America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 10 years ago by teedubbya. 131 replies replies.
3 Pages<123>
Obamacare all summed up....
victor809 Offline
#51 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
cacman wrote:
LOL!!! Got blunts?


No, do you?
Do you suspect that anyone on this forum does?
tailgater Offline
#52 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
victor809 wrote:
Smoking, yes. Smoking 10-20$ cigars which don't provide any high. No.


Not talking about getting high.
A 2-pack a day habit costs over $10 daily.
How many on these boards smoke more than $10 worth every day?


scompay Offline
#53 Posted:
Joined: 04-17-2010
Posts: 1,721
tailgater wrote:
Not talking about getting high.
A 2-pack a day habit costs over $10 daily.
How many on these boards smoke more than $10 worth every day?




LOL, 2 packs a day lol, that does not leave time to cough phelm bro.
tailgater Offline
#54 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
scompay wrote:
LOL, 2 packs a day lol, that does not leave time to cough phelm bro.


??
Most people who claim "pack a day" are closer to 2 than 1.

Most office jobs don't allow that much smoke time, but how many in section 8 (our subject here) work in the office?

scompay Offline
#55 Posted:
Joined: 04-17-2010
Posts: 1,721
tailgater wrote:
??
Most people who claim "pack a day" are closer to 2 than 1.

Most office jobs don't allow that much smoke time, but how many in section 8 (our subject here) work in the office?



No dude, its not a conspiracy. you are mistaken.

you will rarely find someone that smokes 2 packs a day. Even 1 pack is hard; nowadays. And to what end? its not going to be fun, it will be chain smoking. I smoked hard when I was younger, pack was the best i could do. Some hard core brothers could push it to pack and a half. BTW those folks in section 8 aint smoking good cigarettes, those floor sweeping and roll your own buglers will have you coughing blood the next week at 2 packs a day.

RIP Tupac.Pray this man did not mean anything by it.
cacman Offline
#56 Posted:
Joined: 07-03-2010
Posts: 12,216
victor809 wrote:
No, do you?
Do you suspect that anyone on this forum does?

What makes you think there isn't anybody who doesn't. It's a broad generalization to say that no one doesn't, especially considering some of the crap on the bid and 2nds & overruns on the site. Maybe they don't post. But who knows if there isn't someone out there that doesn't enjoy their backwoods or swisher. Guess you never heard of people selling their EBT Cards so they could buy tobacco, liquor, drugs, etc.

scompay wrote:
you will rarely find someone that smokes 2 packs a day. Even 1 pack is hard; nowadays.

What makes you think you know so much about all smokers? Just another broad generalization based on personal opinion. There are plenty out there that smoke 2+ packs a day, just as there are those that smoke upwards of 8+ cigars a day.

Sounds like a couple of silver-spooners that like to stereo-type. Phfffft!
victor809 Offline
#57 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
cacman wrote:
What makes you think there isn't anybody who doesn't. It's a broad generalization to say that no one doesn't, especially considering some of the crap on the bid and 2nds & overruns on the site. Maybe they don't post. But who knows if there isn't someone out there that doesn't enjoy their backwoods or swisher. Guess you never heard of people selling their EBT Cards so they could by tobacco, liquor, drugs, etc.


I think you miss my point.
I watch people on the gov't dole smoking cheap cigars and whatnot. Hell, there's a "cigar shop" practically every 2 blocks where I live, but not a single good cigar to be found.

My point is, that I doubt the people who smoke swisher sweets or whatever are on a discount cigar forum for three reasons. 1 - cbid doesn't sell swisher sweets... why would they be here. 2 - purchase over cbid requires credit cards/debit cards, etc, stuff which while possible when in sec 8 are more of a challenge. and 3 - this forum is ostensibly about discussing the merits of different cigars based on tobacco, roller etc... swisher sweets are closer to cigarettes than cigars in that respect.
cacman Offline
#58 Posted:
Joined: 07-03-2010
Posts: 12,216
^^^ I get your point, but still think it's a broad generalization. It doesn't account for those that choose to smoke swisher, handmades, and other discount cigars that are not on the guberment teet. They are sold on CI and those buyers might venture to the Bid for the occasional celebratory smoke. It doesn't mean they're poor.
HockeyDad Offline
#59 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,149
cacman wrote:
^^^ I get your point, but still think it's a broad generalization. It doesn't account for those that choose to smoke swisher, handmades, and other discount cigars that are not on the guberment teet. They are sold on CI and those buyers might venture to the Bid for the occasional celebratory smoke. It doesn't mean they're poor.



I still wouldn't associate with them.
Bitter Klinger Offline
#60 Posted:
Joined: 03-23-2013
Posts: 877
victor809 wrote:
I never credited you for too much brilliance. But this is a cigar forum. The people here generally pay money for a bundle of leaves and then burn them. Not exactly a "sec 8 housing" type of habit.


Really? Then you can't read. Apparently we're going to have to go through this point by point.

as the link pointed out, the top tax bracket was 39.6% before, and is 39.6% after. Who qualifies for the top bracket has changed, but your statement never included that. If you can't get this, I'm not sure you're qualified to read any further.

This doesn't even exist. There is no "income payroll tax". The idea that you'd think my link, which doesn't list fantasy land taxes, would prove your point just shows you don't understand it.


My link states that it went to 20%. It's in a nice handy little chart. I don't see how you could possibly miss it. Unless, you were just going down to the highest number and not realizing that it didn't apply to general capital gains... could that be it? Could your reading comprehension be as bad as the person who threw your list together? Yeah....


This isn't even mentioned in my link. But since you asked:
http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424127887323689604578219952168695148
If you are making less than 400k annually, your dividend taxes don't change. If you're making more than 400k, your dividends go up to 20%. The 39.6% is a completely false and made up number. You've been duped.


That's just false. Estate tax is 0% for any amount under 5.6MM... and the top tax rate does not reach 55%.


Your reading comprehension is so poor, I don't think you could identify a fact nor understand what a tax actually applies to.


Good Job, Grasshopper.

I'll concede a couple points up there until I can find supporting info elsewhere, however they are not all wrong, of that I'm sure. But it got you thinkin' didn't it, Vic? You seem to backpedal on the issue by stating you didn't agree with the AHA to some extent. So, even though a couple of the items above are arguing semantics, lets let those lie for now.

Lesson #2: Pick the following apart. The last item discusses the individual mandate. Compare & contrast the individual mandate with the employer mandate, and hypothesize the reasonable resulting consequences thereof. List possible results of over taxing the evil, hated, "rich", and estimate the number of additional employment opportunities lost when they decide enough is enough, close up shop and go sit on a beach.

Ready? Go.

• 2.3% Tax on Medical Device Manufacturers 2014

• 10% Tax on Indoor Tanning Services 2014

• Blue Cross/Blue Shield Tax Hike

• Excise Tax on Charitable Hospitals which fail to comply with the requirements of ObamaCare

• Tax on Brand Name Drugs

• Tax on Health Insurers

• $500,000 Annual Executive Compensation Limit for Health Insurance Executives

• Elimination of tax deduction for employer-provided retirement Rx drug coverage in coordination with Medicare Part D

• Employer Mandate on business with over 50 full-time equivalent employees to provide health insurance to full-time employees. $2000 per employee $3000 if employee uses tax credits to buy insurance on the exchange (marketplace). (pushed back to 2015)

• Medicare Tax on Investment Income 3.8% over $200k/$250k

• Medicare Part A Tax increase of .9% over $200k/$250k

• Employer Reporting of Insurance on W-2 (not a tax) But its considered income, therefore it affects the bottom line on a tax return.

• Corporate 1099-MISC Information Reporting (repealed)

• Codification of the "economic substance doctrine" (not a tax)

ObamaCare Taxes That (may) Directly Affect the Average American

• 40% Excise Tax "Cadillac" on high-end Premium Health Insurance Plans 2018

• An annual $63 fee levied by ObamaCare on all plans (decreased each year until 2017 when pre-existing conditions are eliminated) to help pay for insurance companies covering the costs of high-risk pools.

• Medicine Cabinet Tax
Over the counter medicines no longer qualified as medical expenses for flexible spending accounts (FSAs), health reimbursement arrangements (HRAs), health savings accounts (HSAs), and Archer Medical Saving accounts (MSAs).

• Additional Tax on HSA/MSA Distributions
Health savings account or an Archer medical savings account, penalties for spending money on non-qualified medical expenses. 10% to 20% in the case of a HSA and from 15% to 20% in the case of a MSA.

• Flexible Spending Account Cap 2013
Contributions to FSAs are reduced to $2,500 from $5,000.

• Medical Deduction Threshold tax increase 2013
Threshold to deduct medical expenses as an itemized deduction increases to 10% from 7.5%.

• Individual Mandate (the tax for not purchasing insurance if you can afford it) 2014
Starting in 2014, anyone not buying "qualifying" health insurance must pay an income tax surtax at a rate of 1% or $95 in 2014 to 2.5% in 2016 on profitable income above the tax threshold. The total penalty amount cannot exceed the national average of the annual premiums of a "bronze level" health insurance plan on ObamaCare exchanges.
victor809 Offline
#61 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Bitter Klinger wrote:
Good Job, Grasshopper.

I'll concede a couple points up there until I can find supporting info elsewhere, however they are not all wrong, of that I'm sure. But it got you thinkin' didn't it, Vic? You seem to backpedal on the issue by stating you didn't agree with the AHA to some extent. So, even though a couple of the items above are arguing semantics, lets let those lie for now.

WTF?
No you idiot... it didn't "get me thinking"... and no I didn't backpedal. You can find posts from me from back before Obama was elected saying I wasn't a fan of single payer systems for healthcare. You're a blip in the radar here. A blip which has trouble doing its own critical thinking.

And yes, they are ALL wrong. Every single point you laid out was wrong. Do you understand why? Because if something raises taxes by 3%, and you say it raises taxes by 400%, you're WRONG. You don't get partial credit for being in the right direction. This isn't semantics. It's flat out incorrect information which YOU never bothered to double-check. When I have to spend time pulling up the correct information because you're too gullible to think critically about random lists you get in a chain email, you don't get to say you "got me thinking"... I'm doing the work you were supposed to do yourself as a responsible member of society or even a responsible voter. Start pulling your own weight.

Quote:

Lesson #2: Pick the following apart. The last item discusses the individual mandate. Compare & contrast the individual mandate with the employer mandate, and hypothesize the reasonable resulting consequences thereof. List possible results of over taxing the evil, hated, "rich", and estimate the number of additional employment opportunities lost when they decide enough is enough, close up shop and go sit on a beach.

Ready? Go.

seriously? No.
Your habit of posting crap which is clearly "too good to be true" and then relying on other people to do your critical thinking for you, coupled with the delusion that you're helping them out in some way does not make you a philosopher, or any sort of great thinker. there was no "lesson #1" and I'm not going to jump through any "lesson #2 hoops".

wheelrite Offline
#62 Posted:
Joined: 11-01-2006
Posts: 50,119
Yawn,,,

My Broad is Nurse, as you might know and is Management in a premiere hospital corp..

So,,
we have awesome insurance and it's cheap ( realtively speaking)..

Obama can eat me,,


wheel,,
Bitter Klinger Offline
#63 Posted:
Joined: 03-23-2013
Posts: 877
victor809 wrote:

seriously? No.
Your habit of posting crap which is clearly "too good to be true" and then relying on other people to do your critical thinking for you, coupled with the delusion that you're helping them out in some way does not make you a philosopher, or any sort of great thinker. there was no "lesson #1" and I'm not going to jump through any "lesson #2 hoops".



Oh, there was a lesson #1 alright. And you're really upset about it, apparantly.

Go for #2 Vic! You can do it!!

Twist those facts! Spin it! C'mon!! Frying pan Frying pan Frying pan Frying pan
Bitter Klinger Offline
#64 Posted:
Joined: 03-23-2013
Posts: 877
wheelrite wrote:
Yawn,,,

My Broad is Nurse, as you might know and is Management in a premiere hospital corp..

So,,
we have awesome insurance and it's cheap ( realtively speaking)..

Obama can eat me,,


wheel,,


Until the employer mandate hits. Then you won't have any insurance either, but you'll really be glad you married a nurse. The rest of us will be sponge bathing ourselves into our 90's...
Abrignac Offline
#65 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,294
Another bromance in the making....
scompay Offline
#66 Posted:
Joined: 04-17-2010
Posts: 1,721
cacman wrote:

What makes you think you know so much about all smokers? Just another broad generalization based on personal opinion. There are plenty out there that smoke 2+ packs a day, just as there are those that smoke upwards of 8+ cigars a day.

Sounds like a couple of silver-spooners that like to stereo-type. Phfffft!


you will never guess what percentage of smokers who smoke over just 1 pack a day.
http://www.gallup.com/poll/157466/smokers-light-less-ever.aspx

sounds like a recent graduate from the Glenn Beck university for dummies.
So, no there arent plenty who smoke 2+ packs a day
wheelrite Offline
#67 Posted:
Joined: 11-01-2006
Posts: 50,119
Abrignac wrote:
Another bromance in the making....


dude,,

I luv only you,,,Beer
wheelrite Offline
#68 Posted:
Joined: 11-01-2006
Posts: 50,119
scompay wrote:
you will never guess what percentage of smokers who smoke over just 1 pack a day.
http://www.gallup.com/poll/157466/smokers-light-less-ever.aspx

sounds like a recent graduate from the Glenn Beck university for dummies.
So, no there arent plenty who smoke 2+ packs a day



Bro, does the Basque agree with this opinion ?


better check,,,


wheel,,



just Fnn around don't get your thong all bunched up

Abrignac Offline
#69 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,294
wheelrite wrote:
dude,,

I luv only you,,,Beer


Blushing
scompay Offline
#70 Posted:
Joined: 04-17-2010
Posts: 1,721
wheelrite wrote:
Bro, does the Basque agree with this opinion ?


better check,,,


wheel,,



just Fnn around don't get your thong all bunched up



You on the glaucoma medicine tonight
cacman Offline
#71 Posted:
Joined: 07-03-2010
Posts: 12,216
scompay wrote:
you will never guess what percentage of smokers who smoke over just 1 pack a day.
http://www.gallup.com/poll/157466/smokers-light-less-ever.aspx

sounds like a recent graduate from the Glenn Beck university for dummies.
So, no there arent plenty who smoke 2+ packs a day

Do you honestly believe everything in a Gallup pool? Plus it's year old. Does it account for those that smoke the E-Vape crap in addition to tobacco? You know… the smokers that sit behind a desk and don't have the time, those that wish to smoke in public without the scrutiny, and those that believe PG vaping is healthier than tobacco. Not mentioning another cigar boom as many smokers move again to cigars. And pipes? Guess it's all about your environment and where/what you choose to smoke, and believe? But you go ahead and keep promoting that non-smoking propaganda and stereotyping those that chose to smoke what they like. There always has been and always will be a smoking culture regardless of any healthcare or FDA laws passed by a president that smokes himself.

Who's Glenn Beck? Never listened to him. Graduated from The School of Hard Knocks.
scompay Offline
#72 Posted:
Joined: 04-17-2010
Posts: 1,721
There is a point to all this; you dont want to believe first hand from a smoker that 2 packs is near impossible, you dont want to believe a polling company; you want to believe what you know, which comes from neither smoking 2 pack a day yourself, nor taking a poll yourself. If this is your logic, the rest of your worldview is shaped that way.
Abrignac Offline
#73 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,294
scompay wrote:
No dude, its not a conspiracy. you are mistaken.

you will rarely find someone that smokes 2 packs a day. Even 1 pack is hard; nowadays. And to what end? its not going to be fun, it will be chain smoking. I smoked hard when I was younger, pack was the best i could do. Some hard core brothers could push it to pack and a half. BTW those folks in section 8 aint smoking good cigarettes, those floor sweeping and roll your own buglers will have you coughing blood the next week at 2 packs a day.

RIP Tupac.Pray this man did not mean anything by it.


Two packs a day isn't difficult. For years I smoked 2-3 packs of Marlboro Reds daily. When I smoked cigarettes I would go through a carton every 4-5 days.

Stop by a Circle K in the middle of a Sec 8' area and you will find plenty of Marlboro, Kools and Camels being sold.
sd72 Offline
#74 Posted:
Joined: 03-09-2011
Posts: 9,600
I was two packs a day for 25 years and had to try not to break into a third. I've only ever known ( of those who smoke/ed) either two packers, or social smokers who'd only smoke when they drank.
scompay Offline
#75 Posted:
Joined: 04-17-2010
Posts: 1,721
Abrignac wrote:

Stop by a Circle K in the middle of a Sec 8' area and you will find plenty of Marlboro, Kools and Camels being sold.


Assuming you dont live in one, what do you go there fer, head?
sd72 Offline
#76 Posted:
Joined: 03-09-2011
Posts: 9,600
What's a circle k ?
scompay Offline
#77 Posted:
Joined: 04-17-2010
Posts: 1,721
sd72 wrote:
What's a circle k ?


Hobo mecca, you can buy lotto, alcohol, smokes, and groceries in one place. And get the occasional hookup in the restrooms.
sd72 Offline
#78 Posted:
Joined: 03-09-2011
Posts: 9,600
Oh. We call them party stores, grab two packs, a 40, and the hookups happen behind it. No public restrooms. Back tomorrow for two more packs.
scompay Offline
#79 Posted:
Joined: 04-17-2010
Posts: 1,721
cacman wrote:
Do you honestly believe everything in a Gallup pool?


The delusional Tea Party morons and Fox News sure did. Whats the matter, dont want to accept your own bible?
tailgater Offline
#80 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
sd72 wrote:
What's a circle k ?


I was afraid to ask.

Thought it might be a circle _ _ _ K

tailgater Offline
#81 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
sd72 wrote:
I was two packs a day for 25 years and had to try not to break into a third. I've only ever known ( of those who smoke/ed) either two packers, or social smokers who'd only smoke when they drank.


But scompay said it was impossible to smoke 2 packs.
sd72 Offline
#82 Posted:
Joined: 03-09-2011
Posts: 9,600
I'm dying proof.
scompay Offline
#83 Posted:
Joined: 04-17-2010
Posts: 1,721
sd72 wrote:
Oh. We call them party stores, grab two packs, a 40, and the hookups happen behind it. No public restrooms. Back tomorrow for two more packs.


No its not a party store, those are an upgrade. These are called convenience stores, convenient for the poor to pay twice as much as they would at a proper grocery store, cause they dont believe in planning or stocking up before they get the munchies. And dont forget the lottery, its hope.
scompay Offline
#84 Posted:
Joined: 04-17-2010
Posts: 1,721
tailgater wrote:
But scompay said it was impossible to smoke 2 packs.


No i did not.
sd72 Offline
#85 Posted:
Joined: 03-09-2011
Posts: 9,600
No. Their called party stores here. I'm not asking.

Anywhere else in the country they look at me like I'm stupid (go ahead) when I ask where the party store is.
scompay Offline
#86 Posted:
Joined: 04-17-2010
Posts: 1,721
sd72 wrote:
No. Their called party stores here. I'm not asking.

Anywhere else in the country they look at me like I'm stupid (go ahead) when I ask where the party store is.


you call carbonated beverage pop?
sd72 Offline
#87 Posted:
Joined: 03-09-2011
Posts: 9,600
Yup
scompay Offline
#88 Posted:
Joined: 04-17-2010
Posts: 1,721
Party stores are cool in Michigan, muslims peddling alcohol, something very decadent about that.
Convenience stores are hell in comparison, clean, but full of people who have a gift for making the wrong choices in life. Like 2 packs a day and six pack of rubbers.
sd72 Offline
#89 Posted:
Joined: 03-09-2011
Posts: 9,600
I like to go in at call to prayer. Make em miss it, then not buy anything.
teedubbya Offline
#90 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
sd72 wrote:
Oh. We call them party stores, grab two packs, a 40, and the hookups happen behind it. No public restrooms. Back tomorrow for two more packs.


ares are called kum and go.


think I'm kidding?
teedubbya Offline
#91 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
kum to think of it they often have decent pizza too
teedubbya Offline
#92 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
sd72 wrote:
I like to go in at call to prayer. Make em miss it, then not buy anything.



just steal from the west side of the store?
scompay Offline
#93 Posted:
Joined: 04-17-2010
Posts: 1,721
There is nothing is smarter than buying 2 packs of cigarettes from a toothless clerk who talks from his windpipe because he smoked 2 packs a day. Its like supporting your future self. LOL
scompay Offline
#94 Posted:
Joined: 04-17-2010
Posts: 1,721
teedubbya wrote:
ares are called kum and go.




You know I have always wanted to ask some from there, was 'come' too common of a name? why did they choose Kum instead. Did they also have peep shows at some point?
teedubbya Offline
#95 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
scompay wrote:
You know I have always wanted to ask some from there, was 'come' too common of a name? why did they choose Kum instead. Did they also have peep shows at some point?



I don't know. The head quarters is a few miles from where I grew up and it used to be a local chain.

They do make money selling hats, tshirts etc.... I think it's not lost on them.

their HQ is also only a few miles from Cumming, Iowa. I still have an I (heart) Cumming tshirt from an event I attended there.
scompay Offline
#96 Posted:
Joined: 04-17-2010
Posts: 1,721
teedubbya wrote:
I still have an I (heart) Cumming tshirt from an event I attended there.


You wanna be careful wearing that in Georgia, they passed a law yesterday, allowing folks to carry handguns in rest areas, you could be asked for a handjob at gunpoint.
Abrignac Offline
#97 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,294
1) Someone who thinks they know way more than they really do makes a false statement.

scompay wrote:
No dude, its not a conspiracy. you are mistaken.

you will rarely find someone that smokes 2 packs a day. Even 1 pack is hard; nowadays. And to what end? its not going to be fun, it will be chain smoking. I smoked hard when I was younger, pack was the best i could do. Some hard core brothers could push it to pack and a half. BTW those folks in section 8 aint smoking good cigarettes, those floor sweeping and roll your own buglers will have you coughing blood the next week at 2 packs a day.

RIP Tupac.Pray this man did not mean anything by it.




2) Someone who can rebut the that false statement does so.


Abrignac wrote:
Two packs a day isn't difficult. For years I smoked 2-3 packs of Marlboro Reds daily. When I smoked cigarettes I would go through a carton every 4-5 days.

Stop by a Circle K in the middle of a Sec 8' area and you will find plenty of Marlboro, Kools and Camels being sold.



3) The fist someone who has been shown that he made a false statement makes derogatory statements about the someone who corrected the false statement.

scompay wrote:
Assuming you dont live in one, what do you go there fer, head?


A while back I made a comment regarding burning up a clutch in an auto transmission when someone was on a Cadillac ATS roll. That someone made his usual comeback comment. I then made a comment regarding the fact that particular transmission has 5 or 6 internal clutches. The sound of crickets followed.

Is there a pattern?

It seems some people come here for the camaraderie. It seems others come to prove how dumb they are by trying to prove how smart they are.

What would Freud say?

Abrignac Offline
#98 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,294
sd72 wrote:
What's a circle k ?



http://www.circlek.com/
DrMaddVibe Offline
#99 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,466
Abrignac wrote:

What would Freud say?




"That's really fucked up. My secretary will send you a bill" - Signed, S. Freud.
Abrignac Offline
#100 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,294
Someone who called people pedo's sure seems preoccupied with things of a sexual nature.

scompay wrote:
Assuming you dont live in one, what do you go there fer, head?


scompay wrote:
Hobo mecca, you can buy lotto, alcohol, smokes, and groceries in one place. And get the occasional hookup in the restrooms.


scompay wrote:
Party stores are cool in Michigan, muslims peddling alcohol, something very decadent about that.
Convenience stores are hell in comparison, clean, but full of people who have a gift for making the wrong choices in life. Like 2 packs a day and six pack of rubbers.


scompay wrote:
You know I have always wanted to ask some from there, was 'come' too common of a name? why did they choose Kum instead. Did they also have peep shows at some point?


scompay wrote:
You wanna be careful wearing that in Georgia, they passed a law yesterday, allowing folks to carry handguns in rest areas, you could be asked for a handjob at gunpoint.


Users browsing this topic
Guest
3 Pages<123>