America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 13 years ago by plinytheelder. 69 replies replies.
2 Pages<12
Westboro Baptist Church Goes To Mississippi – And Loses
HockeyDad Offline
#51 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,187
I hate Illinois Nazis.
JadeRose Offline
#52 Posted:
Joined: 05-15-2008
Posts: 19,525
My hatred of these people knows no boundary. With that said, the best way to deal with these ****bags is to ignore them. Treat them like a child throwing a tantrum in Walmart. Eventually they will get tired and go away. They will now make the lives of the people in Mississippi miserable by filing lawsuit after lawsuit. Some of which they will probably win. Now you've just financed their activities for another year or so. This is what they WANT to happen. The worst response to them, in their eyes, is no response at all. I can pray that they be killed in a messy way or harmed...but I will not act on it, nor will I advocate it. They will get theirs....I have faith in that.
TMCTLT Offline
#53 Posted:
Joined: 11-22-2007
Posts: 19,733
rfenst wrote:
The way I see this both citizens and the government interfered with their First Amendment rights, despite a recent ruling that clarifies how those rights may be exercised. In my opinion, anyone who supports what this town did has established a precedent that will erode the First Amendment if not brought to a halt. Now, Westboro will probably sue the hell out of the town and collect money to further their ugly message. Great job. Everybody, but Westboro looses. the only thing worse would have been altercation and/or violence.




One question for you counselor, why is it that the legal system ALWAYS seems to put MORE emphasis in upholding the rights of groups and individuals like this while NOT recognizing that the families and friends of the fallen have the right to expect to some civility and understanding while burying their loved ones? If groups like this want to make their point have the Bastards address our Federal Gov. in Wash. as they are the ones who send our troops to do their bidding around the world!!!!
frankj1 Offline
#54 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,245
HockeyDad wrote:
I hate Illinois Nazis.

I hate 'em more. Put them on the Game Show Network
rfenst Offline
#55 Posted:
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,415
frankj1 wrote:
the superiority of our freedom-based way of life in America is it's ability to protect the rights of the vast majority (who need no protection normally) BECAUSE it protects the rights of the most vile and hideously unpopular minority. Without these detestable extreme tests, you folks would have no meaningful rights either. Freedom of speech is alot more than being free to say crap. But when the majority is allowed to play loose with the police to silence those they hate (no matter how right you guys are here) that is when everyone should fear the door to totalitarianism opening up a crack. Extreme protection of rights keeps that door shut.


Here is one of my takes takes on what you said above:


First They came... - Pastor Martin Niemoller


First they came for the communists,

and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a communist.

Then they came for the trade unionists,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a trade unionist.

Then they came for the Jews,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a Jew.

Then they came for me
and there was no one left to speak out for me.



"First they came…" is a famous statement attributed to Pastor Martin Niemöller (1892–1984) about the inactivity of German intellectuals following the Nazi rise to power and the purging of their chosen targets, group after group.




(And if anyone thinks this poem is really about: communism, unions, Jews, Christians or WWII, then feel free to substitute any ofther groups in our society or in history...)
rfenst Offline
#56 Posted:
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,415
TMCTLT wrote:
One question for you counselor, why is it that the legal system ALWAYS seems to put MORE emphasis in upholding the rights of groups and individuals like this while NOT recognizing that the families and friends of the fallen have the right to expect to some civility and understanding while burying their loved ones? If groups like this want to make their point have the Bastards address our Federal Gov. in Wash. as they are the ones who send our troops to do their bidding around the world!!!!


Great question! I love these threads when people really want to discuss things like you do here, whether or not I am a participant in the discussion.

So, here is my take: I think the legal system isn't about individuals as nearly as much as it is about society as a whole i.e. the greater good. This can often lead to emotionally, personally absurd conclusions at times, particularly when one doesn't look at the pig picture or truthfully can't see it (which is NOT what I am implying here).
TMCTLT Offline
#57 Posted:
Joined: 11-22-2007
Posts: 19,733
Robert, I'm honestly having a difficult time discerning your point here. I am indeed trying to think things through a bit clearer rather than simply engaging in an emotionally charged conversation. And it does seem to me that my previous point is the case more often than not....

Hope you and yours are enjoying your Easter holiday

Paul
frankj1 Offline
#58 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,245
rfenst wrote:
Here is one of my takes takes on what you said above:


First They came... - Pastor Martin Niemoller


First they came for the communists,

and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a communist.

Then they came for the trade unionists,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a trade unionist.

Then they came for the Jews,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a Jew.

Then they came for me
and there was no one left to speak out for me.



"First they came…" is a famous statement attributed to Pastor Martin Niemöller (1892–1984) about the inactivity of German intellectuals following the Nazi rise to power and the purging of their chosen targets, group after group.




(And if anyone thinks this poem is really about: communism, unions, Jews, Christians or WWII, then feel free to substitute any ofther groups in our society or in history...)


Yeah, that's what I meant! Thanks Robert.
FuzzNJ Offline
#59 Posted:
Joined: 06-28-2006
Posts: 13,000
TMCTLT wrote:
Robert, I'm honestly having a difficult time discerning your point here. I am indeed trying to think things through a bit clearer rather than simply engaging in an emotionally charged conversation. And it does seem to me that my previous point is the case more often than not....

Hope you and yours are enjoying your Easter holiday

Paul


Pretty sure he's said he's Jewish, frequently. I hope he's enjoying the day as well though.
rfenst Offline
#60 Posted:
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,415
FuzzNJ wrote:
Pretty sure he's said he's Jewish, frequently. I hope he's enjoying the day as well though.


You are correct. But, that's not important. What is important is that he warmly wished my family and I well on one of his holiest days. I think that is very kind. So, I only look at his intention, which clearly came from his heart. IMO, this is not the time for me to tell someone they made a mistake or to possibly even umbras them. Neither does wishing someone of a different faith than mine well one of their holidays ("Merry Christmas"). It is, IMO, just the right way to do things.

rfenst Offline
#61 Posted:
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,415
TMCTLT wrote:
Robert, I'm honestly having a difficult time discerning your point here. I am indeed trying to think things through a bit clearer rather than simply engaging in an emotionally charged conversation.

Hope you and yours are enjoying your Easter holiday

Paul



Maybe I don't understand your question, but I will try some more. The legal system is ideally designed to weigh the family's need against our current society's desire for Freedom of Speech. If a decision were to solely be made on the family's emotion, the greater good of our society's freedom of speech will get lost every time. We often need to keep the emotionally charged aspect of a disputed matter out of the decision, which is very, very difficult to do. We also need to focus on the exact, precise issues involved and not the "peripheral" issue, no matter how much they affect certain individuals' lives. As to limiting freedom of speech solely to redress towards the government, doing that guts our individual and group rights to express ourselves with one another.
TMCTLT Offline
#62 Posted:
Joined: 11-22-2007
Posts: 19,733
Robert, thank you for taking the time to give a deeper explanation here as I have a better grasp of the intent behind the law. It doesn't male it any easier to swallow what these people do, but it clarifies some things.

And forgive me as over the weekend I did indeed recall that your of Jewish faith and did not as you already commented post that with malice. Thanks for understanding :)

Paul
rfenst Offline
#63 Posted:
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,415
TMCTLT wrote:
Robert, thank you for taking the time to give a deeper explanation here as I have a better grasp of the intent behind the law. It doesn't male it any easier to swallow what these people do, but it clarifies some things.

And forgive me as over the weekend I did indeed recall that your of Jewish faith and did not as you already commented post that with malice. Thanks for understanding :)

Paul


Paul,

You did absolutely nothing wrong for me to forgive you for. All that you did was meaningfully wish my family and I well in the very best way that you know how to. It is not your responsibility to remember every-one's particular religion. Although we celebrate different holidays, you can wish me Happy Easter, Merry Christmas and the like every single time you wish to. It will never offend me because I know you simply mean it.

Robert
TMCTLT Offline
#64 Posted:
Joined: 11-22-2007
Posts: 19,733
rfenst wrote:
Paul,

You did absolutely nothing wrong for me to forgive you for. All that you did was meaningfully wish my family and I well in the very best way that you know how to. It is not your responsibility to remember every-one's particular religion. Although we celebrate different holidays, you can wish me Happy Easter, Merry Christmas and the like every single time you wish to. It will never offend me because I know you simply mean it.

Robert



Well again thank you so much for understanding as you're correct on my intentions....:)
gringococolo Offline
#65 Posted:
Joined: 02-04-2006
Posts: 4,626
I got tired of reading some of the replies.


But will someone please actually explain to me how their right to "free speech" was violated. Robert???? any other of you constitutional scholars??



So if a cop pulls me over and I am delayed to a speaking engagement my free speech has been violated.

If I get my ass kicked for saying, "FuzzNJ is just the nanny high jacking his wife's computer". My first amendment rights have somehow been violated?

When my car got towed in FCucking OKC, was my free speech violated? Oh Jesus Christ, I better get a lawer and sue the stupid redneck laundry mat attendant that thought I was from Texas (rental car plate), and had my stuff towed. Did I mention that I think OKC is the most miserable city I have ever had an extended stay in..... twice.


Really, sometimes I think I am surrounded by idiots.

fishinguitarman Offline
#66 Posted:
Joined: 07-29-2006
Posts: 69,152
gringococolo wrote:
I got tired of reading some of the replies.


But will someone please actually explain to me how their right to "free speech" was violated. Robert???? any other of you constitutional scholars??



So if a cop pulls me over and I am delayed to a speaking engagement my free speech has been violated.

If I get my ass kicked for saying, "FuzzNJ is just the nanny high jacking his wife's computer". My first amendment rights have somehow been violated?

When my car got towed in FCucking OKC, was my free speech violated? Oh Jesus Christ, I better get a lawer and sue the stupid redneck laundry mat attendant that thought I was from Texas (rental car plate), and had my stuff towed. Did I mention that I think OKC is the most miserable city I have ever had an extended stay in..... twice.


Really, sometimes I think I am surrounded by idiots.










Applause Beer Applause Beer Applause Beer Applause fog
rfenst Offline
#67 Posted:
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,415
gringococolo wrote:
I got tired of reading some of the replies.


But will someone please actually explain to me how their right to "free speech" was violated. Robert???? any other of you constitutional scholars??



So if a cop pulls me over and I am delayed to a speaking engagement my free speech has been violated.

If I get my ass kicked for saying, "FuzzNJ is just the nanny high jacking his wife's computer". My first amendment rights have somehow been violated?

When my car got towed in FCucking OKC, was my free speech violated? Oh Jesus Christ, I better get a lawer and sue the stupid redneck laundry mat attendant that thought I was from Texas (rental car plate), and had my stuff towed. Did I mention that I think OKC is the most miserable city I have ever had an extended stay in..... twice.


Really, sometimes I think I am surrounded by idiots.



I am not a Constitutional scholar, but I have studied the Constitution in law school and took an advance course on freedom of speech. There are some very good, accurate and well written Wikipedea articles you can read about this stuff. There is also a lot out there on the Internet that discusses the First Amendment in less technical legal terms than the SCOTUS does.

Any how, you really need need to read the entire opinion from the SCOTUS website or Internet. Just automatically skip the citations so that it reads and flows better. That is the Constitutional Opinion and it explains the SCOTUS' full reasoning, based in part on stare decisis. If the are Dissents or Concurrences, read them too. Agree or disagree with it, is the ultimate law of that case.

Here are some "legal explanations":

As to the cop: No. Not if the cop pulled you over for a legitimate traffic infraction and was not targeting you specifically in order to prevent you from being able to speak publicly, as planned. On the other hand, if the stop would not have otherwise occurred or was made for the purpose of delaying you or preventing you from speaking, the stop is "pretextual" and the Fourth Amendment becomes a part of the mix. Your First Amendment rights would likely have been violated.

As to getting your ass kicked: No, if it were Fuzz or any other private citizen who kicked your ass. Yes , if it was some governmental employee acting within the scope of his/her employment ("color of law"), or such a governmental employee condoned it or prevented the cops from responding promptly to protect you. Interestingly, this probably could dovetail into another freedom of speech issue known as the "chilling effect".

OKC: WTF does this have to do with the First Amendment?

No decent, sane American wants these people to communicate their particular message. But, from a strictly legal perspective- their message is fully within their (and our) rights t express, particularly if they express it within the boundaries of the law (parade permits, particular distances from funerals, etc.).







DrMaddVibe Offline
#68 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,552
What about "Free Speech Zones"?

Sarcasm
plinytheelder Offline
#69 Posted:
Joined: 10-24-2006
Posts: 8,838
Why don't they say the funeral is Friday, and have it on Wednesday instead?
Do that a couple of times, then when they figure out what is being done, switch it to a day after...
Keep them guessing until they run out of money and patience.

Personally, I like the blocking them in tactic. Its simple and effective. Applause
Users browsing this topic
Guest
2 Pages<12