America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 9 years ago by TMCTLT. 117 replies replies.
3 Pages<123
Illegal immigrants protest outside White House, with little fear of repercussions
DrafterX Offline
#101 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,560
I dunno.... I'm not even sure what a scurvy is... Mellow
teedubbya Offline
#102 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
i think its another name for a pirate
DrafterX Offline
#103 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,560
a politically correct one..?? Huh
RICKAMAVEN Offline
#104 Posted:
Joined: 10-01-2000
Posts: 33,248
gryphonms

at my age, if I wake up. it's
mikey1597 Offline
#105 Posted:
Joined: 05-18-2007
Posts: 14,162
All the ILLEGALS need to go to Colorado to get their drivers license, and obammama phones, and health care, and free food, and a place to raise all their kids, and send them to school so they can grow up and bring the rest of their family, illegally, to the US cuz we will take care of you.

You people that are citizens better plan on working some overtime and cut back on your own expenses so we can pay for all the hand-outs that the ILLEGALS will be needing.


HELL, LETS SEND ALL THE ILLEGALS TO MUTHFRIGGIN DISNEY WORLD SO THEY CAN HAVE A VACATION TOO AND THEN TO WASHINGTON TO HAVE A PICKNIC ON THE FRONT LAWN OF BARRYS PALACE SO THEY CAN BUMP GUMS AND BE BFF's.


sorry, got carried away
TMCTLT Offline
#106 Posted:
Joined: 11-22-2007
Posts: 19,733
teedubbya wrote:
Being a law and order person I am sure all the other law and order folk beleive the rancher squatting on the federal land letting his cattle graze ilegally should leave, pay his back taxes and\or shut down operations. it is the law. he is the law breaker and so are those who propose re writing our Laws or obstructing our governments ability to enfoce them.

That would include the folks who stop busses of immigrants from central and south american countries \that are going through the process as laid out in the 2008 law. Sure the folks don't like that law but you can't be selective. I hear folks are looking at rewriting that law as we speak. law breakers!


we all chose out of convienience. even me. its not unusual.



I disagree, the man WAS already paying State taxes on the land he was leasing. This was just a case of the Feds " piling on " as they like to do with their tax codes. And the fact that these knot heads we've elected can't seem to see any sense of urgency in re writing the current law regarding non contiguous countries is a F'n joke to begin with is the lling as hell on both sides of the isle....imho
teedubbya Offline
#107 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
It is federal law as is the immigration law. And he is breaking it. That has been clearly established.
TMCTLT Offline
#108 Posted:
Joined: 11-22-2007
Posts: 19,733
teedubbya wrote:
It is federal law as is the immigration law. And he is breaking it. That has been clearly established.



Just another reason the Federal Government needs to be DOWNSIZED.....he pays his State For leasing the land and THAT should be enough! They need to stop squeezing the American people to subsidize foreign **** who give two **** about us...then maybe ALL of us could keep more of what we rightfully earn.
teedubbya Offline
#109 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Should (according to you). Now you seem to be saying you can be selective which laws you follow. He is breaking federal law. Period. Either you are law and order or not.

We all are selective so let's not be too outraged when others "should" differs from yours since you are willing to pick and choose which federal laws should be enforced.

By the way you should experiment. Refuse to pay federal taxes because you paid state taxes and that should be good enough. See how it works out.

Then retread this thread. It should be clear you are inconsistent based on what is convenient to your view. So am I. We all are. At least be honest.
TMCTLT Offline
#110 Posted:
Joined: 11-22-2007
Posts: 19,733
teedubbya wrote:
Should (according to you). Now you seem to be saying you can be selective which laws you follow. He is breaking federal law. Period. Either you are law and order or not.

We all are selective so let's not be too outraged when others "should" differs from yours since you are willing to pick and choose which federal laws should be enforced.

By the way you should experiment. Refuse to pay federal taxes because you paid state taxes and that should be good enough. See how it works out.

Then retread this thread. It should be clear you are inconsistent based on what is convenient to your view. So am I. We all are. At least be honest.




I'm sorry did you say something.....okay okay you get the " I'm the Best Boy Award " assuming that's what your after. I find your defending almost anything our Gov. Does anymore laughable.....they routinely break the LAW and snicker when challenged on it....and YES you are correct our corrupt Federal agencies take Great Pride in " running rough shod" over the masses and I'm sure they're pleased to have a good player in YOU. There I was honest....fog
gryphonms Offline
#111 Posted:
Joined: 04-14-2013
Posts: 1,983
Any bad law needs to be amended. Any existing law needs to be followed. Government on any level should not be able to pick and choose which laws or parts of laws they enforce.
mikey1597 Offline
#112 Posted:
Joined: 05-18-2007
Posts: 14,162
Especially the executive branch which is there to:

A crucial function of the executive branch is to ensure that laws are carried out and enforced to facilitate such day-to-day responsibilities of the federal government as collecting taxes, safeguarding the homeland and representing the United States' political and economic interests around the world.

It is not a function to pick and choose which laws it enforces or to enact new laws.


Hey king Obama, do your **** job!
teedubbya Offline
#113 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
I agree gryph.

Tmctlt wants to pick and choose. My only point is we'd all like to pick and choose. He apparently sees no inconsistency in his view.

teedubbya Offline
#114 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Who in here once the federal government to crack down on Colorado who is breaking federal law when it comes to marijuana?

Who in here wants anybody who's buying and smoking Cuban cigars weather here around foreign soil to be charged to the full extent of the law.

Anyone in here ever speed you think that's okay?

That's just a couple examples but we all pick and choose.
teedubbya Offline
#115 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
I just like to point out that voice recognition sucks.
TMCTLT Offline
#116 Posted:
Joined: 11-22-2007
Posts: 19,733
teedubbya wrote:
I agree gryph.

Tmctlt wants to pick and choose. My only point is we'd all like to pick and choose. He apparently sees no inconsistency in his view.





Oh YOU mean pick and choose like our Elected Officials " Pick and Choose " ??? You bet your ASS....if those are the rules in which to play by!!! We are being governed by a bunch of corrupt individuals who sit and cast judgement on others who are guilty of NO more than themselves. But I'm sure they find it refreshing to have such a strict follower in you sir. And to your other point on Colorado and other states breaking" Federal Laws " ....it never should have had it's nose in there in the first place. Just like they shouldn't be telling the southern states being inundated by ILLEGAL ALIENS how to deal with it and threatening them with Lawsuits.The ONLY way to fix MANY of the ILLS we suffer as a Country is to give more decision power BACK to the STATES IMHO.



teedubbya wrote:
Should (according to you). Now you seem to be saying you can be selective which laws you follow. He is breaking federal law. Period. Either you are law and order or not.

We all are selective so let's not be too outraged when others "should" differs from yours since you are willing to pick and choose which federal laws should be enforced.

By the way you should experiment. Refuse to pay federal taxes because you paid state taxes and that should be good enough. See how it works out.

Then retread this thread. It should be clear you are inconsistent based on what is convenient to your view. So am I. We all are. At least be honest.





To your post here....WE the People already know how THAT works out for us.....that IS my point. Different sets of Rules, you can be a longtime tax cheat and work for the Feds and Get Away With It!!!!! You and I cheat....well...see ya in prison. But yeah let's follow the rule of Law Brick wall
TMCTLT Offline
#117 Posted:
Joined: 11-22-2007
Posts: 19,733
More on HOW we've gotten to where we are SO F'n FAST......regarding the Overflow of Hispanics to the US.


http://www.sessions.senate.gov/public/_cache/files/d5cc9b42-16b4-4279-9f0a-bf7372d7c277/nonenforcement-timeline-updated.pdf

If this doesn't make everything Crystal Clear.....well I dunno what to say!!!

And for those wondering where or if they're dumping in YOUR Neck of the Woods.....

https://www.numbersusa.com

Your welcome citizens.....fog

Oh and as a bonus post here is the estimated costs of sending these Illegal Immigrants children to school as Federal Law mandates on the States:

http://www.newsmax.com/US/Undocumented-children-Central-American-children-education-costs-to-states/2014/09/03/id/592327/?ns_mail_uid=81019587&ns_mail_job=1584395_09032014&s=al&dkt_nbr=iay2w7ln
Users browsing this topic
Guest
3 Pages<123