America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

so should the governor of new mexico sue her queer stylist who now refuses to cut her hair
isn;t it discrimitory
that so called retarded bill has nothing to do with gays
in simple terms it lets you conduct business with who you want without repercussion

oh and screw the eskimos up there are they even real

HAHAHAHA... you knew it was just a matter of time before homosexuals & feminists had a misunderstanding with their rug lugging pals.
Just wait til black muslims read up on their history & figure out their lighter complected counterparts enjoyed trading 'em.

gas...grass or ass...NOBODY rides for free!

I TOLD you...NO ONE RIDES FOR FREE!!!!!

Those eskimos are busy fighting off all the polar bears.

You have to beat off the eskimos to git at 'em.

Naw...that's in Boston!

They migrated there from Georgetown!

Why is this for me?

I generally abhor any activist group, be they LGBT, the teachers union or Greenpeace.
Even good ideas go awry when led by militant morons. (ie. the Tea Party).

I think the muslim barber is an idiot.
But the jilted **** should have just taken her business elsewhere and then tell everyone to keep away from mohammed lesbo-phobe.


I mean, did she really want an angry muslim to be forced to take a straight blade to her throat??

It's for you because I find your input on these odd issues surrounding rights to be interesting.

The lesbian issue is a red-herring, as any woman who wanted a man's-style cut and doesn't like hairdressers could find herself in the same situation.

This actually comes down to women's rights vs religious rights.

It SHOULD be women vs religion. But Butch from Toronto made it a gay thing.
Hence my aversion towards militant activists.

The woman complained because she has been programmed to do so. It's in the LGBT bylaws.


And the people in Arizona would boycott this barber.
I mean, he is Muslim, isn't he?

I dont see why any business owner should be forced to go against there religous beliefs to seve anyone

oh and nice attempt

the whole problem here is the queers seem to think the world revolves around them and they are special cause they are queer

newsflash for the homos act like a normal person and you will be treated just like everyone else
your lust for someone of the same sex does not make you special
99 percent of people could care less what you suck or lick so stop flaunting your gayness like its some badge of honor

no ones falling for it if that is the way its playing it

are there Chik-Filas in Canada.>??

Lesbian ranks higher than woman on the "protected class". You gotta go with the higher point preference.

No... fool me once, shame on you... fool me twice etc etc...

Last time you had a tiny P E N I S hidden under that belly.

^ I heard it looks like an orange cheeto, crumbles, and grows back


Faith McGregor(sp?) knew that to trump a nonwhite muslim barber she would have to be a lesbian woman in order to have a legit discrimination whine. In the past, human rights' commissions have been suckers for gay rights. Alas, it may not be in the cards this time even with that added goodie. Being a hetero (or even gay) white woman may not count for much these days when it comes to outrage that is, UNLESS you're going up against the universally hated and reviled white (preferably Christian) man. Then all she has to do is scream, soil her undies, and point.

Stay tuned.
fatwa at 11

Arizona and pretty much all legislators support whatever has the best chance of getting them re-elected. This actually makes sense since they are trying to please the majority of their constituents.

This is a very interesting idea.

On it's face, I would tend to agree with you. We should be allowed to freely allow or disallow customers for whatever reason we PERSONALLY have.

The problem arises, as with most problems, when people organize.

Let's say you don't trust gingers (really, who does... sick little soulless things), you don't want to serve them at your restaurant. Well, the local ginger family doesn't really want to give you business for being so anti-ginger so they're cool with that. But then the barber, the two markets, the seed store and auto repair store all realize that gingers are disgusting untrustworthy creatures as well and stop serving them. Suddenly, it's impossible for the ginger family to actually live in the town.

Now, that's fine... I mean, they're gingers...

But laws like that are in place to protect actual human beings (not gingers) from being overwhelmed when a majority decides to essentially deny them equality through a de-facto action. We read about these stories as only one-offs... oh, a single bakery somewhere, who cares... or a single diner somewhere, who cares. If it were only those one-off kooks doing it, then it would never be a problem. But we know through history that if it isn't illegal, people organize and it becomes a problem.

But we're not talking about a simple situation like that.

Sure... "He was drunk, I refused to serve him"... or "He got drunk and screwed my dog last time he was here, I'm not serving him again" works fine. But we're talking about the refusal to serve an individual because they are part of a group (women) without any prior interaction with them.

So if you owned a kids clothing store, you saying it's OK that the government tells you you MUST service the known pedophile, even if he seems to take all day just browsing?

Or if you're the IRS, that you might be forced to investigate an occasional company who is not owned by a tea party member?

That's the absolute opposite of what I said.
The guy hanging around a kids clothing store all day IS acting, and could be thrown out for doing exactly what you described. He's not being refused service preemptively.

true... true...

Of course.
My premise was that the store owner shouldn't have to wait for a "full day" before they escort you out.

But you said "fingered" and now I lost my train of thought.