America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 8 years ago by banderl. 154 replies replies.
4 Pages<1234>
Chick-Fil-A
teedubbya Offline
#101 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
tailgater wrote:
The whole "thou doth protest too loud" is foreign to my thought process.

I hate the NY Jets. I tell everyone. Does that mean I secretly dream of Rex Ryan's feet?




http://www.cigarbid.com/...ugby-Shower#post3493741


freak
HockeyDad Offline
#102 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,192
DrafterX wrote:
I think your pic is over in the Pic Post forum so he prolly already has..... Mellow



OUTRAGEOUS!
teedubbya Offline
#103 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
quit with the menacing red letters... the gay homos in here will be asqueered
rumraider Offline
#104 Posted:
Joined: 08-05-2012
Posts: 727
tailgater wrote:
You saying he's now a "wide receiver"?

Laugh
Not that there's anything wrong with that.
tailgater Offline
#105 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
victor809 wrote:
Not unrelated. If you notice the trend, it's usually (at least to me) the irrational public stances that gain that sort of attention, primarily because no one can come up with a rational reason for someone to care so much.

There's a rational reason to be against child violation, elderly woman murder, burglary etc. So people who make a public stance against it don't usually get labeled as closeted forms of whatever they're against (until it actually turns out they were... old drug addict friend of mine made sure he was the drug sergeant for his national guard platoon so he knew when the piss tests were coming... but that's another story).

If you make a public stance against women wearing high-heels, try to pass legislature banning the sale of high heels and the public exhibition of high heels... well, people might start to wonder why it is so important to you that you never see high heels on the street.


Poor high-heel analogy aside, you make a good point.
But it doesn't justify the incorrect terminology of "phobia".

It's akin to calling someone a racist because they voted for McCain last election. It's a tremendous assumption that is all-too often entirely off base.
It's an obvious over-compensation.
And it not only fails to properly define a person, but also creates additional animosity.

Face it. The term was coined to p*ss people off.
tailgater Offline
#106 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
teedubbya wrote:
http://www.cigarbid.com/FORUM/c/posts/m/3493741/Rugby-Shower#post3493741


freak


Those can't be Rex's feet.
Not enough belly in the way.
teedubbya Offline
#107 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
tailgater wrote:
Those can't be Rex's feet.
Not enough belly in the way.


you would know
teedubbya Offline
#108 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Xenophobia is the same. It's intended to piss off the xenos
teedubbya Offline
#109 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
i think it funny that even the phobia calls them homos


and TG your view of what is a phobia and what isn't is strange and frightens or confuses me.... you have now created tailgatorphobia which ironically is just another name for homophobia
victor809 Offline
#110 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
I have idiotophobia....

I admit it. :)
I'm afraid prolonged exposure to idiots will turn me into one.
teedubbya Offline
#111 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
victor809 wrote:
I have idiotophobia....

I admit it. :)
I'm afraid prolonged exposure to idiots will turn me into one.


too late
victor809 Offline
#112 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
tailgater wrote:
Poor high-heel analogy aside, you make a good point.
But it doesn't justify the incorrect terminology of "phobia".

It's akin to calling someone a racist because they voted for McCain last election. It's a tremendous assumption that is all-too often entirely off base.
It's an obvious over-compensation.
And it not only fails to properly define a person, but also creates additional animosity.

Face it. The term was coined to p*ss people off.


I agree it's overused. The term was coined because some psychologist saw some trend somewhere. Now the term is used willy-nilly. (see tw's willy for an example of a nilly willy).

Doesn't mean one should blame the term. One should blame the people who use it beyond it's intended scope.
teedubbya Offline
#113 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
I have Stolidusphobia
teedubbya Offline
#114 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
mine is named willy vanilli
tailgater Offline
#115 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
teedubbya wrote:
mine is named willy vanilli


And by "vanilli" you mean "tiny".
tailgater Offline
#116 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
TW gets homo-erectus when he thinks of homosexual homo-sapiens.

tailgater Offline
#117 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
victor809 wrote:

One should blame the people who use it beyond it's intended scope.


I thought I was.
teedubbya Offline
#118 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
you use iut beyond it's intended scope?
DrafterX Offline
#119 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,583
If you're a homophobe, somebody along the line gave you some help. There was a great teacher somewhere in your life. Somebody helped to create this homophoia that allows you to thrive. Somebody invested in roads and bridges. If you’ve got da homophobe-- you didn’t create that. Somebody else made that happen. The Internets didn’t get invented on its own. Government research created the Internets so that all da homophobia could be spread all over the Internets.

Mellow
victor809 Offline
#120 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
^ way to stick with the whole "original thought" idea.
DrafterX Offline
#121 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,583
sorry Batman.... Sad
Papachristou Offline
#122 Posted:
Joined: 10-20-2010
Posts: 845
HockeyDad wrote:
This frees up money to set up a new foundation for gay-gene research. We will find the cure.


lmao.
DrafterX Offline
#123 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,583
Mellow
DrafterX Offline
#124 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,583
Chick-fil-A: We Made No Concessions

Sep 24, 2012

The president of Chick-Fil-A said they have not given in to the demands of gay-homo marriage advocates in exchange for permission to build a new restaurant in Chicago.


“Chick-fil-A made no such concessions and we remain true to who we are and who we have been, said Dan Cathy in a statement to Fox News Channel host Mike Huckabee.

Cathy said the company had not capitulated to the demands of supporters of gay-homo marriage – in spite of media reports to the contrary.

“There continues to be erroneous implications in the media that Chick-fil-A changed our practices and priorities in order to obtain permission for a new restaurant in Chicago,” he said. “That is incorrect.”

The family-owned restaurant chain has been under siege by gay-homo activists for weeks over its charitable giving to organizations that support traditional family values. Officials in a number of cities, including Chicago, vowed to block the company’s expansion efforts.

But last week, Chicago Alderman Joe Moreno announced that Chick-fil-A had agreed to stop funding those organizations. Moreno called it a “big win” – after he initially announced his intention to block their efforts to build a new restaurant in his district.

Those reports sparked immediate outrage among conservative Christians who posted messages on Chick-fil-A’s Facebook page. Hundreds of thousands had turned out over the summer to support the restaurant on a “Chick-fil-A Appreciation Day.”

“I’m disgusted that your faith is so weak,” wrote one irate diner. “You sure raked in the bucks on Chick-fil-A Day, huh?”

After several days of silence, the company released a statement saying their corporate giving had been mischaracterized.

“A part of our corporate commitment is to be responsible stewards of all that God has entrusted to us,” the statement read. “Because of this commitment, Chick-fil-A’s giving heritage is focused on programs that educate youth, strengthen families and enrich marriages, and support communities. We will continue to focus our giving in those areas. Our intent is not to support political or social agendas.”

Cathy’s latest statement has already generated fresh backlash.

The website Queerty posted a story with the headline: “Dan Cathy Confirms Chick-fil-A Still in the Business of Hate.

Moreno posted a statement online calling Chick-fil-A’s position “disturbing” and said it “muddied the progress we had made.”

“Perhaps Mr. Cathy felt that he could make these public statements to Mike Huckabee because I had provided a letter of support for his restaurant to the city of Chicago earlier this week,” he said. “I still need to introduce legislation to make the Chick-fil-A in the Logan Square neighborhood of Chicago a reality. I will wait to see what Mr. Cathy’s next public statement is, and reflect on that statement before moving forward with appropriate legislation.”

Film at 11.... Shame on you Shame on you Shame on you Shame on you
bloody spaniard Offline
#125 Posted:
Joined: 03-14-2003
Posts: 43,802
Oh, well. My last buying experience with them was an unmitigated disaster anyway. Long line/wait, got my order wrong, & the blah chicken repeated on me. Sick
DrafterX Offline
#126 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,583
were you dressed up like a muppet..?? Huh
victor809 Offline
#127 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Can't take a single thing you say seriously drafter. Seriously? You're the only idiot I know who copy/pastes entire articles, only to purposely change specific words in the article into the equivalent of "blacky-negro".
victor809 Offline
#128 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
bloody spaniard wrote:
Oh, well. My last buying experience with them was an unmitigated disaster anyway. Long line/wait, got my order wrong, & the blah chicken repeated on me. Sick


They're playing both sides to the middle. Based on the wording, they're being careful to not say that they haven't changed what groups they fund. Which means they have changed some of their donations. They just refuse to say that it was to capitulate to some demands (which they honestly shouldn't have done, as despicable as the entire sh%tshow was, they could have sued the hell out of any city which denied them licenses).
DrafterX Offline
#129 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,583
victor809 wrote:
Can't take a single thing you say seriously drafter. Seriously? You're the only idiot I know who copy/pastes entire articles, only to purposely change specific words in the article into the equivalent of "blacky-negro".



typical, avoid the issue at hand and turn it into something else.... just admit you jumped the gun and reported bad info.... Mellow
bloody spaniard Offline
#130 Posted:
Joined: 03-14-2003
Posts: 43,802
victor809 wrote:
They're playing both sides to the middle. Based on the wording, they're being careful to not say that they haven't changed what groups they fund. Which means they have changed some of their donations. They just refuse to say that it was to capitulate to some demands (which they honestly shouldn't have done, as despicable as the entire sh%tshow was, they could have sued the hell out of any city which denied them licenses).



Beginning to look that way, isn't it, Victor?


Are you and Drafter wrasslin' agin'? lol Have to admit, it spices up the predictably staid boards a bit.
victor809 Offline
#131 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
DrafterX wrote:
typical, avoid the issue at hand and turn it into something else.... just admit you jumped the gun and reported bad info.... Mellow


No, I'll have the discussion with any rational, intelligent person on the board who doesn't purposely pepper their posts (alliteration!) with phrases equivalent to "blacky-negro". You've proven yourself to be incapable of that.
DrafterX Offline
#132 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,583
apology accepted.... Mellow
victor809 Offline
#133 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
bloody spaniard wrote:
Beginning to look that way, isn't it, Victor?


Are you and Drafter wrasslin' agin'? lol Have to admit, it spices up the predictably staid boards a bit.


He, like CFA, wants to be able to have it both ways. Uses ridiculous phrases in his cut and pastes every time in an effort to ingratiate himself to people, then when called on it "I was just joking".

CFA probably removed some specific groups from their list of approved donation recipients, in order to appease the politicians. I'm sure they still maintain a number of christian charities (nothing wrong with that) and want to publicize that to their "gay hatin' constituents". Essentially, they want both sides to think they won, so they'll both buy chicken.
DrafterX Offline
#134 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,583
victor809 wrote:
Uses ridiculous phrases in his cut and pastes every time in an effort to ingratiate himself to people,



more of a habit really... didn't give it that much thought... you shouldn't either.. Mellow
victor809 Offline
#135 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
DrafterX wrote:
more of a habit really... didn't give it that much thought... you shouldn't either.. Mellow


I'm not sure what's more disgusting... that you put so much effort into doing it (seriously, the only thing your posts involve is a copy/paste, adding the equivalent of "blacky-negro" and "film at 11"), or the fact that you won't even own up to it.

When a good 50% of the effort in your post is dedicated to doing something, don't try blowing smoke up the rest of our collective asses and say you "don't give it much thought".
bloody spaniard Offline
#136 Posted:
Joined: 03-14-2003
Posts: 43,802
Not to get in the middle of this spat but Victor, you should adjust the IV drip when talking to Drafter. I did. Now, I kinda like the fat coot's schtick.
Don't overthink it.
Bless his Cros searching, fry food eating, film at 11, puppy dog kicking heart. Mellow
Stinkdyr Offline
#137 Posted:
Joined: 06-16-2009
Posts: 9,948
victor809 wrote:
I'm not sure what's more disgusting... try blowing smoke up the rest of our collective asses and say you "don't give it much thought".



Is this some sort of gay-homo orgy thing forming here?

Think
DrafterX Offline
#138 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,583
Stinkdyr wrote:
Is this some sort of gay-homo orgy thing forming here?

Think



he's been trying real hard but it's not gonna happen on my watch... Not talking Not talking
DrafterX Offline
#139 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,583
bloody spaniard wrote:
Not to get in the middle of this spat but Victor, you should adjust the IV drip when talking to Drafter. I did. Now, I kinda like the fat coot's schtick.
Don't overthink it.
Bless his Cros searching, fry food eating, film at 11, puppy dog kicking heart. Mellow



Mellow

Think
DrMaddVibe Offline
#140 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,554
victor809 wrote:
He, like CFA, wants to be able to have it both ways. Uses ridiculous phrases in his cut and pastes every time in an effort to ingratiate himself to people, then when called on it "I was just joking".




I thought all Georgetown rubby players LIKED it BOTH ways??Think

No?Think

The rest is all Pot meet Kettle kinda twisty turvy hyperbole designed to feign outrage. All massive drama.

Once again...jobbed by Chick-Fil-A. That's gotta hurt the entire GLBT community. "We're gonna tear it down!" chants all the way to "We MADE them bow to our demands!" only to be told..."Uh, WTF clean out your ears and learn to read!"

Yet another thread for others to just laugh. Laugh at it all. Thanks for the thread. Eat mor chikn!
bloody spaniard Offline
#141 Posted:
Joined: 03-14-2003
Posts: 43,802
DrafterX wrote:
Mellow
Think



I stand up for you & THAT'S the thanks I get????Brick wall Crying


Mellow
DrafterX Offline
#142 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,583
d'oh!
I didn't realize that's what you were doing... Mellow


thanks man... ThumpUp










Think
victor809 Offline
#143 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
bloody spaniard wrote:
I stand up for you & THAT'S the thanks I get????Brick wall Crying


Mellow



I don't think anyone can expect drafter to really understand anything.
DrafterX Offline
#144 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,583
whatever Batman.... don't fall off that horse.... Mellow
DrafterX Offline
#145 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,583
Here we go again..!! Laugh





Mayor Bill de Blasio and members of the New York City Council are calling for a city-wide boycott of Chick-fil-A – urging citizens to refrain from eating plump juicy chicken breasts tucked between hot buttered buns.

“I’m certainly not going to patronize them and I wouldn’t urge any other New Yorker to patronize them,” the mayor told DNAInfo.com.

Click here to join Todd’s American Dispatch: A Must-Read for Conservatives!

Councilman Daniel Dromm was even more blunt – accusing the Southern restaurant chain of spreading a “message of hate.”

Chick-fil-A opened its first New York City restaurant in 2015 – followed by a second location in April. The mayor’s remarks came after it was announced a third restaurant would be opening in Queens – which happens to be the district represented by Councilman Dromm.

So why does the mayor and the city council have a problem with Chick-fil-A – the unofficial chicken of Jesus?

Well, Chick-fil-A is owned by a devoutly Christian family. Back in 2012 company president Dan Cathy ruffled feathers by telling a reporter that he believed marriage is between a man and a woman.

And Sweet Lord Almighty, but the militant LGBT activists and leftwing lawmakers have been squawking ever since.

“What the ownership of Chick-fil-A has said is wrong,” said De Blasio, a de-facto Communist sympathizer who eats his pizza with a fork.

So it’s not so much that De Blasio is anti-chicken as much as he is anti-Christian.

Councilman Dromm, who founded the Queens Lesbian and Gay Pride Committee and organized the first Queens LGBT Pride Parade and Festival, deeply loathes Chick-fil-A.

“This group imparts a strong anti-LGBT message by forcing their employees and volunteers to adhere to a policy that prohibits same-sex love,” Dromm said in a statement. “It is outrageous that Chick-fil-A is quietly spreading its message of hate by funding these types of organizations.

Councilman Dromm is either ignorant or a liar – or perhaps both.

“The Chick-fil-A culture and service tradition in our restaurants is to treat every person with honor, dignity and respect – regardless of their beliefs, race, creed, sexual orientation and gender,” a spokesperson told DNAInfo.

Chick-fil-A is not in the business of spreading hate. They are in the business of selling chicken and waffle fries and deliciously refreshing lemonade.

And they do not have a policy that prohibits same-sex love. That’s a blatant lie. Chick-fil-A could care less whether birds of a feather flock together or not.

Another item to consider: Chick-fil-A employs hundreds of New Yorkers – adding significant tax dollars to the city’s coffers. And that doesn’t even include the cash donations they’ve made to a number of NYC charities.

But that doesn’t matter to people like Mayor De Blasio and Councilman Dromm. Full and complete compliance to the LGBT agenda is the only thing that matters – even if it means hundreds of New Yorkers lose their jobs.

Perhaps the mayor and the city council should mind their own business and let Chick-fil-A mind theirs.

Meanwhile, New Yorkers don’t seem all that interested in obeying the mayor’s boycott. As matter of fact, instead of eating less chicken – they’re eating more chicken!

There was a lunchtime line that stretched around the block at the Chick-fil-A located a block away from the Fox News Corner of the World.

Before I head over to Chick-fil-A for a snack, I wanted to make one more observation.

It was last year – just after they had opened their inaugural store in Manhattan. I noticed that after two weeks of drinking all that sweet tea and eating fried food, New Yorkers seemed a bit more – how can I put this – a bit more pleasant – and easy going.

Folks on the subway were even waving at each other – with all five fingers – instead of one.

Now, that's the power of the capital G -- Gospel Bird.

Film at 11..... Anxious
gummy jones Offline
#146 Posted:
Joined: 07-06-2015
Posts: 7,969
is delicious
DrafterX Offline
#147 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,583
True... true... Mellow
DrMaddVibe Offline
#148 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,554
Anyone try that frosted lemonade shake of theirs?


OMG!!!


The only thing missing...VODKA!!!
mikey1597 Offline
#149 Posted:
Joined: 05-18-2007
Posts: 14,162
Did you know that every time you say "Thank You", the workers at Chick-Fil_A have to say "It's My Pleasure".


I wear them out when I go.
DrafterX Offline
#150 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,583
I'm gonna have to put this to da test... Mellow
Users browsing this topic
Guest
4 Pages<1234>