America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

What does the Bible say . . . (?)

Don't laugh at the exhibits in the creationist museum in Cincinnati. They will throw your azz out. Ask me how I know.

Ask them how much good could've been accomplished with the money spent on the museum. Bet you will also be asked to leave.

Now I've got to add another item to my bucket list....

Horrified at the exhibits, or horrified at you?

Odds are that we're living in a computer simulation. Much easier to create virtually than for real.

you mean wee..

Wheel when arguing a point rational thought is needed.

First off you lack the basic concept that creationionism and evolution are mutually exclusive. Second by arguing that intelligent design proves creationism is valid does not prove that intelligenct design exists. Finally you ignore all of the scientific evidence supporting evolution and debunking creationism.

The one thing no one ever seems to remember, scientist are PEOPLE too and some just want their 15 minutes of fame. To have ones work end up in some journal weather it's fact or fiction is a driving force.....let's consider Global Warming shall we.

Wow, you have a bit of anger bros. I'm NOT trying to justify my point or anyone else's, simply pointing out the Short Coming and frailties of MAN. So I assume in your world because some scientist says so....it must be the Gospel? Never EVER said science was evil, your letting your emotions cloud your thoughts. Prove I'm incorrect smart guy, show me that no " proven " scientific claim has NEVer been disproven....

Wow, are you myopic. I paraphrased what you said. I find your justification is funny. Since all scientific evidence proves creationism invalid there is nothing I need to prove to you. Instead of trying to justify creationism with invalid points, why not just say you believe in creationism? You could even say based on your religious beliefs you believe in creationism. But when wheel says creationism is the same as evolution and intelligent design proves it I have to laugh because that argument cannot be suported. I have tried not to discredit your arguments. I have decided to quit doing that. If you see that as anger that is your problem not mine.

TG, well played.

Science still has not answered who put the stuff here to start everything from the Universe to animals...

Science is not always right either , it is a fairly young practice that is in only the infant stages of it's evolution..

Just like young people always think they are right about things
So does young science think that way too.


But as both mature they realize that they were simplistic and immature in their early stages and as result were wrong about many things.

So those who argue for science should think about these things and realize that mankind cannot grasp all concepts yet .

There you go again with fact less statements.

I have never said I am smarter than anyone else. That is an assumption on your part.

I have never said I believe science blindly. Again you are making an assumption. When the amount of empirical data is vast, it is easy to discern what is true and what is not.

You find it arrogant to believe scientists, I find it to be common sense when scientists as a who believe the same thing.

The adjectives "creation" and "evolution" get added to the term "science" when the matter of presuppositions and conclusions are dealt with. There is no scientist anywhere in the world who does not hold to some kind of presuppositional truth in his own life. That which he considers true will invariably color his understanding of the science he is involved with. Thus, those who believe evolution to be true will see their work in terms of evolution theory. Those who believe creation to be true will see their work in terms of creation theory. Each will form conclusions based on what they consider true in the first place. The data can be exactly the same, but the conclusions can be radically different because of this. Thus, "creation science" is not a separate science itself, but a way of looking at science through the eyes of those who believe, in whatever form, that the universe and all life was the result of creation by some kind of deity.


Pretty well covers it in my mind...thank you.

like.. Where did BigFoots come from..??

using my past data prolly wouldn't be very logical... they should ask if I'd like something new....

Al Gore invented the universe.

Evolution made it more universey.




I love how everything just appeared without saying something at some point WAS created.

They caught a big foot in the North Georgia Mountains a few years ago

.... the god particle is in no way a reference to any biblical god nor is it an attempt to prove the existence of any sort of sentient creator. It was a fun name.

What you fail to acknowledge is that this is an entire focus of physics research.

No scientist just says "everything just appeared"... they are specifically trying to determine how something can come of nothing.

Saying "everything just appeared" without doing the necessary math behind it is the realm of religion (has christianity ever tried to explain how god was created?).

Victor send me $325.87 and I will explain it and lead you to salvation ....

Maybe the hillbilly snake charmers... not the mega-churches!

And God said, “Let the earth bring forth living creatures of every kind: cattle and creeping things and wild animals of the earth of every kind.” And it was so. God made the wild animals of the earth of every kind, and the cattle of every kind, and everything that creeps upon the ground of every kind. And God saw that it was good.

Then God said, “Let us make humankind in our image, according to our likeness; and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the birds of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the wild animals of the earth, and over every creeping thing that creeps upon the earth.” So God created humankind in his image, in the image of God he created them; male and female he created them. God blessed them, and God said to them, “Be fruitful and multiply, and fill the earth and subdue it; and have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the air and over every living thing that moves upon the earth.” God said, “See, I have given you every plant yielding seed that is upon the face of all the earth, and every tree with seed in its fruit; you shall have them for food. And to every beast of the earth, and to every bird of the air, and to everything that creeps on the earth, everything that has the breath of life, I have given every green plant for food.” And it was so. God saw everything that he had made, and indeed, it was very good. And there was evening and there was morning, the sixth day.

You guys are looking at the "miraculous" from the inside. It gives you a warped perspective and makes you think of it as the only possible way it could occur.

If you step back and realize that the thing out consider the "miracle" really is the end point, and it all the other factors supporting it had been different, you would still have an end point. A different end point, but likely an end point which is sitting around pondering how miraculous it was that everything lined up to create them... You start to realize you're looking at the problem backwards.