dpnewell wrote:Typical liberal hypocrisy. Anyone who disagrees with your world view is a "hate group", yet you, and those who think like you, have no problem hating and bashing those you disagree with.
we covered this. denigrating or restricting the rights of an entire group based on sterotypes etc etc etc is 100% different than calling an individual a jackass for being a jackass. Any of you can bash the hell out of any other for things you know about them based on your personal experience with them. ie - drafter is an idiot
Quote:
When your Georgetown buddies where mugged, it was immediately a “hate crime”, though you have no evidence to support your accusation. I bet you think the gay activist that shot the security guard for the group that supported traditional marriage was not committing a hate crime, even though he said he hated them during the attack. Typical.
my friends were not mugged. there was no attempt to take anything. fortunately they were able to fight the bastards off, but please, list the multitude of other possible reasons for people to be attacked in one of the safest areas of dc.
As for whether the gay activist committed a hate crime, that's a very interesting question. My first answer would be he committed a crime of stupidity. shooting a security guard of an anti-gay group because of their anti-gay stance is the equivalent of shooting a traffic cop outside an abortion clinic. The individual is simply an unaffiliated employee. Did he try to commit a hate crime? I don't know... it's a very interesting question, as you'd have to first define whether you considered the anti-gay supporters to be a "group". Can you define the boundaries of the group? I do think its an interesting question and worth consideration.