America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 9 years ago by frankj1. 179 replies replies.
4 Pages<1234>
Check this out.....
DrafterX Offline
#101 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,560
victor809 wrote:
Sure it is. Some individuals want a wall spanning 100% of the US/Mexico border because people illegally cross the border. These illegal crossings have an unknown cost to our country. This is essentially demanding we cover every single square foot where that illegal activity can occur.

This isn't really any different than demanding a cop at every single location where other felonies could occur... Each of those felonies have a cost to the country... in some cases a better defined cost than that of illegal immigration. Yet no one is demanding a cop at every college party, and in every nightclub and on every streetcorner or on everyone's computer....

They only seem to want 100% coverage when it comes to this particular crime. Hell... they're essentially demanding more preventative measures for illegal immigration than they do for child abuse.

All these things are problems. I find it funny that this particular one gets so much attention... it's like the breast cancer of crimes.




I find it funny that you're ok with it..... Mellow
DrafterX Offline
#102 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,560
victor809 wrote:
Don't be obtuse. That's the entire point. If it's a non-immigration felony people don't seem to care.



not true.... you know better... Mellow
BuckyB93 Offline
#103 Posted:
Joined: 07-16-2004
Posts: 14,217
victor809 wrote:
Sure it is. Some individuals want a wall spanning 100% of the US/Mexico border because people illegally cross the border. These illegal crossings have an unknown cost to our country. This is essentially demanding we cover every single square foot where that illegal activity can occur.

This isn't really any different than demanding a cop at every single location where other felonies could occur... Each of those felonies have a cost to the country... in some cases a better defined cost than that of illegal immigration. Yet no one is demanding a cop at every college party, and in every nightclub and on every streetcorner or on everyone's computer....

They only seem to want 100% coverage when it comes to this particular crime. Hell... they're essentially demanding more preventative measures for illegal immigration than they do for child abuse.

All these things are problems. I find it funny that this particular one gets so much attention... it's like the breast cancer of crimes.



I'd like to hear how a weekend college party is a drain on the economy. How is that one time event or once a week event comparable, with respect to the loss of tax dollars, to an illegal collecting government money on a daily basis?
victor809 Offline
#104 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
BuckyB93 wrote:
I'd like to hear how a weekend college party is a drain on the economy. How is that one time event or once a week event comparable, with respect to the loss of tax dollars, to an illegal collecting government money on a daily basis?


Drugs are a drain on our economy. Addition costs huge numbers of otherwise productive man-hours, and the money spent on drugs is not taxed, and frequently continues out of the country to manufacturers without ever being taxed.

Blocking drug abuse at the individual user level (whether they be casual or habitual) is equivalent to trying to block illegal immigration at the individual level.

EDIT: And how are illegals collecting gov't money??? that makes no sense.
DrafterX Offline
#105 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,560
Seems like we declared war on drugs a while back.... but ignore illegal entry.... Mellow
DrafterX Offline
#106 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,560
victor809 wrote:


EDIT: And how are illegals collecting gov't money??? that makes no sense.



you think all those half a million kids that came across this year are feeding, clothing and educating themselves..?? Huh
victor809 Offline
#107 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
DrafterX wrote:
you think all those half a million kids that came across this year are feeding, clothing and educating themselves..?? Huh


.... seriously? are you still whining about the illegal kids? Those illegals are being processed by the system. We generally have to feed/clothe/house people while they are processed by the system. The topic is illegal immigrants, as in people actually continuing to be illegal immigrants. Not people who were caught and are being sent back.
DrafterX Offline
#108 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,560
whining..????? just the facts ma'am....


how many have been sent back..?? last I heard they were trying to place them with foster parents... You think parents foster for free..?? and even if it is temporary, it still costs money...

I appreciate the banter but I don't believe you believe what your sayin.... Mellow
DrafterX Offline
#109 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,560
You're better than that.... Not talking
victor809 Offline
#110 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
DrafterX wrote:
whining..????? just the facts ma'am....


how many have been sent back..?? last I heard they were trying to place them with foster parents... You think parents foster for free..?? and even if it is temporary, it still costs money...

I appreciate the banter but I don't believe you believe what your sayin.... Mellow


You're whining and it's a distraction from the actual topic. We could house them in mansions and feed them caviar and it would be irrelevant to the topic at hand. They are not illegal immigrants receiving money from the gov't. They are detainees being housed while they are being given a trial, as OUR laws say we have to.
DrafterX Offline
#111 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,560
victor809 wrote:
You're whining and it's a distraction from the actual topic. We could house them in mansions and feed them caviar and it would be irrelevant to the topic at hand. They are not illegal immigrants receiving money from the gov't. They are detainees being housed while they are being given a trial, as OUR laws say we have to.



and why are they here again..???? I think they crossed the border illegally right..?? Huh
opelmanta1900 Offline
#112 Posted:
Joined: 01-10-2012
Posts: 13,954
victor809 wrote:
You're whining and it's a distraction from the actual topic. We could house them in mansions and feed them caviar and it would be irrelevant to the topic at hand. They are not illegal immigrants receiving money from the gov't. They are detainees being housed while they are being given a trial, as OUR laws say we have to.


finally, I get to disagree with victor again...

the complaint is about money being spent on people here illegally - be it men, women or children - be they awaiting trial, deportation, or citizenship - they got here illegally and one way or another they drain our governments financial resources...

it may be the law that we have to spend money on them while they await trial, but if they never got over here to begin with there would be no trial and no money wasted detaining them...
victor809 Offline
#113 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
DrafterX wrote:
and why are they here again..???? I think they crossed the border illegally right..?? Huh


Doesn't matter. Look, I know you like to play dumb, but this is really really simple. We are NOT giving them any money what-so-ever. Any resources or services they are receiving is NOT because they are illegal immigrants, but because they are in custody awaiting trial. I know you really want to spin this as some thing, but it isn't relevant to the discussion, and I'm sure that isn't what Bucky was referring to. Your insistence on this being the answer is simply distracting from an otherwise possibly interesting discussion.

Short answer, if you have a problem with the damn illegal kids being in some housing while they await trial, go find them, and shoot them in the damn head and shut up about it. If you don't have the nutsack to kill the damn kids, then quit whining about them being fed and housed while the gov't figures out where they go.
DrafterX Offline
#114 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,560
victor809 wrote:
Doesn't matter. Look, I know you like to play dumb, but this is really really simple. We are NOT giving them any money what-so-ever. Any resources or services they are receiving is NOT because they are illegal immigrants, but because they are in custody awaiting trial. I know you really want to spin this as some thing, but it isn't relevant to the discussion, and I'm sure that isn't what Bucky was referring to. Your insistence on this being the answer is simply distracting from an otherwise possibly interesting discussion.

Short answer, if you have a problem with the damn illegal kids being in some housing while they await trial, go find them, and shoot them in the damn head and shut up about it. If you don't have the nutsack to kill the damn kids, then quit whining about them being fed and housed while the gov't figures out where they go.



uhh... I think you are the one spinning here.... the issue is illegal immigration and what it costs the taxpayer... and now you've turned into illegals on da welfare..??? Think
victor809 Offline
#115 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
opelmanta1900 wrote:
finally, I get to disagree with victor again...

the complaint is about money being spent on people here illegally - be it men, women or children - be they awaiting trial, deportation, or citizenship - they got here illegally and one way or another they drain our governments financial resources...

it may be the law that we have to spend money on them while they await trial, but if they never got over here to begin with there would be no trial and no money wasted detaining them...


And again, we get back to the fact that we have to question whether the cost of ensuring they can't make it in is greater than what they cost to deport.
BuckyB93 Offline
#116 Posted:
Joined: 07-16-2004
Posts: 14,217
victor809 wrote:
Drugs are a drain on our economy. Addition costs huge numbers of otherwise productive man-hours, and the money spent on drugs is not taxed, and frequently continues out of the country to manufacturers without ever being taxed.

Blocking drug abuse at the individual user level (whether they be casual or habitual) is equivalent to trying to block illegal immigration at the individual level.

EDIT: And how are illegals collecting gov't money??? that makes no sense.



Really? You can't be serious.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/jan/7/illegal-aliens-may-lose-of-some-medicare-benefits/?page=all

http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2011/04/most-illegal-immigrant-families-collect-welfare/

http://dailycaller.com/2013/09/17/report-la-county-to-pay-650-million-in-welfare-benefits-to-illegal-immigrant-parents/

There are plenty more reports out there but I don't want to waste Cbid bandwidth to post them.
victor809 Offline
#117 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
DrafterX wrote:
uhh... I think you are the one spinning here.... the issue is illegal immigration and what it costs the taxpayer... and now you've turned into illegals on da welfare..??? Think


no drafter. You decided to spin off into the "illegal kids" tangent (incidentally, the illegal kids is a very small part of the illegal immigrant problem it just has lots of visibility right now)... you're easily distracted by stupid high-profile tangents. hey.... look, a shiny object.
DrafterX Offline
#118 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,560
victor809 wrote:
And again, we get back to the fact that we have to question whether the cost of ensuring they can't make it in is greater than what they cost to deport.




spending tax dollars either way aren't we..?? Huh
victor809 Offline
#119 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
BuckyB93 wrote:
Really? You can't be serious.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/jan/7/illegal-aliens-may-lose-of-some-medicare-benefits/?page=all

http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2011/04/most-illegal-immigrant-families-collect-welfare/

http://dailycaller.com/2013/09/17/report-la-county-to-pay-650-million-in-welfare-benefits-to-illegal-immigrant-parents/

There are plenty more reports out there but I don't want to waste Cbid bandwidth to post them.


that's what I'm looking for. Thank you bucky. I'll take a look at this
opelmanta1900 Offline
#120 Posted:
Joined: 01-10-2012
Posts: 13,954
victor809 wrote:
And again, we get back to the fact that we have to question whether the cost of ensuring they can't make it in is greater than what they cost to deport.


and it is, just as spending resources preventing cancer will always be wiser than spending resources treating it... doesn't mean we don't treat what's already in existence, but the concentration of our efforts should be placed upon future prevention...
DrafterX Offline
#121 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,560
victor809 wrote:
no drafter. You decided to spin off into the "illegal kids" tangent (incidentally, the illegal kids is a very small part of the illegal immigrant problem it just has lots of visibility right now)... you're easily distracted by stupid high-profile tangents. hey.... look, a shiny object.




you're spinning trying to cover your butt cause you know you're wrong... it's ok.... really... we won't laugh at you and stuff.... Mellow
opelmanta1900 Offline
#122 Posted:
Joined: 01-10-2012
Posts: 13,954
victor809 wrote:
that's what I'm looking for. Thank you bucky. I'll take a look at this


no you won't... Herfing
MACS Offline
#123 Posted:
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,823
victor809 wrote:
Lots of felonies committed in the US which no one cares enough about to require walls and armed private citizens.

Drug felonies? That sh%t happens daily on every college campus, most night clubs, tons of bars. It's illegal, whether you agree with it or not.

Felonies regarding the illegal copying of copyrighted materials? Those happen all the time. And there's data about how much it costs our economy.

Purchase of cuban cigars over $100 is I believe a felony. Seems that no one's screaming for the enforcement of that one.


Hey! Shut up!

I am concerned about the issue of illegal immigration because of this:

Mexico is corrupt, and run by drug cartels. There is not enough work or money for a lot of the poor, tired, huddled masses to be productive and earn a living... so instead of doing what is necessary to change it (revolution?) they come here.

Used to be people wanted to immigrate to the USA to become American. Now they don't. They want to marque numero dos para espanol. The Mexican people are not assimilating into our society. They want to make it theirs. Please refer to my previous paragraph for an example of that...
victor809 Offline
#124 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
BuckyB93 wrote:
Really? You can't be serious.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/jan/7/illegal-aliens-may-lose-of-some-medicare-benefits/?page=all

http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2011/04/most-illegal-immigrant-families-collect-welfare/

http://dailycaller.com/2013/09/17/report-la-county-to-pay-650-million-in-welfare-benefits-to-illegal-immigrant-parents/

There are plenty more reports out there but I don't want to waste Cbid bandwidth to post them.


Ok.
So here's the twist. Illegal immigrants are NOT receiving any money from the govt.
In the first article, this one is the most confusing to me... apparently there is a loophole in Medicare subpart D where indvidiauls can make prescription claims while being illegal. This isn't a gov't program to help illegals. Medicare has policies requiring citizenship. They just have noticed that people are getting around it in subpart D. They are working to close that loophole.

Second and third article. The welfare is going to the citizen, ie the natural born child of illegal immigrants. If you don't like that you're gonna have to go change the 14th amendment to the constitution. The children are citizens... and they're poor... as such they get welfare. If you don't like that, feel free to go shoot them in the head.

Addendum to the second article - a point in the 2nd article was interesting to me, regarding child tax credits. Something to note if families are receivign tax credits, they are paying taxes (IRS federal taxes)... to some extent these families are paying into the system. One cannot then simply claim that the draw from the system is the entire cost, as something is going in.
MACS Offline
#125 Posted:
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,823
victor809 wrote:
Don't be obtuse. That's the entire point. If it's a non-immigration felony people don't seem to care.


Now who's being obtuse? Drug felonies are like comparing apples to oranges. Many will argue the war on drugs is an abject failure, and I am one of them. I do not condone the use of heroin or cocaine or such... but who does it hurt? The retard doing it (many would argue his or her family too, but that's a family matter, not society's). The embargo on Cuba was enacted in what? 1962? Cuba is still around and everyone but us buys their cigars... epic fail.

Completely and utterly different from illegal immigration which affects our entire country. Years ago it was a border problem. California, Arizona, New Mexico and Texas... well... illegal immigrants are EVERYWHERE now. Well... maybe not South Dakota and Montana.
BuckyB93 Offline
#126 Posted:
Joined: 07-16-2004
Posts: 14,217
victor809 wrote:
Ok.
So here's the twist. Illegal immigrants are NOT receiving any money from the govt.
In the first article, this one is the most confusing to me... apparently there is a loophole in Medicare subpart D where indvidiauls can make prescription claims while being illegal. This isn't a gov't program to help illegals. Medicare has policies requiring citizenship. They just have noticed that people are getting around it in subpart D. They are working to close that loophole.


Ooops, my bad. They are taking advantage of a loophole so that doesn’t count as getting government money. Got it.

victor809 wrote:

Second and third article. The welfare is going to the citizen, ie the natural born child of illegal immigrants. If you don't like that you're gonna have to go change the 14th amendment to the constitution. The children are citizens... and they're poor... as such they get welfare. If you don't like that, feel free to go shoot them in the head.


Yeah, the government often writes checks made out to minors. Then these minors take the check to the bank, who often allow minors to open an account under their name, cash it and use it solely for their purposes and illegal mom and dad don’t get a dime of it. Got it.

victor809 wrote:

Addendum to the second article - a point in the 2nd article was interesting to me, regarding child tax credits. Something to note if families are receivign tax credits, they are paying taxes (IRS federal taxes)... to some extent these families are paying into the system. One cannot then simply claim that the draw from the system is the entire cost, as something is going in.


Yeah, I bet they pay in more than they get back. Hey, I have a bridge for sale.

So in summary, illegals ARE getting government money.
MACS Offline
#127 Posted:
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,823
BuckyB93 wrote:
So in summary, illegals ARE getting government money.


Yessir...
DrafterX Offline
#128 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,560
careful guys.... Victor's gonna go all Hillary on us soon I can tell.... Mellow
victor809 Offline
#129 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
MACS wrote:
Now who's being obtuse? Drug felonies are like comparing apples to oranges. Many will argue the war on drugs is an abject failure, and I am one of them. I do not condone the use of heroin or cocaine or such... but who does it hurt? The retard doing it (many would argue his or her family too, but that's a family matter, not society's). The embargo on Cuba was enacted in what? 1962? Cuba is still around and everyone but us buys their cigars... epic fail.

Completely and utterly different from illegal immigration which affects our entire country. Years ago it was a border problem. California, Arizona, New Mexico and Texas... well... illegal immigrants are EVERYWHERE now. Well... maybe not South Dakota and Montana.



Hehehe. Don't get me wrong, I don't care about drugs either. But if people are whining about the cost of illegal immigrants, there is definitely an equivalent cost in drug use. First you've got the cost of drug abuse... an abuser unable to hold a job or get a job which can get him out of poverty is going to be on welfare (hey... that's just like illegal immigrants!... actually probably worse because he doesn't have to have a legal kid to collect). Second you've got the health costs. Easily attributable, I'm not gonna bother looking them up but can if you want. Third you've got the loss of tax revenue, every time illegal drugs are purchased that's tax money forgone. If the drugs are cocaine or heroine or other imported drugs the money directly leaves the country (hey! that's just like illegal immigration too!!!!). And fourth and finally you've got the ancillary crime and the costs associated with dealers and manufacturers fighting for terriroty (hey! that's just like immigration too!!! only probably a little more violent).

My point isn't that the costs are the same. For all I know the costs of drugs could be higher. As TW pointed out, there is absolutely no way to really know the costs of undocumented workers, anyone telling you they know it is lying to you. I'm just saying that similar to illegal immigration there is a cost associated with these felonies. People have their panties in a bundle over illegal immigration NOT because they know it is a bigger cost (because they DON'T know it, since they have no way of knowing it) but simply because they want to be upset about it.
victor809 Offline
#130 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
BuckyB93 wrote:
Ooops, my bad. They are taking advantage of a loophole so that doesn’t count as getting government money. Got it.



Yeah, the government often writes checks made out to minors. Then these minors take the check to the bank, cash it and use it solely for their purposes and illegal mom and dad don’t get a dime of it. Got it.



Yeah, I bet they pay in more than they get back. Hey, I have a bridge for sale.

So in summary, illegals ARE getting government money.



I think you mistook my questioning. I was asking because I did not believe the government was issuing cash to illegal immigrants. Not because I don't want them to get money (in the larger scheme of things I just don't care), but because I didn't believe there was a policy in place in which money was distributed to people who were illegal citizens (which your statement implied). The articles you pointed out helped me understand what you were talking about.

An accurate representation would be "Illegal immigrants using their natural born citizen children to collect money from the government"... but that doesn't sound as sexy as "an illegal collecting government money on a daily basis"...

You see how one sentence, while less accurate, is more likely to inflame the masses...
DrafterX Offline
#131 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,560
What goes up must come down
spinning wheel got to go round
Talking about your troubles it's a crying sin
Ride a painted pony
Let the spinning wheel spin..... Whistle Whistle
BuckyB93 Offline
#132 Posted:
Joined: 07-16-2004
Posts: 14,217
victor809 wrote:
I think you mistook my questioning. I was asking because I did not believe the government was issuing cash to illegal immigrants. Not because I don't want them to get money (in the larger scheme of things I just don't care), but because I didn't believe there was a policy in place in which money was distributed to people who were illegal citizens (which your statement implied). The articles you pointed out helped me understand what you were talking about.

An accurate representation would be "Illegal immigrants using their natural born citizen children to collect money from the government"... but that doesn't sound as sexy as "an illegal collecting government money on a daily basis"...

You see how one sentence, while less accurate, is more likely to inflame the masses...



OK I stand corrected.

They only get their welfare checks once a month. Then once and a while when they need the free healthcare and prescription refills. And 5 times a week when they attend school. Then once a year when they get their tax return.

Sorry, I was so misleading on the "daily basis" statement. I should have said 5 out of 7 days for school, bi monthly for welfare checks and script refills and annually for tax return time.


(Wow Victor, you are really dancing to try to support your argument. Even Fonzie could spit out "I was wrrrooo.... wrrrooo.... wroooonnn..... wrong.")
DrafterX Offline
#133 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,560
Shame on you wrong again Bucky... they get debit cards now... not checks... Not talking
BuckyB93 Offline
#134 Posted:
Joined: 07-16-2004
Posts: 14,217
Might want to let that paint dry before you try walking out of the corner, Victor.
BuckyB93 Offline
#135 Posted:
Joined: 07-16-2004
Posts: 14,217
DrafterX wrote:
Shame on you wrong again Bucky... they get debit cards now... not checks... Not talking


EBT (Electronic Benefit Transfer) cards to be more specific. Just trying to be more accurate and clear for Victor.
DrafterX Offline
#136 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,560
true... true..... Mellow
victor809 Offline
#137 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
I didn't have a problem with your daily basis phrase. Money collected once a month is intended to represent per diem needs.

My problem was with the implication that there are govt programs to distribute welfare to illegals. The programs are intended to assist legal citizen children. The illegal parents may be benefitting as well, but are not the reason for the program.
TMCTLT Offline
#138 Posted:
Joined: 11-22-2007
Posts: 19,733
victor809 wrote:
I didn't have a problem with your daily basis phrase. Money collected once a month is intended to represent per diem needs.

My problem was with the implication that there are govt programs to distribute welfare to illegals. The programs are intended to assist legal citizen children. The illegal parents may be benefitting as well, but are not the reason for the program.



There ARE....what I find a bit troubling is your comment " I don't care " problem IS.....we have have a whole bunch of F*cktards in Washington DC that feel the same way. Our Government HAS been advertising in Mexico for some time to " come fleece our citizenry in the US " cuz well we have lots of liberal minded folks who " Don't Care "
MACS Offline
#139 Posted:
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,823
victor809 wrote:
I didn't have a problem with your daily basis phrase. Money collected once a month is intended to represent per diem needs.

My problem was with the implication that there are govt programs to distribute welfare to illegals. The programs are intended to assist legal citizen children. The illegal parents may be benefitting as well, but are not the reason for the program.


Weak. You got your ass handed to you by Bucky and you can't say "Damn... you're right".

I guess I didn't really expect it. For all my faults, I can at least admit when I'm wrong. When presented with information that proves your opinion wrong... you can either change your opinion, or continue to be wrong.
wheelrite Offline
#140 Posted:
Joined: 11-01-2006
Posts: 50,119
MACS wrote:
Weak. I am a Homo. Wanna a back rub ?.



oh my

wheel,
victor809 Offline
#141 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
MACS wrote:
Weak. You got your ass handed to you by Bucky and you can't say "Damn... you're right".

I guess I didn't really expect it. For all my faults, I can at least admit when I'm wrong. When presented with information that proves your opinion wrong... you can either change your opinion, or continue to be wrong.


MACS, when I'm wrong I'm wrong. In this instance I wasn't staking my claim on an idea that illegals don't manage to get some benefits within our country. I was incredulous that there was some sort of program distributing money to illegal immigrants. (Now for all I know there may actually be, especially at the state and local level)... but the examples given weren't what I thought Bucky was claiming. If he was just claiming what was in the examples, then I've got no argument that it occurs. It makes sense that it occurs, given that we take care of american citizen children, and given that some american citizen children have illegal parents.
Burner02 Offline
#142 Posted:
Joined: 12-21-2010
Posts: 12,884
Simply put, just another case of this administration not doing crap.
teedubbya Offline
#143 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
I'll pull the OIG report on Monday to get a better look but I think I can comment on the Medicare issue.

There is no benefit available to illegal aliens. Apparently a small number 4000 found a way to get enrolled in file claims. While a small number one is too many. The whole purpose of the proposed rule was to shut that down and bring it to zero. This is not an example of giving illegal aliens benefits or federal money. It is actually an example of clamping down and trying to do the opposite. It's an outlier and an error, it's an exception not the rule

I still don't understand the Medicare advantage part. The article did a horrible job they threw out Medicare advantage but never really said what happened. I'm not sure on that one so I'll check it out as well. I suspect it's the same issue and also very small. The whole article was written poorly and with the kind of strange slant.

As for the others it's the age-old anchor baby issue and a legitimate gripe. Technically the benefits are being paid to an American citizen. But in reality The money ends up with the parent who isn't an American citizen. The same could happen if I got paid from those benefits and ship the money out of country to a Mexican. The difference is it would not be direct. This is an issue for parents that are legal as well. The money is for the child's well being but it loses its identity once paid (unless in a non monetary form). That money could also end up in the illegal hands such as drug dealers etc. That said it's a legitimate gripe and we need to clean this one up too. I'm not sure how to accomplish that. But it is disingenuous to suggest those are benefits to illegals. They are not. But it is money that ultimately ends up in the illegal hands. This is one data set that should be a little more obtainable than some of the others. I'll have to look for this one too. It would still be problematic but it at least would be a little more accurate than some of the others.

The anchor baby issue is the most difficult part of the illegal immigration issue in my mind. I do have a soft spot for the kids themselves because they are pawn in the game and don't have much choice. So I do struggle with anything that would harm them and yet I don't want to do anything that benefits their parents. It's a catch 22.

I still don't buy that the federal government is doling out all kinds of money to illegal aliens though. There are all kinds of mechanisms would've been a plate put in place by both parties to make sure that does not happen. I also don't buy that that number is zero. The crumbs that fall off the federal dinnerplate are often very large.
teedubbya Offline
#144 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
I also find it hard to get too upset by people that are trying to improve their lives or the lives of their children.

I already said of the hill here illegally the need to go. But I can still empathize with the fact that where they came from isn't that great in there trying to find something better. That doesn't mean I need to give it to them but I can empathize with them.
teedubbya Offline
#145 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Damn voice recognition.

I already said if they are here illegally....,.,,,

Open up our border for way more legal immigration and clamp down fiercely on illegal immigration.

Except the fact that we really don't want more Mexicans legally or illegally and its a better argument to say it's not about being Mexican it's about being illegal.
TMCTLT Offline
#146 Posted:
Joined: 11-22-2007
Posts: 19,733
Our porous southern border is A HUGE problem period simply because we Do Not Know Who's coming in.....if Mexicans can do it with impunity....who else are we getting?? Can you say TERRORISTS of the worst kind.....but it's okay " it's all about the kids. TW, while I do not disagree completely with your assessment of the kids being caught up in the middle, IT's THAT very fact " pulling on Americans heart strings " that makes this Much More Difficult to deal with logically.
And moreover when I can lay my head down @ night and KNOW that ALL American children are well cared for, I'll focus on OTHER countries problems. Charity Starts @ Home
jetblasted Offline
#147 Posted:
Joined: 08-30-2004
Posts: 42,595
The refusal to protect the boarder is almost like the politicians are laying out a welcome mat to terrorists.
DrafterX Offline
#148 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,560
I heard there is one.... Mellow
victor809 Offline
#149 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
TMCTLT wrote:
Our porous southern border is A HUGE problem period simply because we Do Not Know Who's coming in.....if Mexicans can do it with impunity....who else are we getting?? Can you say TERRORISTS of the worst kind.....but it's okay " it's all about the kids. TW, while I do not disagree completely with your assessment of the kids being caught up in the middle, IT's THAT very fact " pulling on Americans heart strings " that makes this Much More Difficult to deal with logically.
And moreover when I can lay my head down @ night and KNOW that ALL American children are well cared for, I'll focus on OTHER countries problems. Charity Starts @ Home


Oh come on.
If your problem is not with Mexicans, then your problem isn't with the southern border. That's probably the most secure section of our country. I had friends accidentally end up in canada on camping trips... and anyone willing to give a fishing boat some cash could come across from russia into alaska. From there you're flying domestic.

If the problem you're trying to solve is Mexicans, then fine, concentrate on the southern border. If you're trying to tie in some terrorist angle, then you're closing a window while leaving the door open.
jetblasted Offline
#150 Posted:
Joined: 08-30-2004
Posts: 42,595
A former friend from Portland, OR that I knew about 15 years ago used to talk about going "camping" along the Canadian border, and how he would return from "camping" with a backpack full of weed. Fast fwd a few years & I found out he moved back to Portland. A couple of years after that, I heard he was on another "camping" trip, and when he & his buddy were kayaking to shore, some sorta of LEO's there started asking questions. Turns out the kayak was full of ecstasy & I think he had to serve five years. I know he wound up in Miami for the New Orleans Super Bowl & that's the last anyone from our circle heard from him.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
4 Pages<1234>