America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 11 years ago by DrMaddVibe. 86 replies replies.
2 Pages<12
A new word.....
Jump to Bottom | Previous Topic | Next Topic
surfish1961 Offline
#51 Posted: Thu, Feb 14 2013, 3:03 PM EST
Joined: 01-27-2008
Posts: 7,346
DrMaddVibe wrote:
Nobody really likes going to Georgetown...unless it's rubby players going to a rubby game.

What's in Georgetown?
DrMaddVibe Offline
#52 Posted: Thu, Feb 14 2013, 3:06 PM EST
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,513
surfish1961 wrote:
What's in Georgetown?



Rubby
tegulator Offline
#53 Posted: Thu, Feb 14 2013, 3:19 PM EST
Joined: 01-14-2013
Posts: 347
Hey look! MaddVibe changed his picture to show how edgy and cool he is!
DrMaddVibe Offline
#54 Posted: Thu, Feb 14 2013, 3:23 PM EST
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,513
tegulator wrote:
Hey look! MaddVibe changed his picture to show how edgy and cool he is!



Wake up! I change my pic several times a week!
tegulator Offline
#55 Posted: Thu, Feb 14 2013, 3:24 PM EST
Joined: 01-14-2013
Posts: 347
That sounds progressive...
victor809 Offline
#56 Posted: Thu, Feb 14 2013, 3:26 PM EST
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
surfish1961 wrote:
I only went over there for an event and to pay Roberto and the Hays a friendly visit. We just happened to be there at the same time. That is a really nice place and the company was pleasant.

But I try to stay on the New Jersey side of the River except to go to that store in the City, and to CI of course.


How close are you to bensalem? I was dragged up there for a number of months recently.
surfish1961 Offline
#57 Posted: Thu, Feb 14 2013, 3:30 PM EST
Joined: 01-27-2008
Posts: 7,346
victor809 wrote:
How close are you to bensalem? I was dragged up there for a number of months recently.

Right across the B-B.....close to the NE Philly store that's related to the Center City store. 30 minute ride for me.
victor809 Offline
#58 Posted: Thu, Feb 14 2013, 3:35 PM EST
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
surfish1961 wrote:
Right across the B-B.....close to the NE Philly store that's related to the Center City store. 30 minute ride for me.


Man... wish I knew. I was lurking at a cigar lounge in NE Philly weekly for a couple months there. I'd use it as a place to get work done in the evenings.

If you're in that area, you should check out Xander's Bada Bing....
SMGBobbyScott Offline
#59 Posted: Thu, Feb 14 2013, 3:58 PM EST
Joined: 07-24-2012
Posts: 3,328
WHEW! Thank goodness you guys calmed down and came to your senses! I thought that I was going to have to come in here and straighten you guys out!

Sarcasm
Rick Wingfield Offline
#60 Posted: Thu, Feb 14 2013, 6:21 PM EST
Joined: 01-13-2013
Posts: 25
DrMaddVibe wrote:
African or European?



Oh..... I don't know............ AHHHHHhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
Brewha Offline
#61 Posted: Thu, Feb 14 2013, 11:22 PM EST
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,201
dpnewell wrote:
^^Come on Dave, you know that one of the libs top tactics is "deflection".

Nothing personal Brew. I wouldn't expect any less of you.

Thank you DP. It is your expectation that drives me on - guess I'll have to give some thought to wtf you mean by deflection. Remember now, I don't study Fox News so I'm only left with logic . . . .
Brewha Offline
#62 Posted: Thu, Feb 14 2013, 11:30 PM EST
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,201
surfish1961 wrote:
I do not bash people for their appearances. Every person is beautiful in the eyes of our higher power.

And I have no disillusionment. The fact is that the ineptness of the current administration is demonstrated by the failed policies, false and broken promises, and total disregard for the Constitution of the United States of America.

Fair enough. My comment about the First Lady was unwarranted in your case.

However, making the statement "I have no disillusionment" smackes of a whole lotta disillusionment. We all have our illusions and fallacies - all of us. You seem particularly afflicted.

If you have some special clarity of thought, we are waiting for it.
Brewha Offline
#63 Posted: Thu, Feb 14 2013, 11:35 PM EST
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,201
surfish1961 wrote:
That's the reason why I used 'higher power' in post #8 instead of the 'G' word. I knew if I threw God into the conversation, brewha would have gotten all flustered and resort to name calling.

Oh, man up and tempt me. Talking about God is not for everyone. But I'm game . . . .
SMGBobbyScott Offline
#64 Posted: Fri, Feb 15 2013, 9:27 AM EST
Joined: 07-24-2012
Posts: 3,328
Oh please talk about someone you know or at least have read about more than once!
surfish1961 Offline
#65 Posted: Fri, Feb 15 2013, 11:14 AM EST
Joined: 01-27-2008
Posts: 7,346
Brewha wrote:
Fair enough. My comment about the First Lady was unwarranted in your case.

However, making the statement "I have no disillusionment" smackes of a whole lotta disillusionment. We all have our illusions and fallacies - all of us. You seem particularly afflicted.

If you have some special clarity of thought, we are waiting for it.

I'm venturing a guess that that's the best apology I'm going to get from you about the First Lady comment. Apology accepted. It would have been a lot easier to say "I'm sorry".

And don't just re-post snippets of a previous post.

It should read:

And I have no disillusionment. The fact is that the ineptness of the current administration is demonstrated by the failed policies, false and broken promises, and total disregard for the Constitution of the United States of America.

That is the perception of millions of people in this Country. I guess they, as well as myself, are all particularly afflicted.
surfish1961 Offline
#66 Posted: Fri, Feb 15 2013, 11:20 AM EST
Joined: 01-27-2008
Posts: 7,346
Brewha wrote:
Oh, man up and tempt me. Talking about God is not for everyone. But I'm game . . . .

That is my right and my privilege to talk about God. I'm game too. What would you like to talk about?
Brewha Offline
#67 Posted: Fri, Feb 15 2013, 3:36 PM EST
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,201
surfish1961 wrote:
I'm venturing a guess that that's the best apology I'm going to get from you about the First Lady comment. Apology accepted. It would have been a lot easier to say "I'm sorry".

And don't just re-post snippets of a previous post.

It should read:

And I have no disillusionment. The fact is that the ineptness of the current administration is demonstrated by the failed policies, false and broken promises, and total disregard for the Constitution of the United States of America.

That is the perception of millions of people in this Country. I guess they, as well as myself, are all particularly afflicted.

Ok, but what about the perception of the people that don’t watch Fox News? Because to most of us, you seem pretty disillusioned - and bitterly so.
Brewha Offline
#68 Posted: Fri, Feb 15 2013, 3:38 PM EST
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,201
surfish1961 wrote:
That is my right and my privilege to talk about God. I'm game too. What would you like to talk about?

Would you agree that if God did not exist (that’s IF he did not exist) it would be necessary to create him?
DrMaddVibe Offline
#69 Posted: Fri, Feb 15 2013, 3:41 PM EST
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,513
Brewha wrote:
Ok, but what about the perception of the people that don’t watch Fox News? Because to most of us, you seem pretty disillusioned - and bitterly so.



Fox...MSNBC...ABC...NBC...CBS...CNN...WTF!

Stop wasting your time.

There's this invention called the internet. Start using it and you might become more informed than the guy reading from the teleprompter with the suit and bad haircut...just sayin'


Sorry but if anyone is still suckling the teat of network news THEY'RE disillusioned. You'll get back at least an hour of your life each night by turning the tv off.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#70 Posted: Fri, Feb 15 2013, 3:43 PM EST
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,513
Brewha wrote:
Would you agree that if God did not exist (that’s IF he did not exist) it would be necessary to create him?



If?


You're going to bring IF to the party? That's the big knot in your g-string? IF? That's what the whole discussion is going to hinge on now? C'mon.


YOU CAN'T BRING THAT WEAKASS STUFF UP IN THIS HUMPTY BUMPTY!
Brewha Offline
#71 Posted: Fri, Feb 15 2013, 3:49 PM EST
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,201
surfish1961 wrote:
And I really didn't know that my appeal was subject to your approval.

Oh but that's right. Being a liberal, you are an intellectual. I forgot. My bad.


Well now you know.
I accept your apology.


Wait – you’re calling me a intellectual liberal?
Well, I guess it not “name calling” if it’s accurate, right?
Brewha Offline
#72 Posted: Fri, Feb 15 2013, 3:52 PM EST
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,201
DrMaddVibe wrote:
If?


You're going to bring IF to the party? That's the big knot in your g-string? IF? That's what the whole discussion is going to hinge on now? C'mon.


YOU CAN'T BRING THAT WEAKASS STUFF UP IN THIS HUMPTY BUMPTY!

What’s wrong with “if”? Too many letters?
Brewha Offline
#73 Posted: Fri, Feb 15 2013, 3:56 PM EST
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,201
tegulator wrote:
This is the problem, Brew. You can't have a discussion with people who refuse to deny that there are valid viewpoints other than their own. Only a godless, communist, Islamo-fascist, militant homosexual, man-hating feminazi would suggest otherwise.

Yes, but if we stand and say nothing, then the children shall lead . . . .
DrMaddVibe Offline
#74 Posted: Fri, Feb 15 2013, 4:01 PM EST
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,513
Brewha wrote:
What’s wrong with “if”? Too many letters?



I suppose it is...for those "intellectual liberals"!

Let's swap words...watch what happens...

Brewha wrote:
Would you agree that if Jell-O did not exist (that’s IF it did not exist) it would be necessary to create it?



Brewha wrote:
Would you agree that if my brain did not exist (that’s IF it did not exist) it would be necessary to create it?



Brewha wrote:
Would you agree that if rubby did not exist (that’s IF it did not exist) it would be necessary to create it?



You want to gut a fish...catch a fish, get a sharp knife...git 'r done. No if's. It's not necessary. Try to think of a bigger word to phrase out what you want, but don't bring that to the table and expect to keep your "intellectual liberal" tiera.
Brewha Offline
#75 Posted: Fri, Feb 15 2013, 4:44 PM EST
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,201
I see that your keen eye, cat like reflexes and sublime reasoning keep you the formidable advisory as always . . . .
tegulator Offline
#76 Posted: Fri, Feb 15 2013, 5:29 PM EST
Joined: 01-14-2013
Posts: 347
Again, Brew, there's no sense talking. We bring up hypothetical situations or questions and they're shot down for not being "real," we use valid and sound logic and we're called names because our claims conflict with people's biases which are somehow universal in terms of generality and correctness.

Oh, and MaddVibe...it's spelled "tiara." Apparently proper spelling means that one is an "intellectual liberal."
surfish1961 Offline
#77 Posted: Fri, Feb 15 2013, 6:58 PM EST
Joined: 01-27-2008
Posts: 7,346
Brewha wrote:
Ok, but what about the perception of the people that don’t watch Fox News? Because to most of us, you seem pretty disillusioned - and bitterly so.

If you want to keep insisting that I am disillusioned, this conversation is over. Disillusionment is a matter of perspective and I would say you're seriously disillusioned and that would be a stalemate and thus I am done.
surfish1961 Offline
#78 Posted: Fri, Feb 15 2013, 7:00 PM EST
Joined: 01-27-2008
Posts: 7,346
Brewha wrote:
Would you agree that if God did not exist (that’s IF he did not exist) it would be necessary to create him?

It's all a matter of faith and if a person does not have faith, he is an empty shell. So your point again is moot because my faith tells me God exists.
surfish1961 Offline
#79 Posted: Fri, Feb 15 2013, 7:08 PM EST
Joined: 01-27-2008
Posts: 7,346
Brewha wrote:
Well now you know.
I accept your apology.


Wait – you’re calling me a intellectual liberal?
Well, I guess it not “name calling” if it’s accurate, right?

That was not an apology. Just proving your arrogance that I should have to validate myself to you.

Aren't all liberals intellectuals? They are usually the smartest people in the room. Just ask them and they'll tell you so.
Brewha Offline
#80 Posted: Sat, Feb 16 2013, 12:12 AM EST
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,201
tegulator wrote:
Again, Brew, there's no sense talking. We bring up hypothetical situations or questions and they're shot down for not being "real," we use valid and sound logic and we're called names because our claims conflict with people's biases which are somehow universal in terms of generality and correctness.

Oh, and MaddVibe...it's spelled "tiara." Apparently proper spelling means that one is an "intellectual liberal."

Odd at it is, I find sence in it.
Who said 'the play is the thing'?
yardobeef Offline
#81 Posted: Sat, Feb 16 2013, 12:23 AM EST
Joined: 10-25-2011
Posts: 849
Brewha wrote:
Odd at it is, I find scents in it.
Who said 'the play is the thing'?



Fixed your typo.
Brewha Offline
#82 Posted: Sat, Feb 16 2013, 12:28 AM EST
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,201
surfish1961 wrote:
It's all a matter of faith and if a person does not have faith, he is an empty shell. So your point again is moot because my faith tells me God exists.

I see your point.

I gather that the question made you sufficiently uncomfortable, so as not to answer it. I was not making a point as much as asking how you viewed God.

Each man comes to know God is his own way. Yet the faith of some disallows this.
Brewha Offline
#83 Posted: Sat, Feb 16 2013, 12:37 AM EST
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,201
surfish1961 wrote:
That was not an apology. Just proving your arrogance that I should have to validate myself to you.

Aren't all liberals intellectuals? They are usually the smartest people in the room. Just ask them and they'll tell you so.

Honestly, I am starting to think my sarcasm is wasted on you.

No matter, I'll come clean; you did not offer an apology - at least not a proper one.
Would you like to try again?
DrMaddVibe Offline
#84 Posted: Sat, Feb 16 2013, 9:27 AM EST
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,513
tegulator wrote:
Again, Brew, there's no sense talking. We bring up hypothetical situations or questions and they're shot down for not being "real," we use valid and sound logic and we're called names because our claims conflict with people's biases which are somehow universal in terms of generality and correctness.

Oh, and MaddVibe...it's spelled "tiara." Apparently proper spelling means that one is an "intellectual liberal."



O noes...the mutha*****ing Spellin' 5-0 is a here! Quick skeedaddle! Of course you'd know how to spell that...why you NEVER make a spelling mistake!

Please...you 2 chuckleheads and your little club are almost as funny as the NWO. Us against the world...good luck on that very very small "intellectual liberal" island.

We'll toss in Vic if you want...just so you can have an odd number to play with...wat do you say...we got a deal? He could bring his soundproof box and rubby gear...now that's the kinda deal we're willing to make. Act now and we just might toss in some ginsu knive....wait...scratch that...you can't handle sharp pointy objects...say, we have the bowling balls over here if you act now!
Brewha Offline
#85 Posted: Sat, Feb 16 2013, 11:47 AM EST
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,201
^ too much blotter.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#86 Posted: Sat, Feb 16 2013, 11:51 AM EST
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,513
Brewha wrote:
^ too much blotter.


Not talking
Users browsing this topic
Guest
2 Pages<12
Back to Top