America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 12 years ago by Charlie. 58 replies replies.
2 Pages12>
Fort Hood Shooter Will Face Death Penalty
DrafterX Offline
#1 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,552

Accused Fort Hood Shooter to Have Military Trial, Will Face Death Penalty

Published July 06, 2011

DEVELOPING: The Army psychiatrist charged in the deadly Fort Hood rampage in Texas will be court-martialed and face the death penalty, Fox News confirms.

Fort Hood's commanding general announced the decision Wednesday for Maj. Nidal Hasan.
The 40-year-old is expected to appear in a Fort Hood courtroom for an arraignment and could enter a plea.

Hasan is charged with 13 counts of premeditated murder and 32 counts of attempted premeditated murder in the November 2009 shooting spree at the Army post.

Hasan's lead attorney, John Galligan, had urged the commanding general not to seek the death penalty, saying such cases were more costly, time-consuming and restrictive.

Two Army colonels previously recommended that Hasan be tried in a military court and face the death penalty.



Film at 11.... ram27bat
MTappert Offline
#2 Posted:
Joined: 04-27-2011
Posts: 1,085
He absolutely should be court-marshalled.

He absolutely should be facing the death penalty.
ZRX1200 Offline
#3 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,613
^ yup.
fishinguitarman Offline
#4 Posted:
Joined: 07-29-2006
Posts: 69,152
Before they execute him, they should let him serve some time with some very large, gay, ex-military violent convicts. They might save us some trouble.
Brewha Offline
#5 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,182
^ "And his little dog too!"
daveincincy Offline
#6 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2006
Posts: 20,033
fishinguitarman wrote:
Before they execute him, they should let him serve some time with some very large, gay, ex-military violent convicts. They might save us some trouble.


...and save us some starfish... Anxious
DrafterX Offline
#7 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,552
Think Think

how so we incorporate the starfish into the waterboarding process..??
daveincincy Offline
#8 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2006
Posts: 20,033
DrafterX wrote:
Think Think

how so we incorporate the starfish into the waterboarding process..??


FGM brought it up. He mentioned Convict.
Stinkdyr Offline
#9 Posted:
Joined: 06-16-2009
Posts: 9,948
Ship him to Saudi Arabia........let them finish the job with a nice little public display of execution.


Applause
donutboy2000 Offline
#10 Posted:
Joined: 11-20-2001
Posts: 25,000
He will be out on parole in 20 years.
borndead1 Offline
#11 Posted:
Joined: 11-07-2006
Posts: 5,216
If he is executed, he will be seen as a martyr and a hero to Islamic extremists. Do we really want to give them this? They would see it as a victory.

FuzzNJ Offline
#12 Posted:
Joined: 06-28-2006
Posts: 13,000
Mother f'r should have been shot and killed where he stood.
FuzzNJ Offline
#13 Posted:
Joined: 06-28-2006
Posts: 13,000
borndead1 wrote:
If he is executed, he will be seen as a martyr and a hero to Islamic extremists. Do we really want to give them this? They would see it as a victory.



Who the f cares what a buncy of religious f*ck nuts think. I don't care what the religious whackos in this country think either. But, I'm not for the death penalty. That's why he should have been killed when he had the gun in his hand.
wheelrite Offline
#14 Posted:
Joined: 11-01-2006
Posts: 50,119
FuzzNJ wrote:
Who the f cares what a buncy of religious f*ck nuts think. I don't care what the religious whackos in this country think either. But, I'm not for the death penalty. That's why he should have been killed when he had the gun in his hand.


yes...

god help me I agree with the Marxist...
FuzzNJ Offline
#15 Posted:
Joined: 06-28-2006
Posts: 13,000
wheelrite wrote:
yes...

god help me I agree with the Marxist...


and. . . . .I'm not a Marxist.
wheelrite Offline
#16 Posted:
Joined: 11-01-2006
Posts: 50,119
FuzzNJ wrote:
and. . . . .I'm not a Marxist.


tomato ,tomaaaaato...
Brewha Offline
#17 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,182
wheelrite wrote:
yes...

god help me I agree with the Marxist...


Groucho or Harpo?
tonyt722 Offline
#18 Posted:
Joined: 06-20-2007
Posts: 23,649
I remember the day that happened, my boss was on edge waiting for a phone call. His son was stationed at Ft. Hood when that happened and was actually heading into his residence when he heard the shots fired. Kid is a medic and was busy helping out with the wounded. Took a while to answer dads calls (for good reason), but finally let him know he was ok
borndead1 Offline
#19 Posted:
Joined: 11-07-2006
Posts: 5,216
FuzzNJ wrote:
Who the f cares what a buncy of religious f*ck nuts think.


Ummm....isn't there a war going on over what a bunch of religious f*ck nuts think? Why validate their beliefs by turning one of them into a martyr?
MTappert Offline
#20 Posted:
Joined: 04-27-2011
Posts: 1,085
FuzzNJ wrote:
Mother f'r should have been shot and killed where he stood.



damn damn damn damn damn.


I agree.

damn it.
TMCTLT Offline
#21 Posted:
Joined: 11-22-2007
Posts: 19,733
borndead1 wrote:
If he is executed, he will be seen as a martyr and a hero to Islamic extremists. Do we really want to give them this? They would see it as a victory.





Yet another reason why Fuzz is correct, he should have been shot F'n dead right then and there!!!!!!!
One $.50 cent round and it would have been a done deal.......NO TRIAL
apachelm Offline
#22 Posted:
Joined: 04-26-2008
Posts: 8,549
Don't let them hold the trial in Floridad'oh!
FuzzNJ Offline
#23 Posted:
Joined: 06-28-2006
Posts: 13,000
apachelm wrote:
Don't let them hold the trial in Floridad'oh!


Another reason why HockeyDad is always wrong about everything. Florida is full of all the crazies. Must be the heat.

Is HD in Florida? I don't remember, nor care really.
ZRX1200 Offline
#24 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,613
I beg to differ Fuzzy.

Oregon has a share o da crazy pie.......
DrafterX Offline
#25 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,552
Hey.... I was born there.....ram27bat
Stinkdyr Offline
#26 Posted:
Joined: 06-16-2009
Posts: 9,948
FuzzNJ wrote:
Mother f'r should have been shot and killed where he stood.


kill him b4, kill him now.......


whatever, just fry him.


NEXT !!!!!!!


Applause
TNA_69 Offline
#27 Posted:
Joined: 10-15-2007
Posts: 521
I say cover him in bacon while sitting in a pigpen and have the firing squad line up. Then the pigs will clean up the mess left over. problem solved.

TNA
FuzzNJ Offline
#28 Posted:
Joined: 06-28-2006
Posts: 13,000
TNA_69 wrote:
I say cover him in bacon while sitting in a pigpen and have the firing squad line up. Then the pigs will clean up the mess left over. problem solved.

TNA


Well, isn't that special. This is why we have elections so hopefully people who think like that get weeded out. unfortunately, there are more and more people that think like this and they vote for sadists and fascists. Very sad.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#29 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,440
FuzzNJ wrote:
Well, isn't that special. This is why we have elections so hopefully people who think like that get weeded out. unfortunately, there are more and more people that think like this and they vote for sadists and fascists. Very sad.



I know...there there...that lil' Hopey Changey thing is almost over.

THANK GOD!

Perhaps we'll get a real LEADER instead of another tool that behaves like an oligarchy bought and paid for by Soros and GE!
DrMaddVibe Offline
#30 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,440
Stinkdyr wrote:
kill him b4, kill him now.......


whatever, just fry him.


NEXT !!!!!!!


Applause



AND catapult him over the border when we're done!Frying pan
FuzzNJ Offline
#31 Posted:
Joined: 06-28-2006
Posts: 13,000
DrMaddVibe wrote:
I know...there there...that lil' Hopey Changey thing is almost over.

THANK GOD!

Perhaps we'll get a real LEADER instead of another tool that behaves like an oligarchy bought and paid for by Soros and GE!


I shudder at your idea of a 'real' leader. And I will bet you that there is no Republican who once elected who would EVER do what the was suggested in the post I was responding to.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#32 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,440
FuzzNJ wrote:
I shudder at your idea of a 'real' leader.



You get all wobbly in the knees at the thought of actually leaving your house!

Grow a pair and then a spine you worthless gasbag!
FuzzNJ Offline
#33 Posted:
Joined: 06-28-2006
Posts: 13,000
DrMaddVibe wrote:
You get all wobbly in the knees at the thought of actually leaving your house!

Grow a pair and then a spine you worthless gasbag!


lol, hugs and kisses.
TNA_69 Offline
#34 Posted:
Joined: 10-15-2007
Posts: 521
I agree with your previous statement, he should have two to the chest and one in the head while he was carrying out that horrible deed. But anyone who opens fire on a bunch of unarmed soldiers deserves the same punishment, eye for an eye…..what reasoning could possibly be given to condone his actions? None.

TNA
FuzzNJ Offline
#35 Posted:
Joined: 06-28-2006
Posts: 13,000
TNA_69 wrote:
I agree with your previous statement, he should have two to the chest and one in the head while he was carrying out that horrible deed. But anyone who opens fire on a bunch of unarmed soldiers deserves the same punishment, eye for an eye…..what reasoning could possibly be given to condone his actions? None.

TNA


Condone is not the only choice besides eye for an eye. That comparison is crap.
gringococolo Offline
#36 Posted:
Joined: 02-04-2006
Posts: 4,626
He was shot, several times. He was put into a medical coma and returned to health, by a right wing bunch of military doctors.

FuzzNJ Offline
#37 Posted:
Joined: 06-28-2006
Posts: 13,000
gringococolo wrote:
He was shot, several times. He was put into a medical coma and returned to health, by a right wing bunch of military doctors.



You know they were right wingers how?
HockeyDad Offline
#38 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,134
If you stood outside the hospital looking at the front entrance, his room was on the right side.
gringococolo Offline
#39 Posted:
Joined: 02-04-2006
Posts: 4,626
All military associated folks are right gay bashing, gun toting, anti-abortionists. Don't be coy.
FuzzNJ Offline
#40 Posted:
Joined: 06-28-2006
Posts: 13,000
gringococolo wrote:
All military associated folks are right gay bashing, gun toting, anti-abortionists. Don't be coy.


Interesting stereotype.
gringococolo Offline
#41 Posted:
Joined: 02-04-2006
Posts: 4,626
FuzzNJ wrote:
Interesting stereotype.



That you and most lefties internalize.

Prior to 9/11 you actually had the cojones to criticize the military. I give it 6 months prior to election time when Obama has pulled most of the troops out, and declares victory. Then all the lefties will be out on a crusade once again against the military. All aspects, political, financial, moral, etc...

See FuzzNJ, I am joking...... no mocking, gutless fools like you.

[whiney FuzzNJ voice] "He should have been killed where he stood". Like you would have to stones to pick up a gun and shoot him.

Just do us all a favor and quit lying to us.
FuzzNJ Offline
#42 Posted:
Joined: 06-28-2006
Posts: 13,000
gringococolo wrote:
That you and most lefties internalize.

Prior to 9/11 you actually had the cojones to criticize the military. I give it 6 months prior to election time when Obama has pulled most of the troops out, and declares victory. Then all the lefties will be out on a crusade once again against the military. All aspects, political, financial, moral, etc...

See FuzzNJ, I am joking...... no mocking, gutless fools like you.

[whiney FuzzNJ voice] "He should have been killed where he stood". Like you would have to stones to pick up a gun and shoot him.

Just do us all a favor and quit lying to us.


Um, you seem to be mistaking criticizm of military policy and spending with criticism of actual military personel, and I've done it after 9/11 also. Common mistake.

You may also want to note that I did not say "I would have picked up a gun . . .". Another common mistake, over-stating the other person's positions in an effort to make your argument seem stronger.
HockeyDad Offline
#43 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,134
FuzzNJ wrote:

You may also want to note that I did not say "I would have picked up a gun . . .". Another common mistake, over-stating the other person's positions in an effort to make your argument seem stronger.




So he was right. Fair enough.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#44 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,440
HockeyDad wrote:
So he was right. Fair enough.



Gringo didn't invent right. He makes it rightier.
gringococolo Offline
#45 Posted:
Joined: 02-04-2006
Posts: 4,626
I believe the US Military is too large at this time and drastic cutbacks are needed.

Being the worlds police and "fighting" the worlds wars the way of the lefties involves a larger force. That is unfortunately what we have right now. It is also the reason we are as bloated right now. Because of a lefty way of prosecuting a war. This giant military is not a result of the righties. Generals like lean, fast, forces that get in and get out. No the "pretty" war we have been forced to prosecute.

If they would just let them go into a country, blow the **** out of the enemy, it's resources, it's people, it's morale, it's combat capability - then we could cut it drasticly.

But people just can't stomach that. Instead we have to go in half-assed, build a future force for us too fight, and rebuild everything we just got done blowing up.


Moronic
FuzzNJ Offline
#46 Posted:
Joined: 06-28-2006
Posts: 13,000
gringococolo wrote:
I believe the US Military is too large at this time and drastic cutbacks are needed.

Being the worlds police and "fighting" the worlds wars the way of the lefties involves a larger force. That is unfortunately what we have right now. It is also the reason we are as bloated right now. Because of a lefty way of prosecuting a war. This giant military is not a result of the righties. Generals like lean, fast, forces that get in and get out. No the "pretty" war we have been forced to prosecute.

If they would just let them go into a country, blow the **** out of the enemy, it's resources, it's people, it's morale, it's combat capability - then we could cut it drasticly.

But people just can't stomach that. Instead we have to go in half-assed, build a future force for us too fight, and rebuild everything we just got done blowing up.


Moronic


Um, what? Have you been asleep the last 20 years? Holy sh*t what a bunch of crap that post is. Maybe that used to be the case but not any more.

Eisenhower was the last Republican who talked about the danger of the military industrial complex. After that it's been full speed ahead. Clinton, when he used the military got in and out, you can argue as to the effectiveness. Bush got in, and in and stayed and stayed after campaigning against nation building saying he wanted to bring Democracy to the middle east, and the Republicans were in lock-step right behind him. Again, you can argue over the effectiveness, but that much is true.

When Clinton tried to continue the Bush Sr. policy of reducing the military after the cold war, he was roundly criticized by the right for killing the military. Lean and fast? Rumsfeld even complained he didn't have enough people saying you go to war with the army you have, not the army you want while at the same time saying he could take Iraq and hold it easily with a small force firing Generals who disagreed with him.

Holy crap dude, where do you get this sh*t?
gringococolo Offline
#47 Posted:
Joined: 02-04-2006
Posts: 4,626
Exactly what branch of service did you serve in for the last 20 years?


Oh, I guess you probably read a lot of stuff from Huffington.

Capt. Crunch and General Electric are not good military sources.



I don't really give two craps what you think Fuzz. You don't even make sense. I don't care about Eisenhower either.




FuzzNJ Offline
#48 Posted:
Joined: 06-28-2006
Posts: 13,000
gringococolo wrote:
Exactly what branch of service did you serve in for the last 20 years?


Oh, I guess you probably read a lot of stuff from Huffington.

Capt. Crunch and General Electric are not good military sources.



I don't really give two craps what you think Fuzz. You don't even make sense. I don't care about Eisenhower either.



Just what I thought. Don't let facts get in your way, just let your feelings tell you what 'truthiness' is.

Truthiness: a "truth" that a person claims to know intuitively "from the gut" without regard to evidence, logic, intellectual examination, or facts.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#49 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,440
FuzzNJ wrote:
Just what I thought. Don't let facts get in your way, just let your feelings tell you what 'truthiness' is.

Truthiness: a "truth" that a person claims to know intuitively "from the gut" without regard to evidence, logic, intellectual examination, or facts.



Fuzz didn't make the facts...he makes them B$ier.
gringococolo Offline
#50 Posted:
Joined: 02-04-2006
Posts: 4,626
Fuzz,

Your facts are "your facts".

Clinton was killing the military with budget shortfalls, not the size. The end strength today is basicly what it was when Bush Sr. shrunk it. I am talking about the purpose, and the missions of the U.S. Military which have been skewed to the left for the last 20 years.

You need a resume from me or or something. I have attended 10 schools which focus in part or whole on how to prosecute a war, from the smallest team to entire divisions in joint doctrine warfare. I have Sun Tzu's art of war in my nightstand.

You are talking philosophy (as usual), I am talking about the political pressures that have shaped the "leaders" of the military for the last 12 years or more. Yes I realize that Bush Jr, was a part of that. I painfully read his book, and realized that he had to conceed many things to get what he wanted done. I am not pleased with his leadership either.


Users browsing this topic
Guest
2 Pages12>