America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 9 years ago by teedubbya. 108 replies replies.
3 Pages<123>
Is it time to repeal the McCain Amendment???
Abrignac Offline
#51 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,327
Unfortunately those nations on the periphery will prolly do nothing for the foreseeable future. The Arabic nations especially Saudi Arabia have far too much to lose if they miscalculate sentiment. Iran on the other had is prolly supplying them.
victor809 Offline
#52 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
TMCTLT wrote:
Because he and others Think we overstepped our boundaries when we water boarded etc. some terrorists being held in Guantanamo to get answers they would NOT otherwise be forthcoming with. Vicki and OBama supporters alike are all in when it comes to " playing Nice and Fair " with Terrorists!!!



Sigh...
You really aren't usually able to understand complex concepts are you.

First, the most important question. How do you know everyone held at Guantanamo is a terrorist or has been associated with terrorists at any time in their life?
(psst... the answer is you don't. Because of the way this administration and previous administrations have run guantanamo there is no course of action for an individual to defend themselves from their incarceration. You could be picked up and shipped to guantanamo and there would never be a trial for you to be able to prove you don't buy pizza hut pizza).

Once we get past the idea of whether the indiividuals are actually terrorists or whatnot... I'd like you to point to a single instance where I have said we need to "play nice and fair". That's a straw man you've been bandying about. You pretend I made that argument, then you argue against it. Now, I understand that it may be hard for you to grasp the nuances of my posts, but I have little care what we do with proven enemy combatants, homeless people, people who can't read, or people without a basic grasp of logic. If you want to behead them all, go for it. Turn them into soylent green. My argument is simply that you can't have your cake and eat it too. You can't go strutting around pretending you're from the greatest nation on the planet if the nation can be dragged down by the lowest groups on the planet. It's so simple I think even you can understand this.

teedubbya Offline
#53 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
victor809 wrote:
Sigh...
You really aren't usually able to understand complex concepts are you.

First, the most important question. How do you know everyone held at Guantanamo is a terrorist or has been associated with terrorists at any time in their life?
(psst... the answer is you don't. Because of the way this administration and previous administrations have run guantanamo there is no course of action for an individual to defend themselves from their incarceration. You could be picked up and shipped to guantanamo and there would never be a trial for you to be able to prove you don't buy pizza hut pizza).

Once we get past the idea of whether the indiividuals are actually terrorists or whatnot... I'd like you to point to a single instance where I have said we need to "play nice and fair". That's a straw man you've been bandying about. You pretend I made that argument, then you argue against it. Now, I understand that it may be hard for you to grasp the nuances of my posts, but I have little care what we do with proven enemy combatants, homeless people, people who can't read, or people without a basic grasp of logic. If you want to behead them all, go for it. Turn them into soylent green. My argument is simply that you can't have your cake and eat it too. You can't go strutting around pretending you're from the greatest nation on the planet if the nation can be dragged down by the lowest groups on the planet. It's so simple I think even you can understand this.




personally I think vic should have to go hang out with the terrorists since he wants to play nicey nice with them and TMCTLT should have to behead a few and butcher their limbs etc. since that is what he is proposing. After each get done with their assignments I hope they post their experiences and how it changed them.
DrafterX Offline
#54 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,560
pics or it didn't happen... Not talking
victor809 Offline
#55 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
teedubbya wrote:
personally I think vic should have to go hang out with the terrorists since he wants to play nicey nice with them and TMCTLT should have to behead a few and butcher their limbs etc. since that is what he is proposing. After each get done with their assignments I hope they post their experiences and how it changed them.


I'm pretty sure if we handed TCBY a big ole beheading sword and a tied up terrorist he'd just make some excuse about not having the time to put in the sort of effort in beheading that those damn terrorists have and he's gotta go somewhere and do something.
teedubbya Offline
#56 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
victor809 wrote:
I'm pretty sure if we handed TCBY a big ole beheading sword and a tied up terrorist he'd just make some excuse about not having the time to put in the sort of effort in beheading that those damn terrorists have and he's gotta go somewhere and do something.



true..true.....



kidding aside if we implemented that policy (behead and dismember them) can you imagine how effed up the person would have to be (or would be following) that had to carry it out? Personnaly I think the ISIS folks that do that have to be sick in the head if not full out psychotic. Whomever did it on this end would have to approach that as well. sort of a microcosm of the broader policy.... and stuff
DrafterX Offline
#57 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,560
we could build a remote control guillotine with a dozen triggers so no one is sure if they be-headed the dude or not... Mellow
teedubbya Offline
#58 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
What if that tech fell in to the hands of the enema?
DrafterX Offline
#59 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,560
we'll just turn some ebola loose on their ass.... Mellow
CelticBomber Offline
#60 Posted:
Joined: 05-03-2012
Posts: 6,786
teedubbya wrote:
true..true.....



kidding aside if we implemented that policy (behead and dismember them) can you imagine how effed up the person would have to be (or would be following) that had to carry it out? Personnaly I think the ISIS folks that do that have to be sick in the head if not full out psychotic. Whomever did it on this end would have to approach that as well. sort of a microcosm of the broader policy.... and stuff



That statement right there, I think, highlights the fundamental difference in our(The West) outlook on life and what it means to be a decent human being to them(The terrorists, and Middle Easterners in general). They grew up in a culture and religion that teaches them life is cheap. Your sister gets raped? Kill her or your family has no honor. A woman in your family goes unaccompanied into public without a male relative? Whip her. Their Prophet Muhammad, Gods supposed messenger had sex with a 9 year old girl and they see not one thing wrong with that.... They teach that part of his history! They don't even try to act like it didn't happen! The religion of peace? Yeah, right. One thing most people don't know about the Koran is that if there is any conflicting messages found, the part that was written later trumps any earlier message. So the Koran starts with messages of peace but is contradicted later on by messages of kill all non believers. So the Imams go on CNN and preach about the religion of peace and fail to mention that all those peaceful messages are over ruled by later parts of the Koran. A thief gets caught and they cut off his hand and then they all slap each other on the back for a job well done. Growing up in a brutal culture and religion like that... they just don't see the horror and inhumanity in the things they do like we do. It's why we will never be able to affect change over there. Those guys who behead our people... I'd give 1000 to 1 odds that they sleep like babies and will even brag to their friends and family about it for their entire lives, short lives I hope. You cannot reason with a culture who has a different definition of what reasonable thought and behavior is.
TMCTLT Offline
#61 Posted:
Joined: 11-22-2007
Posts: 19,733
victor809 wrote:
I'm pretty sure if we handed TCBY a big ole beheading sword and a tied up terrorist he'd just make some excuse about not having the time to put in the sort of effort in beheading that those damn terrorists have and he's gotta go somewhere and do something.



It's interesting to me that TW addressed both of us in his post....yet YOU choose not to comment on your miserable Ass going over there to " play nice with terrorists " I would lop those who do this to Americans heads off in a F'n heartbeat AND probably....probably still sleep well @ night.....as I know I did what I HAD TO DO. See Victoria...I started out and would end my life a Better Person as I would not routinely do something like THAT to a fellow " human being " but they are NOT that.....They ARE ANIMALS in the 1st degree and I would simply be performing a civic duty for my fellow peace and Freedom loving Human friends.....I know it's a tough concept for you To grasp....see in my mind they DO what they do because they thrill to the shock and awe shown by most when something this barbaric is done to human beings, I see performing the same task as Evening the score.....leveling the playing field however you want to put it. PayBack if you will

I would have but One request though if I were handed a beheading sword as You put it.....it would have to be by YOU sweetheart.....
HockeyDad Offline
#62 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,163
With all the talk about how bad ISIS is, there sure are a lot of reports out there that they were trained and armed by the USA. Those weapons we bought in Libya needed a home and what better place than to people fighting Assad in Syria.

Keep in mind that ISIS is actually fighting against the Iranian alliance in the Middle East. This is also helpful to Israel and Saudi Arabia. They got too bold in Iraq for our liking but still are useful to our goals of destabilizing the region.

I wouldn't be expecting any major attack on ISIS from the USA.
HockeyDad Offline
#63 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,163
You people need to keep your eyes on the prize in the grand narrative. War with Iran.
Abrignac Offline
#64 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,327
There is something to be said for the old saying, "A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush."

Though hated Huessian, Mubarack and to a lessor extent Qaddafi and Assad had a way of controlling their countrymen. Challenges to their regime were dealt with swiftly and severely. In the void left by by the deaths of 3 and the marginalization of the other the middle east has been conscripted by Muslims wishing to establish an Islamic State ruled by Sharia Law led by the Taliban in Afghanistan and Khomeini in Iran.

As is often the case, one should be cautious in what one wishes for.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#65 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,507
Cleaning the Haus of Saud should've been the first target on the "War on Terror".

Instead we enlisted their help and are taking out their trash.
Abrignac Offline
#66 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,327
DrMaddVibe wrote:
Cleaning the Haus of Saud should've been the first target on the "War on Terror".

Instead we enlisted their help and are taking out their trash.



Perhaps a better strategy would be to let those in that region run their own affairs. It seems modern history has been unkind to those would seek regime changes in lands far from their borders.

We meddled in the affairs of Vietnam. Countless casualties and the loss of 55,000+ American lives achieved what?.

The Russians attempted to control Afghanistan and were pushed out. To a large degree we have had no bettor success.

Saddam was removed from power because of ****** Chaney's 1% doctrine. The administration convinced the American people he had WMD's and planned to use them on us. We now know that was not the case. Look at Iraq now. Are we safer or more at danger with Saddam's demise?

Suppose we "cleaned the House of Saud," what guarantee do we have that the new regime would be a bettor ally?
DrMaddVibe Offline
#67 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,507
You clean out the Haus of Saud...you cut off the head of the snake.

See them for what they are. They are destabilizers. They're content to let anyone do the dirty work.

Have no fear...they pay handsomely.
Abrignac Offline
#68 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,327
DrMaddVibe wrote:
You clean out the Haus of Saud...you cut off the head of the snake.



We'll have to agree to disagree. If one were to cut off the head of king snake so to speak, then there will be no one to control all the small snakes. The current situation is far from perfect, but the alternative is murky at best and more likely than not intensely chaotic. Considering the outcome of the recent regime changes I find it real hard to believe it would be a net plus.
HockeyDad Offline
#69 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,163
Abrignac wrote:
In the void left by by the deaths of 3 and the marginalization of the other the middle east has been conscripted by Muslims wishing to establish an Islamic State ruled by Sharia Law led by the Taliban in Afghanistan and Khomeini in Iran.



Although there may be a desire for an Islamic state or Caliphate, you have to keep your scorecard updated. Some Sunnis want that. Some Shia want that. They sure as hell don't want the each other to have that.

The civil war in Syria is Shia (the minority Alawite ****es are in control through Assad) versus Sunni.
The civil war in Iraq is Shia (now in control of the government via free elections) verus Sunni (Saddam's group)
Taliban and Afghanistan = Sunni
Pakistan = Sunni
Saudi Arabis = Sunni
ISIS = Sunni
Palestinians = Sunni
Iran = Shia


victor809 Offline
#70 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
TMCTLT wrote:
It's interesting to me that TW addressed both of us in his post....yet YOU choose not to comment on your miserable Ass going over there to " play nice with terrorists " I would lop those who do this to Americans heads off in a F'n heartbeat AND probably....probably still sleep well @ night.....as I know I did what I HAD TO DO. See Victoria...I started out and would end my life a Better Person as I would not routinely do something like THAT to a fellow " human being " but they are NOT that.....They ARE ANIMALS in the 1st degree and I would simply be performing a civic duty for my fellow peace and Freedom loving Human friends.....I know it's a tough concept for you To grasp....see in my mind they DO what they do because they thrill to the shock and awe shown by most when something this barbaric is done to human beings, I see performing the same task as Evening the score.....leveling the playing field however you want to put it. PayBack if you will

I would have but One request though if I were handed a beheading sword as You put it.....it would have to be by YOU sweetheart.....


See... this is the sort of stuff I find funny.

Ok. First, let me say it again... your whole "play nice with terrorists" thing is a strawman. In case you don't understand what a strawman is (I know, you skipped class that day too).. YOU created the argument in your own head, because in YOUR head that's what you think I want. Then you say I want us all to do it, and demand I defend against it. I never said anything about playing nice with anyone. You can drop that entire argument (except then you're left with nothing... which is why you're clinging to it).

On the other hand, you've now gone and stated that you'd practically take joy in beheading an unarmed, tied up terrorist in custody... because you're convinced that it's your "civic duty" and that you have to "even the score" and "level the playing field"... Most interestinly, it's because you "know I did what I HAD TO DO"... are you so afraid of an unarmed, tied up person in your custody that the only option you feel is available to you is to kill them? I'm pretty sure there are other options available... maybe better, maybe worse... but beheading definitely doesn't fit under "HAD TO DO"....and for some strange reason you want me nearby while you're on your "beheading unarmed people" spree.

What I find most ironic about the entire thing... your justification... "They ARE ANIMALS in the 1st degree" that's the same justification they use to justify their beheading of infidels. What was I just saying earlier about sinking to their level???
DrMaddVibe Offline
#71 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,507
HockeyDad wrote:
Although there may be a desire for an Islamic state or Caliphate, you have to keep your scorecard updated. Some Sunnis want that. Some Shia want that. They sure as hell don't want the each other to have that.

The civil war in Syria is Shia (the minority Alawite ****es are in control through Assad) versus Sunni.
The civil war in Iraq is Shia (now in control of the government via free elections) verus Sunni (Saddam's group)
Taliban and Afghanistan = Sunni
Pakistan = Sunni
Saudi Arabis = Sunni
ISIS = Sunni
Palestinians = Sunni
Iran = Shia





And who funds them all???

Yes.

See what cutting off the head would do to the Sunni movement? It would neuter it.
Abrignac Offline
#72 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,327
HockeyDad wrote:
Although there may be a desire for an Islamic state or Caliphate, you have to keep your scorecard updated. Some Sunnis want that. Some Shia want that. They sure as hell don't want the each other to have that.

The civil war in Syria is Shia (the minority Alawite ****es are in control through Assad) versus Sunni.
The civil war in Iraq is Shia (now in control of the government via free elections) verus Sunni (Saddam's group)
Taliban and Afghanistan = Sunni
Pakistan = Sunni
Saudi Arabis = Sunni
ISIS = Sunni
Palestinians = Sunni
Iran = Shia




I omitted the scorecard because I didn't want to wade into that quagmire. But, you're right as those two major sub-factions have been at war since the dawn or Islam. Since we are aligned with the Saud's it's no surprise that we are seen as an enemy to the Shia's and particularity the ISIS movement.
HockeyDad Offline
#73 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,163
DrMaddVibe wrote:
And who funds them all???

Yes.

See what cutting off the head would do to the Sunni movement? It would neuter it.



Saudi Arabia funds the Sunni uprisings everywhere as part of their Cold War against Iran and their Shia allies. The USA is in bed with Saudi and the Sunni uprisings. With all the constant strife and wars in the Middle East, ever notice that it is actually Iran and Saudi Arabia that never fire a shot?! Masterful gamesmanship. Get others to do your bidding.

Even on this thread we've got Americans clamoring to do Iran's bidding!

Take out Saudi and Iran wins. Now we have a very strong Syria-Iraq-Iran alliance that forms. Israel won't like that. They're not gonna let us take out Saudi.

Israel is OK with the status quo and there is widespread consensus that ISIS poses no threat to Israel. They're sitting this one out while Muslims kill Muslims. Palestinians, Egyptians, and Jordanians don't have any interest in the Islamic State idea.



HockeyDad Offline
#74 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,163
Abrignac wrote:
I omitted the scorecard because I didn't want to wade into that quagmire. But, you're right as those two major sub-factions have been at war since the dawn or Islam. Since we are aligned with the Saud's it's no surprise that we are seen as an enemy to the Shia's and particularity the ISIS movement.



ISIS is a Sunni movement. Iran hates them and wants them all dead. We're actually aligned with ISIS. We're only an enemy of ISIS if we get involved.
Buckwheat Offline
#75 Posted:
Joined: 04-15-2004
Posts: 12,251
If you want to kill them, kill them. Torture accomplishes next to nothing.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#76 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,507
Pretty ironic that the Shias would rather use the democratic process than military coups!
DrMaddVibe Offline
#77 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,507
Buckwheat wrote:
If you want to kill them, kill them. Torture accomplishes next to nothing.


John McCain at the Hanoi Hilton would disagree!!!
Abrignac Offline
#78 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,327
HockeyDad wrote:
ISIS is a Sunni movement. Iran hates them and wants them all dead. We're actually aligned with ISIS. We're only an enemy of ISIS if we get involved.



I stand corrected. I was thinking it was a Shia movement.
TMCTLT Offline
#79 Posted:
Joined: 11-22-2007
Posts: 19,733
victor809 wrote:
See... this is the sort of stuff I find funny.

Ok. First, let me say it again... your whole "play nice with terrorists" thing is a strawman. In case you don't understand what a strawman is (I know, you skipped class that day too).. YOU created the argument in your own head, because in YOUR head that's what you think I want. Then you say I want us all to do it, and demand I defend against it. I never said anything about playing nice with anyone. You can drop that entire argument (except then you're left with nothing... which is why you're clinging to it).

On the other hand, you've now gone and stated that you'd practically take joy in beheading an unarmed, tied up terrorist in custody... because you're convinced that it's your "civic duty" and that you have to "even the score" and "level the playing field"... Most interestinly, it's because you "know I did what I HAD TO DO"... are you so afraid of an unarmed, tied up person in your custody that the only option you feel is available to you is to kill them? I'm pretty sure there are other options available... maybe better, maybe worse... but beheading definitely doesn't fit under "HAD TO DO"....and for some strange reason you want me nearby while you're on your "beheading unarmed people" spree.

What I find most ironic about the entire thing... your justification... "They ARE ANIMALS in the 1st degree" that's the same justification they use to justify their beheading of infidels. What was I just saying earlier about sinking to their level???



Okay wordsmith, show me anywhere where I said I'd " Take Joy " in doing something like that to another human being. The difference between you and I sweetie is I would do it to show them that two can....and WILL play that game. I'm not gonna justify your dribble about an unarmed man....as Anyone who can " without provocation " do that to a Non Combative person is just that...an Animal in the first degree and deserves a swift death. But you do have me curious, tell me.....what other / better options would you prescribe when dealing with Animals. A spot of Tea perhaps....
DrafterX Offline
#80 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,560
Beer summit... Beer
danmdevries Offline
#81 Posted:
Joined: 02-11-2014
Posts: 17,437
DrafterX wrote:
Beer summit... Beer



I like beer.
gryphonms Offline
#82 Posted:
Joined: 04-14-2013
Posts: 1,983
It would have to be mead Drafter.
DrafterX Offline
#83 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,560
no way man... Not talking
they'll drink beer or we'll find any easy way to pour it down their throats... Not talking
victor809 Offline
#84 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
TMCTLT wrote:
Okay wordsmith, show me anywhere where I said I'd " Take Joy " in doing something like that to another human being. The difference between you and I sweetie is I would do it to show them that two can....and WILL play that game. I'm not gonna justify your dribble about an unarmed man....as Anyone who can " without provocation " do that to a Non Combative person is just that...an Animal in the first degree and deserves a swift death. But you do have me curious, tell me.....what other / better options would you prescribe when dealing with Animals. A spot of Tea perhaps....



Oh this is precious. First, I said "practically take joy" (note.. this is close to joy, not joy). You said you'd do it in a heartbeat, would lose no sleep, etc etc... the way you throw around words like "evening the score" and "payback" it sounds like you're practically playing with yourself while you type them.

What's even funnier, is that now you say "Anyone who can " without provocation " do that to a Non Combative person is just that...an Animal in the first degree and deserves a swift death"... what would you call an unarmed man in custody anyway? Not like they're any threat to you or anyone else at that point. So it sounds to me like you're pretty much describing yourself.

As for what other options I would prescribe? I don't prescribe anything. I simply understand that there are options. There's lifetime incarceration. There's a lobotomy. There's removal of hands/feet/tongue and rupturing of the eardrums. There's death through lethal injection. That's just off the top of my head. My only point is that you were incorrect in stating that the absolute only option one has with a terrorist is to allow TBCY to chop off their heads. Each option has it's own upsides and downsides. I pointed out the downsides of torture, I didn't say we can't, just that there's a downside.

Seriously... you need help. I could copy and paste the crap you write here and it would practically match word for word the same sh%t terrorists say to justify beheading american troops.
Abrignac Offline
#85 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,327
“Off with their heads!”
TMCTLT Offline
#86 Posted:
Joined: 11-22-2007
Posts: 19,733
victor809 wrote:
Oh this is precious. First, I said "practically take joy" (note.. this is close to joy, not joy). You said you'd do it in a heartbeat, would lose no sleep, etc etc... the way you throw around words like "evening the score" and "payback" it sounds like you're practically playing with yourself while you type them.

What's even funnier, is that now you say "Anyone who can " without provocation " do that to a Non Combative person is just that...an Animal in the first degree and deserves a swift death"... what would you call an unarmed terrorist in custody anyway? ( I'd call him F*cked to a fare the well )Not like they're any threat to you or anyone else at that point. So it sounds to me like you're pretty much describing yourself.

As for what other options I would prescribe? I don't prescribe anything. I simply understand that there are options. There's lifetime incarceration. There's a lobotomy. There's removal of hands/feet/tongue and rupturing of the eardrums. There's death through lethal injection ( yeah but I prefer to use fire against fire so beheading works well here)hat's just off the top of my head. My only point is that you were incorrect in stating that the absolute only option one has with a terrorist is to allow TBCY to chop off their heads. Each option has it's own upsides and downsides. I pointed out the downsides of torture, I didn't say we can't, just that there's a downside.

Seriously... you need help. I could copy and paste the crap you write here and it would practically match word for word the same sh%t terrorists say to justify beheading american troops.



Yeah....I need a LOT of help understanding tinker belles like yourself who think that you deal with these Animals, yes I used it again....just can't come up with anything more befitting them than Animals. And it concerns me that your envisioning me " playing with myself " please STOP
victor809 Offline
#87 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
TMCTLT wrote:
Yeah....I need a LOT of help understanding tinker belles like yourself who think that you deal with these Animals, yes I used it again....just can't come up with anything more befitting them than Animals.


You don't read, do you TCBY? You just repeat the same crap over and over... I never said "deal with" anywhere in any of my suggestions. I haven't even made a single suggestion. You just have this dumb idea in your useless brain that you know what my suggestion would be, you then try to make a point based on this incorrect idea you have.... and at the end shoot your mouth off about how much you want to behead people.

Why don't you just go and join ISIS? You're practically the same people.
MACS Offline
#88 Posted:
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,823
The wheels on the bus go round and round, round and round, round and round...

But the bus never moves. d'oh!
TMCTLT Offline
#89 Posted:
Joined: 11-22-2007
Posts: 19,733
victor809 wrote:
You don't read, do you TCBY? You just repeat the same crap over and over... I never said "deal with" anywhere in any of my suggestions. I haven't even made a single suggestion. You just have this dumb idea in your useless brain that you know what my suggestion would be, you then try to make a point based on this incorrect idea you have.... and at the end shoot your mouth off about how much you want to behead people.

Why don't you just go and join ISIS? You're practically the same people.



Maybe you could just.....Talk Them To Death.....sweetheart.
TMCTLT Offline
#90 Posted:
Joined: 11-22-2007
Posts: 19,733
Abrignac wrote:
“Off with their heads!”



^^^^ This Right Here....Tinker Belle
victor809 Offline
#91 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
TMCTLT wrote:
Maybe you could just.....Talk Them To Death.....sweetheart.


Yeah whatever... you haven't said anything of value.
tailgater Offline
#92 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
This used to be fun.
teedubbya Offline
#93 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
It did?
Brewha Offline
#94 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,201
Can't we all just.........get along?
TMCTLT Offline
#95 Posted:
Joined: 11-22-2007
Posts: 19,733
Brewha wrote:
Can't we all just.........get along?




NO
DrafterX Offline
#96 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,560
Brewha wrote:
Can't we all just.........get along?



When your day is long
And the night, the night is yours alone
When you're sure you've had enough
Of this life, well hang on

Don't let yourself go
'Cause everybody cries
And everybody hurts sometimes.... Whistle
ZRX1200 Offline
#97 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,628
I'm with LHD on this one, and if you remember some history the best luck anyone had dealing with the zealous mooselums were the British. Beheading isn't the best method to strike fear into them, killing then burying them in pig skins was the ticket. Maybe some REALLY anti mooselum videos depicting sycophants as deviant homosexuals who rape goats and little pee pees. .........
teedubbya Offline
#98 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Maybe if we just encourage them to loosen their gun laws there will be less violence.
victor809 Offline
#99 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
teedubbya wrote:
Maybe if we just encourage them to loosen their gun laws there will be less violence.


It'll all blow over once TCBY goes over there to behead some unarmed people already in custody. Mind you... he doesn't actually want to find any armed terrorists. Just behead the ones we've already captured.
ZRX1200 Offline
#100 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,628
Where's USAhog?

He would have HiLo jumped with nothing more than a bowie knife and a bag of jerky and killed every last mother ****ING one of them.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
3 Pages<123>