America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 11 years ago by DrMaddVibe. 86 replies replies.
2 Pages12>
A new word.....
Jump to Bottom | Previous Topic | Next Topic
surfish1961 Offline
#1 Posted: Wed, Feb 13 2013, 2:33 PM EST
Joined: 01-27-2008
Posts: 7,346
Ineptocracy (in-ep-toc’-ra-cy)

1). A system of government where the least capable to lead are elected by the least capable of producing, and where the members of society least likely to sustain themselves or succeed, are rewarded with goods and services paid for by the confiscated wealth of a diminishing number of producers.

About sums it up, doesn't it?

disclaimer: I don't, in any way, lay claim to inventing this word. It was thought up by someone much smarter than me. But remember, he didn't do it himself. Someone did it for him.

Should I have put it in capital red letters so RICKAMAVEN could read and understand it?
Brewha Offline
#2 Posted: Wed, Feb 13 2013, 8:50 PM EST
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,201
surfish1961 wrote:
Ineptocracy (in-ep-toc’-ra-cy)

1). A system of government where the least capable to lead are elected by the least capable of producing, and where the members of society least likely to sustain themselves or succeed, are rewarded with goods and services paid for by the confiscated wealth of a diminishing number of producers.

About sums it up, doesn't it?

disclaimer: I don't, in any way, lay claim to inventing this word. It was thought up by someone much smarter than me. But remember, he didn't do it himself. Someone did it for him.

Should I have put it in capital red letters so RICKAMAVEN could read and understand it?

Spot on.
Bush ran an ineptocracy. As was further proven by the Mitwits . . .
surfish1961 Offline
#3 Posted: Wed, Feb 13 2013, 9:17 PM EST
Joined: 01-27-2008
Posts: 7,346
Brewha wrote:
Bush ran an ineptocracy. As was further proven by the Mitwits . . .

So what you are saying is that Bush was elected twice by the same knuckleheads that put the "Texas post turtle" in office for two terms? I find that hard to believe.

And I don't think Mitt was elected, was he? So your point on Mitt is moot.

Maybe I should have put it in red capital letters so you could understand it.
Brewha Offline
#4 Posted: Wed, Feb 13 2013, 9:20 PM EST
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,201
surfish1961 wrote:
So what you are saying is that Bush was elected twice by the same knuckleheads that put the "Texas post turtle" in office for two terms? I find that hard to believe.

And I don't think Mitt was elected, was he? So your point on Mitt is moot.

Maybe I should have put it in red capital letters so you could understand it.

Or you could have tried making a cogent point . . . . .
surfish1961 Offline
#5 Posted: Wed, Feb 13 2013, 9:31 PM EST
Joined: 01-27-2008
Posts: 7,346
Brewha wrote:
Or you could have tried making a cogent point . . . . .

It appeals to one's reason that the point I made was referring to the current administration.

But the current administration has the tendency to blame its' problems on past administrations just as was your reasoning.
Brewha Offline
#6 Posted: Wed, Feb 13 2013, 9:45 PM EST
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,201
surfish1961 wrote:
It appeals to one's reason that the point I made was referring to the current administration.

But the current administration has the tendency to blame its' problems on past administrations just as was your reasoning.

Yes, well your appeal is denied by reason of a lack of demonstrated fact.
It did read like you were Bush bashing. Sorry to misunderstand your disillusionment.



Perhaps you would feel better if you assailed the First Lady on the grounds of her hip dimensions . . . . .
dpnewell Offline
#7 Posted: Wed, Feb 13 2013, 9:49 PM EST
Joined: 03-16-2009
Posts: 7,491
^^Come on Dave, you know that one of the libs top tactics is "deflection".

Nothing personal Brew. I wouldn't expect any less of you.
surfish1961 Offline
#8 Posted: Wed, Feb 13 2013, 9:52 PM EST
Joined: 01-27-2008
Posts: 7,346
Brewha wrote:
Yes, well your appeal is denied by reason of a lack of demonstrated fact.
It did read like you were Bush bashing. Sorry to misunderstand your disillusionment.



Perhaps you would feel better if you assailed the First Lady on the grounds of her hip dimensions . . . . .

I do not bash people for their appearances. Every person is beautiful in the eyes of our higher power.

And I have no disillusionment. The fact is that the ineptness of the current administration is demonstrated by the failed policies, false and broken promises, and total disregard for the Constitution of the United States of America.
chemyst Offline
#9 Posted: Thu, Feb 14 2013, 2:01 AM EST
Joined: 05-29-2006
Posts: 1,674
My favorite 'new' words:

from 2009 = Bankster
from 2012 = Libtard

Surfish, posts like the OP will get you "Enemy of the State" status,
under the new libtard rules.

Chemyst Cool
DadZilla3 Offline
#10 Posted: Thu, Feb 14 2013, 4:46 AM EST
Joined: 01-17-2009
Posts: 4,633
surfish1961 wrote:
The fact is that the ineptness of the current administration is demonstrated by the failed policies, false and broken promises, and total disregard for the Constitution of the United States of America.

Unfortunately in the eyes of over half of the voting public, this is far outweighed by giving away lots of 'free' stuff and by delivering slick speeches from a teleprompter that somebody else wrote.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#11 Posted: Thu, Feb 14 2013, 6:53 AM EST
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,513
Using bold red letters strikes the fear of














GOD












in them...they cower in fear...they form their circle jerk and mutter about the menacing red letters.
surfish1961 Offline
#12 Posted: Thu, Feb 14 2013, 10:03 AM EST
Joined: 01-27-2008
Posts: 7,346
chemyst wrote:
Surfish, posts like the OP will get you "Enemy of the State" status,
under the new libtard rules.

Chemyst Cool

Don't care my friend. Come and get me.
surfish1961 Offline
#13 Posted: Thu, Feb 14 2013, 10:04 AM EST
Joined: 01-27-2008
Posts: 7,346
DadZilla3 wrote:
Unfortunately in the eyes of over half of the voting public, this is far outweighed by giving away lots of 'free' stuff and by delivering slick speeches from a teleprompter that somebody else wrote.

You're absolutely correct. Look at the "Occupy" movement as an example.

And we all know POTUS is out of his league without TOTUS.
surfish1961 Offline
#14 Posted: Thu, Feb 14 2013, 10:08 AM EST
Joined: 01-27-2008
Posts: 7,346
DrMaddVibe wrote:
Using bold red letters strikes the fear of














GOD












in them...they cower in fear...they form their circle jerk and mutter about the menacing red letters.

That's the reason why I used 'higher power' in post #8 instead of the 'G' word. I knew if I threw God into the conversation, brewha would have gotten all flustered and resort to name calling.
surfish1961 Offline
#15 Posted: Thu, Feb 14 2013, 10:12 AM EST
Joined: 01-27-2008
Posts: 7,346
Brewha wrote:
Yes, well your appeal is denied by reason of a lack of demonstrated fact.

And I really didn't know that my appeal was subject to your approval.

Oh but that's right. Being a liberal, you are an intellectual. I forgot. My bad.

A pound of common sense outweighs a ton of book smarts everyday and twice on Sundays.
tegulator Offline
#16 Posted: Thu, Feb 14 2013, 12:37 PM EST
Joined: 01-14-2013
Posts: 347
This is the problem, Brew. You can't have a discussion with people who refuse to deny that there are valid viewpoints other than their own. Only a godless, communist, Islamo-fascist, militant homosexual, man-hating feminazi would suggest otherwise.
surfish1961 Offline
#17 Posted: Thu, Feb 14 2013, 12:45 PM EST
Joined: 01-27-2008
Posts: 7,346
tegulator wrote:
Only a godless, communist, Islamo-fascist, militant homosexual, man-hating feminazi would suggest otherwise.

There are a lot of people on the boards that are glad that you are finally coming out of the closet and acknowledging yourself for what you are. I'm just happy that I didn't resort to the name-calling as that would put myself below your level.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#18 Posted: Thu, Feb 14 2013, 1:22 PM EST
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,513
tegulator wrote:
This is the problem, Brew. You can't have a discussion with people who refuse to deny that there are valid viewpoints other than their own. Only a godless, communist, Islamo-fascist, militant homosexual, man-hating feminazi would suggest otherwise.



You forgot the slave whipping, bidnezz ownin' and highly educated whiteys!
DrMaddVibe Offline
#19 Posted: Thu, Feb 14 2013, 1:23 PM EST
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,513
surfish1961 wrote:
There are a lot of people on the boards that are glad that you are finally coming out of the closet and acknowledging yourself for what you are. I'm just happy that I didn't resort to the name-calling as that would put myself below your level.




I outed this bastion. It's a gift. Just ask Jimmy.
tegulator Offline
#20 Posted: Thu, Feb 14 2013, 1:26 PM EST
Joined: 01-14-2013
Posts: 347
DrMaddVibe wrote:
You forgot the slave whipping, bidnezz ownin' and highly educated whiteys!


Go take your ball and play by yourself for a while MaddVibe. The adults are trying to have a conversation.
tegulator Offline
#21 Posted: Thu, Feb 14 2013, 1:28 PM EST
Joined: 01-14-2013
Posts: 347
surfish1961 wrote:
There are a lot of people on the boards that are glad that you are finally coming out of the closet and acknowledging yourself for what you are. I'm just happy that I didn't resort to the name-calling as that would put myself below your level.


Of course you'd be happy! I forgot that I, and anyone who disagrees with you, am clearly in the wrong.
surfish1961 Offline
#22 Posted: Thu, Feb 14 2013, 1:41 PM EST
Joined: 01-27-2008
Posts: 7,346
tegulator wrote:
Of course you'd be happy! I forgot that I, and anyone who disagrees with you, am clearly in the wrong.

Never said I personally was happy. Glad you can read my mind.

Actually I am quite saddened. That a person with your education can be so misguided by slogans and platitudes is a testament of the future of our society. God (yes I said God) help my children who are being brought up to be conservative. I see the world that they are going to inherit and I do not like it.
tegulator Offline
#23 Posted: Thu, Feb 14 2013, 1:44 PM EST
Joined: 01-14-2013
Posts: 347
surfish1961 wrote:
There are a lot of people on the boards that are glad that you are finally coming out of the closet and acknowledging yourself for what you are. I'm just happy that I didn't resort to the name-calling as that would put myself below your level.


I don't read minds, just words.

I know...I'm just so misguided that no one can even attempt to have a discussion with me based on some of my moral and intellectual failings. I'm truly sorry to you all.
surfish1961 Offline
#24 Posted: Thu, Feb 14 2013, 1:46 PM EST
Joined: 01-27-2008
Posts: 7,346
tegulator wrote:
Go take your ball and play by yourself for a while MaddVibe. The adults are trying to have a conversation.

Hey DMV, what he is saying is never go into battle of wits with an unarmed man. The armed man will lose every time to the more superior, educated man.
tegulator Offline
#25 Posted: Thu, Feb 14 2013, 1:48 PM EST
Joined: 01-14-2013
Posts: 347
surfish1961 wrote:
Hey DMV, what he is saying is never go into battle of wits with an unarmed man. The armed man will lose every time to the more superior, educated man.


Of course I'm unarmed! I disagree with you both, which means I'm already wrong by default!

What party should I vote for to make myself feel better?
surfish1961 Offline
#26 Posted: Thu, Feb 14 2013, 1:48 PM EST
Joined: 01-27-2008
Posts: 7,346
tegulator wrote:
I don't read minds, just words.

I know...I'm just so misguided that no one can even attempt to have a discussion with me based on some of my moral and intellectual failings. I'm truly sorry to you all.

Not even in the same sentence. And apology accepted for your moral and intellectual failings.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#27 Posted: Thu, Feb 14 2013, 1:49 PM EST
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,513
tegulator wrote:
Of course I'm unarmed! I disagree with you both, which means I'm already wrong by default!

What party should I vote for to make myself feel better?



The STFU party.
tegulator Offline
#28 Posted: Thu, Feb 14 2013, 1:50 PM EST
Joined: 01-14-2013
Posts: 347
DrMaddVibe wrote:
The STFU party.


The strawberry taffy and flying unicorn party? Sounds lovely!
DrMaddVibe Offline
#29 Posted: Thu, Feb 14 2013, 1:52 PM EST
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,513
tegulator wrote:
The strawberry taffy and flying unicorn party? Sounds lovely!



Get on your Pol Pot saddle and ride, ya clopper!
tegulator Offline
#30 Posted: Thu, Feb 14 2013, 1:53 PM EST
Joined: 01-14-2013
Posts: 347
Coconuts are more efficient for clopping than pots...
surfish1961 Offline
#31 Posted: Thu, Feb 14 2013, 1:54 PM EST
Joined: 01-27-2008
Posts: 7,346
tegulator wrote:
Of course I'm unarmed! I disagree with you both, which means I'm already wrong by default!

What party should I vote for to make myself feel better?

You have already voted for the right party if you want failed policies, false and broken promises, and a total disregard for the Constitution.

I myself am not a subscriber to any political party. Don't believe in them, never have. I am a conservative and was brought up that way. I am, all by myself, responsible for my life and actions that I take. I don't need the government and a handful of so-called intellectuals telling me what I can and cannot do. And I certainly do not blame my problems and misfortunes on anyone else but myself.
victor809 Offline
#32 Posted: Thu, Feb 14 2013, 1:55 PM EST
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
surfish1961 wrote:

Actually I am quite saddened. That a person with your education can be so misguided by slogans and platitudes is a testament of the future of our society.


Not to point out anything controversial... but your opening post would likely count as a "slogan" and/or "platitude"
DrMaddVibe Offline
#33 Posted: Thu, Feb 14 2013, 1:55 PM EST
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,513
tegulator wrote:
Coconuts are more efficient for clopping than pots...



African or European?
tegulator Offline
#34 Posted: Thu, Feb 14 2013, 1:56 PM EST
Joined: 01-14-2013
Posts: 347
surfish1961 wrote:
You have already voted for the right party if you want failed policies, false and broken promises, and a total disregard for the Constitution.

I myself am not a subscriber to any political party. Don't believe in them, never have. I am a conservative and was brought up that way. I am, all by myself, responsible for my life and actions that I take. I don't need the government and a handful of so-called intellectuals telling me what I can and cannot do. And I certainly do not blame my problems and misfortunes on anyone else but myself.


Good thing I didn't vote for Barrack Obama... Angel
DrMaddVibe Offline
#35 Posted: Thu, Feb 14 2013, 1:57 PM EST
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,513
victor809 wrote:
Not to point out anything controversial... but your opening post would likely count as a "slogan" and/or "platitude"



Maybe in Georgetown...but












THIS



















IS




















CBID!!!!








































LOLZ!!!
victor809 Offline
#36 Posted: Thu, Feb 14 2013, 1:57 PM EST
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
victor809 wrote:
Not to point out anything controversial... but your opening post would likely count as a "slogan" and/or "platitude"


As would your post "Old Sailors Tale"....
victor809 Offline
#37 Posted: Thu, Feb 14 2013, 2:01 PM EST
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
victor809 wrote:
Not to point out anything controversial... but your opening post would likely count as a "slogan" and/or "platitude"


And your picture post "Free Cash"...
DrMaddVibe Offline
#38 Posted: Thu, Feb 14 2013, 2:01 PM EST
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,513
Awesome 3rd person reference!
surfish1961 Offline
#39 Posted: Thu, Feb 14 2013, 2:03 PM EST
Joined: 01-27-2008
Posts: 7,346
victor809 wrote:
Not to point out anything controversial... but your opening post would likely count as a "slogan" and/or "platitude"

Nope.
surfish1961 Offline
#40 Posted: Thu, Feb 14 2013, 2:04 PM EST
Joined: 01-27-2008
Posts: 7,346
victor809 wrote:
And your picture post "Free Cash"...

Wait until you see the 'bumper sticker'!!!!!
victor809 Offline
#41 Posted: Thu, Feb 14 2013, 2:06 PM EST
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
surfish1961 wrote:
Nope.


Really?
Well, they definitely fit under "Truisms", "Tropes" and "Conventional Wisdoms"... all of which are synonyms of "Platitudes"....
DrMaddVibe Offline
#42 Posted: Thu, Feb 14 2013, 2:08 PM EST
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,513
victor809 wrote:
Really?
Well, they definitely fit under "Truisms", "Tropes" and "Conventional Wisdoms"... all of which are synonyms of "Platitudes"....



Look who's going for his Grammar Badge!!!!whip
surfish1961 Offline
#43 Posted: Thu, Feb 14 2013, 2:10 PM EST
Joined: 01-27-2008
Posts: 7,346
victor809 wrote:
Really?
Well, they definitely fit under "Truisms", "Tropes" and "Conventional Wisdoms"... all of which are synonyms of "Platitudes"....

We have a wordsmith in our midst. Glad to hear from you Victor.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#44 Posted: Thu, Feb 14 2013, 2:12 PM EST
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,513
surfish1961 wrote:
We have a wordsmith in our midst. Glad to hear from you Victor.



Quick...hide the Scrabble board!horse
victor809 Offline
#45 Posted: Thu, Feb 14 2013, 2:12 PM EST
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
surfish1961 wrote:
We have a wordsmith in our midst. Glad to hear from you Victor.


You know I gotta call you out on this stuff. :) The irony just kills me if I don't point it out.
surfish1961 Offline
#46 Posted: Thu, Feb 14 2013, 2:17 PM EST
Joined: 01-27-2008
Posts: 7,346
victor809 wrote:
You know I gotta call you out on this stuff. :) The irony just kills me if I don't point it out.

Don't know what 'calling out" is all about. I already stated that I didn't make this up. Just passing on information that was in one of the local newspapers. It was in printed form so it must be based on fact.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#47 Posted: Thu, Feb 14 2013, 2:20 PM EST
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,513
surfish1961 wrote:
Don't know what 'calling out" is all about. I already stated that I didn't make this up. Just passing on information that was in one of the local newspapers. It was in printed form so it must be based on fact.




Shhh


If he didn't call you out...he'd bust out the iron. Then he'd prolly get the swifter out too!

All that would kill him.
victor809 Offline
#48 Posted: Thu, Feb 14 2013, 2:34 PM EST
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
surfish1961 wrote:
Don't know what 'calling out" is all about. I already stated that I didn't make this up. Just passing on information that was in one of the local newspapers. It was in printed form so it must be based on fact.


Oh come on... you know what I mean. You were giving this poor tegulator guy crap and accusing him of believing the same sort of stuff you just posted...

Everyone is guilty of it... everyone does it. But it's absolutely hilarious to me when people demand it be their specific platitudes you believe. :)

anyway... you still smoke at the same shop? I haven't been up your way in forever.
surfish1961 Offline
#49 Posted: Thu, Feb 14 2013, 2:53 PM EST
Joined: 01-27-2008
Posts: 7,346
victor809 wrote:
anyway... you still smoke at the same shop? I haven't been up your way in forever.

I only went over there for an event and to pay Roberto and the Hays a friendly visit. We just happened to be there at the same time. That is a really nice place and the company was pleasant.

But I try to stay on the New Jersey side of the River except to go to that store in the City, and to CI of course.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#50 Posted: Thu, Feb 14 2013, 2:58 PM EST
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,513
surfish1961 wrote:
I only went over there for an event and to pay Roberto and the Hays a friendly visit. We just happened to be there at the same time. That is a really nice place and the company was pleasant.

But I try to stay on the New Jersey side of the River except to go to that store in the City, and to CI of course.



Nobody really likes going to Georgetown...unless it's rubby players going to a rubby game.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
2 Pages12>
Back to Top