answer Tailgater. But is it at all possible to not be baiting when calling a nation (and America's most trusted ally if real world war breaks out btw) by the same terms as those used to describe the nation that came dangerously close to wiping all Jews off the face of Europe and beyond? Is that not being just a bit beyond clever and provocative? I can not explain the depth of pain you create for the survivors and relations of those extinguished systemtically by the Nazis by calling today's Israel and by extension Judaism (it is the Jewish Homeland, no?) by the most hideous terms their ears can hear. You guys are bright. come up with new insults. I don't even think you are antisemites, just what you consider playful is beyond playful.

Tough to have feigned outrage about the genocide of your own. Duh!

Israel is not systematically solving today's version of the Jewish Problem .Hell, the new borders were taken as a result of being ATTACKED on all fronts at the exact same moment (talk about genocide!)and then pushing back. No nation in history was ever denounced nor told to return said land taken in its own defense! Egypt saw the light and entered into serious peace treaty while Israeli soldiers sat 90 miles from Cairo. They then returned MOST of the land. Interesting the mention of four walls...would you say a nation surrounded by nations committed to its destruction is also inside of four walls? Would you agree that some restriction of movement may be the reason said nation still exists? Or is at least a bit more secure? Can you walk into Canada without being checked out. Ever hear Dylan's "Neighborhood Bully"?

Gotta go to work, but where do many Arabs and most Palestinians work, go to school, even hold citizenship and vote...alll legall? Now tell me how to negotiate with opposition that does not include Israel on the map of the world, says things like "the river to the sea" and would not allow my dirty feet to step inside of Mecca and other cities?

Want the walls down? Start by accepting Israel's right to exist and accept the 98% of the land that Arafat turned down...then TRY to get ONE SQUARE INCH of barren land donated by Jordan et al. Those nations are delighted that they don't have to take care of their disenfranchised people, Israel supplies more jobs and money and all else than any of their Islamic Brothers.

By the way, personally I do believe it is way past the time that there was a Palestine next to Israel, but not without guarantees of israeli security.

HockeyDad Offline
#81 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,187
If a real war ever broke out that threatened the USA, our most trusted ally will once again be the United Kingdom. Next will be France and Germany and then the rest of NATO. Israel doesn't have the economic means to come to our aid in any measurable capacity.

Concentration camps have existed during every war. The USA had them in WW2, the Korean Peace Action, the Vietnam Peace Action, and both Iraq conflicts. It is not a German/Jewish/Holocaust term. Israel is running concentration camps, not Nazi-style extermination camps. Israel is not enacting the Final Solution to deal with the Palestinian problem. Israel's concentration camps have no endgame. They can't exterminate the Palestinians, they can't annex the land because it would screw up the Jew/Arab population balance in Israel, and the Palestinians won't leave.

Israel is not surrounded by four walls. Israel is not surrounded by nations committed to its destruction. Israel has peace and normalized relations with Jordan and Egypt, it's two longest borders. The threats of imminent destruction and cries of "Never again" are over exaggerated for political purposes, one of which is to suck US money in. Everybody knows that Israel will turn the entire Middle East into a nuclear wasteland before being overrun. None of the real or perceived threats can explain the need for the Gaza and West Bank concentration camps.

The opposition does recognize Israel's right to exist. The opposition does show Israel on the map but with different borders. Iran recognized Israel's right to exist until the Shah fell from power. The Palestinian Authority recognizes Israel's right to exist. The PA doesn't recognize Israel as a "Jewish State" as demanded in the recent peace talks. I don't care for theocracies as well.

Too many people on all sides stay in power in the Middle East by perpetuating war. Peace neuters them. Arafat is a great example. It serves him right that the French killed him.

It is time to give up on the West Bank land grab. It is time to get USA taxpayer money out of Israel. When Israel wants peace, we can talk.
borndead1 Offline
#82 Posted:
Joined: 11-07-2006
Posts: 5,216
Agreeing with Le HockeyDad on all points.

HockeyDad should be an ambassador or czar of something. At the very least he should be a talking head on cable news.
frankj1 Offline
#83 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,242
tailgater wrote:
Frank,
I've been on these boards since almost day one, and over those years I've seen some (and have contributed some) ignorant posts.
And while some folks have taken real offense or perhaps feigned some outrage, I've not seen any "purposeful Jew baiting".

Now, I know you're no longer including this thread, but I would like to see what you consider Jew baiting because an ill conceived comparison simply does not qualify.

Your American compatriots might use a little hyperbole by including holocaust references, but it's usually to express utter disgust with some topic. And what topic is better to use as the "pinnacle" of modern horror than the holocaust?

I'm not suggesting that holocaust references be used in daily conversations to make one's point. I'm just saying that even a classless and inappropriate usage should not be viewed a "baiting" anything.

But I could be wrong. So if specific references truly do support your claim, I'd be interested in seeing them.


I accept/truly believe that most of it is not purposeful. Perhaps akin to someone saying "some of my best friends are black" and truly not understanding what the black guy hears and feels when those words are spoken.

Without making this low-tech writer actually dredge up posts, how about examples such as..."yawn" which I have seen once or twice when the Holocaust is mentioned as a topic, not as a comprison. I have seen references suggesting that Jews have skewed the real number of those that were extinguished and that some real scholastic research should be done. Need I go on or do you recall seeing such posts? Tell me why that is not baiting? Hell, research all ya want, I'll give you all the names of survivors you could ever want to interview, including the war criminals captured or free, including German government officials that admit the sickening truth. Should be the easiest research ever done. Ask some heroic American Liberators what they saw....

I do not, however, even think for a second you or HD or Wheel etc. are antisemitic...I nod in agreement when HD points out that questioning the Nation of Israel's politics and policies makes many Jews unfairly play the antisemite card. He generally has cogent (if short on history) points to make. Disagreeing with Israel is not equal to hating Jews..but likening Jewish policy to the nightmare that nearly wiped out an entire religion, well shall we settle on "strongly insensitive"???

I'm sure you'll be glad to know I am done. You either get it or you don't, I have nothing more to add.
frankj1 Offline
#84 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,242
HockeyDad wrote:
If a real war ever broke out that threatened the USA, our most trusted ally will once again be the United Kingdom. Next will be France and Germany and then the rest of NATO. Israel doesn't have the economic means to come to our aid in any measurable capacity.

Concentration camps have existed during every war. The USA had them in WW2, the Korean Peace Action, the Vietnam Peace Action, and both Iraq conflicts. It is not a German/Jewish/Holocaust term. Israel is running concentration camps, not Nazi-style extermination camps. Israel is not enacting the Final Solution to deal with the Palestinian problem. Israel's concentration camps have no endgame. They can't exterminate the Palestinians, they can't annex the land because it would screw up the Jew/Arab population balance in Israel, and the Palestinians won't leave.

Israel is not surrounded by four walls. Israel is not surrounded by nations committed to its destruction. Israel has peace and normalized relations with Jordan and Egypt, it's two longest borders. The threats of imminent destruction and cries of "Never again" are over exaggerated for political purposes, one of which is to suck US money in. Everybody knows that Israel will turn the entire Middle East into a nuclear wasteland before being overrun. None of the real or perceived threats can explain the need for the Gaza and West Bank concentration camps.

The opposition does recognize Israel's right to exist. The opposition does show Israel on the map but with different borders. Iran recognized Israel's right to exist until the Shah fell from power. The Palestinian Authority recognizes Israel's right to exist. The PA doesn't recognize Israel as a "Jewish State" as demanded in the recent peace talks. I don't care for theocracies as well.

Too many people on all sides stay in power in the Middle East by perpetuating war. Peace neuters them. Arafat is a great example. It serves him right that the French killed him.

It is time to give up on the West Bank land grab. It is time to get USA taxpayer money out of Israel. When Israel wants peace, we can talk.

Not quite done I guess:

POW camps are not the same as the concentration camps referenced here. Spin all you want, just ain't so. True, torture etc shows up in most, but in our discourse we all know the word references Nazi Germany, not the generic term "concentration camp". The gas bills are much lower in most concentration camps. Ikeed, I keed, insensitive lout that I am.

Without Israel's strategic intelligence and disciplined experience in how to fight those that use apartment complexes as launch sites, you can tell the French and others to stay home, they'll just get hurt.

Israel is very much surrounded by four walls, especially since now the small coastline can be threatened. Peace with E and J came because they both attacked and were thrown back so suddenly and forcefully that they were stupified. Elsewise they'd be sniping from condos with children as human shields for CNN cameras just the same as Hamas et al do daily.

60 years ago the world was like you are now, refusing to believe there's a movement afoot to extinguish Jews/Israel. The fact that Israel has refrained from ending this nonsense should be obvious to you that they prefer peace and the right to CO-exist.

Arafat wanted to perpetuate war because he did not want co-existence, he wanted ALL the land, and so do many of them today. Do not be naive. They are not on the map with modified borders, the have been erased. Be pro-Palestinian if you wish, but do not misrepresent their goals.

Ah, the "land grab". There it is. History's first condemnation of a country pushing back its attackers and keeping the land as a security buffer...and actually having returned most of it in previous attempts at negotiating an eternal peace and the start of a Palestinian homeland. To call it a land grab is to promote the inference that Israel started that war and stole land. Readers, look it up.


HockeyDad Offline
#85 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,187
If Jews now own the term "concentration camp" and the rest of the world has to use POW, so be it. Israel need to stop running concentration camps where the concentrate Palestinians that are not prisoners of war.

Israel's strategic intelligence and disciplined experience in how to fight those that use apartment complexes as launch sites is not of any value to the USA in a real war. That would only be of value if we are meddling on some middle eastern craphole. This is very different than a real war that threatened the USA. In that situation, Israel would be useless.

If Israel is surrounded by four walls, then Egypt and Jordan are still enemies even though there are peace treaties and normalized relations. That is the mindset of needing to keep creating new enemies, even when the enemies has moved on. Did you know Egypt supplies 40% of Israel's natural gas needs? In Hamas and Hezbollah, Israel has enemies on the border but need to create the illusion of even greater threats. A key aspect of fascism is creating enemies of the state to give the population an external threat.

Arafat didn't want peace. Israel as the enemy gave him power and wealth. Do not be so naive as to not believe that there are arabs and Israelis doing the exact same thing. Keep in mind you have already been convinced that Egypt and Jordan are still the enemies even though there is a peace treaty and the last shot was fired 37 years ago.

Building brand new shiny subdivisions full of houses and townhomes for 700,000 Israelis in occupied West Bank territory is not the same as a country pushing back its attackers and keeping the land as a security buffer. Remember, the West Bank was Jordanian territory and as part of their peace treaty with Israel, they released any claims on it. Why run it as a concentration camp, why not just annex it as part of the nation of Israel and declare everyone citizens???? Jordan won't complain.

But we can't call it a land grab? Sure, all those nice little settlements are just security buffers!

It is not 1939. It is not 1948. It is not 1953. It is not 1967. It is not 1973. Time to move on.

HockeyDad Offline
#86 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,187
US foreign aid to Israel is 3% of their national budget. Israel was expecting a pay raise that had been promised and new money for another missile system and neither of this appeared in recent US stopgap budgets and they were not pleased.

Cut off the funds.
Stinkdyr Offline
#87 Posted:
Joined: 06-16-2009
Posts: 9,948
I agree. End welfare payments to Egypt, Israel and Puerto Rico, etc. Let em stand on their own 2 feet.
frankj1 Offline
#88 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,242
I don't care what terms the world uses, it started with terms being used here. We should move off of that, everyone is probably sleeping.

While England, Germany and France may be real friends, have some cash, some expendable military, and hope to hell we will protect them, the new war that will be fought (and I should have said before I had terrorism in mind, not China or N Korea) is perhaps Israel's long suit compared to the experiences of the other three allies. How do you think they have stayed open for business? With superb intelligence and a defense predicated on the accuracy of that info which leads to solid preemptive strikes, ...that's how you stay in biz when you are under seige. And that defense philosophy came from surprise attacks, from being surrounded despite your denial, by enemies. Glad you listed most of the dates. They were surprise attacks riight, not land grabs right? Right??? But you advise the worst is behind them as they sit in the middle of the Middle East in chaos. Think they may disagree?

Remember Iran's previous nuclear plant? Israel knew who those bombs were built for, same as todays nuclear program...premptive strikes are good defense, not aggression as done by Imperialists/expansionists. Entebbee, in and out, no colonies started (yeah, different situation but awesome, eh?) Egypt and Jordan signed on out of paralyzing, crap-in-their-pants fear, not because they suddenly thought the Jews weren't so bad after all. Quite a bit different than saying they are no longer threats. Fear, and realizing Israel and Jews will never again be victims, is how you get Arab nations to sign treaties. Some take longer than others.

If war is so profitable for Israel, why do you say they can not afford it? Pick a side, can't play both. Profitable or not? Skip the "world opinion" answer, if you do not understand that Israel has absolutely no concerns for what France thinks, they simply intend to survive, you never will get it.

Here's a crazy thought. Let's say those oh-so friendly Arab nations (Please note: Iran is not an Arab nation!) sudenly have protesters overthrow the ruling regimes. Maybe you were caught napping, but if Israel naps, it dies in its sleep. You genuinely don't see this? Iran warships pass through the Suez one week later. Trawling for cod? You remarked earlier about US allowed thru by Egypt...um Israel played a part, not your guys in Hamas.

If Israel falls, woe is us!!

When was the last time, or the first time, you saw footage of Israelis chanting "Death to U.S., death to Jews?"
HockeyDad Offline
#89 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,187
Now you're just cranking up the propaganda.

You seemed to miss the part about explaining the West Bank settlements. Building brand new shiny subdivisions full of houses and townhomes for 700,000 Israelis in occupied West Bank territory is not the same as a country pushing back its attackers and keeping the land as a security buffer. Remember, the West Bank was Jordanian territory and as part of their peace treaty with Israel, they released any claims on it. Why run it as a concentration camp, why not just annex it as part of the nation of Israel and declare everyone citizens???? Jordan won't complain.

One of the things you have to decide is if you are a Zionist or support Zionism. If you do then you support the expulsion of all non-Jews from the biblical land of Zion which includes the Palestinian territories. In that case, forcefully removing or exterminating the Palestinians is perfectly fine. In that case, Israel is the aggressor and this is a Biblical war, a mid-evil war out to right the wrongs of the Muslim conquest and the Christian Crusades. Time to take back all of Zion, not co-exist in peace. I'm not real big on the USA funding that effort. It is possible to support Israel but not Zionism.

Terrorism isn't going to be the new war that threatens the USA that Israel will ride to our rescue. Terrorism is an annoyance and a scare tactic but not a military conquering threat. You're overplaying Israel's true capability to be a military ally. Are the Israel's going to defend Alaska or Hawaii? Please.

Iran didn't have a nuclear plant, Iraq did. No one knows who those bombs were built for because no bombs were ever built. You just got the enemy wrong and leaped forward on their weapons capability. Egypt and Jordan are still enemies. You're creating enemies as fast as you can type. Why are there 700,000 Israelis living in settlements in the West Bank and the USA funding it? It still doesn't add up.

Did you know that international treaties regarding the Suez Canal allow for the passage of any nation's commercial or warships? Israel, France, and Britain played a part that last time it was threatened to be closed and the USSR almost jumped into that war. Did you know that one of the two Iranian ships that passed through the Suez Canal was made by the USA 40 years ago and the other is a supply ship. Soon they will be 1000 miles from Iranian air support and 100 miles from the Israeli Air Force. Yes, Israel is now doomed. We need to increase US funding immediately.

By the way, I never said war was profitable for Israel. I said Israel can't afford war without USA funding. That is the opposite. You just created a straw-man and knocked it down. Meanwhile there 700,000 Israelis living in settlements in the West Bank and the USA is funding it.

By the way, I have no guys in Hamas. You just created another straw-man and knocked it down. You just fell into the trap that anyone who criticizes Israeli policy must be a terrorist.

You are following the standard Israeli political hawkish line of thinking. Peace with arab neighbors can only be had through their complete defeat, fear of Israel, and subjugation. Kinda like the US embargo of Cuba, after 60 years of repeating the same thing expecting different results, you might want to try something new. In the meantime, cut all US funding. We also fund Jordan, Lebanon, and Egypt. Screw pay for peace. Let the hawks fight.

By the way, Israelis chanting "Death to Jews" would be pretty stupid.








HockeyDad Offline
#90 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,187
If Israel falls there will be 200 nuclear warheads detonated all around the Middle East. The radioactive fallout will be woe to us and all of Europe. Israel ain't going nowhere except to more drama acting lessons.
frankj1 Offline
#91 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,242
Exterminating Palestinians. Wow, you blew your cool dude. Didn't mean to do that to you, sorry to you and everyone else that may have suffered through this.
Support who you believe is right and who stands with America.

No further reply required.

It's been a blast. Sincerely.


You would have hated Hebrew School and Bar Mitzvah lessons

Frank...heading to cigar forum for ever!
HockeyDad Offline
#92 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,187
I never blow my cool regardless of topic.

I will accept your surrender and subjugation. However, that still doesn't answer why there are 700,000 Israelis living in settlements in the West Bank and the USA is funding it.

I knew that was "game over" the second I typed it. I also knew the answer already and so do you.

Let's face it, Palestinians suck.
frankj1 Offline
#93 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,242
thanks again for opening up.
your humor remiains intact though. s & s, funny.
good recovery

Good night.

Frank
HockeyDad Offline
#94 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,187
700,000
DrMaddVibe Offline
#95 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,541
and a microphone...where it's at!whip
tailgater Offline
#96 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
Does anyone realize that the original subject of this thread was Planned Parenthood and thier PRO abortion agenda?

frankj1 Offline
#97 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,242
my fault, Sorry TG and Wheel. Back to the topic...please. I'll behave from now on.

Frank
DrMaddVibe Offline
#98 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,541
“You know my bottom line is I think that Planned Parenthood in the past has done good work. If there was a specific problem at this center, it should be addressed, but we shouldn’t get so distracted with some of these issues.” - Barake "The Kenyan King" Odumba
rfenst Offline
#99 Posted:
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,403
tailgater wrote:
Does anyone realize that the original subject of this thread was Planned Parenthood and thier PRO abortion agenda?



You have got to be kidding yourself!
HockeyDad Offline
#100 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,187
The original subject was boring.

Some want to ban abortion.
Some want to legalize abortion.
Some don't like abortion but wouldn't ban it.
Planned Parenthood ain't Auschwitz.
Planned Parenthood has some shady origins.


5 posts could have cleared all that up.
Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
3 Pages<123>