America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 9 years ago by gryphonms. 101 replies replies.
3 Pages123>
Mama Bear Palin calls for Hussein Obamas Impeachment
Bitter Klinger Offline
#1 Posted:
Joined: 03-23-2013
Posts: 877

by Sarah Palin8 Jul 2014, 8:05 AM PDT15220post a comment


Enough is enough of the years of abuse from this president. His unsecured border crisis is the last straw that makes the battered wife say, “no mas.”

Without borders, there is no nation. Obama knows this. Opening our borders to a flood of illegal immigrants is deliberate. This is his fundamental transformation of America. It’s the only promise he has kept. Discrediting the price paid for America’s exceptionalism over our history, he’s given false hope and taxpayer’s change to millions of foreign nationals who want to sneak into our country illegally. Because of Obama’s purposeful dereliction of duty an untold number of illegal immigrants will kick off their shoes and come on in, competing against Americans for our jobs and limited public services. There is no end in sight as our president prioritizes parties over doing the job he was hired by voters to do. Securing our borders is obviously fundamental here; it goes without saying that it is his job.

The federal government is trillions of dollars in debt; many cities are on the verge of insolvency; our overrun healthcare system, police forces, social services, schools, and our unsustainably generous welfare-state programs are stretched to the max. We average Americans know that. So why has this issue been allowed to be turned upside down with our “leader” creating such unsafe conditions while at the same time obstructing any economic recovery by creating more dependents than he allows producers? His friendly wealthy bipartisan elite, who want cheap foreign labor and can afford for themselves the best “border security” money can buy in their own exclusive communities, do not care that Obama tapped us out.

Have faith that average American workers – native-born and wonderful legal immigrants of all races, backgrounds, and political parties – do care because we’re the ones getting screwed as we’re forced to follow all our government’s rules while others are not required to do so. Many now feel like strangers in their own land. It’s the American worker who is forced to deal with Obama’s latest crisis with our hard-earned tax dollars while middle class wages decrease, sustainable jobs get more scarce, and communities become unrecognizable and bankrupted due to Obama’s flood of illegal immigration.

Who’s looking out for the American workers? Who has their backs? Who fights for them?

We should.

President Obama’s rewarding of lawlessness, including his own, is the foundational problem here. It’s not going to get better, and in fact irreparable harm can be done in this lame-duck term as he continues to make up his own laws as he goes along, and, mark my words, will next meddle in the U.S. Court System with appointments that will forever change the basic interpretation of our Constitution’s role in protecting our rights.

It’s time to impeach; and on behalf of American workers and legal immigrants of all backgrounds, we should vehemently oppose any politician on the left or right who would hesitate in voting for articles of impeachment.

The many impeachable offenses of Barack Obama can no longer be ignored. If after all this he’s not impeachable, then no one is.
fiddler898 Offline
#2 Posted:
Joined: 06-15-2009
Posts: 3,782
Ha ha. Another attempt to become relevant from someone whose fifteen minutes have long since passed.
jackconrad Offline
#3 Posted:
Joined: 06-09-2003
Posts: 67,461
Not with dem legs !
Buckwheat Offline
#4 Posted:
Joined: 04-15-2004
Posts: 12,251
fiddler898 wrote:
Ha ha. Another attempt to become relevant from someone whose fifteen minutes have long since passed.


+1

She quit Alaska to become a talking head and she seldom has an original thought on current affairs. horse
teedubbya Offline
#5 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
she's goin with the nooclur option
TMCTLT Offline
#6 Posted:
Joined: 11-22-2007
Posts: 19,733
fiddler898 wrote:
Ha ha. Another attempt to become relevant from someone whose fifteen minutes have long since passed.




I would take her in a minute to finish out this Bastards last two years, surely not even you Alan can believe he's NOT doing more harm than good. Does Anyone think continuing to ignore our Southern Border is a GOOD idea??
Abrignac Offline
#7 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,278
Sorry Paul, but Alan does have a point. Though I do agree with some of her views she is usually very late to the party and mostly echos what has already been said by others.

As far as impeachment is concerned, I think Pat Buchanan got it right. If the Repubs really want to energize the Dem base and get out their vote they should impeach Obama. Nothing like cutting off ones nose to spite their face.
TMCTLT Offline
#8 Posted:
Joined: 11-22-2007
Posts: 19,733
Abrignac wrote:
Sorry Paul, but Alan does have a point. Though I do agree with some of her views she is usually very late to the party and mostly echos what has already been said by others.

As far as impeachment is concerned, I think Pat Buchanan got it right. If the Repubs really want to energize the Dem base and get out their vote they should impeach Obama. Nothing like cutting off ones nose to spite their face.



At least what she says I can relate to and agree with regardless of who said it 1st. If that's how we're gonna role then they had better do away with speech writers as they're the First to come up " anything original "
fiddler898 Offline
#9 Posted:
Joined: 06-15-2009
Posts: 3,782
TMCTLT wrote:
I would take her in a minute to finish out this Bastards last two years, surely not even you Alan can believe he's NOT doing more harm than good. Does Anyone think continuing to ignore our Southern Border is a GOOD idea??


Is this damning with faint praise, or praising with faint damnation? Either way Paul, I'll take it!

Herfing
ZRX1200 Offline
#10 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,615
Echo, late to the party......she's got the balls to say what 90% of the spineless Repukes won't say. I'm no huge Palin fan but I'm sick of misdirected hate.

(Not here in this thread, just in general)

He should be impeached. The problem is the partisan wagon circling. We come so far as to not recognize when our side has gone astray of the law and their oaths.
MACS Offline
#11 Posted:
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,791
The border has been a sieve forever. I don't like the guy's admin, but we can't blame him for something that has been an issue for as long as we've had a border.

Plus... dude is on his second term. We're stuck with him and likely screwed with another lib next go round, too. Get used to it, or vote in every election you're eligible to vote in.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#12 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,444
Buckwheat wrote:
+1

She quit Alaska to become a talking head and she seldom has an original thought on current affairs. horse



Shame on you

She quit being governor because of the distraction running for VP, doing all of McCain's legwork and other court room dramas that didn't hold merit. She's said it multiple times and she stepped down instead of keeping her "day job" while seeking another. She felt the distractions of her staying outweighed the good of the people.

Nice try.

Stop carrying the Dem "water"...it doesn't suit you.
victor809 Offline
#13 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
ZRX1200 wrote:


He should be impeached. The problem is the partisan wagon circling. We come so far as to not recognize when our side has gone astray of the law and their oaths.


There isn't anything to impeach him on at this time.
Republican talking heads have suddenly decided that impeachment is somehow equivalent to simply suing someone and have started going all Judge Judy.

Impeachable offenses: treason, bribery, or "high crimes and misdemeanors". Keeping in mind that "treason" doesn't actually mean "any policy he has which I disagree with", you're really only left with "high crimes and misdemeanors" which is essentially defined by congress at any point in time.

Keep in mind there has to be a crime. About the closest thing there is is the NSA spying scandal, but that may be "By the book" since bush put in that damn patriot act. And then you'd have to tie it directly to obama if it does violate the unfortunately broad patriot act.
tailgater Offline
#14 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
Buckwheat wrote:
+1

She quit Alaska to become a talking head and she seldom has an original thought on current affairs. horse


Well, she never claimed to be a community organizer.

Buckwheat Offline
#15 Posted:
Joined: 04-15-2004
Posts: 12,251
DrMaddVibe wrote:
Shame on you

She quit being governor because of the distraction running for VP, doing all of McCain's legwork and other court room dramas that didn't hold merit. She's said it multiple times and she stepped down instead of keeping her "day job" while seeking another. She felt the distractions of her staying outweighed the good of the people.

Nice try.

Stop carrying the Dem "water"...it doesn't suit you.


No water carrying. I just stopped drinking the Kool Aid. She was the distraction in that election. I liked and supported McCain. I left McCain after Palin was brought on.
tailgater Offline
#16 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
Buckwheat wrote:
No water carrying. I just stopped drinking the Kool Aid. She was the distraction in that election. I liked and supported McCain. I left McCain after Palin was brought on.



So you liked Biden over Palin?

ZRX1200 Offline
#17 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,615
"I liked McCain"





Wow.
Buckwheat Offline
#18 Posted:
Joined: 04-15-2004
Posts: 12,251
tailgater wrote:
So you liked Biden over Palin?



WTF? NO. I liked McCain over the other presidential candidates in that election.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#19 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,444
Buckwheat wrote:
WTF? NO. I liked McCain over the other presidential candidates in that election.



Well, if you liked McCain...she was HIS pick. HIS.

There's a reason why he picked her too.

She was the ONLY one running that had real Executive experience...and boy howdy have we seen what pain it is to have a couple of clown shoes learn on the job.

So you liked McCain? SHE was the one filling stadiums. Only Ron Paul was close to her as far as attendance went...but our illustrious media downplayed the significance so they could usher in the Kenyan King.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#20 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,444
ZRX1200 wrote:
"I liked McCain"





Wow.



I'm still trying to make sense outta that too.

I held my nose voting for McCant just so I could vote for her. I was hoping he'd kick off 2 months into taking office.

McCan't is the koolaid.
Buckwheat Offline
#21 Posted:
Joined: 04-15-2004
Posts: 12,251
Clearly, being an affective legislator and good governance have little weight in your selection of who to vote for. Oh well... and now we have Obama because of the fallout from Bush.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#22 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,444
Buckwheat wrote:
Clearly, being an affective legislator and good governance have little weight in your selection of who to vote for. Oh well... and now we have Obama because of the fallout from Bush.



I hardly think it was Bush that ushered in the Kenyan King.

Take a look at the media. They slobbered and got all tingly. They spun it so if you didn't vote for the Kenyan King you were a racist!

For all the failures of the Bush Presidency...he pales in comparison to this current buffoon. Oh, if only he would've at least done SOME of what he said he was going to do...yeah. History will show...hell, the pollsters already have it now...that he's the worst modern day President since Kennedy.

Please, Bush shouldered enough...you cannot blame the failures of the Kenyan King on him too!

Nice try though.
Buckwheat Offline
#23 Posted:
Joined: 04-15-2004
Posts: 12,251
DrMaddVibe wrote:
I hardly think it was Bush that ushered in the Kenyan King.

Take a look at the media. They slobbered and got all tingly. They spun it so if you didn't vote for the Kenyan King you were a racist!

For all the failures of the Bush Presidency...he pales in comparison to this current buffoon. Oh, if only he would've at least done SOME of what he said he was going to do...yeah. History will show...hell, the pollsters already have it now...that he's the worst modern day President since Kennedy.

Please, Bush shouldered enough...you cannot blame the failures of the Kenyan King on him too!

Nice try though.


I never blamed Bush for any of the Obama's current F-Ups. Those are 100% on Obama. I said that the Bush presidency had more to do with Obama getting elected than the media. Did you feel like a raciest because you didn't vote for Obama? I wouldn't think so. So why do you think anyone else would? When do you really give 2 cents what the polls have to say? Kennedy worse than Carter? WOW!

I actually have to get back to work so I'll have to pick this back up after hours. Later for now.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#24 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,444
Buckwheat wrote:
I never blamed Bush for any of the Obama's current F-Ups. Those are 100% on Obama. I said that the Bush presidency had more to do with Obama getting elected than the media. Did you feel like a raciest because you didn't vote for Obama? I wouldn't think so. So why do you think anyone else would? When do you really give 2 cents what the polls have to say? Kennedy worse than Carter? WOW!

I actually have to get back to work so I'll have to pick this back up after hours. Later for now.


Bush wasn't running for office...didn't stump for McCain either. He wasn't the reason for the media's swooning over the Kenyan King.

I didn't say Kennedy was worse than Carter. What I said was the Kenyan King was the worst modern day President SINCE Kennedy. He eclipsed Carter too and that wasn't an easy thing to do. Put some more age on the guy and he'll be smelling like a rotting corpse in the summer sun. Nobody will be able to deny it. Nobody.
tailgater Offline
#25 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
Buckwheat wrote:
WTF? NO. I liked McCain over the other presidential candidates in that election.


So you supported McCain over Obama.
Until Palin was brought on board (your words).

But Obama brought Biden on board.

So if you bailed on McCain because of Palin, then you obviously liked Biden over Palin.

How is this a WTF moment?
gryphonms Offline
#26 Posted:
Joined: 04-14-2013
Posts: 1,983
Sarah Palin is who she is. She is probably one of the most polarizing people of this century. Love her or hate her you certainly notice her. Her comments are exactly that, comments. Oddly enough I find her interesting in a did she really say that kind of way. She is not helping the Republicans with her comments. I wish someone would emerge as a leader of the Republican party. As it stands a fractured Republican party is bad for America. We need a fully functional 2 party system.
ZRX1200 Offline
#27 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,615
Hey azzhat, where have her comments been different than many conservatives? She is NOT POLARIZING.

That is a leftist straw man to ala rules for radicals to ostracize a WOMAN from viability. Would I vote for her? No. Nor would I do to Hilliary what the left has done to her. I have NO PROBLEM arguing Hilldogs dirty past and gov't service. That's a FAR CRY from what has been purpitrated on Palin.
gryphonms Offline
#28 Posted:
Joined: 04-14-2013
Posts: 1,983
Polarizing, to divide into sharply opposing factions such as political groups. Palin is polarizing to the right. Clinton is polarising to the left. If you want to take that as a criticism so be it. It actually is an observation by definition.
jetblasted Offline
#29 Posted:
Joined: 08-30-2004
Posts: 42,595
I saw her once . . . She's HOT !!!

http://www.flickr.com/photos/derekjacksonphotography/3075889900/
Abrignac Offline
#30 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,278
ZRX1200 wrote:
Hey azzhat, where have her comments been different than many conservatives? She is NOT POLARIZING.

But, she does get some poles a rising.

ZRX1200 Offline
#31 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,615
Who does Clinton polarize?

The far left?

Who on the right does Palin polarize?

The establishment?

F'em both
victor809 Offline
#32 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
ZRX1200 wrote:
Who does Clinton polarize?

The far left?

Who on the right does Palin polarize?

The establishment?

F'em both


Z, no offense, but I think you're missing the point of the word "polarize".

It isn't necessarily negative or positive... and it doesn't impact just one side or the other. Palin's polarizing, Obama's polarizing, Clinton's polarizing, the abortion debate is polarizing, environmental debate is polarizing.... etc etc etc.

ZRX1200 Offline
#33 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,615
Hey Victor do you kmow what contex is?

He was talking about IN THE REPUBLICAN PARTY.

She has mostly standard fare conservative republican views. She is HATED. read some more and try again. Maybe try some sleepytime tea before bed.
MACS Offline
#34 Posted:
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,791
Does the sleepy time tea really make one sleepy? Cuz I thought tea had more caffeine than coffee.
jetblasted Offline
#35 Posted:
Joined: 08-30-2004
Posts: 42,595
I think they make it from flowers.
jetblasted Offline
#36 Posted:
Joined: 08-30-2004
Posts: 42,595
And stuff.
Bitter Klinger Offline
#37 Posted:
Joined: 03-23-2013
Posts: 877
gryphonms wrote:
Sarah Palin is who she is. She is probably one of the most polarizing people of this century. Love her or hate her you certainly notice her. Her comments are exactly that, comments. Oddly enough I find her interesting in a did she really say that kind of way. She is not helping the Republicans with her comments. I wish someone would emerge as a leader of the Republican party. As it stands a fractured Republican party is bad for America. We need a fully functional 2 party system.



Ah, she's not trying to "help" the republicans. She stated plainly just the other day that the Republican party has left her, and I would agree. They've left every true conservative standing with zero representation by their refusal to right the wrongs being perpetrated upon we the people.

Look, you can't pretend being Mr. middle-of-the-road, then claim someone who makes perfect sense every time she opens her mouth is somehow just a polarizing figure with nothing to say. Try paying attention to the words, researching the statements for factual content, then assess for accuracy. Right now, you're regurgitating liberal spin. Be your own man!

The woman is more patriotic than any other public female in America since Betsy effin Ross. She ran her state with much success - How's McCain's Arizona fairing lately? (maybe fine, I really don't know)

Regardless, John McCain is a shining example of whats wrong with our government right now. His actions encourage the selling out to special interests over doing whats right for the party and nation. On both sides.

I'll always respect the man for his military service, but he needs to stop "serving". He's become a disservice to his party because the man is a RINO just like most of his party. The Republicans will lose again, and it will because of those RINO's.

Our 2 party system will eventually right itself once a new party replaces the RINO's. And this is what terrifies the left, and why they attempt to discredit anything that resembles a Tea Party. Call it names. Create stupid skits on SNL to try to discredit true patriotism. Use the media to spin their lies. Its all they have because the they lose the debate of reason every time.

Liberals thrive in pools of laziness and stupidity, and they are having no trouble finding plenty of it lately. And when they feel like maybe some people are waking up, they bus in more of it in the name of humanitarianism. Brilliant.
ZRX1200 Offline
#38 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,615
We have two parties?
victor809 Offline
#39 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
ZRX1200 wrote:
Hey Victor do you kmow what contex is?

He was talking about IN THE REPUBLICAN PARTY.

She has mostly standard fare conservative republican views. She is HATED. read some more and try again. Maybe try some sleepytime tea before bed.


Z... he said "most polarizing person in this century". There is no context about it just being within the republican party. And honestly, within the republican party she isn't that polarizing. Some love her and some seem to be "meh"....
ZRX1200 Offline
#40 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,615
28. Author: gryphonms Date: Wed, 7/9/2014, 1:33PM Reply

Polarizing, to divide into sharply opposing factions such as political groups. Palin is polarizing to the right. Clinton is polarising to the left. If you want to take that as a criticism so be it. It actually is an observation by definition.
ZRX1200 Offline
#41 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,615
In retrospect Victor I recommend Sleepytimes Throat tamer tea. The added licorice really negates the need for sweetner, just a dab of honey does the trick.

Perhaps a 5mg melatonin.
victor809 Offline
#42 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
ZRX1200 wrote:
28. Author: gryphonms Date: Wed, 7/9/2014, 1:33PM Reply

Polarizing, to divide into sharply opposing factions such as political groups. Palin is polarizing to the right. Clinton is polarising to the left. If you want to take that as a criticism so be it. It actually is an observation by definition.


Yes. As in anything that comes out of palin's mouth (as a rightwing figure) strongly polarizes people into right/left stances. Same with clinton (as a leftwing figure).

People are still going to the same poles... no one is changing in either of those cases.

Palin makes a statement - Right yells how correct she is. Left yells how stupid she is.
Clinton makes a statement - Left yells how correct she is. Right yells how ugly she is.
ZRX1200 Offline
#43 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,615
Bullshcit. You really read his direct simple "TO THE RIGHT "for "TO THE LEFT" that way?

He made no enferrence or mention of a left right paradigm. And my statement was directly responding to his answer.

And bullschit #2 Clinton only divides the left who's unhappy she's not more leftist. The pundits on the right that hate Palin are desperate to hold their perceived power grip. McShame only took her aboard for turnout because he's a hack and he knows he could only turn out a small % without an evil D to run against. Not the same at all.
Bitter Klinger Offline
#44 Posted:
Joined: 03-23-2013
Posts: 877
victor809 wrote:
Yes. As in anything that comes out of palin's mouth (as a rightwing figure) strongly polarizes people into right/left stances. Same with clinton (as a leftwing figure).

People are still going to the same poles... no one is changing in either of those cases.

Palin makes a statement - Right yells how correct she is. Left yells how stupid they want everyone to believe she is.
Clinton makes a statement - Left yells how correct she is. Right yells what a murderous traitor she is.



FIFY

Note that nobody died on Sarah's watch. In fact, unlike Clinton, you really can't find a single scandal tarnishing her ability to perform her duties to a high standard.

Hitlary's entire existance is riddled with nothing but, starting with her inability to pass the bar after several tries, only passing when Bill cheated for her, through being thrown off the watergate law team, laughing about a man that raped a 12 year old child, and eventually being disbarred. THAT was her illustrius law career, and that was her best feature. Her disgrace of public service only gets worse. That hag is a train wreck of a human being, unworthy of public mention let along office.

If you can't set aside your love for socialism for a rare moment of objectivity, you'll be doomed to remain ignorant.
ZRX1200 Offline
#45 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,615
Victor doesn't love socialism he loves deploring us.

victor809 Offline
#46 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
ZRX1200 wrote:
Bullshcit. You really read his direct simple "TO THE RIGHT "for "TO THE LEFT" that way?

He made no enferrence or mention of a left right paradigm. And my statement was directly responding to his answer.

And bullschit #2 Clinton only divides the left who's unhappy she's not more leftist. The pundits on the right that hate Palin are desperate to hold their perceived power grip. McShame only took her aboard for turnout because he's a hack and he knows he could only turn out a small % without an evil D to run against. Not the same at all.


Z... at this point we're really just arguing over the interpretation of what gryphon said. I'm gonna just throw in and say "lets ask him what he meant in the morning"...

victor809 Offline
#47 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Bitter Klinger wrote:
FIFY

Note that nobody died on Sarah's watch. In fact, unlike Clinton, you really can't find a single scandal tarnishing her ability to perform her duties to a high standard.

Hitlary's entire existance is riddled with nothing but, starting with her inability to pass the bar after several tries, only passing when Bill cheated for her, through being thrown off the watergate law team, laughing about a man that raped a 12 year old child, and eventually being disbarred. THAT was her illustrius law career, and that was her best feature. Her disgrace of public service only gets worse. That hag is a train wreck of a human being, unworthy of public mention let along office.

If you can't set aside your love for socialism for a rare moment of objectivity, you'll be doomed to remain ignorant.


You bring stupidity to every discussion.
Bitter Klinger Offline
#48 Posted:
Joined: 03-23-2013
Posts: 877
I'm pretty sure he's a devout socialist, Z.

But its fun pushing him down the stairs. You should do it with more zeal, its more fun that way.
Bitter Klinger Offline
#49 Posted:
Joined: 03-23-2013
Posts: 877
victor809 wrote:
I'm the biggest Idiot on CBid


Go fist yourself.
victor809 Offline
#50 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Bitter Klinger wrote:
I'm an uneducated middle age white man who is bitter about a stagnant career and looming suspicion that I have made a mistake with every decision I made, including my sexuality.



Seriously... that's how I translate pretty much every post you make.
Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
3 Pages123>