America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 12 years ago by bloody spaniard. 137 replies replies.
3 Pages<123>
Where will you be when the Israelis bomb Iran in the spring?
bloody spaniard Offline
#51 Posted:
Joined: 03-14-2003
Posts: 43,802
rfenst wrote:
This thread has, once again, degenerated and become pathetic...



I disagree, rfenst. Don't be so dramatic, my friend. They are passionate. That's all.
Despite agreeing/disagreeing (and ignoring- lol) with bits and pieces, I've also learned from both.

Ultimately, I see Iran as a theocratic caliphate intent on war & martyrdom. Middle eastern media is full of anti-West rhetoric with an almost sentimental yearning for the return of the Mahdi. And I also see elements of our industrial complex, their political allies, and investors yearning for a war at the expense of our children so that they can line their pockets.
HockeyDad Offline
#52 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,187
rfenst wrote:
This thread has, once again, degenerated and become pathetic. No responsible country would stand still while its most determined and apparently soon to be capable enemy nation appears to be technologically moving close to its undeniable stated goal of annihilation of that country. Whether the U.S gets dragged in or chooses to participate is on the U.S., not the pro-Israel or the Jewish lobbies. Even though I am a Jew. Even though I believe that Israel should exist. Even though I believe in most of the concepts of Zionism, I do NOT want there to be a war, let alone one where the U.S. gets involved.



Oh good Lord, don't go all sensitive on me now! If you're going to buy into all the Iranian rhetoric over the years and going with "No responsible country would stand still while its most determined and apparently soon to be capable enemy nation appears to be technologically moving close to its undeniable stated goal of annihilation of that country", you can't go all soft at the same time and say you don't want there to be a war. You can't have it both ways. You should be screaming that Israel should attack Iran right now and doesn't need to wait for the USA to give permission or wait for the USA to do the attack for them and I would be right there next to you screaming "Hell yeah!" (while buying oil through an Etrade app on my smartphone that I learned about from that baby on the commercials)

There is no solution other than war, we just need to accept that and move on to the appropriate investing. What is the scenario that leads to no war and the threat to Israel is removed? Let's try it.....

Possibility 1: Akmenajihad says there is no weapons program or agrees to eliminate a weapons program, opens up everything to IAEA inspectors, Netanyahoo and Obama get to tag along with the inspections, and when it is all done, Akmenajihad, Netanyahoo, and Obama all hold a press conference saying Iran in nuke free and that all sanctions are lifted immediately and Iran is now a favored nation trading partner. There is no oil spike, no hit on the global economy, no war, no gains to the US and Israeli military industrial complexes, and no no-bid reconstruction contracts to Le HockeyDad.

Possibility 2: Akmenajihad says there is no weapons program or agrees to eliminate a weapons program and opens up everything to IAEA inspectors. After the inspections the US and Israel say Iran is still hiding their weapons program, they failed to prove it did not exist, and the war starts. (Remember, this is right out of the playbook for the war on Iraq)

Possibility 3: Everything stays the current course and we get war!

Which option is more likely? Are we being realistic sitting back and praying for Possibility #1? Come on....Invest accordingly.

The drums of war are beating louder every day!

DrMaddVibe Offline
#53 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,552
frankj1 wrote:
Oh there's a clear picture painted alright, but it's by Iran's leaders, and if you can't see it then check out the lyrics they have supplied in unambiguous terms:

Israel must be removed from the face of the Earth.

Crystal clear. They do not want to be misinterpreted. Old words that never stopped from them, and others. They are proud of it, they are not hiding in shameful shadows. This is no whisper campaign. The difference today is they have finally decided to make their dream come true. Such is the unavoidable destiny of modern holocaust denyers like their Maynard G. Krebs look-alike leader. The citizens of Iran, not so sure they totally buy into it but they are oppressed by their gov't. Never read about that from you.

But it's an ancient hatred for them, they are not neo-nazis. Might have even inspired Hitler's nutty little Aryan master race blueprint, I dunno, but this is not a new idea for them or other radical Muslims.

You have issues with Israel and Israeli policy. Fine. Many agree with you. But don't you see that what Iran et al really despise is Judaism? And Israel sticks in their craw. You absolutely never address that underlying FACT other than citing some new negative that Israel has done to cause it now. But they have hated forever. They will continue to hate. It isn't because of settlements. This is not an Arab/Israeli skirmish. There is simply zero desire for a life in peace side by side in their dream.

Their not-so clandestine military policies, along with those kooks from Syria, have been to dispassionately lead Palestinians to slaughter in an effort to destabilize Israel, take her down, corrupt the world's view of her. But it just ain't working and Syria as they know it, may be disappearing. What to do if you are Iran?

You are correct in one sense, Iran does not want war either, they want a laydown.

Has Israel ever said they plan to erase another nation from the map? The truth, as you know it too, is nope.

They won't allow anyone to erase them. You call that provocative agitation. Unfathomable.

If you don't want to send aid (money/arms) to Israel or any country. Fine. Believe in that, it's an arguable political position with merit. I can understand that position/vision/philosophy.

I'll never convince you, not really my goal. Just want to make sure the truth stays alive here and anywhere there are deniers and people gullible enough to believe the neuveau slick marketing of Israel's enemies spinning the softening of their destroy-Israel policies.

Don't bother speaking for me...I pray there will not be a war with Iran. You guessed wrong.




Good thought provoking post...BUT they were in on the whole Hitler plan!


http://www.tellthechildrenthetruth.com/gallery/


http://christianactionforisrael.org/antiholo/arabnazi.html
topper7788 Offline
#54 Posted:
Joined: 06-21-2006
Posts: 4,719
Geez, this thread reminds me why I hardly ever bother to view the politics board.....

Frank, why are you bothering???

Robert, surprised you bothered to post to this thread again...

HD... oh, never mind...
HockeyDad Offline
#55 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,187
I fully support Israel attacking Iran and I still can't make people happy!

bloody spaniard Offline
#56 Posted:
Joined: 03-14-2003
Posts: 43,802
HockeyDad wrote:
I fully support Israel attacking Iran and I still can't make people happy!


poor bas tard can't win for losingSad
rfenst Offline
#57 Posted:
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,415
bloody spaniard wrote:
I disagree, rfenst. Don't be so dramatic, my friend. They are passionate. That's all.
Despite agreeing/disagreeing (and ignoring- lol) with bits and pieces, I've also learned from both.




If hoping and praying that there won't be war for many, many reasons, despite it appearing virtually inevitable (absent divine intervention), is "dramatic", then I certainly am.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#58 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,552
They're a nation that either has (and hasn't declared it formally!) or hasn't (see Saddam Hussein's plan of crying WMD to his neighbors and how THAT turned out for him!) nuclear capabilities of dealing with it's foes.

They've shown that they can handle their own fights and why they weren't allowed in on the whole "War on Terror" at the beginning is beyond me! They don't need our permission to flyover and take out the Iranian facilities. Facilities that even the House of Saud has cried they shouldn't have! They don't need us for one damn thing. We're not their "big bully brother" waiting to see if the fight's fair to enter into the fray.

Let them take care of their own business and let the UN deal with them...or not...either way, they're a soverign nation...Iran has to deal with it...not us...it's pure provacation that the rest of the Iranian population has to deal with their leadership! If the general census is that they don't want what these crazy hellbent on a holy war holy rollers let THEM deal with overthrowing the sharia system they voted in! Either that or they're complicit with the whole thing and want to feel the warm glow of a nuclear blast.

It's not a United States issue at all. We've meddled in their affairs far too long with no positive results. Short term solutions and scads of useless Nobel Peace Prize winners and people getting rich while the poor get poorer. They want to take them out...who cares...let them. Really. Who are we to say they can or can't? Look at the messes we've put our noses in? Our track record flat out sucks!
DrMaddVibe Offline
#59 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,552
bloody spaniard wrote:
poor bas tard can't win for losingSad



Meh..he shudda hedged his wins with a short position that losing mighta been a slight possibility!

Glass half-full!!!Beer
rfenst Offline
#60 Posted:
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,415
HockeyDad wrote:
If you're going to buy into all the Iranian rhetoric over the years and going with "No responsible country would stand still while its most determined and apparently soon to be capable enemy nation appears to be technologically moving close to its undeniable stated goal of annihilation of that country", you can't go all soft at the same time and say you don't want there to be a war. You can't have it both ways.


Emotionally and truthfully, I do not want there to be a war. That is what I pray for. Realistically, I know it is virtually unavoidable. I do have it both ways. Once the decision and execution of war begins, you have my assurance that I will be screaming at the top of my lungs that I want Israel to both win and survive. Realistically, I just don't think that will happen. That is why I want to have it both ways
HockeyDad Offline
#61 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,187
DrMaddVibe wrote:
They're a nation that either has (and hasn't declared it formally!) or hasn't (see Saddam Hussein's plan of crying WMD to his neighbors and how THAT turned out for him!) nuclear capabilities of dealing with it's foes.

They've shown that they can handle their own fights and why they weren't allowed in on the whole "War on Terror" at the beginning is beyond me! They don't need our permission to flyover and take out the Iranian facilities. Facilities that even the House of Saud has cried they shouldn't have! They don't need us for one damn thing. We're not their "big bully brother" waiting to see if the fight's fair to enter into the fray.

Let them take care of their own business and let the UN deal with them...or not...either way, they're a soverign nation...Iran has to deal with it...not us...it's pure provacation that the rest of the Iranian population has to deal with their leadership! If the general census is that they don't want what these crazy hellbent on a holy war holy rollers let THEM deal with overthrowing the sharia system they voted in! Either that or they're complicit with the whole thing and want to feel the warm glow of a nuclear blast.

It's not a United States issue at all. We've meddled in their affairs far too long with no positive results. Short term solutions and scads of useless Nobel Peace Prize winners and people getting rich while the poor get poorer. They want to take them out...who cares...let them. Really. Who are we to say they can or can't? Look at the messes we've put our noses in? Our track record flat out sucks!




HELL YEAH!

(See rfenst, that's how it's done!)
HockeyDad Offline
#62 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,187
rfenst wrote:
If hoping and praying that there won't be war for many, many reasons, despite it appearing virtually inevitable (absent divine intervention), is "dramatic", then I certainly am.



Look at the war as divine intervention. Now there is no need to pray to stop it. Problem solved.
HockeyDad Offline
#63 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,187
DrMaddVibe wrote:
Meh..he shudda hedged his wins with a short position that losing mighta been a slight possibility!

Glass half-full!!!Beer




Disclaimer: Le HockeyDad has placed absolutely no bets on the upcoming war yet. Timing is everything.
rfenst Offline
#64 Posted:
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,415
DrMaddVibe wrote:
They're a nation that either has (and hasn't declared it formally!) or hasn't (see Saddam Hussein's plan of crying WMD to his neighbors and how THAT turned out for him!) nuclear capabilities of dealing with it's foes.

They've shown that they can handle their own fights and why they weren't allowed in on the whole "War on Terror" at the beginning is beyond me! They don't need our permission to flyover and take out the Iranian facilities. Facilities that even the House of Saud has cried they shouldn't have! They don't need us for one damn thing. We're not their "big bully brother" waiting to see if the fight's fair to enter into the fray.

Let them take care of their own business and let the UN deal with them...or not...either way, they're a soverign nation...Iran has to deal with it...not us...it's pure provacation that the rest of the Iranian population has to deal with their leadership! If the general census is that they don't want what these crazy hellbent on a holy war holy rollers let THEM deal with overthrowing the sharia system they voted in! Either that or they're complicit with the whole thing and want to feel the warm glow of a nuclear blast.

It's not a United States issue at all. We've meddled in their affairs far too long with no positive results. Short term solutions and scads of useless Nobel Peace Prize winners and people getting rich while the poor get poorer. They want to take them out...who cares...let them. Really. Who are we to say they can or can't? Look at the messes we've put our noses in? Our track record flat out sucks!


You are right. It is not currently the U.S.'s direct problem. We should do everything to stay out of it. But at the very least, once oil flow diminishes and world prices jump over night, then it does become our real economic business. We may not see U.S. military dropping bombs, but you can bet it all that the U.S has already and will inevitably give Israel whatever under-the-radar resources it can.
rfenst Offline
#65 Posted:
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,415
HockeyDad wrote:
Look at the war as divine intervention. Now there is no need to pray to stop it. Problem solved.


If war were a divine intervention, then there simply would be no need for war.

I am of the opinion that man almost always lives with free will and that divine intervention, known as a miracle, for better or worse is a very, very rare-event and not to be counted on.
HockeyDad Offline
#66 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,187
Many religious believe that God controls everything. To them God is going to start this war.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#67 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,552
rfenst wrote:
You are right. It is not currently the U.S.'s direct problem. We should do everything to stay out of it. But at the very least, once oil flow diminishes and world prices jump over night, then it does become our real economic business. We may not see U.S. military dropping bombs, but you can bet it all that the U.S has already and will inevitably give Israel whatever under-the-radar resources it can.



http://news.yahoo.com/obama-says-risky-attack-iran-wants-diplomatic-fix-002001512.html

See, he cudda done something about this back in the spring of 2009...he didn't because he's not an effectual leader!

Our fuel prices have shot up and will continue to because of Iran's insistence of closing or controlling the St. of Hormuz already.

We might act as an air controller for them...but the rest of the world won't know it! For that very same reason Russia and China will aid and line their pockets with their weaponry too. It's faulty and shaky at best but we won't sell them our stuff!
Stinkdyr Offline
#68 Posted:
Joined: 06-16-2009
Posts: 9,948
DrMaddVibe wrote:
They're a nation that either has (and hasn't declared it formally!) or hasn't (see Saddam Hussein's plan of crying WMD to his neighbors and how THAT turned out for him!) nuclear capabilities of dealing with it's foes.

They've shown that they can handle their own fights and why they weren't allowed in on the whole "War on Terror" at the beginning is beyond me! They don't need our permission to flyover and take out the Iranian facilities. Facilities that even the House of Saud has cried they shouldn't have! They don't need us for one damn thing. We're not their "big bully brother" waiting to see if the fight's fair to enter into the fray.

Let them take care of their own business and let the UN deal with them...or not...either way, they're a soverign nation...Iran has to deal with it...not us...it's pure provacation that the rest of the Iranian population has to deal with their leadership! If the general census is that they don't want what these crazy hellbent on a holy war holy rollers let THEM deal with overthrowing the sharia system they voted in! Either that or they're complicit with the whole thing and want to feel the warm glow of a nuclear blast.

It's not a United States issue at all. We've meddled in their affairs far too long with no positive results. Short term solutions and scads of useless Nobel Peace Prize winners and people getting rich while the poor get poorer. They want to take them out...who cares...let them. Really. Who are we to say they can or can't? Look at the messes we've put our noses in? Our track record flat out sucks!



Well said. Amen to that my botl!

As I have said many times, since Israel and Puerto Rico are both our wefare byches, let's start calling some shots that work for USA. Move Israel to Vieques......problema solved.

fog
HockeyDad Offline
#69 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,187
DrMaddVibe wrote:

See, he cudda done something about this back in the spring of 2009...he didn't because he's not an effectual leader!



Obama could give the attack order today but........WWRPD?

(What Would Ron Paul Do)
DrMaddVibe Offline
#70 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,552
HockeyDad wrote:
Obama could give the attack order today but........WWRPD?

(What Would Ron Paul Do)



Who cares what Ron Paul would do? His stance is similar to mine. That's why I voted for the man. That's why I'm an ardent supporter of his books. He's been unwaivering with a track record spanning 30 years. Now being associated with the Constitution is en vogue. Thanks for playing catch up. He was right and the guy to fix what's ailing America right now.

The Globalists have their man ushered in to take Obama's throne away.

Ron Paul will be another historic figure that was relagated down...just like Thomas Paine, H. Ross Perot and a host of thousands!

Just business...but you already KNEW that!
DrafterX Offline
#71 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,577
DrMaddVibe wrote:
His stance is similar to mine.




TW has a wide stance.... or so I've heard anyway... Mellow
pgje51 Offline
#72 Posted:
Joined: 01-13-2006
Posts: 5,013
"I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones." Albert Einstein.
HockeyDad Offline
#73 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,187
For every investment argument, there is a counter argument.

We've all pretty much reached the conclusion that Israel will attack Iran soon and we all support it.......but.....

Maybe we're all wrong and an Israeli attack isn't so likely...



Does Iran have deliverable nuclear weapons now? No.

If Israel attacks Iran now does that mean Iran would never get nuclear weapons? No, it would postpone that outcome for at most a year or two.

If Israel attacks Iranian nuclear installations would that ensure future peace between the two countries? No.

Would it make it less likely that the Tehran regime uses such weapons to strike at Israel in future? No. It would have the exact opposite effect. It would ensure direct warfare between the two countries and might make Iran’s use of nuclear weapons against Israel in the future a certainty.

Would an attack by Israel be likely to succeed in doing maximum damage? No.


While considering your investment options, here is some light reading.

http://www.nowtheendbegins.com/blog/

...and some nice music...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mVzt7S6CGWs&feature=related
8trackdisco Offline
#74 Posted:
Joined: 11-06-2004
Posts: 60,103
I heard there is yellow cake uranium and a strong link to Al-Queida.

Let's have war! We can afford it!
rfenst Offline
#75 Posted:
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,415
"Calling Israel a danger to Islam, the conservative website Alef, with ties to Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, said the opportunity must not be lost to remove 'this corrupting material. It is a ‘jurisprudential justification' to kill all the Jews and annihilate Israel, and in that, the Islamic government of Iran must take the helm.' ”


http://www.nowtheendbegins.com/blog/
rfenst Offline
#76 Posted:
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,415
8trackdisco wrote:
I heard there is yellow cake uranium and a strong link to Al-Queida.

Let's have war! We can afford it!



Yellowcake is the part of the story that didn't come out until the end of the real part of the war. And, it is not to be ignored as it is another step along the way to weapons grade uranium. It is also suitable for "dirty bomb" which we all know Iraq was capable of delivering by missile. I think we knew all about it BEFORE the attack and that the U.S. hid its knowledge of it for security reasons and to prevent Iraq from being able to dis[pose of it in an attempt to avoid all out war.
HockeyDad Offline
#77 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,187
rfenst wrote:
"Calling Israel a danger to Islam, the conservative website Alef, with ties to Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, said the opportunity must not be lost to remove 'this corrupting material. It is a ‘jurisprudential justification' to kill all the Jews and annihilate Israel, and in that, the Islamic government of Iran must take the helm.' ”


http://www.nowtheendbegins.com/blog/



It is an outrage. Israel should attack. (Of course this rhetoric has been going on for about 30 years. Israel has been screaming about Iranian nukes for over 20 years but, now it is different.)
HockeyDad Offline
#78 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,187
rfenst wrote:
It is also suitable for "dirty bomb" which we all know Iraq was capable of delivering by missile.


Delivering it by missile to whom? The Coalition of the Willling???

By the way yellow cake in a dirty bomb wouldn't be very dirty at all. That isn't really a threat.

The yellow cake in Iraq was always known about and was under supervision of UN inspectors. The invented yellow cake from Niger was the yellow cake that Iraq couldn't prove it didn't have because it was all faked documents.



....but none of this has any bearing on the current Iran war buildup.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#79 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,552
HockeyDad wrote:
The yellow cake in Iraq was always known about and was under supervision of UN inspectors. The invented yellow cake from Niger was the yellow cake that Iraq couldn't prove it didn't have because it was all faked documents.



That Colin Powell sold off really well...don't take my word for it though...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nt5RZ6ukbNc

Part 1 of 5...be sure to watch the other 4 too.
HockeyDad Offline
#80 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,187
I liked this version better.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Db3UbxmMRr8


....but like I said, none of this has any bearing on the current Iran war buildup. The US and Israel would never even consider using that same ruse that got us into the war with Iraq.

This is serious this time....this is an existential threat....we're facing an immunity zone.
HockeyDad Offline
#81 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,187
I realize I just used some undefined buzz words that perhaps need some clarification. When investing around warfare it is important to understand the buzzwords so you can properly assess the timetable for war and thus the timetable for entering and exiting investments.

Immunity Zone: This is a relatively new buzzword that is used to describe the point where the Iranian nuclear program is so spread out and hardened that military strikes would be of no value. Once entering the Immunity Zone, Iran could then begin to develop a nuclear weapon if they chose to do so. The current war plan being floated is to attack Iran before the enter the Immunity Zone which is before they start developing a nuclear weapon, not before they finish a nuclear weapon. Nobody knows when the Immunity Zone date starts.

Existential Threat: Something that threatens the very existence of Israel. This term is used daily by right wing Israeli politicians and has been used to describe an Arab with a butter knife, a flock of seagulls pooping on a Mercedes parked at the beach, the Iranian nuclear program, and anything in between.



Next we need to tackle some war terms that help ease the whole conscience thing with death and destruction being a byproduct of war. If you're going to invest for war or chimp scream for war even while praying for peace, you gotta toughen up a bit. Heck, Topper can't even post on the politics board anymore just from reading this thread and that kind of behavior is way too soft.

Collateral Damage: This is what happens when your weapons miss their target and kill civilians and non-military property. The neat thing about the term it is is used both for dead people and blown up buildings so it equates a mother holding her child that has been blown in half with an outhouse that got blown up. Remember, we are trying to take the whole human factor/guilt out of this. If you see the pictures of the child blown in half and then start feeling guilty that you own stock in Boeing that made the bomb that did it, you lose your ability to invest clearly.

Purposeful Disregard for Civilian Life, a Violation of the Geneva Convention, and Terrorism: This is the term for when your enemy's weapons miss their target and kill civilians and non-military property.

Casualty: Dead people. Casualty sounds much better, agreed? It sounds more like someone is just strolling along with their hands in their pockets while wearing a new pair of Dockers.

Acceptable Losses: Cars use oil, Cars lose hubcaps, sometimes you drop a $5 bill, insurance deductibles......all acceptable losses. OK, here acceptable losses are how many dead people(military or civilian) we can have before the chances of having a parade afterwards turn into a better chance that there will be board of inquiries, indictments, and forced retirements.
Stinkdyr Offline
#82 Posted:
Joined: 06-16-2009
Posts: 9,948
Can we move Israel to Vieques yet?

Seriously, it would be so much cheaper.


fog
DrMaddVibe Offline
#83 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,552
Stinkdyr wrote:
Can we move Israel to Vieques yet?

Seriously, it would be so much cheaper.


fog



Think they'd want too?

They could have like this whole vacation resort once they clean up all the empty shells...but they're used to that!
DrMaddVibe Offline
#84 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,552
Saudi Arabia Will Not Let Oil Go Above $100

An "element of fear" is playing into the price of oil despite higher supply and decreasing demand, Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin Talal al Saud told CNBC Monday.

Bin Talal, the billionaire member of the Saudi Arabian royal family who runs the Kingdom Holding Co., said the fear comes from "what may happen with Iran and the possibility of closing the Hormuz Strait."

But Saudi Arabia has already said it will not let the price of oil, which closed Monday around $97 a barrel, go above $100, bin Talal said.

"We can use our leverage, our excess capacity to be sure to pump more [oil] if needed so it will not impact the consumer countries while they’re getting out of their recessions slowly but surely," the prince said.

As for Iran, he said it is important for the U.S. and other nations to put sanctions on the "renegade country" to force its government to negotiate. Issuing an ultimatum of war would push Iran to the "desperate move" of blocking the vital oil shipment waterway.

"I believe a solution is not impossible with them," bin Talal said of Iran. "A dialog is the best way to do it."

But if the strait is blocked he believes the U.S. can reopen the strait "very quickly." He added he wants a "nuclear-free" region, which means Israel should give up its nuclear arsenal, too.

He said the European debt crisis is "pulling down the growth of the world economies" and it is important for the European Union countries to "get their house in order because this can't go on indefinitely." Greece leaving the EU would set a bad precedent, he added, and could lead to the disintegration of the euro.

The prince, Citigroup's [C 33.30 ] biggest shareholder, said CEO Vikram Pandit has brought the bank "out of the wilderness" and expects the company to pay a dividend or buy back shares sometime this year, once it gets clearance from the Federal Reserve .

Bin Talal, also a major shareholder in News Corp. [NWSA 19.56 --- UNCH ]and Apple [AAPL 463.97 ], said he recently invested $300 million in Twitter, saying the huge number of its users makes it a "force to be reckoned with." He hasn't invested in Facebook, he said, but "we never say no to anything."

http://www.cnbc.com/id/46285933


Yeah...that's gonna keep the beach ball under the water longer...yeah.
bloody spaniard Offline
#85 Posted:
Joined: 03-14-2003
Posts: 43,802
First of all, the Saudis are ****ting bricks thinking about the people's Spring headed their way & will promise the (crescent ) moon for protection. In the meantime, they fund West- hating madras which produced the Twin Tower sabouteurs and the Bushes will continue to literally walk hand in hand with Saudi royalty whispering words of unrequited love into their hairy ears.

Secondly, the EU will cut away Greece, Ireland, & Portugal (unfortunately nothing but deadweight anyway) & infuse large amounts of aid into Spain & Italy because they still have large industrial infrastructures. Britain, the Netherlands and a few other anemic northern European countries are also on death watch. Keep in mind that Europe has more gold than the USA... thus, our perfect storm will be larger.

Thirdly, Vieques don't want no stinkin' jews nor any other immigrants. Had family that owned vast stretches of that once tropical paradise only to have the gringos buy it up pennies on the dollar & then use it for target practice. The indigenous population was happy to see the Americans stick it to the Spanish hacienda-owning "man".

Tapping foot & waiting impatiently for other shoe to fall on Iran.
Pray
teedubbya Offline
#86 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
I remember a day when the spaniards had balls. now they are a second or third teir country pushed aside by neuvo trailer park money.
HockeyDad Offline
#87 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,187
You gotta love it when we rest our economic impact hopes on a Saudi prince who is a major shareholder in FoxNews and the largest shareholder of Citigroup! Notice how he sneaked the part in about Israel should also give up their nuclear weapons. Sounds like a fair deal.....Israel gives up its nukes and Iran gives up their nuke ambitions. We shall await the Israeli lobby response!

Meanwhile oil has ranged from $76 to $114 over the past 12 months.
bloody spaniard Offline
#88 Posted:
Joined: 03-14-2003
Posts: 43,802
Hi, Chachi (TW). Hope you're feeling better.
HockeyDad Offline
#89 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,187
I cannot support any relocation of Israelis to Vieques.

1. This is really only Israel's second attempt at an independent country in thousands of years and we need to give them a chance to make it work.

2. All Puerto Ricans carry knives and are hot tempered so I think the mix would be dangerous.
HockeyDad Offline
#90 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,187
teedubbya wrote:
I remember a day when the spaniards had balls. now they are a second or third teir country pushed aside by neuvo trailer park money.



You remember before the Spanish-American War?!

bloody spaniard Offline
#91 Posted:
Joined: 03-14-2003
Posts: 43,802
I inadvertently erased my previous post... but to encapsulate:

Thanks, HD.

Since I don't read the daily rags & national "unbiased news" (laughable) magazines any more, I rely on a mix of Fox, CNN, Al Jazeera, Russian channel (273 ?), Piers Morgan, and a few botl like you to provide me with the latest & greatest.
bloody spaniard Offline
#92 Posted:
Joined: 03-14-2003
Posts: 43,802
Puerto Riqueños love their music, booze & fine clothes. If you can get jews to open up more distilleries & discount shopping outlets there, they will we welcomed with opened abrazos.
Dancing Dancing Dancing
HockeyDad Offline
#93 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,187
Wanna see a good movie?

"Lebanon"

http://www.amazon.com/Lebanon-Reymond-Amsalem/dp/B003Y5H5II/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1328629931&sr=8-1

Trailer at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IMRD3z_mTqI

It is about an Israeli tank crew in the 1982 invasion of Lebanon.

This is an Israeli-made movie, not Hollywood so it is a bit more edgy. People who chimp scream for war or invest for war need to be able to watch movies like this. It helps develop the hardened shell necessary.
teedubbya Offline
#94 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
[quote=HockeyDad]Wanna see a good movie?

"Lebanon"
quote]


Meh...

"Lesbian" staring Gina Gershon is much better
bloody spaniard Offline
#95 Posted:
Joined: 03-14-2003
Posts: 43,802
Saw it last year. It was a bit slow & EXTREMELY depressing.
Hard to believe that the common Israeli enlisted man challenges his commanding officers like that...
teedubbya Offline
#96 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
How was it depressing? I thought it was hot
bloody spaniard Offline
#97 Posted:
Joined: 03-14-2003
Posts: 43,802
teedubbya wrote:
How was it depressing? I thought it was hot



I'd like to see you go weeks without bathing/shaving with a rotting corpse in your passenger seat and urine backwash on your floorboards...
oh wait, you do.
HockeyDad Offline
#98 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,187
"Waltz With Bashir" and Beaufort" our two more movies out of Israel. These can be found on youtube even.
DrafterX Offline
#99 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,577
bloody spaniard wrote:
I'd like to see you go weeks without bathing/shaving with a rotting corpse in your passenger seat and urine backwash on your floorboards...





Mellow
teedubbya Offline
#100 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
bloody spaniard wrote:
I'd like to see you go weeks without bathing/shaving with a rotting corpse in your passenger seat and urine backwash on your floorboards...
oh wait, you do.


dude are you inviting me on a roadtrip?
Users browsing this topic
Guest
3 Pages<123>