America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 12 years ago by jetblasted. 80 replies replies.
2 Pages12>
Great Moments in Democrat Racist History
Jump to Bottom | Previous Topic | Next Topic
wheelrite Offline
#1 Posted: Mon, May 30 2011, 11:13 AM EST
Joined: 11-01-2006
Posts: 50,119
http://www.popmodal.com/video/2667/Great-Moments-in-Democrat-Racist-History--Hugo-Black

http://www.popmodal.com/video/6299/The-most-devastating-historical-exposé-on-the-Democrat-Party-of-slavery-by-Reverend-Wayne-Perryman

d'oh!
ZRX1200 Online
#2 Posted: Mon, May 30 2011, 11:28 AM EST
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,635
Uh oh.....
wheelrite Offline
#3 Posted: Mon, May 30 2011, 11:34 AM EST
Joined: 11-01-2006
Posts: 50,119
ZRX1200 wrote:
Uh oh.....



what ???
jackconrad Offline
#4 Posted: Mon, May 30 2011, 11:40 AM EST
Joined: 06-09-2003
Posts: 67,461
Hurricane Hugo ..
chiefburg Offline
#5 Posted: Mon, May 30 2011, 11:42 AM EST
Joined: 01-31-2005
Posts: 7,384
Yeah, I usually don't watch too many of the video's posted here. But, I do tend to agree with Reverend Wayne Perryman on many of his points. I'm 53 and have seen much and studied much about slavery and those who support it. Unfortunately, the Dems have been the party of segregation although they claim to be the righteous ones. I'm not going to go as far as saying the Republicans are angels because they are not. But, of the people I know, those who are Dems are the most racist and I find that unfortunate. I am so sick of the race card being tossed up blindly.
ZRX1200 Online
#6 Posted: Mon, May 30 2011, 11:44 AM EST
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,635
Well said chiefburg.

Wheel I'm just expecting some insightful posts with "colored" capital letters....
wheelrite Offline
#7 Posted: Mon, May 30 2011, 11:51 AM EST
Joined: 11-01-2006
Posts: 50,119
ZRX1200 wrote:
Well said chiefburg.

Wheel I'm just expecting some insightful posts with "colored" capital letters....


well,,
Rick was at the Civil War...
HockeyDad Offline
#8 Posted: Mon, May 30 2011, 3:40 PM EST
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,169
Colored Capital Letter OUTRAGE!
wheelrite Offline
#9 Posted: Mon, May 30 2011, 4:23 PM EST
Joined: 11-01-2006
Posts: 50,119
HockeyDad wrote:
Colored Capital Letter OUTRAGE!


is it not better to say "Capital Letters of Color"??
wheelrite Offline
#10 Posted: Mon, May 30 2011, 5:42 PM EST
Joined: 11-01-2006
Posts: 50,119
1956 African-American civil rights leaders Martin Luther King and Ralph Abernathy vote for Republican Dwight Eisenhower for President


ruh roh...
DadZilla3 Offline
#11 Posted: Mon, May 30 2011, 7:21 PM EST
Joined: 01-17-2009
Posts: 4,633
Follow the money. If it weren't for lucrative careers based on perpetuating class envy and race baiting, demagogues like Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, and Jeremiah Wright would have to get real jobs.
FuzzNJ Offline
#12 Posted: Mon, May 30 2011, 7:43 PM EST
Joined: 06-28-2006
Posts: 13,000
chiefburg wrote:
Yeah, I usually don't watch too many of the video's posted here. But, I do tend to agree with Reverend Wayne Perryman on many of his points. I'm 53 and have seen much and studied much about slavery and those who support it. Unfortunately, the Dems have been the party of segregation although they claim to be the righteous ones. I'm not going to go as far as saying the Republicans are angels because they are not. But, of the people I know, those who are Dems are the most racist and I find that unfortunate. I am so sick of the race card being tossed up blindly.


Why then do you think the overwhelming majority of african americans democrats?
wheelrite Offline
#13 Posted: Mon, May 30 2011, 7:56 PM EST
Joined: 11-01-2006
Posts: 50,119
FuzzNJ wrote:
Why then do you think the overwhelming majority of african americans democrats?


Oh Marxist one !

Please enlighten us on why ?

We already know but your views should be,,,, interseting...

Pray
FuzzNJ Offline
#14 Posted: Mon, May 30 2011, 8:07 PM EST
Joined: 06-28-2006
Posts: 13,000
wheelrite wrote:
Oh Marxist one !

Please enlighten us on why ?

We already know but your views should be,,,, interseting...

Pray


If you would notice, I was asking a question. Since you already know it shouldn't be hard to provide it then.
wheelrite Offline
#15 Posted: Mon, May 30 2011, 8:20 PM EST
Joined: 11-01-2006
Posts: 50,119
FuzzNJ wrote:
If you would notice, I was asking a question. Since you already know it shouldn't be hard to provide it then.


Oh come now...

Please elaborate,enumerate and postulate for us ...
HockeyDad Offline
#16 Posted: Mon, May 30 2011, 8:23 PM EST
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,169
FuzzNJ wrote:
Why then do you think the overwhelming majority of african americans democrats?




Because it pays better?
FuzzNJ Offline
#17 Posted: Mon, May 30 2011, 8:32 PM EST
Joined: 06-28-2006
Posts: 13,000
wheelrite wrote:
Oh come now...

Please elaborate,enumerate and postulate for us ...


Fine, if you'd rather not answer, I'll move on and see if Chief answers.
wheelrite Offline
#18 Posted: Mon, May 30 2011, 8:48 PM EST
Joined: 11-01-2006
Posts: 50,119
FuzzNJ wrote:
Fine, if you'd rather not answer, I'll move on and see if Chief answers.



I am so very disappointed,,,

I posted this for you...

darn...

lol

wheel,
donutboy2000 Offline
#19 Posted: Mon, May 30 2011, 8:49 PM EST
Joined: 11-20-2001
Posts: 25,000
Read & learn lefty:

The Mis-Education Of The African-American Democrat

This may be bitter in the mouth and sweet in the stomach of many. It is very rare, in fact, it is taboo for African-Americans to question their loyalty to the Democratic Party within their communities. The BPR doesn’t walk the line that other so-called African-American organizations do… we speak Truth 2 Power here!
Look no further than the Democratic Party’s website ( http://www.democrats.org/agenda.html) to review the agenda of the party of choice for African-Americans.
1. Honest Leadership & Open Government 2. Real Security 3. Energy Independence 4. Economic Prosperity & Educational Excellence 5. A Healthcare System That Works For Everyone 6. Retirement Security
Where are the political planks that deal specifically with the African-American agenda? Black on Black crime, fair housing, jobs in the inner city, failing public schools (voucher initiatives), teen pregnancy, Affirmative Action, etc.
Forgive me, they do dedicate 5 sentences to their ongoing commitment to Civil Rights… typical of the dems, keep the African-Americans looking at issues that are not at the forefront of what is progressive for the lifting of the masses of their people.
The dems are more concerned with courting the Latino vote and are invested in getting immigration reforms passed to give citizenship to an estimated 10 – 20 million illegal immigrants. Don’t get it twisted by the term undocumented worker… they are illegal immigrants.
African-Americans no longer carry the favored minority label placed on them by the Democratic Party… that belongs to the Latino community. But don’t blame the dems, African-Americans vote each year at a rate of 90% (or better) for democrats running for office. With this kind of blind loyalty, you are asking to be taken for granted and that is what has happened.
African-Americans would be wise to leverage this voting block in order to force the Democratic and Republican Parties to listen to their concerns and act on their behalf. Since this isn’t happening, the Republicans completely ignore African-Americans because they know they will not get their vote and the Democrats take them for granted because they know they already have their vote.
African-American leadership is complicit in this failure to have an agenda heard by both political systems and needs to change those in charge and set off in a new and progressive direction.

The Black Political Review
wheelrite Offline
#20 Posted: Mon, May 30 2011, 8:55 PM EST
Joined: 11-01-2006
Posts: 50,119
btw,,,

The dems were the ONLY political party when in control to inter ethnic American citizens in Concentration Camps
FuzzNJ Offline
#21 Posted: Mon, May 30 2011, 9:05 PM EST
Joined: 06-28-2006
Posts: 13,000
wheelrite wrote:
I am so very disappointed,,,

I posted this for you...

darn...

lol

wheel,


You posted this expecting what from me? I'm here participating.

I asked a question, you said you knew the answer, yet won't provide it.

I guess you were looking to bait me or something and it didn't work.

wheelrite Offline
#22 Posted: Mon, May 30 2011, 9:09 PM EST
Joined: 11-01-2006
Posts: 50,119
FuzzNJ wrote:
You posted this expecting what from me? I'm here participating.

I asked a question, you said you knew the answer, yet won't provide it.

I guess you were looking to bait me or something and it didn't work.



Well..

humor me just the same ! lol !!

but,,

It is ironic that the Dems have such a horrendous history to present day as racist and conventional Lib philosophy disregards it.

dontcha know ?
FuzzNJ Offline
#23 Posted: Mon, May 30 2011, 9:13 PM EST
Joined: 06-28-2006
Posts: 13,000
wheelrite wrote:
Well..

humor me just the same ! lol !!


I won't. Instead of a conversation, you want a fight. Not in the mood.
wheelrite Offline
#24 Posted: Mon, May 30 2011, 9:15 PM EST
Joined: 11-01-2006
Posts: 50,119
FuzzNJ wrote:
I won't. Instead of a conversation, you want a fight. Not in the mood.


Fuzz...

I above all else don't like to fight..

debate,perhaps...
chiefburg Offline
#25 Posted: Mon, May 30 2011, 9:55 PM EST
Joined: 01-31-2005
Posts: 7,384
FuzzNJ wrote:
Fine, if you'd rather not answer, I'll move on and see if Chief answers.

Simple: The Dems cater to social programs and so-called social justice. They thrive on keeping people down and claiming to meet their needs and take care of them. The Dems do not like it when people strike out on their own and fend for themselves. Traditionally, the non-whites in this country have been held down (mostly by liberal programs) and the Dems claim to have their back and support them. This is so very obvious that I hate to even have to point it out to you.

I should just delete this post......the argument is too siimple and I don't have the energy to spar with someone who thinks their party is the savior party of this country. I despise the majority of the social programs this country has because it gives something for nothing and breeds laziness and contempt. It forces peopel to rely on the Government and that's quite the opposite of what I believe. We do need some social programs, but the majority have been abused beyond belief. Minorities will continue to vote Democratic because they are lulled into the belief they government is behind them and will take care of them.

Find someone else to argue with today. It's Memorial Day - a time to honor those who gave everything so we could be free to pursue whatever we want in this country. It's not a day to celebrate the liberals social programs.
FuzzNJ Offline
#26 Posted: Mon, May 30 2011, 10:19 PM EST
Joined: 06-28-2006
Posts: 13,000
chiefburg wrote:
Simple: The Dems cater to social programs and so-called social justice. They thrive on keeping people down and claiming to meet their needs and take care of them. The Dems do not like it when people strike out on their own and fend for themselves. Traditionally, the non-whites in this country have been held down (mostly by liberal programs) and the Dems claim to have their back and support them. This is so very obvious that I hate to even have to point it out to you.

I should just delete this post......the argument is too siimple and I don't have the energy to spar with someone who thinks their party is the savior party of this country. I despise the majority of the social programs this country has because it gives something for nothing and breeds laziness and contempt. It forces peopel to rely on the Government and that's quite the opposite of what I believe. We do need some social programs, but the majority have been abused beyond belief. Minorities will continue to vote Democratic because they are lulled into the belief they government is behind them and will take care of them.

Find someone else to argue with today. It's Memorial Day - a time to honor those who gave everything so we could be free to pursue whatever we want in this country. It's not a day to celebrate the liberals social programs.


Dude, I didn't post the thread and didn't even argue anything yet. So f*ck off already, holy crap you got issues.

What is 'so-called social justice'?

So if the Democratic party is just holding down the non-whites, are they just too stupid to realize that's what's happening?

Do you honestly think that any social program is something most non-whites aspire to and find to be acceptable? Do you think that the whites on these programs are working hard to get off of them?

You have heard of the civil rights acts, especially 1964 right and the Southern Strategy? Do you think that has anything to do with party loyalty?
chiefburg Offline
#27 Posted: Mon, May 30 2011, 10:24 PM EST
Joined: 01-31-2005
Posts: 7,384
Thank you for responding as I expected. I rest my case....... Please see your mental health professional as soon as possible for the sake of your family.

Done with this thread........
wheelrite Offline
#28 Posted: Mon, May 30 2011, 10:26 PM EST
Joined: 11-01-2006
Posts: 50,119
FuzzNJ wrote:
Dude, I didn't post the thread and didn't even argue anything yet. So f*ck off already, holy crap you got issues.

What is 'so-called social justice'?

So if the Democratic party is just holding down the non-whites, are they just too stupid to realize that's what's happening?

Do you honestly think that any social program is something most non-whites aspire to and find to be acceptable? Do you think that the whites on these programs are working hard to get off of them?

You have heard of the civil rights acts, especially 1964 right and the Southern Strategy? Do you think that has anything to do with party loyalty?



Um .
The longest filibuster in Congressional history was by the Dems trying to block passage of the 1964 voting Rights Act.It only passed because of the Repubs...
chiefburg Offline
#29 Posted: Mon, May 30 2011, 10:28 PM EST
Joined: 01-31-2005
Posts: 7,384
wheelrite wrote:
Um .
The longest filibuster in Congressional history was by the Dems trying to block passage of the 1964 voting Rights Act.It only passed because of the Repubs...


Bill: Don't bother......you are completely wasting your time and energy. Or, continue if this is just for pure entertainment value.
FuzzNJ Offline
#30 Posted: Mon, May 30 2011, 10:31 PM EST
Joined: 06-28-2006
Posts: 13,000
chiefburg wrote:
Thank you for responding as I expected. I rest my case....... Please see your mental health professional as soon as possible for the sake of your family.

Done with this thread........


I guess you don't like the Socratic method?

It appears you have some anger issues, but I don't care, it's an observation. You can't even discuss something, anything with someone who may hold a different view.

Your case is rested saying that non-whites are stupid and lazy and that's why they voted Democratic and that it is obvious and simple.

I don't and was willing to discuss it with you, thanks for answering the question. Wheel wouldn't.
FuzzNJ Offline
#31 Posted: Mon, May 30 2011, 10:35 PM EST
Joined: 06-28-2006
Posts: 13,000
wheelrite wrote:
Um .
The longest filibuster in Congressional history was by the Dems trying to block passage of the 1964 voting Rights Act.It only passed because of the Repubs...



And his name was? Strom Thurmond.

Who pushed it through? A Democratic president who said some racist stuff in his life.

After it passed what happened? Strom and all the other dixiecrats changed parties, Nixon employed the Southern Strategy, and the south flipped from Democratic to Republican and has been voting that way regularly to this day.

It is true that the Democratic party was anti-civil rights and further back pro-slavery.
FuzzNJ Offline
#32 Posted: Mon, May 30 2011, 10:37 PM EST
Joined: 06-28-2006
Posts: 13,000
chiefburg wrote:
Bill: Don't bother......you are completely wasting your time and energy. Or, continue if this is just for pure entertainment value.


lmao, go away as you said you would. You don't contribute anything worthwhile anyway.
ZRX1200 Online
#33 Posted: Mon, May 30 2011, 10:45 PM EST
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,635
Koombaya Fuzzy.....

Koombaya......
rfenst Offline
#34 Posted: Mon, May 30 2011, 11:01 PM EST
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,383
You are all freakin' warped.
ZRX1200 Online
#35 Posted: Mon, May 30 2011, 11:47 PM EST
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,635
LET ROBERT BYRD REST IN .....
wheelrite Offline
#36 Posted: Tue, May 31 2011, 6:50 AM EST
Joined: 11-01-2006
Posts: 50,119
FuzzNJ wrote:
And his name was? Strom Thurmond.

Who pushed it through? A Democratic president who said some racist stuff in his life.

After it passed what happened? Strom and all the other dixiecrats changed parties, Nixon employed the Southern Strategy, and the south flipped from Democratic to Republican and has been voting that way regularly to this day.

It is true that the Democratic party was anti-civil rights and further back pro-slavery.


um no..

nice try..

* Democrat Senator Robert Byrd of West Virginia, personally filibustered the Civil Rights Act of 1964 for 14 straight hours to keep it from passage
wheelrite Offline
#37 Posted: Tue, May 31 2011, 6:51 AM EST
Joined: 11-01-2006
Posts: 50,119
Here's more Golden Oldies..


Democrat President Woodrow Wilson, reintroduced segregation throughout the federal government immediately upon taking office in 1913.
* Democrat Senator John F. Kennedy voted against the 1957 Civil rights Act.
* Democrat President John F. Kennedy opposed the 1963 March on Washington by Dr. King.
* Democrat President John F. Kennedy, had Dr. King wiretapped and investigated by the FBI.
* Democrat President Bill Clinton’s mentor was U.S. Senator J. William Fulbright, an Arkansas Democrat and a supporter of racial segregation.
* Democrat President Bill Clinton interned for J. William Fulbright in 1966-67.
* Democrat Senator J. William Fulbright signed the Southern Manifesto opposing the Supreme Court’s 1954 Brown vs. Board of Education decision.
* Democrat Senator J. William Fulbright joined with the Dixiecrats in filibustering the Civil Rights Acts of 1957 and 1964.
* Democrat Senator J. William Fulbright voted against the 1965 Voting Rights Act.
FuzzNJ Offline
#38 Posted: Tue, May 31 2011, 9:52 AM EST
Joined: 06-28-2006
Posts: 13,000
wheelrite wrote:
um no..

nice try..

* Democrat Senator Robert Byrd of West Virginia, personally filibustered the Civil Rights Act of 1964 for 14 straight hours to keep it from passage



Sigh, here, from a source you probably trust.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,90552,00.html

WASHINGTON — Fortified with a good rest, a steam bath and a sirloin steak, Sen. Strom Thurmond (search) talked against a 1957 civil rights bill for 24 hours and 18 minutes — longer than anyone has ever talked about anything in Congress.

The South Carolina (search) senator, then a Democrat, opened his one-man filibuster on Aug. 28, 1957, at 8:54 p.m. against the bill, which he said was unconstitutional and "cruel and unusual punishment."
Nicar Offline
#39 Posted: Tue, May 31 2011, 10:45 AM EST
Joined: 03-18-2010
Posts: 14,972
Sigh!!

1957 Filibuster.. longest by single person...

1964 Filibuster... longest by senate... 57 days the democrats kept it going or something like that
FuzzNJ Offline
#40 Posted: Tue, May 31 2011, 11:07 AM EST
Joined: 06-28-2006
Posts: 13,000
Nicar wrote:
Sigh!!

1957 Filibuster.. longest by single person...

1964 Filibuster... longest by senate... 57 days the democrats kept it going or something like that



True!

Here's more truth.

It wasn't a D vs R issue, it was a regional one.

Democrats from the north voted overwhelmingly for the 1964 bill. From the south overwhelmingly against it. Both the senate and the house. Same for the republicans.

Democrats held the south from reconstruction up to this point. The southern democrats didn't agree with their northern counterparts, became republicans, ala Thurmond. Then, seeing an opening and a way to win back the south, the republicans employed the Southern Strategy and have held the south since pretty well.
ZRX1200 Online
#41 Posted: Tue, May 31 2011, 11:23 AM EST
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,635
Racist liberals......
borndead1 Offline
#42 Posted: Tue, May 31 2011, 11:54 AM EST
Joined: 11-07-2006
Posts: 5,216
FuzzNJ wrote:
Your case is rested saying that non-whites are stupid and lazy and that's why they voted Democratic and that it is obvious and simple.


Not stupid. Brainwashed. Just like republicans are brainwashed into thinking that their party is "the party of small government".
ZRX1200 Online
#43 Posted: Tue, May 31 2011, 12:08 PM EST
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,635
They're not?
Sarcasm horse
wheelrite Offline
#44 Posted: Tue, May 31 2011, 12:50 PM EST
Joined: 11-01-2006
Posts: 50,119
FuzzNJ wrote:
True!

Here's more truth.

It wasn't a D vs R issue, it was a regional one.

Democrats from the north voted overwhelmingly for the 1964 bill. From the south overwhelmingly against it. Both the senate and the house. Same for the republicans.

Democrats held the south from reconstruction up to this point. The southern democrats didn't agree with their northern counterparts, became republicans, ala Thurmond. Then, seeing an opening and a way to win back the south, the republicans employed the Southern Strategy and have held the south since pretty well.



Um wrong again about the mass exodus of the Dixiecrats.
only 3 switched parties...

How many Dixiecrats joined the GOP after 1964?

How many pre-1964 southern racist Democrat bigots did NOT join the Republican party after 1964?

Orval Fabus
Benjamin Travis Laney
John Stennis
James Eastland
Allen Ellender
Russell Long
John Sparkman
John McClellan
Richard Russell
Herman Talmadge
George Wallace
Lester Maddox
John Rarick
Robert Byrd
Al Gore, Sr.
Bull Connor

In fact, it seems that MOST of the Dixiecrats did NOT join the Republican party, even though many of them lived long past 1964.

Only a very FEW of them switched to the GOP, such as Strom Thurmond and Mills Godwin.

And as we all know by now, the ONLY admitted former KKK member in Congress as of late is Robert Byrd, a former KKK Kleagle, a recruiter who persuaded people to join the KKK.

So where do we get this myth that "most" of the southern racist Democrats switched to the Republican party after 1964?

Is it a myth?

Or just another Democrat LIE?

Boo hoo!


ZRX1200 Online
#45 Posted: Tue, May 31 2011, 12:58 PM EST
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,635
Aren't most democrats grand kegels?????
wheelrite Offline
#46 Posted: Tue, May 31 2011, 1:01 PM EST
Joined: 11-01-2006
Posts: 50,119
How about Al Gore Sr. ?

Articles in Intellectual Digest in 1971, as well as brief news reports of eyewitness testimony pertaining to the King assassination published in Newsweek in 1970-73, strongly suggest the complicity of some Memphis Police Department individuals in the King assassination and strongly suggest major Southern Democratic politicians were implicated. Among the names then being bandied about was Albert Gore, sr., Senator from Tennessee and father of the Democratic Party Presidential candidate.

Al Gore Sr. proposed an amendment to the Civil Rights Act that would have kept federal funds flowing to schools that defied court desegregation orders. It was defeated by a vote of 74-25. 23 Democrats and 1 Republican voted for it.


In his remarks upon signing the Civil Rights Act, President Lyndon Johnson praised Republicans for their "overwhelming majority." He did not offer similar praise to his own Democratic Party. Moreover, Senate Minority Leader Everett Dirksen, an Illinois Republican, collaborated with the White House and the Senate leadership of both parties to draft acceptable compromise amendments to end the southern Democrats' filibuster of the Act.
FuzzNJ Offline
#47 Posted: Tue, May 31 2011, 1:15 PM EST
Joined: 06-28-2006
Posts: 13,000
borndead1 wrote:
Not stupid. Brainwashed. Just like republicans are brainwashed into thinking that their party is "the party of small government".


You are arguing for Cheif now?
FuzzNJ Offline
#48 Posted: Tue, May 31 2011, 1:27 PM EST
Joined: 06-28-2006
Posts: 13,000
wheelrite wrote:
Um wrong again about the mass exodus of the Dixiecrats.
only 3 switched parties...

How many Dixiecrats joined the GOP after 1964?

How many pre-1964 southern racist Democrat bigots did NOT join the Republican party after 1964?

Orval Fabus
Benjamin Travis Laney
John Stennis
James Eastland
Allen Ellender
Russell Long
John Sparkman
John McClellan
Richard Russell
Herman Talmadge
George Wallace
Lester Maddox
John Rarick
Robert Byrd
Al Gore, Sr.
Bull Connor

In fact, it seems that MOST of the Dixiecrats did NOT join the Republican party, even though many of them lived long past 1964.

Only a very FEW of them switched to the GOP, such as Strom Thurmond and Mills Godwin.

And as we all know by now, the ONLY admitted former KKK member in Congress as of late is Robert Byrd, a former KKK Kleagle, a recruiter who persuaded people to join the KKK.

So where do we get this myth that "most" of the southern racist Democrats switched to the Republican party after 1964?

Is it a myth?

Or just another Democrat LIE?

Boo hoo!




lol

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20100212105354AAsKqHz


Is it your position that the south solidly votes republican since BECAUSE the northern republicans voted for the 1964 civil rights act then? Both parties voted for the act with an overwhelming majority based on geographical location. There were like only 30 Republicans in the senate at the time.

Do you know about the Southern Strategy and that some of those involved detailed what it was and how it was supposed to work, it's not a made up thing.

It is true that up to the 60's southern democrats did not support any civil rights legislation, but to put that up as proof of anything 50 years later is dishonest without looking at what actually happened.
fishinguitarman Offline
#49 Posted: Tue, May 31 2011, 1:34 PM EST
Joined: 07-29-2006
Posts: 69,152
FuzzNJ wrote:
lmao, go away as you said you would. You don't contribute anything worthwhile anyway.






And you do?LOL
wheelrite Offline
#50 Posted: Tue, May 31 2011, 1:34 PM EST
Joined: 11-01-2006
Posts: 50,119
FuzzNJ wrote:
lol

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20100212105354AAsKqHz


Is it your position that the south solidly votes republican since BECAUSE the northern republicans voted for the 1964 civil rights act then? Both parties voted for the act with an overwhelming majority based on geographical location. There were like only 30 Republicans in the senate at the time.

Do you know about the Southern Strategy and that some of those involved detailed what it was and how it was supposed to work, it's not a made up thing.

It is true that up to the 60's southern democrats did not support any civil rights legislation, but to put that up as proof of anything 50 years later is dishonest without looking at what actually happened.



The point of this post is to highlight the Dems hypocrisy regarding race realtions.This is not taught in History classes schools as it should be.The media never mentions it.They eulogize a KKK member Senator when he croaks.

Remember,,
what the title of this thread is...

nothing dishonest here,,,
Users browsing this topic
Guest
2 Pages12>
Back to Top